Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-23Last updated on 2026-06-23

Abstract

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

Original Author: Cleve Mesidor (Executive Director, Washington DC Blockchain Foundation)

Original Compilation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

In this sports season filled with Cinderella stories, the crypto industry is also looking forward to its own moment in the spotlight – the CLARITY Act currently advancing in the U.S. Senate could be that crucial 'comeback'. However, with two quarters left before the final whistle, Republicans likely need to reach a compromise with the White House on ethical issues while also persuading a few Republican senators still on the fence to secure the 60 votes for passage.

It's only halftime; there are still six months in the year, anything is possible. Legislative victories are essentially no different from scoring points on the field—they require the precise alignment of multiple factors. Sometimes, burning a little sage for good luck doesn't hurt—just look at the New York Knicks this year.

The second half of this policy year will be a critical period for intensive bipartisan negotiations in both the Senate and the House. Zooming out, market structure legislation is just one piece of a larger script aimed at building a comprehensive policy and regulatory framework for Web3 and DeFi.

The congressional calendar is already packed, with only 40+ legislative working days remaining—even factoring in the lame-duck session and midterm elections, time is extremely tight for all sides to strategize and adjust the score.

A Crowded Policy Arena

Beyond the prospects for the CLARITY Act, can the multiple crypto tax proposals spun off from the new PARITY Act hitch a ride on a larger legislative 'vehicle' and become law this year?

Can the core language of the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act pull off a 'Hail Mary' pass to formally enshrine developer protections into law?

Furthermore, the full-court press on the GENUIS rulemaking continues, with key provisions still awaiting finalization.

For crypto enthusiasts, this is like sports fans following an entire season: rich in storylines, full of suspense, exciting yet nerve-wracking.

CFTC Lacks Its Starting Lineup

The fact that a financial regulator is missing four commissioners is a deep concern for the industry. For crypto, this directly impacts expectations for action from Washington—uncertainty remains over whether new commissioners can be nominated and confirmed this year.

More pressingly, who will win the jurisdictional battle over prediction markets? The individual states, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)? Or will it ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court?

Of course, this is not a suggestion to place a bet.

Crypto Champions Set to Retire

Regardless of the final policy outcomes, the remainder of this year is likely to be bittersweet. Two heavyweight 'crypto champions' are set to hang up their federal government jerseys, and their departure will have profound short and long-term impacts: SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis.

Peirce, a two-term commissioner and leader of the SEC's crypto task force, has been a core architect of cross-regulatory coordination efforts. Lummis, as Chair of the Senate Banking Committee's Subcommittee on Digital Assets, has been a key negotiator for bipartisan compromise and a staunch advocate for the BRCA.

Second-Half Outlook: Views from Industry Leaders

I interviewed several senior industry leaders to get their read on the current crypto policy deliberations. Here are their perspectives on CLARITY, taxation, and prediction markets:

Sara K. Weed (Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP):

"It's undeniable we are steadily moving in the right direction. However, constrained by the shortage of legislative days and election pressures, the likelihood of CLARITY passing in this Congress is low. Consequently, agencies like the SEC and CFTC will be forced to play a more active role in providing much-needed certainty for the industry. The question, of course, is how far they can go within their existing authority."

Sulolit 'Raj' Mukherjee (CEO, Bodin Advisory):

"If history is any guide, meaningful crypto tax legislation is most likely to pass not as a standalone bill, but embedded within broader tax, budget, or end-of-year omnibus legislation. The current array of proposals are relatively targeted, enjoy bipartisan consensus, and aim to address specific issues like de minimis exemptions, tax treatment of staking, wash sale rules, and information reporting requirements. Such provisions are easier to advance when attached to must-pass larger bills. Ultimately, enactment hinges on bandwidth in Congress, scoring, and whether lawmakers view crypto tax rules as technical fixes to improve compliance rather than part of a larger digital asset policy debate. The chance for at least one or two measures to become law this year is real, but likely via a vehicle, not a standalone crypto tax bill."

Rashan Colbert (U.S. Policy Director, Crypto Council for Innovation):

"I won't predict how the courts will resolve the jurisdictional dispute, but the overarching direction is becoming clear: as the prediction market category matures, the CFTC is committed to building a more durable regulatory framework for it. The recent NPRM is another step towards providing more transparency and legal certainty for market participants—in a space seeing significant growth in user base and trading volume.

The central question is: should prediction markets primarily be viewed as financial market infrastructure or broadly categorized as gambling? I believe these markets have the potential to be sophisticated tools for expressing views, hedging risk, and streamlining access to derivatives on a wide range of events and assets. An overly broad gambling framework risks stifling that potential before the markets have a chance to develop into positive-sum financial infrastructure."

The second half of crypto policy has begun. The time window is narrow, but the window of opportunity remains open. The industry needs sustained bipartisan communication and pragmatic push to achieve substantive results by 2026.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main focus of the CLARITY Act currently being advanced in the U.S. Senate, and what is its key legislative hurdle?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to provide regulatory clarity for the crypto industry in the U.S. Its key legislative hurdle is securing the 60 votes needed for passage in the Senate, which requires bipartisan support and potentially compromises with the White House on ethical issues, as well as winning over several undecided Republican senators.

