# Competition Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Competition", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

The Economist: The Real Threat of Cryptocurrency to Traditional Banks

The Economist article "The Real Threat Cryptocurrency Poses to Traditional Banks" examines the escalating tensions between the traditional banking sector and the crypto industry. Despite both benefiting from a more favorable regulatory environment, especially following the passage of the GENIUS Act which provided a legal framework for stablecoins, a significant power shift is occurring. Banks' most immediate concern is regulatory arbitrage in stablecoins. Although the GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying interest to prevent deposit outflows, companies like Circle circumvent this by sharing revenue with exchanges, which then pay "rewards" to users. Banks are demanding this loophole be closed. Furthermore, crypto firms are breaking into the core of the financial system. In a landmark move, U.S. regulators granted national bank trust charters to five digital asset firms, including Circle and Ripple, allowing them to provide custody services nationwide. The collective impact of these developments poses a profound threat. The core of the banks' dilemma is their waning political influence. Crypto has firmly entrenched itself within the right-wing, anti-establishment political sphere, amassing a massive war chest for lobbying. Banks are no longer the most powerful financial voice in the Republican party. In a ironic twist, they now sometimes find themselves allied with Democratic senators and left-leaning groups who share concerns over stablecoin risks, proving that political alliances in this battle are increasingly unpredictable.

深潮12/16 05:57

The Economist: The Real Threat of Cryptocurrency to Traditional Banks

深潮12/16 05:57

Digital Banks No Longer Rely on Banking for Profit; The Real Goldmines Are Stablecoins and Identity Verification

Digital banks are no longer competing on user scale but on revenue per customer, as seen in Revolut's diversified income streams versus Nubank's reliance on credit. The real value lies in stablecoins and identity authentication. Stablecoins, especially those backed by reserves, generate profit from interest on assets like treasury bonds—a revenue stream captured by issuers, not front-end platforms. This has pushed firms like Stripe and Circle to build proprietary settlement networks (e.g., Tempo, Arc) to control profitability, privacy, and transaction efficiency. Stablecoins disrupt traditional payment systems by enabling direct, low-cost transfers, forcing digital banks to integrate stablecoin channels or become obsolete. Simultaneously, identity authentication is evolving into a portable, cross-platform system. Initiatives like the EU Digital Identity Wallet and crypto projects (Worldcoin, Gitcoin Passport, Polygon ID) aim to create reusable digital identities, reducing redundant KYC processes. This shifts digital banks from controlling identity to becoming service providers within a trusted identity framework. Future digital banks will succeed by focusing on one of three models: 1. **Interest-driven**: Profit from user deposits via stablecoin interest and staking. 2. **Payment flow-driven**: Generate revenue from high transaction volumes as the default transfer channel. 3. **Infrastructure-driven**: Control stablecoin issuance, reserves, and settlement for the highest profitability. The market will split between consumer-facing apps (low switching costs) and infrastructure players (high stickiness, core to value flow).

marsbit12/15 10:05

Digital Banks No Longer Rely on Banking for Profit; The Real Goldmines Are Stablecoins and Identity Verification

marsbit12/15 10:05

From Airdrop Myth to King of Derivatives: A Look Back at Hyperliquid's 2025 Conquest

Reviewing crypto's growth in 2025, Hyperliquid stands out. It began the year with an epic airdrop and strong price performance, capturing attention. By year's end, it transformed into a top-four revenue-generating platform in crypto, earning over $650M and at one point capturing 70% of all perp trading volume. Its success was no accident. In Q1, it solidified its reputation by being first to list new assets like the TRUMP perp and launched HyperEVM, a smart contract layer. Q2 saw explosive growth: HYPE token surged 4x from April lows, and HyperEVM's TVL grew from $350M to $1.8B. The platform gained mainstream media coverage. In Q3, major wallets like Phantom and MetaMask integrated via Hyperliquid's builder codes, routing $158B in volume and earning partners nearly $50M. A high-profile stablecoin bid war was won by Native Markets, aligning with Hyperliquid's bootstrapped ethos. However, new competitors like Aster and Lighter emerged with aggressive airdrops. Q4 brought permissionless listings via HIP-3, enabling new markets like stock perps and yield-bearing collateral. Yet, HYPE fell nearly 50% from its September peak due to market conditions, a rare ADL event during a crash, and the start of team token unlocks. As perps go mainstream in 2026, Hyperliquid's true test begins. Its success came from building a superior product and ecosystem without shortcuts. Maintaining leadership will require doing it all over again in a crowded field.

marsbit12/12 11:35

From Airdrop Myth to King of Derivatives: A Look Back at Hyperliquid's 2025 Conquest

marsbit12/12 11:35

From 'Stablecoin First Stock' to 'Ankle Cut' in Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from the Spotlight into a Revaluation Cycle

