Polymarket tightens rules on insider trading and manipulation across DeFi, U.S. platforms

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-23Last updated on 2026-03-23

Polymarket has introduced updated market integrity rules across its DeFi platform and CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange. It tightens restrictions on insider trading and market manipulation as the prediction market continues to scale.

The changes, announced on 23 March, update the platform’s Terms of Use and U.S. rulebook. It is also launching new market integrity pages outlining enforcement mechanisms and reporting processes.

Polymarket sets clearer rules on insider trading

The updated framework defines three specific categories of prohibited insider trading activity.

Users are barred from trading on stolen confidential information, including non-public data that could influence the outcome of an event.

The rules also prohibit trading on illegally obtained tips, where users knowingly act on information shared in breach of trust or confidentiality.

Additionally, Polymarket bans trading by individuals who hold positions of influence over an outcome, such as those directly involved in events tied to prediction markets.

The company said the changes are designed to bring greater clarity to participants and reinforce expectations across both platforms.

Expanded crackdown on manipulation tactics

Beyond insider trading, the updated rules explicitly prohibit a range of manipulative behaviors.

These include spoofing and wash trading, front-running and self-dealing, fictitious transactions, and broader attempts to disrupt orderly market activity.

The framework also covers information misuse and any effort to influence contract outcomes artificially.

Multi-layered surveillance system introduced

Polymarket outlined separate enforcement approaches for its DeFi platform and its U.S. exchange.

On the DeFi side, the platform relies on blockchain transparency, with all trades recorded on the Polygon network and publicly accessible. Third-party surveillance tools and internal monitoring systems complement this.

If suspicious activity is detected, enforcement actions may include wallet bans, internal investigations, or referrals to law enforcement.

For its U.S. exchange, Polymarket said it operates a more structured compliance system, including real-time monitoring via a control desk and partnerships with surveillance providers.

Also, there is oversight through a Regulatory Services Agreement with the National Futures Association [NFA].

Violations on the U.S. platform may result in suspensions, financial penalties, or regulatory referrals.

Scrutiny grows over prediction market activity

The rule update follows earlier scrutiny of trading activity on the platform.

Early in the month, AMBCrypto reported a cluster of linked wallets that collectively earned over $1 million from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military strikes involving Iran.

The timing of those trades raised questions about whether participants may have acted on non-public or privileged information.

While no formal wrongdoing was established, the findings added to broader concerns about insider trading risks in decentralized prediction markets.


Final Summary

  • Polymarket has tightened rules on insider trading and manipulation, introducing clearer definitions and stronger enforcement mechanisms.
  • The update follows earlier scrutiny of suspicious trading activity, highlighting ongoing integrity challenges in prediction markets.

Related Reads

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbit59m ago

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbit59m ago

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

"On-Chain Numbers on the Eve of the World Cup: $1.6 Billion Traded Before Kick-off" Analysis of on-chain markets before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reveals significant crypto integration into football. The most striking figure is the approximately **$1.6 billion** in total trading volume on the single "World Cup Winner" contract on the Polymarket prediction market platform, accumulated before a single match was played. This represents explosive growth for a sector whose annual volume surged from ~$16B in 2024 to ~$64B in 2025. The ecosystem is maturing beyond speculation. Key developments include: 1) **Infrastructure upgrades** like Polymarket's migration to native, regulated USDC stablecoin for settlements; 2) **Reliable data oracles**, such as Chainlink, being used to resolve real-world match outcomes on-chain; and 3) **Official recognition**, with FIFA appointing its first-ever "Prediction Markets" partner. Over 100 contracts now cover everything from the outright winner to individual match results and even non-sporting risks like venue relocation. This evolution marks a fundamental shift. While crypto firms are absent from FIFA's top-tier sponsor list, the technology has deeply penetrated the tournament's financial and predictive infrastructure through regulated stablecoin settlements, decentralized oracles, and new official partnership categories. The regulatory landscape remains complex and varies by jurisdiction, but on-chain markets for the World Cup are already a multi-billion-dollar reality.

marsbit1h ago

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

marsbit1h ago

From SpaceX's IPO to the Future of Crypto: Which Crypto Sectors Will Host the Trillion-Dollar Narrative?

From the SpaceX IPO, which targets a $750 billion raise at a $1.77 trillion valuation, we can extrapolate capital flow trends relevant to crypto. The focus shifts from speculative narratives to foundational infrastructure and real-world asset (RWA) integration. Key crypto sectors poised to benefit include: 1. **AI Infrastructure**: The narrative is moving from consumer-facing AI applications to underlying, scarce resources like compute power and decentralized GPU networks (e.g., TAO, RENDER, AKT, IO). These protocols are positioning as the essential "picks and shovels" providers for the AI economy. 2. **Real-World Assets (RWA)**: Beyond tokenized treasury bonds, RWA's future lies in on-chain equity and pre-IPO assets like SpaceX. This could democratize access to high-growth assets and reshape global capital flows, benefiting infrastructure projects like ONDO, LINK, and Plume that facilitate issuance, data, and liquidity. 3. **Core Financial Infrastructure**: Stablecoins, payment networks, and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) are critical for settling the future on-chain economy. Their role expands from internal trading tools to foundational layers for global finance, AI systems, and real-world asset networks, leading to potential value reassessment. In summary, the next cycle may prioritize long-term infrastructure value—AI compute, asset tokenization networks, and settlement layers—over short-lived application hype, mirroring the broader market's shift towards funding the foundational systems of the future.

marsbit2h ago

From SpaceX's IPO to the Future of Crypto: Which Crypto Sectors Will Host the Trillion-Dollar Narrative?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片