Philippines considers suspension of payment system operator registrations and tightening of VASP checks

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-09-07Last updated on 2026-09-07

Abstract

The Philippines' central bank, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), has proposed a 12-month moratorium on new payment system operator (OPS) registrations. This pause aims to allow for a comprehensive review of its classification and licensing framework. Applications submitted before the suspension will still be processed but will not receive final approval or rejection until the moratorium ends. Simultaneously, the BSP plans to tighten controls on payment schemes involving virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Regulated financial institutions that acquire merchants will be required to establish direct agreements with VASP clients. These relationships will be subject to enhanced due diligence, transaction and settlement limits, and other risk-based controls. The requirement applies to VASPs licensed or authorized by the BSP, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or other relevant bodies. VASPs are now categorized alongside gambling firms, gaming service providers, adult-content companies, and money transfer services for these heightened scrutiny measures. The draft circular is open for public comment. If finalized, the rules would take effect 15 days after publication.

The Central Bank of the Philippines has proposed a 12-month suspension on the registration of new Payment System Operators (OPS), while simultaneously tightening control over payment schemes involving Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs).

According to a draft circular, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) stated it will suspend the acceptance and processing of applications from OPS to engage in business, in order to conduct a "comprehensive review" of its classification and licensing system.

Applications submitted before the suspension may continue to be processed; however, the BSP will neither approve nor reject them until the pause ends. Organizations will be prohibited from commencing any activity requiring OPS registration unless the regulator permits otherwise.

The proposal will obligate institutions under BSP supervision that provide merchant acquisition services to serve regulated VASPs through direct agreements with merchants. Such relationships will be subject to enhanced due diligence and monitoring procedures, transaction and settlement limits, and other risk-based control measures.

This requirement applies to virtual asset companies that must obtain a license, register with, or receive authorization from the BSP, the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission, or another competent authority. VASPs are listed alongside gaming companies, game service providers, adult companies, and money remittance service companies.

The draft will take effect 15 days after publication if adopted in its final form; the BSP is currently accepting feedback.

Cointelegraph contacted the BSP for additional information but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

Related: Philippine SEC names dYdX and six other crypto platforms as unauthorized

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat is the central bank of the Philippines proposing regarding the registration of new payment system operators?

AThe Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) is proposing a 12-month suspension on the registration of new payment system operators.

QWhy is BSP proposing this suspension on new OPS registrations?

AThe BSP is proposing the suspension to conduct a comprehensive review of its classification and licensing system for payment system operators.

QHow will the BSP's new proposal affect supervised institutions that onboard merchant businesses, specifically regarding VASPs?

AThe proposal will require these institutions to service regulated Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) through direct agreements with the merchants, subjecting these relationships to enhanced due diligence, transaction limits, and risk-based controls.

QAccording to the proposal, what categories are VASPs grouped with for the purpose of this new rule?

AVASPs are grouped with gaming companies, gaming service providers, adult content companies, and money transfer service companies for the purposes of the new enhanced control measures.

QWhen will the proposed circular potentially take effect?

AThe draft circular will take effect 15 days after publication if finalized in its current form. The BSP is currently soliciting feedback on the proposal.

Related Reads

Founders Fund Leads $5 Million Token Purchase of ANVL: What Exactly is This "Non-Lending" DeFi Protocol Doing?

On October 6th, Founders Fund, led by Peter Thiel, invested $5 million to purchase ANVL tokens from the DeFi protocol Anvil's treasury. The round included participation from Pantera Capital and others, alongside angel investors like Compound founder Robert Leshner. Anvil is not a lending protocol. Instead, users lock assets like ETH or USDC into its vault to generate a verifiable on-chain "Letter of Credit" (LOC). This LOC acts as an economic guarantee, proving the user has sufficient locked collateral to back financial commitments, without borrowing funds. The protocol applies this mechanism to use cases like payment guarantees for merchants (via integration with Flexa) and enabling instant deposits for traders on exchanges like Bullish. Anvil's economic model is unique: it charges zero protocol fees. Its native token, ANVL, derives value solely from governance rights over parameters like supported collateral types. The total supply is 100 billion tokens. Despite an 83% price surge on the investment news, ANVL remains down approximately 89% from its all-time high. The protocol's Total Value Locked (TVL) has also fallen about 87% from its peak of ~$109 million in July 2025 to around $14 million currently. The investment represents a strategic bet that on-chain credit guarantees could become a significant category. Key factors to watch include the rate of real enterprise adoption through Anvil's SDK, the long-term sustainability of its zero-fee model, and the broader migration of traditional trade finance needs to blockchain infrastructure.

marsbit15m ago

Founders Fund Leads $5 Million Token Purchase of ANVL: What Exactly is This "Non-Lending" DeFi Protocol Doing?

marsbit15m ago

Mathematical Explosion: OpenAI Overnight Solves 722 Math Problems, Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Proven