From "Stablecoin Unicorn" to "Ankle-Cut" Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from Its Peak into a Revaluation Cycle Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, experienced a dramatic stock price decline shortly after its IPO in June, dropping from an initial peak of around $260 to approximately $88. This reflects a broader market shift from hype-driven optimism to a more rational reassessment of the stablecoin industry. Multiple factors contributed to this sharp correction. Initially, the stock was significantly overvalued due to market enthusiasm for the "first stablecoin stock" and the high-interest environment that boosted the appeal of its reserve-backed revenue model. As early investors took profits and sentiment cooled, a price correction was inevitable. Increased competition is also pressuring Circle. While USDC is the world's second-largest dollar stablecoin, it faces growing challenges from new stablecoin projects and digital dollar initiatives from traditional financial institutions. The sector is shifting from an oligopoly to intense competition, raising investor concerns about USDC's future growth certainty. Furthermore, macroeconomic interest rate trends pose a fundamental risk to Circle's business model. Its core revenue comes from interest earned on the cash and short-term U.S. Treasuries backing USDC. Expectations that the Federal Reserve may begin a rate-cutting cycle could directly compress this income. Rising operational and distribution costs further squeeze profitability. Analysts hold divergent views on Circle's future. Firms like Mizuho have turned bullish, upgrading the stock and suggesting the sell-off related to its post-IPO lockup expiration may have created a buying opportunity. They point to USDC's continued adoption by mainstream financial institutions. Conversely, analysts at firms like Susquehanna remain pessimistic, maintaining an "Underperform" rating. They warn that lower future interest rates and potential underperformance in USDC growth could continue to pressure the stock price and have lowered their price target. The upcoming end of the post-IPO lockup period, which restricts insiders from selling shares, has added near-term selling pressure, but this is viewed by some as a temporary overhang. Circle's recent Q3 earnings report, which beat expectations for both revenue and profit, shows that these fundamental concerns have not yet materialized, leaving the company's trajectory highly dependent on future interest rates and its ability to maintain and grow USDC's market share amidst fierce competition.

cointelegraph_中文12/10 10:18

From 'Stablecoin First Stock' to 'Ankle Cut' in Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from the Spotlight into a Revaluation Cycle

cointelegraph_中文12/10 10:18

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is the Profit Moat of Stablecoin Leader CRCL Solid?

The article presents a heated debate surrounding Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, focusing on the sustainability of its business model following its IPO and Q3 2025 earnings report. Key bearish points, led by figures like Jiang Zhuo'er, argue that CRCL's profits are unsustainable. They compare it to a bank reliant on an interest rate spread, which is highly vulnerable to Federal Reserve rate cuts. Critics highlight that over 60% of profits are paid to distributor Coinbase, leaving CRCL with a thin margin. They warn that competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan could easily disrupt its model, and that its regulatory advantage is a temporary benefit, not a permanent moat. Bullish commentators, including @BTCdayu and @qinbafrank, counter that CRCL is a long-term infrastructure play, not a simple bank. They believe current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve market dominance and network effects, similar to companies like Amazon in their early days. They argue that future growth from massive USDC adoption (potentially reaching trillions) will far outweigh the impact of falling interest rates. They see compliance as a powerful, long-term moat that will eliminate smaller competitors. Additional short-term concerns include a significant sell-off pressure from the post-IPO lockup expiration and a structural barrier to USDC's use in U.S. retail payments due to its classification as a taxable asset. In summary, the debate pits short-term cyclical risks (interest rates, high costs, sell pressure) against a long-term structural opportunity (market growth, network effects, compliance as a barrier to entry). The core question remains whether CRCL's current model is a fragile interest-rate play or a foundational bet on the future of digital currency.

比推12/09 20:19

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is the Profit Moat of Stablecoin Leader CRCL Solid?

比推12/09 20:19

Tether's "Favorite Son" STABLE Crashes? Plunges 60% on First Day, Whale Jumping the Queue + No CEX Listing Sparks Trust Panic

Stable, a new Layer 1 blockchain heavily backed by Tether and Bitfinex, launched its mainnet and STABLE token on December 8. Despite significant pre-launch deposits totalling over $1.3 billion and strong market interest, the token’s first-day performance was highly disappointing. It opened around $0.036, briefly rose to nearly $0.046, then plummeted over 60% to a low of $0.015. Its fully diluted valuation (FDV) fell to $1.7 billion amid thin liquidity. The token’s not yet listed on major centralized exchanges like Binance or Coinbase, limiting its accessibility. The launch wass marred by controversy after a whale deposited hundreds of millions of USDT before the official start time, raising concerns about fairness and possible insider trading. This damaged trust in a project whose core narrative is transparency and reliability. Stable is designed as a stablecoin-focused chain with USDT as the native gas fee, aiming for a near gas-less user experience. It uses a custom DPoS consensus mechanism and is EVM-compatible. However, its tokenomics have raised concerns: STABLE tokens are used only for governance and staking, not fee payment, and 50% of the total 100 billion supply is allocated to the team, investors, and advisors with a one-year cliff. The project faces intense competition from established chains like Polygon, Tron, and Solana, as well as emerging stablecoin-specific L1s like Circle’s Arc and Paradigm-backed Tempo. Its success hinges on rapid execution, ecosystem development, and enterprise adoption planned for late 2025 to mid-2026. Early missteps and a lack of trust have cast doubt on its ability to compete.

marsbit12/09 18:11

Tether's "Favorite Son" STABLE Crashes? Plunges 60% on First Day, Whale Jumping the Queue + No CEX Listing Sparks Trust Panic

marsbit12/09 18:11

活动图片