Monad keeps its uptrend going with another 17% gain in 24 hours: What’s next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-10Last updated on 2026-04-10

Abstract

Monad (MON) has demonstrated strong bullish momentum, gaining 17% in 24 hours and breaking past key resistance level of $0.031. The rally is attributed to accumulation and increased buying pressure, with trading volume rising significantly after a weak March and early April. The RSI reached overbought levels at 75, suggesting potential for a short-term pullback, but the overall structure remains bullish. Key support levels to watch are $0.02912, $0.025, and $0.02-$0.0218. A break below $0.02912 may signal a trend reversal. The next major resistance is the supply zone at $0.046-$0.048, near the all-time high. Traders are advised to consider buying on dips to $0.03 or $0.033, maintaining a bullish bias unless support is broken.

Monad [MON] has exhibited remarkable bullish strength in recent days, rapidly rising past local resistance levels to keep its uptrend going.

AMBCrypto had reported that this was a result of accumulation and steady buying pressure.

Source: MON/USD on TradingView

The 20-day average trading volume had been weak in March and the beginning of April but was starting to reach higher.

The breakout past the psychological round number resistance at $0.03, accompanied by increased trading volume, signaled market conviction.

The OBV did not see a dramatic move higher, as the increased spot trading volume has only kicked in recently. The current bullish breakout came alongside a strong RSI spike to 75, into overbought territory.

This can be followed by a short-term correction, but overall, the structure was bullish. The $0.0169 and $0.031 levels were the key ones to watch since December.

Monad managed a bullish internal structure break on the 1-day timeframe on the 14th of February. The altcoin has set higher lows since then, maintaining the uptrend.

Beyond $0.0314, the $0.046-$0.048 supply zone just below the all-time high would be the next target.

Should traders buy the MON breakout?

Source: CoinGlass

The steady uptrend in March meant that there was not much time for long liquidations to build up. The closest cluster of liquidity to the south was at $0.025, and a larger pocket at $0.02-$0.0218.

From $0.025 to $0.035, the current market price, there was a vacuum of notable long liquidations. Meanwhile, short liquidations up to $0.04 could provide fuel for a short squeeze in the coming days.

Source: MON/USD on TradingView

The 1-day timeframe’s volume trends showed a lack of heavy buying volume until recently. The 1-hour chart’s OBV illuminated the increased MON demand in April.

The $0.03 and $0.033 were the demand zones on this timeframe that could be retested in the short term. Traders can wait for a pullback to these areas to buy and expect the uptrend to continue.

A drop below $0.02912 would break the 1-hour timeframe’s bullish swing structure. It would also be the first warning that the higher timeframe trend might be facing a retracement phase or even a failed breakout past $0.0314.


Final Summary

  • The altcoin has made steady gains since the February crash and finally managed to breach the January highs at $0.0314.
  • Traders can remain bullishly biased on MON until the $0.02912 level is breached.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price level of Monad (MON) that signals market conviction according to the article?

AThe breakout past the psychological round number resistance at $0.03, accompanied by increased trading volume, signaled market conviction.

QWhat are the next target supply zones for MON beyond the $0.0314 level?

ABeyond $0.0314, the $0.046-$0.048 supply zone just below the all-time high would be the next target.

QWhat key level would break the 1-hour timeframe's bullish swing structure and serve as a warning for a potential retracement?

AA drop below $0.02912 would break the 1-hour timeframe's bullish swing structure and be the first warning that the higher timeframe trend might be facing a retracement.

QWhat does the article suggest about the RSI level and its potential implication for MON's price?

AThe current bullish breakout came alongside a strong RSI spike to 75, into overbought territory, which can be followed by a short-term correction, but the overall structure remains bullish.

QAccording to the liquidation data, what could provide fuel for a short squeeze in the coming days?

AShort liquidations up to $0.04 could provide fuel for a short squeeze in the coming days.

Related Reads

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手58m ago

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手58m ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1h ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片