OpenAI has stunned the global mathematics and AI communities by releasing a GitHub repository containing 722 manuscripts addressing 372 previously unresolved major mathematical problem families, all reportedly generated by an unreleased internal AI model. The announcement, made without prior peer review, has provoked both excitement and alarm among mathematicians. The most notable breakthrough claims to be a proof of a "quasi-Riemann Hypothesis," establishing a zero-free region for Dirichlet L-functions with real part greater than 7/8 and eliminating the Landau-Siegel zeros—a significant leap in analytic number theory. The work has reportedly undergone formal verification using Lean. Other highlighted results include: unconditionally proving the NP-hardness of the basic semidefinite programming (SDP) threshold for approximation algorithms, based solely on P ≠ NP and circumventing the Unique Games Conjecture; proving the rational Hodge conjecture for abelian varieties with complex multiplication (CM); and resolving both the symmetric and asymmetric Mahler conjectures in convex geometry. According to OpenAI, most proofs were generated automatically by the model, with an average "thinking" time of just three hours per problem. This unprecedented scale and speed have sparked intense debate about the future of human mathematicians. While some express fear about the concentration of intellectual power, others see it as the dawn of a new era of discovery driven by AI. The mathematical world is now tasked with scrutinizing these claims, which, if verified, would represent historic milestones.

marsbit48m ago

Mathematical Explosion: OpenAI Overnight Solves 722 Math Problems, Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Proven

marsbit48m ago

As Midterm Elections Approach, the Real Trade in U.S. Stocks Isn't About Who Wins

With the US midterm elections approaching in early November, political uncertainty has re-emenrged as a market variable. While market participants are weighing potential shifts in congressional control and policy direction, historical data suggests midterm elections themselves are not a definitive negative catalyst for US equities. Since 1937, the S&P 500 has averaged a positive gain of 9.2% in midterm election years, though this lags behind the 13.3% average for non-election years. A more consistent historical pattern is increased market volatility and a tendency for stronger performance concentrated in the fourth quarter, as political uncertainty is resolved. The article, citing analysis from J.P. Morgan and Capital Group, argues that the market's primary concern is policy path uncertainty rather than which party wins. This uncertainty tends to depress markets in the run-up to the vote, with a potential rebound afterward as the political risk premium dissipates. However, the article cautions against attributing market performance solely to the election. Recent midterm years like 2018 and 2022 saw significant market declines primarily driven by factors like Federal Reserve tightening and inflation, not the election outcome itself. The core argument is that the midterm election's impact on markets is often secondary to more fundamental drivers. Regardless of whether the result is a unified or divided government, the market's longer-term trajectory has historically been determined by underlying economic conditions. For the current environment, the key variables to watch post-election are not political labels but the path of interest rates, corporate earnings trends, and whether any actual policy changes materially alter cash flow expectations for businesses. The election may influence sentiment and policy expectations, but the sustainability of any year-end rally will ultimately depend on these core fundamentals of profitability, rates, and economic data.

marsbit54m ago

As Midterm Elections Approach, the Real Trade in U.S. Stocks Isn't About Who Wins

marsbit54m ago

AI Can't Change 'DNA': How Long Can SanDisk Stay Strong?

**AI Cannot Alter the "DNA": How Much Longer Can Western Digital's Run Last?** This analysis examines the sustainability of the current "super cycle" for NAND flash memory, driven by AI, with a focus on Western Digital (WD). The core argument is that while AI demand has fundamentally shifted NAND's role from a data warehouse to an essential component on the compute path, especially for AI inference, this does not eliminate the industry's cyclical nature. The piece first assesses the supply-demand dynamics. On the supply side, major producers are showing capital expenditure restraint for NAND, prioritizing DRAM/HBM. Capacity growth through 2028 relies heavily on technological upgrades (increasing 3D layers to 300+) and expansion primarily from China's YMTC, rather than new fabs. Global new fab capacity from players like Samsung and WD/Kioxia is concentrated post-2029. This results in estimated bit supply growth (CAGR ~24% for 2026-2028) largely driven by higher per-wafer output. Demand is undergoing a structural shift. AI-related NAND demand (for data lakes, KV cache, and staging) is forecast to grow at a 75% CAGR from 2025-2028, becoming the dominant driver. Data center demand will surpass 50% of total NAND demand in 2026. Consumer demand (PC, smartphone) is being squeezed and is expected to decline or stagnate. A key 2027 demand catalyst is NVIDIA's Rubin platform with its dedicated contextual memory storage (ICMS). The analysis concludes that a supply-demand deficit will persist into 2027. However, 2028 is identified as a potential inflection point where supply (led by YMTC's new fab) could outpace demand, ending the price rally. For Western Digital, the analysis models a more conservative path than management's guidance. It forecasts Average Selling Price (ASP) peaking in FY28 (ending June 2028) before declining in FY29-30 as the market loosens, though supported by long-term agreements (LTAs) and a higher mix of data center products. Consequently, margins and profits are expected to peak in FY28 and then contract. The valuation suggests WD's current price largely reflects a neutral scenario, with limited short-term upside unless the market becomes convinced that prices will remain stable post-2028. The fundamental takeaway is that despite AI's transformative impact, NAND's cyclical "DNA" remains intact.

marsbit1h ago

AI Can't Change 'DNA': How Long Can SanDisk Stay Strong?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片