The Ethereum Foundation Has Perished, Long Live a Plurality of Ethereum Organizations

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-07-10Last updated on 2026-07-10

Abstract

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has entered a period of significant upheaval, marked by major organizational restructuring and a shift towards a more decentralized leadership model. The EF's Protocol Support Team has officially disbanded, part of what is described as its largest-ever round of layoffs, cutting 20% of its staff. This follows the high-profile resignation of Executive Director Aya Wang and the departure of at least eight senior figures this year. This internal transformation coincides with the rise of new, independent non-profit organizations like Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional, founded by former EF researchers. These entities aim to take on roles in research, development, and institutional adoption that were previously associated with the EF, signaling a fragmentation of the ecosystem's central guiding body. Simultaneously, the EF's security team is evolving its approach by deploying specialized AI agents to perform red-team testing on the Ethereum network, a process that has already identified real vulnerabilities. While the EF states AI complements rather than replaces human researchers, this technological shift presents further questions about the foundation's future structure and staffing. Criticism of the EF's centralized decision-making and market influence has been growing within the community. Faced with these internal reforms, external competition, and technological changes, the article suggests the Ethereum Foundation may be transitioning from a ce...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

Last evening, the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team officially announced that the team has been formally dissolved. Previously, Wang Xiaowei, the co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, who was seen as "one of the representative figures of EF organizational reform," has also formally resigned. So far this year, at least 8 senior personnel have left the Ethereum Foundation.

On the other side of organizational and personnel changes are the encroachment and functional replacement of the Ethereum Foundation organization by non-profit independent institutions such as EthLabs and Ethereum Institutional; it is also technological progress like the recent adoption of AI agents for red-team testing of the ETH network by the Ethereum Foundation security team, which discovered real vulnerabilities.

As the ETH price faces wave after wave of industry scrutiny, what lies before the Ethereum Foundation are the more complex and diverse contradictions and tests following internal reforms. Related to this is the divisive transformation that Ethereum's leading body is now directly confronting.

The Era of Decline for the Ethereum Foundation: Rise of Contenders, Brain Drain, and the AI Shift

The Ethereum Foundation (hereinafter referred to as EF) has long been criticized for its rigid system, decision-making by a minority, organizational value, and market-influencing sell-offs. Criticisms within the Ethereum community are particularly fierce. Not long ago, Bankless founder David Hoffman even went so far as to "sell his last ETH holdings" to express his dissatisfaction with EF, calling on the Ethereum community to build the ecosystem in their own way.

Now, the formal dissolution of EF's Protocol Support Team has exposed the organization's internal conflicts and crisis of division like a thunderclap to all. It is noteworthy that this round of organizational changes is particularly different from the organizational changes initiated by Ethereum founder Vitalik last year—this is a thorough personnel purge, also seen as 'the largest round of layoffs since EF's founding,' rather than previous partial leadership changes.

When the Ethereum Ecosystem Leader Chooses to Sever Its Tail to Survive: The Whole Story of EF's Major Layoffs

Everything begins with the official announcement "New EF Structure" formally released by EF on June 23.

In this lengthy article spanning thousands of words, EF differentiated the new organizational structure into protocol layer, access layer, user layer, community layer, and institutional layer. It subsequently stated that "this organizational restructuring involves laying off 54 people, accounting for 20% of EF's members." What's even more disheartening is the beginning of the announcement: "Through this process, we have gained the structure, activities, and personnel needed to execute the critical tasks we will soon face." In other words, the laid-off personnel and departments were eliminated, unnecessary, and without value.

It must be said that EF, which has always presented itself as a research organization and ecosystem leader with a scholarly demeanor, has for the first time revealed the cold side of its organizational management.

Schematic diagram of the new EF structure

The Dissolution of EF's Protocol Support Department Marks a Key Sign of EF's Organizational Split

It's worth mentioning that the work of EF's Protocol Support department leaned towards infrastructure construction, mainly responsible for coordinating the Ethereum protocol development process, including organizing and coordinating core developer meetings, tracking Ethereum network upgrades, supporting EIP advancement, and running the Ethereum protocol. Now, its main functions have been allocated to the protocol layer part of EF.

