South Korea Requires Reporting of Crypto Accounts at Bankrupt Overseas Exchanges

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-09-07Last updated on 2026-09-07

Abstract

South Korea's National Tax Service (NTS) has clarified that residents must still report cryptocurrency accounts held with overseas exchanges even after those platforms go bankrupt and assets become inaccessible. This ruling came in response to a resident's inquiry regarding an account at an exchange that filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. The NTS stated that the foreign financial account reporting requirement persists regardless of the exchange's insolvency, focusing on the account itself rather than the tax status of the assets. Under South Korea's international tax laws, residents and domestic companies must report overseas financial accounts, including virtual asset accounts, if the combined balance exceeds 500 million won (approx. $361,000) at any month-end during the year. Reports are due in June of the following year. Virtual asset accounts were added to this reporting system in 2023. The NTS also reported that the total value of declared overseas virtual assets for the 2026 reporting cycle was 10.5 trillion won, a 5.4% decrease from the previous year, partly attributed to lower crypto prices. Individual holdings increased by 5.4% to 9.8 trillion won, while corporate holdings fell sharply by 61.1% to 700 billion won.

South Korea’s National Tax Service (NTS) has clarified that residents may still have to report cryptocurrency accounts held with overseas exchanges even after those platforms have gone bankrupt and customers can no longer trade or withdraw their assets.

The NTS issued the interpretation on August 28 after a South Korean resident asked whether an account with a bankrupt overseas crypto exchange remained subject to the country’s foreign financial account reporting rules. The resident was a creditor of an overseas virtual asset exchange that filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. The account could no longer be used for normal trading or withdrawals, and the assets had become part of the bankruptcy process.

Bankruptcy Does Not Remove Reporting Requirement

The tax agency said an account opened with an overseas virtual asset service provider for digital asset transactions remains subject to reporting even if the exchange later becomes insolvent. The ruling focuses on the account reporting requirement and does not itself determine whether the assets are subject to additional tax.

Under South Korea’s Adjustment of International Taxes Act, residents and domestic companies must report their overseas financial accounts when the combined balance exceeds 500 million won ($361,000) at the end of any month during the year. The report must be filed with the tax authorities in June of the following year. The threshold applies to the combined balances of qualifying overseas accounts rather than just one account.

Virtual asset accounts were added to South Korea’s overseas financial account reporting system in 2023. The requirement covers qualifying accounts held with overseas virtual asset service providers alongside other foreign financial accounts.

The NTS also reported that overseas virtual assets declared in the 2026 reporting cycle totaled 10.5 trillion won, down 5.4% from the previous year. Individual holdings rose 5.4% to 9.8 trillion won, while corporate holdings fell 61.1% to 700 billion won. The agency attributed the overall decline partly to lower virtual asset prices.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Vitalik Buterin Doubles Down on Crypto While Bitcoin’s AI Security Debate Gets Louder

TagsCrypto ExchangeSouth KoreaSouth korean exchanges

Related Questions

QWhat is the key clarification made by South Korea's National Tax Service regarding cryptocurrency accounts held with bankrupt overseas exchanges?

ASouth Korea's National Tax Service clarified that residents must still report cryptocurrency accounts held with overseas exchanges even if those platforms have gone bankrupt and customers can no longer trade or withdraw their assets. The reporting requirement remains under the country's foreign financial account reporting rules.

QAccording to the article, what does the NTS's ruling specifically focus on for accounts with bankrupt overseas crypto exchanges?

AThe NTS's ruling specifically focuses on the foreign financial account reporting requirement. It does not itself determine whether the assets held in such accounts are subject to additional tax.

QWhat is the reporting threshold under South Korea's Adjustment of International Taxes Act for overseas financial accounts?

AUnder South Korea's Adjustment of International Taxes Act, residents and domestic companies must report their overseas financial accounts when the combined balance of all qualifying accounts exceeds 500 million won (approximately $361,000) at the end of any month during the year.

