The Quantum Threat Is Coming—Stellar Reveals Its Defense Strategy

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-10Last updated on 2026-06-10

Abstract

The Stellar Development Foundation has released a Quantum Preparedness Plan, aiming to migrate the entire Stellar network to quantum-safe cryptography by the end of 2027. The urgency stems from quantum computers potentially using Shor's algorithm to crack the elliptic curve cryptography currently securing blockchains. A significant challenge identified is handling dormant accounts, where quantum attacks could derive private keys from public ones, risking account takeover. Stellar's structural advantage is that its account addresses are separate from signing keys. This allows users to add quantum-safe signers via existing operations without changing their address or moving assets, unlike most other blockchains. The migration will occur in phases: post-quantum signature verification for smart contracts in 2026, native support for classic accounts in 2027, and a future deprecation of the old Ed25519 standard. However, the plan notes that zero-knowledge proof systems on the network remain vulnerable and require further research.

Dormant accounts are the hardest part. That is one of the quiet admissions buried in Stellar’s newly released Quantum Preparedness Plan, a phased roadmap to migrate the entire network to quantum-safe cryptography by the end of 2027.

The Stellar Development Foundation said it will seek community input on how to handle accounts that have gone inactive — and whether recovery mechanisms are even possible for them.

A Threat That Starts With Math

The urgency behind the plan traces back to Shor’s algorithm, a mathematical process that sufficiently advanced quantum computers could use to crack elliptic curve cryptography — the same signing method Stellar and most other blockchains rely on today.

Scientists at INRIA have already reduced the number of logical qubits needed to break 256-bit elliptic curves, while the US National Institute of Standards and Technology has revised its risk window to 2029 or earlier. Google is also targeting post-quantum readiness by that same year.

Stellar identified two core risks. The first involves validator signatures, where a breach could destabilize network consensus. The second — and more difficult — is account takeover, where a quantum machine could derive a private key directly from a public one.

With thousands of dormant accounts on the network, addressing that second threat at scale is a problem without an easy answer.

What Sets Stellar Apart

Most blockchains tie an address directly to a public key, which means going quantum-safe typically requires moving assets to an entirely new account.

Stellar works differently. Its account addresses are separate from the signing keys attached to them. Users can add or swap signers through an existing operation called set_options without touching their address, balance, or transaction history.

BTCUSD trading at $61,220 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

According to the foundation, that structural design gives the network a smoother path than many of its peers.

The rollout is structured in three stages. Starting in 2026, post-quantum signature verification using NIST-standard algorithms ML-DSA-44 and ML-DSA-65 will be added to Soroban smart contracts, allowing enterprise wallets to begin migrating.

In 2027, a Core Advancement Proposal will bring quantum-safe signer types to classic accounts natively, letting all existing users add them alongside current keys.

The third stage — deprecation of the old Ed25519 standard — has no fixed date and will depend on how quantum computing develops and how ready the broader ecosystem is.

One Gap Remains Open

Not everything is covered. Reports indicate that zero-knowledge proof systems running on the network use pairing-based curves that are also vulnerable to quantum attack, and the foundation acknowledged that this area still requires further research. Separate collaboration with ZK protocol teams is planned to address it.

Featured image from Trezor, chart from TradingView

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main challenge Stellar faces in implementing its Quantum Preparedness Plan according to the article?

AThe hardest part is dealing with dormant accounts, as they are difficult to migrate to quantum-safe cryptography, and the foundation is seeking community input on how to handle or potentially recover them.

QWhat is the primary cryptographic threat that Stellar's plan aims to address?

AThe threat is Shor's algorithm, which could allow sufficiently advanced quantum computers to break the elliptic curve cryptography that Stellar and most other blockchains currently rely on for digital signatures.

QHow does Stellar's account structure provide an advantage for migrating to quantum-safe cryptography compared to other blockchains?

AOn Stellar, account addresses are separate from their signing keys. This allows users to add or swap to quantum-safe signers using the existing set_options operation without changing their address, balance, or transaction history, unlike chains where the address is tied directly to the public key.

QWhat are the three stages of Stellar's rollout plan for quantum-safe cryptography?

A1. In 2026, add post-quantum signature verification to Soroban smart contracts. 2. In 2027, introduce quantum-safe signer types natively to classic accounts via a Core Advancement Proposal. 3. A future stage to deprecate the old Ed25519 standard, with no fixed date.

QWhat specific vulnerability does the article mention is not yet fully addressed by Stellar's current quantum preparedness roadmap?

AZero-knowledge proof systems running on the network that use pairing-based curves are also vulnerable to quantum attack. The foundation acknowledged this area requires further research and plans separate collaboration with ZK protocol teams.

Related Reads

The Once-Niche Field of Philosophy Becomes a Hot Topic in "Governing" AI

"Cold" Philosophy Becomes Hot in Taming AI This article explores the rising prominence of philosophical inquiry at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC), highlighting a shift from purely technical discussions to deeper questions about AI's nature and impact. A key theme is the foundational question of intelligence itself. Philosopher Sun Ning argued that true, grounded intelligence requires embodiment, environment, interaction with others, and historical context, summarized as "Before intelligence, there is a world. Before mind, there is relationship." The forum then examined AI's expanding role in science. Researchers presented AI systems that can autonomously generate scientific papers and mathematical proofs, raising critical questions about evaluation, attribution of discovery, and potential misuse. The proposed solution is a collaborative framework: AI expands the search space, humans define value and provide rigorous constraints, and machines handle verification. As AI models begin to simulate human societies and behaviors for research, new risks emerge. Simulations can inherit and amplify societal biases from their training data, and their outputs risk being mistaken for genuine social signals. This necessitates robust governance focused on auditability, bias correction, and clear human oversight—ensuring people retain intervention, correction, and explanation rights ("human-in-the-loop"). The discussion extended to industry, where AI integrates with wet labs for bio-manufacturing. Here, challenges involve bridging the digital-physical gap and adapting regulatory and business models from process-based to outcome-based partnerships, fundamentally altering production relationships. The convergence of philosophers, scientists, and entrepreneurs at WAIC signals a broader trend: as AI permeates knowledge creation and social systems, technical progress is increasingly intertwined with urgent questions of ethics, governance, economic distribution, and public policy. The core challenge becomes not just what AI *can* do, but what we *should* ask it, trust from it, and guide it towards.

