When China's Crypto Tycoons Start Buying Gold

深潮Published on 2025-12-09Last updated on 2025-12-09

Abstract

Chinese crypto billionaires are increasingly turning to gold as a traditional safe-haven asset, signaling a strategic shift from digital to tangible wealth preservation. Wu Jihan, co-founder of Bitmain and Bitdeer, acquired Singapore’s high-security Le Freeport vault for S$40 million—a facility offering tax-free storage for gold, art, and luxury assets. This move aligns with a broader trend among Asian ultra-wealthy individuals and institutions seeking asset protection amid market volatility and geopolitical uncertainty. Meanwhile, Fujian-based entrepreneur Zhan Ketuan, through Antalpha and in partnership with Tether, is pioneering a "tokenized gold" system. Tether holds ~80 tons of physical gold in Swiss vaults, backing the XAU₮ token, which enables fractional ownership, liquidity, and collateralization—effectively modernizing gold’s role in finance. As gold prices surged past $4,000/oz in 2025, driven by central bank accumulation, Asian private wealth, and crypto-led financial innovation, these developments highlight gold’s evolving function: as a sovereign hedge, a intergenerational store of value, and a programmable asset in the digital age.

Author: Lin Wanwan

Twelve minutes' drive north of Singapore's Changi Airport, one of the world's most secure private vaults stands at the end of the runway—Le Freeport.

This building, costing approximately S$100 million, is known as the "Fort Knox of Asia." It has no windows but maintains a constant temperature of 21°C and 55% humidity year-round, perfectly suited for preserving valuable items.

Behind heavily guarded steel doors lie billions of dollars worth of gold, silver, and rare artworks—all exempt from customs declarations and taxes.

Three years ago, one of Asia's youngest crypto billionaires, Bitdeer founder Jihan Wu, acquired this vault for S$40 million (about RMB 210 million), a steal compared to its rumored S$100 million construction cost.

The deal was confirmed by Bloomberg, with Bitdeer, led by Wu, as the buyer. At the time, some mocked it as a "distraction" for a crypto giant—why buy an offline vault when mining Bitcoin was profitable?

But with gold soaring past $4,000 per ounce in 2025, this acquisition now seems less like a detour and more like a masterstroke.

However, Wu didn't just buy concrete and steel. Le Freeport was designed as a tax-free enclave for the super-rich and institutions: high-security storage, private exhibition spaces, and a way to elegantly bypass tariffs.

It reveals a truth: China's Bitcoin millionaires are turning to humanity's oldest safe-haven asset—gold.

The Nursing Home for Gold

In May 2010, Le Freeport opened in Singapore. Designed as critical infrastructure, it sits adjacent to the airport, with direct access to runways, allowing valuables to be moved from planes to vaults in minutes.

Singapore's government support was evident in its ownership structure. The National Heritage Board and National Arts Council were among its initial shareholders.

As Singapore transitioned from a "trade hub" to an "asset hub," Le Freeport became part of a global art and wealth management plan, benefiting from the Zero GST Warehouse Scheme, making it one of the few vaults globally with tax-free, bonded, and cross-border settlement capabilities.

Under this framework, Le Freeport quickly attracted global elites and institutions. It allowed storage of high-value physical assets without customs procedures or tariffs for non-Singaporean holders.

For a Picasso worth $50 million, storing it at Le Freeport could save tens of millions in taxes at 10%–30% rates.

Since Le Freeport hasn't released internal photos, we can only glimpse its setup from images of a similar vault, The Reserve.

It once hosted top-tier tenants like J.P. Morgan, Christie's subsidiary CFASS, UBS, and Deutsche Bank, facilitating cross-border gold transfers and custody.

But as some countries tightened regulations on luxury goods and offshore assets, these institutions began leaving, and Le Freeport fell into losses.

By 2017, it was labeled a "problem asset" and put up for sale. It took five years to find a buyer—Jihan Wu.

