Hash Global Research Report: Bitcoin Hasn't Risen Yet, Why Are We Starting to Think the Bear Market Might Be Over?

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-13Last updated on 2026-08-13

Abstract

Hash Global Research Report: Why We Think the Bear Market Might Be Ending Even Before Bitcoin Rises Over the past six months, AI has dominated market attention, causing a significant shakeout in crypto. Bitcoin has tested the $58-60K support three times since February, with volatility hitting multi-year lows. Despite stagnant prices, key underlying dynamics are shifting. The forces that drove the market down are weakening: macro tightening fears are easing as US inflation and jobs data cool, the perceived systemic risk from large holders like MicroStrategy selling is diminishing as they shore up finances, and institutional outflows have stopped. Simultaneously, on-chain data shows a rare concentration of over 240,000 BTC (approx. 12% of supply) accumulated in the $61-65K range, forming a new, consolidated base reminiscent of historical bottoms. Meanwhile, the AI trade is cooling, potentially redirecting capital towards undervalued crypto assets, as seen in July's relative outperformance. The current phase, where AI money hesitates and crypto veterans await a final dip, creates a "no-man's-land" investment opportunity—a potential entry point before a new consensus forms. While a definitive upturn isn't guaranteed, the confluence of weakening bearish pressures, improved on-chain structure, and a possible capital rotation suggests the window for positioning for the next cycle is opening.

Author:Jessica Feng (@Jf4172), Investment Manager of Hash Global BNB Fund;

Henry Yang (@ARSHenry1), Investment Partner, Head of Hash Global Secondary Market Funds.

Over the past six months, the booming AI market has almost captured the market's full attention, even shaking the last bastion of faith in Crypto - Bitcoin. Since falling below $70,000 in February, BTC has tested the $58,000–$60,000 range three times. Veteran players in the industry—Strategy—have begun selling coins, mining companies are shifting to AI, and the dim industry outlook has made each wave of panic feel more real than the last.

While US stocks continue to climb and gold rebounds from its lows, Crypto seems to have been forgotten by the world: BTC has been consolidating between $62,000 and $65,000 for nearly two months, with the 30-day implied volatility once dropping to 36%, hitting multi-year lows. The lifeless market conditions make it difficult for the public to be optimistic.

Recently, however, we have been focusing more on the "changes" and "perspectives"—the shifts happening beneath the price surface.

The forces that previously weighed down the market are weakening one by one: expectations for macro tightening are cooling, the Strategy blow-up crisis is easing, and institutional fund outflows have ceased.

Meanwhile, on-chain Bitcoin holdings are re-accumulating amidst the consolidation.

Everything seems to signal an approaching inflection point, but these changes have not yet been reflected in the price because the market is waiting for clearer signals.

Outside the market, AI trading is cooling down, and funds are about to begin a new round of allocation switching. Inside the market, veteran OGs are still waiting for the final dip and have yet to act. This moment of calm on the surface precisely offers us the best entry angle and timing.

Predicting exactly when the rally will start is difficult, but what can be grasped is that we are entering the time window to position for the next cycle.

I. Beneath the Unchanging Price, the Holdings Structure is Being Reshuffled, a New Bottom is Forming

BTC has tested the $60,000 level three times, and each time it has found clear support.

Subsequently, the price rebounded to around $65,000, where selling pressure re-emerged, and the market fell back into repeated fluctuations between $63,000 and $65,000. On the surface, the price has hardly changed, but on-chain holdings have quietly undergone a round of redistribution.

Currently, over 2.4 million BTC have settled in the $61,000–$65,000 range, accounting for about 12% of the circulating supply; of this, over 1 million BTC are concentrated around $63,000 alone, representing about 5.2% of the circulating supply. The degree of concentration has risen to historically rare levels.

This change deserves more attention than short-term price movements. Bottoms do not appear suddenly; they are "bought out" by the market through repeated tugs-of-war: some exit, while others take positions; old holdings are constantly transferred, and new capital re-establishes a cost basis at lower levels. As more and more BTC clusters around similar price levels, a new price consensus is also being established.

