Why Is Solana No Longer Suitable for Hosting Conferences?

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

"Solana Breakpoint 2025 in Abu Dhabi marked a significant evolution from its early developer-focused roots into a global 'festival' for builders, rather than a traditional conference. Written by a long-time Solana ecosystem builder, this reflection argues that as Breakpoint has scaled—paralleling Solana’s growth in transactions, DEX volume, and application revenue—it has managed to maintain a builder-first culture despite increased institutional and capital interest. The event emphasized openness, anti-elitism, and shared momentum, where developers, founders, and creators coexisted without hierarchy. The author notes a mature, product-centric energy, with serious discussions on DeFi, infrastructure, and new experiments, though cautioning against insular 'Solana-only' mindsets. Ultimately, Breakpoint 2025 succeeded as a celebration of creation and cultural cohesion, showcasing Solana’s resilience and forward motion beyond mere price cycles and speculation."

Editor's Note: In December 2025, after Solana Breakpoint 2025 concluded in Abu Dhabi, Abhitej, a long-time entrepreneur deeply involved in the Solana ecosystem, wrote this article. As the co-founder of Filament Finance and a core builder at Bento.fun, he reflects on his firsthand experience attending multiple Breakpoint events, questioning whether builders are still truly at the center as the conference scales.

The title may seem sharp, but it is not a negation of the grand event. Rather, it is a reminder from within the ecosystem: as Breakpoint evolves from an early developer-led gathering into a global spectacle alongside events like the F1 Grand Prix and Bitcoin MENA, with institutions, capital, and grand narratives flooding in, are the true "heads-down coders" being diluted in the process?

Unlike macro-level judgments from an external perspective, Abhitej focuses on those hard-to-quantify yet ecosystem-defining factors—whether the culture remains open, whether the stage still belongs to builders, and whether participation remains low-barrier. The article does not attempt to provide a standard answer, but it reminds us: Solana's vitality has never been on the stage or in the narratives, but in the developers around the globe who are persistently, quietly, yet truly building products.

Below is the original text:

I attended the first Breakpoint in Lisbon, and four years later, I came to Abu Dhabi for the latest edition. In between, industry giants have fallen, SOL's price has completed roller-coaster rides more than once, and Memecoin mania has repeatedly tested the resilience of the entire ecosystem.

But as the Solana ecosystem began preparing for Breakpoint 2025, it had already established its position:

Leading in multiple core metrics such as transaction volume, application revenue, and DEX trading volume

Boasting the most culturally perceptive and user-close ecosystem atmosphere

Being the strongest, or at least one of the strongest, builder ecosystems

@joeljohn's article "Most used chain based on what?" also aptly highlights Solana's dominance across various dimensions recently.

All of this has happened against the backdrop of an extremely brutal cycle for retail investors. Arbitrageurs have squeezed value to near its limits, altcoins have underperformed the market overall, and net developer inflow has hit a low. What this industry truly lacks is a spark of optimism, something that reminds people: the crypto world itself is still beautiful.

I believe Breakpoint lit that very match.

When I walked into the Solana Breakpoint venue in Abu Dhabi, the first thing I felt was not excitement, but a movement in motion.
Not the kind of noisy, chaotic bustle. More like an undercurrent. A force in flow.

It didn't feel like entering a conference. There was no tension, no forced social pressure, no anxiety about "I must be in the right room at the right time." It felt more like a festival, a place where people weren't there to "extract value" from each other, but to genuinely celebrate "creation."

People were smiling, talking, moving around freely. Developers, creators, founders, institutions—everyone had their place, and the overall balance wasn't lost.

This sense of harmony was obvious from the start. No single group was overly amplified: institutions didn't dominate the narrative; creators weren't treated as mascots; founders weren't elevated to unreachable heights. Everyone seemed approachable.

And that, in itself, is very rare.

The longer I stayed at Breakpoint, the more I felt that this was not accidental, but deliberately designed.

The agenda wasn't like a top-down information dump: five-minute lightning talks, debates, product demos, conversations. Short, sharp, high information density. Letting more people be seen, rather than having a few repeatedly occupy the stage. You could clearly feel that this wasn't a one-time inspiration, but the result of long-term iteration.

Breakpoint wasn't achieved overnight; it gradually figured out "what really works" through years of practice.

A brief exchange with @paarugsethi from Superteam India was enough to realize how deeply the Solana ecosystem thinks about culture and the founder community.

Dissolving Elitism

But if there's one thing Solana does better than most ecosystems, it's this: it successfully dissolves elitism.

There's no invisible hierarchical structure where "only a few voices matter." As long as you've genuinely built something valuable, even if it's small, you get a platform to showcase it.

This openness changes everything: it reduces fear, invites more participation, and ultimately builds momentum. And momentum compounds.

After talking to more and more people, another characteristic became clear: within the Solana ecosystem, there is a shared sense of direction. Not a dogmatic consensus, but a state of "moving forward together." There are navigators, signal sources, and people seen as directional coordinates by others. Because of this, the ecosystem doesn't easily fragment.

In many ecosystems, people fight their own battles, narratives conflict, gaps keep widening, and everyone endlessly argues about "how it should be," while hesitating to accept "what is working."