At the time, crypto was in a deep winter. LUNA's collapse triggered a crisis of confidence; Three Arrows Capital, Celsius, and BlockFi imploded, culminating in FTX's downfall and widespread counterparty risks.

Amid this, Chinese crypto entrepreneur Jihan Wu, via Bitdeer, acquired the vault for S$40 million (RMB 210 million).

Wu, co-founder of Bitmain, once controlled 75% of Bitcoin's mining power. After exiting Bitmain, he focused on Bitdeer's mining operations as a Singapore PR.

He rarely commented on the purchase, only confirming it to Bloomberg.

Today, Le Freeport's website highlights it as an exclusive, private experience for the few.

While crypto enthusiasts obsess over private keys, the truly wealthy store assets in Singapore—some as trust documents, others as seed phrases etched on steel plates.

It's not just Chinese tycoons; new wealth from India and Southeast Asia are also becoming Le Freeport's clients.

Le Freeport never discloses clients, but auction houses hint that many artworks go "straight to the vault" after sales, never re-entering the market.

Similarly, Southeast Asian billionaires divert proceeds into Le Freeport—gold bars, jewelry, Patek Philippes, vintage cars, and art—all moved directly from transactions to the vault.

For aspiring "vault members," here’s the storage process:

Armed guards check passports and backgrounds at the entrance. Access requires passing five checkpoints: ID verification, biometrics, bulletproof doors, and item inspections. Hundreds of cameras monitor everything 24/7. With silver bars weighing 30kg and gold bricks 12.5kg, even if someone broke in, they couldn’t carry much out.

While outsiders debate "if gold will rise," insiders discuss storing hundreds of bottles of Romanée-Conti (at $15,000 each) and which shelf Picasso or Rembrandt should occupy for better photo ops.

Workers end with公积金 accounts; Asian tycoons end up in Singapore's windowless walls.

But vaults are just physical assets. To dominate the gold industry, one must go upstream.

Fujianese Shake Gold's Bloodline

While Chinese aunties queue for gold discounts, old money and crypto nouveau riche are battling over who controls tons of gold.

In May, fintech firm Antalpha filed for a Nasdaq IPO. Its prospectus mentioned Bitmain, co-founded by Jihan Wu.

It stated: "We are a key financing partner for Bitmain," with a memorandum to continue collaboration and client referrals.

Antalpha provided supply chain loans and client financing for Bitmain, a legacy from Wu's era.

Now, with Wu gone, control has passed to co-founder Micree Zhan, another crypto tycoon from Fujian, China.

Many in China believe in gold, but Fujianese tie their fate to it: Longyan's Chen Jinghe turned a "worthless mine" into Zijin Mining, a global giant; Fuqing's Zhou Zongwen founded Chow Tai Seng, a top jewelry chain; Putian's goldsmiths dominate half of China's gold wholesale and retail.

With gold mines, shops, and tycoons in Fujian, it seems Fujianese have gold in their blood.

Clearly, Zhan's bloodline ignited. How could Fujianese miss out on chain-based gold?

He took aim at Tether, the largest stablecoin issuer and now a top-30 global gold buyer, the new "chain-based gold owner."

In October, Tether partnered with Antalpha to build a "Tokenized Gold Treasury," raising $200 million based on gold token XAU₮, creating a "digital credit system backed by gold."

The分工 is Fujian-style: Tether tokenizes gold and stores it in Swiss vaults; Antalpha turns the token into a financial tool, designing loans and expanding vault networks in Singapore, Dubai, and London, making "on-chain gold" a pledgeable asset exchangeable for physical bars.

In short, a modern "gold standard": Tether as the mint, Antalpha as the bank, set in Swiss vaults instead of Bretton Woods.

Reports say Tether holds ~80 tons of gold in Swiss vaults, rivaling some national reserves. But for "security," the vault locations are undisclosed.

Unlike central banks locking gold away, XAU₮ is fragmented on-chain—traceable, divisible, tradable, and pledgeable. Idle gold becomes "dynamic liquidity" for institutions.