Coincidentally, on the same day EF announced its new structure, Ethlabs, a non-profit R&D lab co-founded by five former EF researchers, was officially announced. This organization aims to advance Ethereum as a settlement layer for the global economy and has received support from a series of investment institutions, Ethereum ecosystem projects, independent individuals, and EF foundation members, including Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin (Chairman of Sharplink, founder of Consensys), ETH treasury company BitMine (Tom Lee's Ethereum treasury company), Sharplink, and crypto investment firm SNZ.

ETHLabs Community Participant List (Source: Official Account)

On July 1st, Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members David Walsh, Marius Smith, and Matthew Dawson, was officially unveiled.

This organization's main concept is "the institutional finance application plan for Ethereum," dedicated to promoting the institutionalization and institutional-grade application of Ethereum, its secondary nodes, applications, and the entire ecosystem. The organization also emphasizes collaboration with Ethlabs, Etherealize, and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, taking charge of institutional demand connection and explaining Ethereum's value proposition to banks; Ethlabs focuses on translating related demands into technical products. As a non-profit independent institution, Ethereum Institutional will provide free Ethereum application-related consulting to banks and asset management companies.

A week later, Ethereum Institutional announced the start of core team recruitment. In the coming weeks, the focus will be on hiring roles such as Institutional Business Development (Institutional GTM), Marketing & Community Operations, as well as technical positions like Solution Architect and Technical Project Lead.

Thus, the EF layoff storm officially concluded with the emergence of two major non-profit independent organizations and the dissolution of the Protocol Support department, drawing an imperfect full stop to the "internal organizational transformation" personally promoted by Vitalik last year. Beyond organizational-level fragmentation and the loss of high-level talent like Executive Director Wang Xiaowei, EF also faces the impact of AI technology.

The Era of AI Offense and Defense Begins, EF Security Team Upgrades Testing

Yesterday, researchers from the EF Protocol Security Team stated in a blog post that they have deployed a series of AI agents to test software relied upon by the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems, protocol code, and smart contracts.

The vulnerabilities discovered by the AI agents include a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub peer-to-peer layer used by Ethereum consensus clients. This issue has been fixed and disclosed on GitHub as CVE-2026-34219.

The researchers stated that the AI agents were organized into specialized roles such as reconnaissance, search, patching, and verification, used to find potential attack paths, reproduce failures, and verify their applicability to production code. EF stated that AI has not replaced security researchers but has changed the way they work, enabling the team to cover a far greater scope than manual review. However, it requires researchers to make more cautious judgments on a large number of seemingly credible conclusions.

Considering today's news of the official launch of the GPT-5.6 model, subsequent maintenance of Ethereum protocol security may be jointly handled by AI models and EF security researchers. Moreover, although EF now mentions "AI has not replaced researchers," with the continuous development and evolution of AI models, personnel within the EF security team and perhaps the entire organization may be further reduced in the future. In other words, EF will also face the test of AI models on its organizational structure and the execution of its own functions.

Summary: EF Organizational Transformation Reaches a Staged Conclusion, May Become an Ecosystem Mascot in the Future?

In January of last year, we provided a systematic analysis of EF's organizational transformation in the article "Vitalik Fires the First Shot of 'Reform,' Where is the Ethereum Foundation Headed?" Back then, Vitalik was ambitiously and forcefully pushing for EF organizational change. In May this year, after more than a year of organizational innovation, Vitalik's tune changed, stating that "the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and will shift towards a smaller, long-termism route."

It must be said that after ETH has grown into an asset with a market cap in the hundreds of billions, EF, the official ecosystem organization founded nearly a decade ago, has also entered the awkward situation of being "a large ship hard to turn." No wonder Vitalik previously even remarked—"I will no longer write regular blog posts, I have decided to try writing some science fiction on the topic of decentralized governance."