QWhen were virtual asset accounts added to South Korea's overseas financial account reporting system, and what does the requirement cover?

AVirtual asset accounts were added to South Korea's overseas financial account reporting system in 2023. The requirement covers qualifying accounts held with overseas virtual asset service providers, alongside other types of foreign financial accounts.

QWhat was the trend reported by the NTS regarding the value of declared overseas virtual assets in the 2026 reporting cycle?

AFor the 2026 reporting cycle, the total value of declared overseas virtual assets was 10.5 trillion won, representing a 5.4% decrease from the previous year. Individual holdings increased by 5.4% to 9.8 trillion won, while corporate holdings fell sharply by 61.1% to 700 billion won. The NTS attributed the overall decline partly to lower virtual asset prices.

Related Reads

Founders Fund Leads $5 Million Token Purchase of ANVL: What Exactly is This "Non-Lending" DeFi Protocol Doing?

On October 6th, Founders Fund, led by Peter Thiel, invested $5 million to purchase ANVL tokens from the DeFi protocol Anvil's treasury. The round included participation from Pantera Capital and others, alongside angel investors like Compound founder Robert Leshner. Anvil is not a lending protocol. Instead, users lock assets like ETH or USDC into its vault to generate a verifiable on-chain "Letter of Credit" (LOC). This LOC acts as an economic guarantee, proving the user has sufficient locked collateral to back financial commitments, without borrowing funds. The protocol applies this mechanism to use cases like payment guarantees for merchants (via integration with Flexa) and enabling instant deposits for traders on exchanges like Bullish. Anvil's economic model is unique: it charges zero protocol fees. Its native token, ANVL, derives value solely from governance rights over parameters like supported collateral types. The total supply is 100 billion tokens. Despite an 83% price surge on the investment news, ANVL remains down approximately 89% from its all-time high. The protocol's Total Value Locked (TVL) has also fallen about 87% from its peak of ~$109 million in July 2025 to around $14 million currently. The investment represents a strategic bet that on-chain credit guarantees could become a significant category. Key factors to watch include the rate of real enterprise adoption through Anvil's SDK, the long-term sustainability of its zero-fee model, and the broader migration of traditional trade finance needs to blockchain infrastructure.

marsbit1h ago

Founders Fund Leads $5 Million Token Purchase of ANVL: What Exactly is This "Non-Lending" DeFi Protocol Doing?

marsbit1h ago

Mathematical Explosion: OpenAI Overnight Solves 722 Math Problems, Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Proven

OpenAI has stunned the global mathematics and AI communities by releasing a GitHub repository containing 722 manuscripts addressing 372 previously unresolved major mathematical problem families, all reportedly generated by an unreleased internal AI model. The announcement, made without prior peer review, has provoked both excitement and alarm among mathematicians. The most notable breakthrough claims to be a proof of a "quasi-Riemann Hypothesis," establishing a zero-free region for Dirichlet L-functions with real part greater than 7/8 and eliminating the Landau-Siegel zeros—a significant leap in analytic number theory. The work has reportedly undergone formal verification using Lean. Other highlighted results include: unconditionally proving the NP-hardness of the basic semidefinite programming (SDP) threshold for approximation algorithms, based solely on P ≠ NP and circumventing the Unique Games Conjecture; proving the rational Hodge conjecture for abelian varieties with complex multiplication (CM); and resolving both the symmetric and asymmetric Mahler conjectures in convex geometry. According to OpenAI, most proofs were generated automatically by the model, with an average "thinking" time of just three hours per problem. This unprecedented scale and speed have sparked intense debate about the future of human mathematicians. While some express fear about the concentration of intellectual power, others see it as the dawn of a new era of discovery driven by AI. The mathematical world is now tasked with scrutinizing these claims, which, if verified, would represent historic milestones.

marsbit1h ago

Mathematical Explosion: OpenAI Overnight Solves 722 Math Problems, Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Proven

marsbit1h ago

As Midterm Elections Approach, the Real Trade in U.S. Stocks Isn't About Who Wins