Antalpha's Aurelion invested $134 million in XAU₮, aiming to become the "first listed treasury with on-chain gold reserves." This rewrites the old money playbook of "stuffing Swiss vaults" into "stuffing balance sheets with XAU₮."

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino summarized: "Gold and Bitcoin are two poles of the same logic—one the oldest store of value, the other the most modern."

Gold prices validate this: global gold investment rose 50%+ this year, and XAU₮'s market cap doubled. Risk-averse and risk-loving investors are on the same path.

They answer a bigger question: Can humanity's oldest wealth storage method thrive again on blockchain?

Breaking the Old Rules

In October 2025, gold surged past $4,000/oz, a record high, up 50% year-to-date, making it a top-performing asset.

On surface, a "gold bull market"; underneath, three forces reshaping gold's power structure.

First, central banks. They've been buying gold to de-dollarize and hedge against sanctions, indifferent to short-term swings, focused on one question: In the worst case, can it trade for food, weapons, or allies?

Second, Asian ultra-rich. Money from China, Hong Kong, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia flows into Singapore vaults, Swiss cellars, and family trusts, building new gold walls.

They skip "paper gold" for physical bars. Some deposit cash in Singapore banks; others store gold directly—two types of deposits, vastly different security.

Wu's Le Freeport acquisition is a node in this chain: from mining Bitcoin to safeguarding gold and art, shifting from "on-chain gains" to "off-chain security."

Third, crypto nouveau riche. Zhan, Antalpha, and Tether play a different game: Wu bought vault walls; they buy the variable inside—XAU₮.

In this structure, Tether tokenizes gold into Swiss vaults; Antalpha tokenizes it into assets for balance sheets and collateral.

Thus, gold's role is quietly rewritten: for central banks, it's the "ultimate collateral"; for Asian tycoons, a "family cold wallet"; for crypto nouveau riche, a financial layer for leverage and liquidity premiums.

For most, gold is charts and grams; for these three groups, it's a ledger of family, sovereignty, and security.

Narratives change, but the underlying asset is ancient. Capital is honest—when the show ends, they seek security for a good night's sleep.

Related Questions

QWho is the founder of Bitdeer and what significant acquisition did he make in Singapore?

AWu Jihan, the founder of Bitdeer, acquired the Le Freeport, a high-security vault in Singapore, for approximately 400 million SGD (about 210 million RMB).

QWhat are the key features and benefits of the Le Freeport vault in Singapore?

ALe Freeport is a high-security vault located near Singapore's Changi Airport. It offers features like 24/7 surveillance, biometric access controls, and bulletproof doors. It operates under a zero-GST warehouse scheme, allowing tax-free and duty-free storage of valuable assets like gold, silver, and art for non-Singaporean holders without customs procedures.

QWhich company, associated with Wu Jihan's former venture Bitmain, is partnering with Tether on a tokenized gold project?

AAntalpha, a financial technology company that was a major financing partner for Bitmain, is collaborating with Tether to build a 'Tokenized Gold Treasury' using the gold-backed token XAU₮.

QWhat is the XAU₮ token and how does Tether use it in their gold strategy?

AXAU₮ is a gold-backed token issued by Tether. Each token is pegged to physical gold stored in Swiss vaults. Tether uses it to create a 'digital credit system' where the token can be used for transactions, collateral, and lending, effectively bringing gold onto the blockchain.

QWhat are the three major forces driving the recent surge in gold's value and ownership according to the article?

AThe three major forces are: 1) Central banks buying gold as a hedge against de-dollarization and geopolitical risks; 2) Asian ultra-wealthy individuals storing physical gold in vaults like Le Freeport for safety and legacy; 3) Crypto investors and firms like Tether and Antalpha using tokenized gold to create new liquidity and financial structures.

Related Reads

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit8m ago

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit8m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit12m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit12m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报17m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报17m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit22m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit22m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit23m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit23m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片