marsbit11m ago

The Once-Niche Field of Philosophy Becomes a Hot Topic in "Governing" AI

marsbit11m ago

After six years of pie-in-the-sky fundraising, 90% of funds used to replenish cash flow: The illusion and reality of L'CI Technology's silicon carbide "industrialization"|TMTPost Deep Dive

After six years and raising approximately 3.2 billion yuan through two private placements, Luxshare Technology has officially terminated its two major SiC wafer projects. Only about 7.75% of the raised funds were actually invested in SiC construction and R&D, with the remaining 90% redirected to replenish working capital and repay loans. Despite previous ambitious plans for a 10-billion-yuan SiC industrial park and public assurances of progress, the company's actual SiC capacity remains unclear, with its subsidiary recording significant losses. The article details a pattern of chasing market trends, from electric vehicles and photovoltaics to the current focus on SiC. However, its SiC entry was late; while peers like Tianke Heda and Tianyue Advanced have moved from mass-producing 6-inch to 8-inch and even 12-inch wafers, Luxshare is still struggling with its 6-inch plans and now promises to develop larger sizes with its own funds. Key concerns include unclear disclosures about the status of its chief scientist, Chen Zhizhan, and significantly lower R&D investment compared to competitors. Financially, since its 2011 IPO, the company has raised over 7 billion yuan but generated only 221 million yuan in cumulative net profit. Meanwhile, the controlling shareholder family has cashed out nearly 2 billion yuan since 2018. The article positions Luxshare as a case study of a listed company focused more on financing and capital operation around hot topics than on substantive industrial development.

marsbit52m ago

After six years of pie-in-the-sky fundraising, 90% of funds used to replenish cash flow: The illusion and reality of L'CI Technology's silicon carbide "industrialization"|TMTPost Deep Dive

marsbit52m ago

ChatGPT Finally Can 'Search Itself': Nearly Four Years of Conversations, Retrieved with One Click

ChatGPT, nearly four years old, has long lacked a functional way for users to search their own accumulated history. This changed on July 14th, when OpenAI launched a comprehensive "Unified Search" feature across all platforms and plans. This new search allows users to find and instantly access past conversations, uploaded documents, generated images, and projects within their own ChatGPT account, all from a single sidebar entry. This update signifies a major shift in ChatGPT's role, transforming it from a transient chat tool into a personal knowledge base or "file system" for users' AI-generated content. It completes a critical missing piece as OpenAI expands ChatGPT's capabilities with features like Projects, Memory, Work, and Sites, aiming to make it a central hub for work and creativity. The ability to easily retrieve years of personal data makes that data more valuable as a unique, irreplaceable asset in the AI era. However, it also highlights the increasing weight and potential sensitivity of this data, given default settings that allow conversations to be used for model training and legal precedents involving user logs. While a significant improvement over the previous ineffective search, this move is seen as addressing an industry-wide oversight. As the competition between AI assistants (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) moves beyond raw model power, the new battleground is becoming which platform can best organize, retain, and leverage the valuable data co-created by users and AI.

marsbit1h ago

ChatGPT Finally Can 'Search Itself': Nearly Four Years of Conversations, Retrieved with One Click

marsbit1h ago

7-Year-Olds Starting Companies? 9-Year-Olds Making Movies? Post-90s Parents Are Raising 'AI Prodigies'

"AI Genius Kids: A New Wave or a Parental Anxiety Trap?" The article examines the recent surge in AI-focused educational camps and programs in China, heavily marketed to parents of young children with sensational claims like "7-year-olds start companies" and "9-year-olds make movies." These programs promise rapid, practical AI skills—from creating agents and business plans to generating content—often for significant fees, capitalizing on parental anxieties about the AI-dominated future. It contrasts this trend with earlier, more foundational AI education, arguing current offerings prioritize superficial, immediate application over deep learning. The author critiques this approach as premature for children still in basic education, suggesting it fosters a shortcut mentality and may even teach improper use, like using AI to cheat on homework. The driving force behind this trend is identified as the profound anxiety of the current generation of parents—largely professionals in tech or related fields—who are witnessing firsthand how AI disrupts and replaces jobs. This workplace fear translates into a desperate desire to equip their children with perceived competitive advantages from an extremely young age, viewing AI proficiency as a magical key to success. The piece also casts a skeptical eye on the phenomenon of real "AI child prodigies," citing examples like Australian teen Alby Churven, whose ventures attract media buzz but little serious investment. It suggests that beyond the hype, the business world remains wary of child-led enterprises. True advancement, the article implies, still relies on solid, traditional education and foundational knowledge, not just early exposure to tools. Ultimately, it frames the AI camp boom less as a legitimate educational movement and more as a reflection of societal pressure and a potentially expensive exploitation of parental fears in a rapidly changing technological landscape.

marsbit1h ago

7-Year-Olds Starting Companies? 9-Year-Olds Making Movies? Post-90s Parents Are Raising 'AI Prodigies'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy ONE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Harmony (ONE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Harmony (ONE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Harmony (ONE)After purchasing your Harmony (ONE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Harmony (ONE)Easily trade Harmony (ONE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ONE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ONE (ONE) are presented below.

活动图片