QAccording to the article, what is a major operational concern for the crypto industry regarding the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission)?

AA major operational concern is that the CFTC is currently missing four commissioners, creating a 'one-person commission' scenario. This vacancy raises uncertainty about whether new commissioners can be nominated and confirmed within the year, directly impacting the industry's expectations for regulatory action from Washington.

QWho are the two key 'crypto champions' in the U.S. federal government mentioned as leaving their posts, and what roles have they played?

AThe two key 'crypto champions' are SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis. Peirce has been the architect of the SEC's crypto task force and a core coordinator across agencies. Lummis, as Chair of the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets, has been a key bipartisan negotiator and a staunch advocate for regulatory frameworks like the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA).

QBased on expert opinion in the article, what is the most likely pathway for meaningful crypto tax legislation to pass in the current Congress?

AExperts suggest meaningful crypto tax legislation is most likely to pass not as a standalone bill but by being attached to larger, must-pass legislation such as broader tax, budget, or year-end packages. Proposals addressing specific issues like minimum exemptions, staking tax treatment, and wash sale rules have bipartisan consensus and are easier to advance when bundled with essential bills.

QWhat is the core jurisdictional debate surrounding prediction markets, and what potential risk does a broad classification pose according to one policy director interviewed?

AThe core debate is whether jurisdiction over prediction markets should fall to individual states, the CFTC and SEC, or ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court. The risk, as noted by Rashan Colbert, is that if prediction markets are broadly classified as gambling, it could stifle their potential to develop into positive-sum financial infrastructure before they have the chance to mature.

Related Reads

Should Ethereum's Staking Rate Be Capped? EIP-8363 Proposal Ignites Heated Debate

The Ethereum community is currently engaged in intense debate over EIP-8363, a proposal aiming to cap the network's staking ratio. With the ETH staking rate exceeding 33% and rising, concerns have grown about potential centralization if a few large entities control most staked ETH and about perpetual dilution for non-stakers. The "diminishing issuance burn" mechanism of EIP-8363 would progressively burn an increasing portion of validator rewards as the total staked ETH approaches roughly 50% of the supply. At that threshold, new consensus issuance would effectively stop, leaving validators to earn solely from transaction fees and MEV until the staking ratio falls back below 50%. Proponents argue this protects ETH's monetary properties by limiting dilution and establishing a firmer supply cap, while also disincentivizing excessive growth by large stakers first. Critics, however, warn the proposal threatens DeFi vitality by destabilizing the staking yield which serves as a benchmark rate for lending and other protocols. They also argue it could make independent, home staking economically unviable as fixed costs remain while rewards shrink, potentially increasing centralization as MEV becomes a larger portion of validator income. Some suggest the proposal's economic rationale needs refinement. The proposal's procedural status for inclusion in a future upgrade is pending. Regardless of the immediate outcome, the debate centers on whether Ethereum currently overpays for security and if implementing such a cap is worth the potential disruption.

marsbit31m ago

Should Ethereum's Staking Rate Be Capped? EIP-8363 Proposal Ignites Heated Debate

marsbit31m ago

Michael Saylor's Latest Interview: The 'Wealth Logic' of AI and Bitcoin

Michael Saylor, in a recent interview, discussed leveraging AI for financial innovation, leading to a $15 billion capital raise. He advised focusing on directing AI rather than competing with it, emphasizing the search for "S-curve" opportunities in technology. Saylor argued that fiat currencies inevitably depreciate, citing a ~7% annual loss in the U.S. dollar's purchasing power. He positioned Bitcoin as the superior, universal capital asset for long-term savings, outperforming gold, real estate, and major indices due to its verifiable scarcity and resistance to confiscation. Addressing AI's impact, he agreed that basic commodities would become abundant but contended that status-driven demand for scarce assets would persist, ensuring money's role. For careers, he warned against entering fields like law or medicine at the end of their S-curves, urging instead to master AI tools and tackle novel, edge-case problems. Saylor outlined ten foundational life principles, including focus, health, critical thinking, and integrity. He defended MicroStrategy's recent minor Bitcoin sale as a strategic move to dispel market myths about a potential "death spiral," affirming their ability to fund dividends sustainably if Bitcoin appreciates above 3.2% annually. He predicted Bitcoin's continued outperformance versus traditional assets and recommended that individuals invest in both AI subscriptions and Bitcoin. Finally, he shared two profound personal learnings: applied statistics (via Taleb's works) for discerning signal from noise, and a deep study of history (Will Durant's "The Story of Civilization") to gain perspective on recurring human patterns, including the inevitable debasement of all fiat currencies.

marsbit4h ago

Michael Saylor's Latest Interview: The 'Wealth Logic' of AI and Bitcoin

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片