Solana does it differently. If speculation works, it's accepted. If it aligns with the behavior of the new generation internet, it's studied, not shamed. There's no moral superiority, no whitewashing. Even memecoins, despite that phase being chaotic and predatory, were seen as an acceleration experiment, a stress test for internet capital markets.

The system crashed, some profited from it, and lessons were truly absorbed. Solana didn't pretend it never happened; instead, it distilled the insights as an "entire ecosystem." This acceptance, in turn, created space for innovation, rather than accumulating resentment.

The most prominent feeling this year was Breakpoint's extreme builder-first approach. The market has cooled, prices are no longer狂热, and the "100x overnight" crowd has noticeably thinned. But it's precisely at times like these that the real builders begin to shine.

DeFi appears more mature; infrastructure discussions return to reality: predictability of block space, latency optimization, how to make application execution cheaper and more reliable.

You can see this change in specific products: Kalshi choosing Solana as its tokenization infrastructure; Phantom powering consumer-facing interface experiences; Phoenix perpetual contracts, Prop AMM, new market designs; experiments in AI, bots, privacy; hackathons, Superteam projects, those still rough but real early ideas. People come to listen to shares to learn, not to ask "how to pump this token."

This energy shift is extremely important. It makes the entire conference feel solid, honest, and product-centric.

If there's one discomfort, it's this: there still exists some narrow-mindedness within the ecosystem—"if it's not Solana-only, it's not worth paying attention to."

This mindset isn't unique to Solana, but it shrinks the pie. The real opportunity isn't winning a public chain war, but reshaping the entire tech stack. And that can only be achieved through collaboration, not posturing.

The irony is: Solana doesn't need to proclaim loudly. Anyone walking into Breakpoint can feel it directly. This ecosystem doesn't need to mock others online. The products, the culture, the builders, the momentum—they are loud enough.

A "Festival"

This brings me back to the initial conclusion: Solana is no longer suitable for "hosting conferences." Conferences are one-way, static, and bounded. What Solana is doing aligns more with the native form of the new generation internet: a festival, a celebration that exists for builders. A space where culture, capital, experimental spirit, and belief collide.

And these "festivals" will only continue to grow: more vibrant, more immersive, more diverse. Every corner adds new flavor to this internet that is taking shape.

Breakpoint 2025 was one of the best conferences I've ever attended, and it clearly shows where Solana is heading.

P.S.: In my opinion, choosing Abu Dhabi as the host city was a key reason why Breakpoint 2025 could be so special.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument made in the article about Solana Breakpoint?

AThe article argues that Solana Breakpoint has evolved from a developer-focused conference into a large-scale global event, and questions whether it still effectively centers on the builders and maintains its open, low-barrier culture amidst the influx of institutions, capital, and grand narratives.

QAccording to the author, what positive cultural aspects of the Solana ecosystem were observed at Breakpoint 2025?

AThe author observed a culture of openness, a lack of elitism, shared direction among participants, and a builder-first atmosphere where people celebrated creation rather than just extracting value from each other.

QHow does the author describe the change in energy and focus at Breakpoint 2025 compared to previous periods?

AThe author notes that the energy shifted to be more focused on real builders, with discussions on mature DeFi, practical infrastructure, and product-centric innovation, rather than the previous '100x returns' hype and memecoin frenzy.

QWhat is one criticism or narrow-minded attitude the author says still exists within the Solana ecosystem?

AThe author points out that some in the ecosystem hold a narrow 'Solana-only' mindset, believing that projects not exclusively built on Solana are not worth attention, which can limit collaboration and growth.

QWhy does the author conclude that Solana is no longer suitable for holding a 'conference'?

AThe author believes that Solana's event has transcended a traditional conference, becoming more like a 'festival' or a celebration for builders—a dynamic, immersive, and diverse space where culture, capital, and experimentation collide, which is more aligned with the native form of the new internet.

Related Reads

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手19m ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手19m ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit24m ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit24m ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbit25m ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

marsbit25m ago

The AI Industrial Revolution: Where Are We Now?

This article explores the current stage of the AI industrial revolution, arguing we are still merely attaching new tools to old workflows rather than fundamentally redesigning production. The author compares this to the early Industrial Revolution, where factories simply replaced waterwheels with steam engines without changing their core structure. Similarly, today we embed AI chat windows into existing software but leave organizational processes unchanged. While massive investment floods into AI infrastructure (data centers, chips), akin to railway manias of the past, the real transformation lies in "dismantling the old workshop"—reorganizing companies around AI. Examples include Notion's use of hundreds of AI Agents and Y Combinator's experiments with self-improving AI systems that operate autonomously. The author notes a critical gap: while China has vast AI user growth, few companies have rebuilt core workflows. AI is beginning to impact entry-level jobs, and early adopters are gaining a compounding advantage. The conclusion is that the pivotal moment will not be the invention of better models, but when organizations decide to tear down old structures and rebuild around AI, shifting the bottleneck from human coordination to computing power. The future workplace and job titles are yet to be defined, but the imperative is to move away from legacy processes and position oneself where the new "railway" is being built.

marsbit57m ago

The AI Industrial Revolution: Where Are We Now?

marsbit57m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片