As former EF researcher and Ethlabs member Ansgar Dietrichs said on a podcast earlier this month, "After five years of failing to break through $5,000, ETH still lacks a clear value narrative."

Currently, it seems that EF is already struggling to shoulder the banner of "revitalizing the Ethereum ecosystem and driving ETH price breakthroughs." Future large-scale adoption and institutional investment may have to rely on organizations like Ethlabs, Ethereum Institutional, and Etherealize.

Perhaps, in the near future, playing the role of an "ecosystem mascot" would be more suitable for EF.

Recommended Reading

Ethereum Enters a "Mid-Life Crisis," Analyzing Development Performance from a Data Perspective

Given: ETH = Nokia, Find: Ethereum = iOS?

Ethereum Is "Sick," Are These Three Remedies Appropriate?

Where Lies the Path? A Brief Analysis of the Three Major Abstract Problems Facing the Ethereum Ecosystem Today

Enumerating the Seven Deadly Sins of Ethereum, Who Can Play Its "Salvation Oratorio"?

Where Lies the Orthodoxy of Ethereum? A Detailed Explanation of the "Cryptocurrency Masterpiece" in Vitalik's Heart

Ethereum's Tenth Anniversary: Revisiting ETH's Change of Ownership Journey, The Resurgence of Token Centralization

Are L2s a Detour for Ethereum?

Bankless Founder Liquidates ETH Holdings, Collective Disillusionment with Ethereum Faith

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the major announcement regarding the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team, and why is it significant?

AThe Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team has officially disbanded. This is significant as it represents the largest round of layoffs in the EF's history, affecting 20% of its staff, and is seen as a major indicator of the organization's internal restructuring and fragmentation.

QWhat are two new non-profit independent organizations that emerged following the Ethereum Foundation's restructuring?

ATwo new non-profit independent organizations that emerged are Ethlabs, founded by five former EF researchers, and Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members. These organizations aim to take over functions related to R&D and institutional adoption of Ethereum, respectively.

QHow is the Ethereum Foundation's security team incorporating AI technology into its work?

AThe EF's security team has deployed a series of AI agents to test Ethereum's ecosystem software. These AI agents are organized into specialized roles to find potential attack paths, identify vulnerabilities (such as the CVE-2026-34219 issue), and verify fixes. The team states AI augments rather than replaces researchers, allowing them to cover much more ground.

QAccording to the article, what is one of the major criticisms faced by the Ethereum Foundation from within the community?

AOne major criticism from within the community is directed at the EF's perceived rigid structure, decision-making by a small group, questions about its organizational value, and its market-influencing ETH sell-offs. Bankless founder David Hoffman's public criticism and divestment from ETH is cited as an example of this discontent.

QWhat future role does the article suggest might be most suitable for the Ethereum Foundation?

AThe article suggests that, given its challenges in driving large-scale adoption and ETH price growth, the Ethereum Foundation's most suitable future role might be that of an 'ecological mascot' or a symbolic figurehead, while newer organizations lead practical development and institutional outreach.

Related Reads

June Transaction Volume Doubles: x402 Ecosystem Continues to Expand, Content Monetization Narrative Faces Crucial Test

X402, a protocol for AI and data services, experienced significant growth in June. Its transaction volume doubled compared to May, primarily driven by the AI inference routing service BlockRun. The ecosystem expanded with new integrations: Apify enabled data scraping services, Exa extended its AI search to Solana, and Seal launched 'Hacks', a marketplace for automated AI agents. The protocol itself received crucial upgrades, including 'Builder Codes' for tracking and affiliate systems and 'Batch Settlement' to enable practical micropayments for high-frequency AI tasks. Major external validation came from tech giants. Amazon Web Services (AWS) launched a solution for AI traffic metering at its edge nodes. More significantly, Cloudflare opened its waitlist for a Content Monetization Gateway. This gateway allows websites to charge AI bots and other automated agents for accessing content, using x402 for stablecoin payments. This addresses a core internet monetization problem and represents x402's most promising path to mass adoption, though Cloudflare's CEO noted current blockchain scalability remains a critical hurdle. Current leading use cases are AI inference routing and paid data feeds. However, the large-scale real-world test with Cloudflare's gateway will be decisive in determining if x402 can transition from a useful tool to a fundamental infrastructure component for a new web economy where AI agents pay for the content they consume.