With the US midterm elections approaching in early November, political uncertainty has re-emenrged as a market variable. While market participants are weighing potential shifts in congressional control and policy direction, historical data suggests midterm elections themselves are not a definitive negative catalyst for US equities. Since 1937, the S&P 500 has averaged a positive gain of 9.2% in midterm election years, though this lags behind the 13.3% average for non-election years. A more consistent historical pattern is increased market volatility and a tendency for stronger performance concentrated in the fourth quarter, as political uncertainty is resolved. The article, citing analysis from J.P. Morgan and Capital Group, argues that the market's primary concern is policy path uncertainty rather than which party wins. This uncertainty tends to depress markets in the run-up to the vote, with a potential rebound afterward as the political risk premium dissipates. However, the article cautions against attributing market performance solely to the election. Recent midterm years like 2018 and 2022 saw significant market declines primarily driven by factors like Federal Reserve tightening and inflation, not the election outcome itself. The core argument is that the midterm election's impact on markets is often secondary to more fundamental drivers. Regardless of whether the result is a unified or divided government, the market's longer-term trajectory has historically been determined by underlying economic conditions. For the current environment, the key variables to watch post-election are not political labels but the path of interest rates, corporate earnings trends, and whether any actual policy changes materially alter cash flow expectations for businesses. The election may influence sentiment and policy expectations, but the sustainability of any year-end rally will ultimately depend on these core fundamentals of profitability, rates, and economic data.

marsbit1h ago

As Midterm Elections Approach, the Real Trade in U.S. Stocks Isn't About Who Wins

marsbit1h ago

AI Can't Change 'DNA': How Long Can SanDisk Stay Strong?

**AI Cannot Alter the "DNA": How Much Longer Can Western Digital's Run Last?** This analysis examines the sustainability of the current "super cycle" for NAND flash memory, driven by AI, with a focus on Western Digital (WD). The core argument is that while AI demand has fundamentally shifted NAND's role from a data warehouse to an essential component on the compute path, especially for AI inference, this does not eliminate the industry's cyclical nature. The piece first assesses the supply-demand dynamics. On the supply side, major producers are showing capital expenditure restraint for NAND, prioritizing DRAM/HBM. Capacity growth through 2028 relies heavily on technological upgrades (increasing 3D layers to 300+) and expansion primarily from China's YMTC, rather than new fabs. Global new fab capacity from players like Samsung and WD/Kioxia is concentrated post-2029. This results in estimated bit supply growth (CAGR ~24% for 2026-2028) largely driven by higher per-wafer output. Demand is undergoing a structural shift. AI-related NAND demand (for data lakes, KV cache, and staging) is forecast to grow at a 75% CAGR from 2025-2028, becoming the dominant driver. Data center demand will surpass 50% of total NAND demand in 2026. Consumer demand (PC, smartphone) is being squeezed and is expected to decline or stagnate. A key 2027 demand catalyst is NVIDIA's Rubin platform with its dedicated contextual memory storage (ICMS). The analysis concludes that a supply-demand deficit will persist into 2027. However, 2028 is identified as a potential inflection point where supply (led by YMTC's new fab) could outpace demand, ending the price rally. For Western Digital, the analysis models a more conservative path than management's guidance. It forecasts Average Selling Price (ASP) peaking in FY28 (ending June 2028) before declining in FY29-30 as the market loosens, though supported by long-term agreements (LTAs) and a higher mix of data center products. Consequently, margins and profits are expected to peak in FY28 and then contract. The valuation suggests WD's current price largely reflects a neutral scenario, with limited short-term upside unless the market becomes convinced that prices will remain stable post-2028. The fundamental takeaway is that despite AI's transformative impact, NAND's cyclical "DNA" remains intact.

marsbit2h ago

AI Can't Change 'DNA': How Long Can SanDisk Stay Strong?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片