US Regulator Warns Prediction Markets Against Simplifying Terms in Event Contracts

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-27

Анотація

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which positions itself as the leading regulator of prediction markets run by companies like Kalshi and Polymarket, issued a warning on Friday. It reminded these companies that they must not simplify the certification procedure for event contracts covering a wide range of topics. The CFTC stated that companies should not submit general, template certifications, marking the second time in recent months the regulator has warned against overly broad filings. The agency noted that many designated contract markets continue to self-certify event contracts using generic templates without providing the terms for each specific offering or a proper analysis of the product's compliance. The regulator warned that circumventing the proper procedure undermines its ability to determine if a firm has provided all necessary information and adequately assessed the settlement methodology and data sources for all contract options. However, the CFTC clarified that closely related event contracts can be certified as a single class, referencing legitimate ways to file consolidated documents. The explosive growth of the event contract market, especially in sports betting and political outcome prediction, presents a dynamic regulatory challenge. This is due to the industry's relative inexperience and ongoing legal uncertainty about the CFTC's regulatory status. The CFTC's role as the primary regulator is itself facing legal challenges, with cour...

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which positions itself as the leading regulator of prediction markets managed by companies like Kalshi, Coinbase, Polymarket, and Crypto.com, issued a warning on Friday reminding these companies that simplifying the contract certification procedure covering a wide range of events is not permissible.

The agency stated that 'general, template certificates should not be submitted,' marking the second instance in recent months where the regulator had to caution against overly generalized documents.

Many of the 'designated contract markets' regulated by the CFTC 'continue to self-certify event contracts' (in other words, prediction market contracts) using general templates, 'without providing the terms for each offered combination, as well as a brief explanation and analysis of the product terms, underlying commodity, and the product’s compliance with requirements,' the agency said in a statement.

The regulator stated that bypassing the procedure could undermine its ability to determine whether a firm has provided 'all necessary information, explanations, and analysis,' as well as whether it has 'adequately assessed the settlement methodology, data sources, and compliance with the core principles of all contract options.'

Nevertheless, the agency clarified that 'closely related event contracts may be certified as a single class,' citing legitimate ways to submit consolidated filings with common appendices.

The explosive growth of the event contract market - particularly in the areas of sports betting and political outcome prediction - to some extent represents a situation requiring an on-the-fly solution, given the relative inexperience of much of the industry and the uncertainty of the CFTC's legal status.

The CFTC's status as the primary regulator of prediction markets itself still faces some legal uncertainty, which is expected to be resolved by the courts - perhaps at some point by the U.S. Supreme Court. While the regulator's chairman, Mike Selig, has made it an agency priority to wage a full-scale battle in state and federal courts across the country, insisting that the CFTC bears sole responsibility for overseeing event contract platforms, a large number of states are pursuing these companies on charges of illegal sports betting, which should be regulated at the state level.

Also on Friday, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a notice extending the regulatory status of the Kraken platform, the Kraken Derivatives Exchange, which had been in 'inactive' status. The last trade on this exchange was made in early 2025, and the CFTC's approval of the company's request means 'granting the registered entity the opportunity to resume operations.' Kraken stated that it needs more time to evaluate its next steps following the acquisition of Bitnomial earlier this year.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWhich U.S. regulator issued a warning about simplifying event contract certifications?

AThe U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued the warning.

QWhat specific practice did the CFTC warn prediction market companies against in their certification process?

AThe CFTC warned companies against filing general, template certificates for event contracts without providing terms, explanations, and analysis for each specific contract combination offered.

QWhat potential problem does the CFTC say is caused by the 'template' certification approach?

AIt undermines the CFTC's ability to determine if a firm has provided all necessary information and adequately assessed the settlement methodology, data sources, and compliance of all contract options.

QWhat legal uncertainty surrounds the CFTC's role as the main regulator of prediction markets, according to the article?

AThe CFTC's status as the primary regulator faces legal uncertainty, with disputes expected to be resolved in courts (potentially the U.S. Supreme Court), as many states pursue these companies for what they claim are illegal sports bets under state-level oversight.

QWhat other regulatory action did the CFTC take on the same Friday, as mentioned in the article?

AThe CFTC issued a notice extending the regulatory status of the 'inactive' Kraken Derivatives Exchange platform, allowing the entity to resume activities if it chooses.

Пов'язані матеріали

3% Cashback, 6% Annual Interest, and a Debit Card: Elon Musk Launches X Money in the US

On July 27, 2026, the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) launched its integrated financial service, X Money, initially available only to US-based Premium and Premium+ subscribers. Founder Elon Musk emphasized the launch's significance for the platform. US residents over 18 with a verified X account can use the service. X Payments LLC is not a bank; user funds are held in FDIC-insured accounts at Cross River Bank, with insurance potentially extended up to $10 million through a cash sweep program across partner banks. The core of the service is the X Card, a virtual or physical metal Visa debit card. Key features include: 3% cashback on most purchases (with some exclusions), free instant peer-to-peer payments, worldwide ATM fee reimbursement, no foreign transaction fees, and support for Apple/Google Pay. The service offers interest on account balances, up to 6.00% APY. Premium+ users get this rate immediately, while Premium users must meet a qualifying direct deposit requirement. Additional features include early direct deposit, wire transfers, bill pay, and paper check ordering. Security features include passkey login, customizable transaction limits, and Visa's Zero Liability Policy for fraud. The public launch followed a limited beta test with select Premium+ users in late June 2026. The launch marks X's continued evolution from a social network into a broader digital platform combining communication with everyday financial operations.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

3% Cashback, 6% Annual Interest, and a Debit Card: Elon Musk Launches X Money in the US

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片