Foresight News14m ago

June Transaction Volume Doubles: x402 Ecosystem Continues to Expand, Content Monetization Narrative Faces Crucial Test

Foresight News14m ago

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes Revision of MiCA to Cover Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift and 17 Banks to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes MiCA Revision for Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments with 17 Banks During the statistical period of July 3-10, 2026, the RWA sector showed signs of recovery. The total on-chain market capitalization of RWAs rebounded to $33.12 billion, ending a prolonged decline. The stablecoin market cap also returned above $300 billion, with active addresses and holders increasing, indicating restored market vitality. Key regulatory developments include China promoting the use of digital yuan in consumption vouchers, the EU considering revisions to its MiCA framework to cover tokenization and non-EU stablecoins, and Kazakhstan authorizing stablecoin use for cross-border corporate and government payments. In Hong Kong, HSBC issued its first "digitally native" structured product. Major project updates feature Swift announcing readiness of its blockchain ledger for a 24/7 tokenized cross-border payment pilot involving 17 global banks. Ondo launched a perpetuals platform allowing tokenized stocks as collateral. Sony received conditional U.S. OCC approval to launch a stablecoin-focused trust bank in 2027. Tether plans to natively issue USDT on Bitcoin via the RGB protocol. Significant funding rounds saw Securitize planning to deploy over $400 million for acquisitions to expand its institutional tokenization business, while Tether invested $20 million in Brazil's Mercado Bitcoin to support its growth in on-chain financial services. Analysis highlights that stablecoins are evolving into global financial infrastructure with regional specializations and that institutions should consider international expansion to gain practical experience in the RWA tokenization space amidst evolving regulations.

marsbit47m ago

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes Revision of MiCA to Cover Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift and 17 Banks to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments

marsbit47m ago

The first to catch the wave of the Robinhood Chain hype is Arbitrum, up nearly 20%

"ARB, the native token of Arbitrum, surged nearly 20% recently, emerging as a top-performing L2 token. This rally is attributed to the launch of 'Robinhood Chain,' a Real-World Asset (RWA) Layer 2 built using Arbitrum's technology. The launch has brought renewed attention to the 'Arbitrum Expansion Plan' (AEP), a year-and-a-half-old program. AEP allows external projects to build their own chains using Arbitrum's Orbit technology. In return, these 'tenant' chains that do not settle on Arbitrum's main networks must share 10% of their net protocol revenue with the Arbitrum ecosystem—8% to the DAO treasury and 2% to the developer guild. While smaller chains like Degen Chain previously triggered AEP, Robinhood Chain is the first major, high-profile tenant, making the revenue-sharing model economically significant for the first time. Initial data from Robinhood Chain is impressive, with over 35 million transactions, 350,000 addresses, $2.5 billion in TVL, and over $1 billion in DEX volume shortly after launch. However, its current protocol revenue, at roughly $146,000 net, translates to only a minimal payout to Arbitrum DAO. The ARB price surge thus reflects the market's anticipation of future revenue as Robinhood's vast $324 billion platform assets potentially migrate on-chain. This 'landlord' model mirrors Optimism's approach with its OP Stack and Superchain. However, Optimism's model faces pressure as its largest tenant, Base, announced plans to depart, causing a significant drop in OP's price. Similarly, analysts question Robinhood Chain's long-term dependence on Arbitrum, noting its daily sequencer revenue already nears three times that of Arbitrum itself. There is speculation that, like Base, it may eventually seek independence, with ETH potentially being its primary economic token rather than ARB."

Foresight News1h ago

The first to catch the wave of the Robinhood Chain hype is Arbitrum, up nearly 20%

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片