# TVL Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "TVL", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Ondo State-based Company QQQon Raises $2.3 Million in Ethereum Investment Amid Surge in Tokenized Stocks

Company QQQon from the state of Ondo attracted $2.3 million in Ethereum investment amid the growth of tokenized stocks. This follows a single Ethereum transaction where a trader spent $2,328,595.73 to purchase 3,167.53 $QQQon tokens. Ondo Finance stated this seven-figure purchase signals tokenized stocks are moving beyond an experimental phase. Ondo Stocks, the company's tokenized ETF platform, recently surpassed $1 billion in Total Value Locked (TVL), with total trading volume reaching $27 billion since its September 2025 launch. $QQQon allows blockchain investors access to various US stocks. The large transaction indicates growing institutional interest in a market traditionally dominated by small retail trades. Furthermore, Ondo has enabled its tokens, like $QQQon and $SPYon, to be used as collateral for DeFi loans, transforming them from passive assets into productive investment tools. Ondo has expanded trading to 24/7 operations across multiple blockchains and now offers over 430 tokenized stocks and ETFs. While the tokenized stock market remains small compared to traditional equities, it is growing rapidly, valued at over $1.7 billion as of June 2026, a 149% year-over-year increase. Regulatory bodies like the SEC have emphasized that securities laws apply regardless of tokenization. Ondo's TVL has seen remarkable growth, from approximately $192 million in January 2024 to about $3.51 billion currently, an 18.3x increase, positioning it as a leading platform in the Real-World Asset (RWA) sector alongside names like BlackRock's BUIDL and Circle's USYC.

cryptonews.ru9h ago

Ondo State-based Company QQQon Raises $2.3 Million in Ethereum Investment Amid Surge in Tokenized Stocks

cryptonews.ru9h ago

Kerbrat from Robinhood Promotes Tokenization While Memecoins Dominate Its Tokenless L2

Robinhood Crypto's senior vice president, Johann Kerbrat, has emphasized the company's focus on building the technical network infrastructure for tokenization, calling it "just the beginning," rather than on launching tokens. The centerpiece is Robinhood Chain, a tokenless, EVM-compatible layer-2 network built on Arbitrum technology, which settles on Ethereum and uses ETH for gas fees. The network's primary offering is stock tokens, providing 24/7 blockchain-based exposure to companies like Nvidia and Apple for users outside the U.S., though these tokens confer no legal shareholder rights. Despite its focus on tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), currently valued at around $12.81 million, memecoins overwhelmingly dominate trading volume on Robinhood Chain. Research indicates over 99% of trading volume comes from memecoins, with the network's mascot-inspired token, $CASHCAT, surging over 5,500% in a week. Kerbrat, who recently called assets without utility "not a long-term purpose," acknowledged the chain is also "great for memes." The network has seen significant growth since launch. DeFiLlama data shows a Total Value Locked (TVL) of approximately $536 million, a stablecoin market cap of around $634 million, and 24-hour DEX trading volume of about $440 million. Notably, Ethena's USDe stablecoin has grown to constitute nearly 43% of the network's stablecoins. In mid-July, the chain was processing over 7 million daily transactions, surpassing Coinbase's Base. Robinhood is currently covering gas fees for eligible wallet users on swaps, bridges, and perps, but this subsidy is set to end in September. Separately, Robinhood reported Q2 cryptocurrency transaction revenue of $100 million, a 38% year-over-year decline, while its prediction markets generated $156 million, exceeding crypto revenue for the first time.

cryptonews.ru08/15 20:08

Kerbrat from Robinhood Promotes Tokenization While Memecoins Dominate Its Tokenless L2

cryptonews.ru08/15 20:08

Hyperliquid is Strongly Strangling HyperEVM

The article analyzes the apparent failure of HyperEVM, the application engine of the Hyperliquid blockchain, contrasting it with the success of its core trading engine, HyperCore. Hyperliquid operates on a dual-engine architecture. HyperCore is a closed, high-performance order-book exchange for perpetuals and spot trading, which dominates on-chain volume and generates massive fees. HyperEVM, launched in February 2025, is an EVM-compatible layer meant for DeFi applications like lending and DEXs, which can access HyperCore's liquidity. Despite Hyperliquid's overall strength in a bear market, a stark divergence exists: * **HyperCore (Trading):** Captures over half of on-chain perpetual volume, generating ~$56M in fees over 30 days. * **HyperEVM (Applications):** All DeFi protocols combined generate less than $60M in fees. TVL is shrinking, daily active addresses are low (~8k), and the ecosystem lacks diversity. The DEX sector is particularly anemic, with most volume concentrated in a single protocol. The article identifies four key reasons for HyperEVM's struggles: 1. **Core Monopoly on Execution:** HyperCore exclusively handles order matching. This makes native DEXs on HyperEVM redundant and limits viable applications to those leveraging its order book (e.g., staking, lending). 2. **Architectural Concentration:** Shared liquidity across interfaces naturally leads to a "winner-takes-most" outcome, explaining the high concentration in both the trading (e.g., trade.xyz) and application layers. 3. **"No Insider" Philosophy:** Hyperliquid's commitment to fair launch means it provides no grants, business development, or marketing support to ecosystem projects, stunting growth. 4. **Complex Developer Experience:** The asynchronous design between HyperEVM and HyperCore (via the CoreWriter contract) creates non-standard development hurdles, as EVM transactions don't roll back if the core action fails. The conclusion is that HyperEVM's weakness is a deliberate trade-off, not an accident. Hyperliquid prioritized building an unbeatable trading engine, sacrificing the development of a broad, independent application ecosystem. HyperEVM functions more as a tokenization layer for HyperCore's liquidity rather than a general-purpose chain. The debate isn't whether it's "dead"—it serves a niche—but whether Hyperliquid ever intended to build a thriving, diverse DeFi ecosystem beyond its core trading product.

marsbit08/11 14:56

Hyperliquid is Strongly Strangling HyperEVM

marsbit08/11 14:56

活动图片