Therefore, changes in momentum often precede price. Looking back at history, between May and November 2024, BTC also experienced a half-year adjustment after the ETF rally. Before rising from $60,000 to $100,000, the chain also showed a highly concentrated structure around the $50,000–$60,000 range. In hindsight, the bottom formed then was the springboard for the subsequent rally.

History doesn't simply repeat, but a similar holdings structure indicates the market is undergoing a similar bottoming and transfer process.

II. A Directional Choice Approaches, the Forces Suppressing the Market are Crumbling

Holdings concentration represents intensified contention, meaning the market is about to make a choice, but it alone cannot predict the direction.

What truly tilts the balance upward is that the several forces that drove the market down are weakening.

1. Macro Pressure Easing, Interest Rate Hike Risk Diminishing

The most important driver behind this round of adjustment has been market concerns over higher interest rates.

Geopolitical conflicts fueled inflation expectations, the Fed released hawkish signals, US Treasury yields and the dollar strengthened, naturally pressuring risk assets.

Recently, however, this high-interest-rate pricing logic has begun to loosen.

US CPI for June fell 0.4% month-over-month, the largest single-month drop since April 2020; core CPI was flat month-over-month, below market expectations. Meanwhile, July non-farm payrolls decreased by 23,000, also significantly weaker than expected.

Inflation is cooling, and employment is weakening. This marginal change has reversed the conditions for the market's previous tightening pricing.

When this expectation loosens, the pressure on risk assets naturally lessens.

2. Blow-up Crisis Cooling, Strategy Embarks on a Third Transformation

Over the past few months, FUD surrounding Strategy further amplified panic. Many believed Strategy's capital structure was problematic, and the largest buyer supporting this cycle would turn into a structural seller that could overwhelm the market during a downturn.

Due to these concerns, STRC once fell to $74, and MSTR's mNAV also dropped below 1x.

However, after Strategy actually began selling coins, the market's reaction gradually diminished. Behind this "desensitization" lies the market's evolving understanding of Strategy's tactics.

To date, Strategy has sold a total of 0.26% of its BTC holdings, boosting cash reserves to about $4.5 billion, sufficient to cover approximately 3 years of interest payments. It has also significantly repurchased discounted STRC, continuously reducing its debt scale at low cost. The market is gradually realizing that Strategy's series of operations precisely constitutes a transformation—from passive holding to active capital management, cutting off the negative spiral the market feared.

By contracting positions during the bear market, supplementing liquidity and stabilizing the capital structure through small-scale sales to ensure survival, Strategy preserves sufficient financing capacity to restart the flywheel in the next market cycle.

Recently, STRC has rebounded to around $95, and Strategy has resumed MSTR financing. Short-term funding pressure has eased, reducing the risk of forced large-scale sell-offs.

This means one of the most concerning structural selling pressures is clearly weakening.

3. AI Trading Cools, Crypto's Allure for Allocation is Rising, Possibly Attracting Fund Flows Back

Over the past six months, the AI sector has significantly diverted global capital.

Compared to narrative-starved Crypto, AI offered investment opportunities with more certain growth. Recently, however, AI trading has begun to cool.

As valuations continued to climb, growth expectations became fully priced in, and the crowded AI trade saw concentrated deleveraging in July: the Nasdaq 100 index fell about 7%, the S&P 500 was flat month-over-month, while previously oversold Crypto assets saw a counter-trend recovery: BTC gained about 6% for the month, ETH rose about 18%. Blue-chip DeFi assets with significantly improved fundamentals performed even stronger, with UNI surging over 100% for the month.

When funds begin looking for new allocation directions, undervalued crypto assets with improving policy and fundamental backdrops may re-enter the sight of capital.

III. Before the Tide Arrives, Position During the "Unclaimed" Period

Marginal improvement in pressure factors does not equal a full reversal, so it's premature to conclude that the rally has already arrived.

While the market waits for clearer signals, this precisely provides a valuable time window.

Legendary investor Stanley Druckenmiller, when reflecting on his investment in Teva Pharmaceuticals, spoke of the concept of the "Unclaimed Territory": value investors were selling due to strategic transformation, while growth investors were still on the sidelines as the transformation was incomplete. When neither type of capital had truly entered, it presented a structurally disjointed investment opportunity.

BTC currently faces a similar disjointed opportunity: Crypto hasn't started its move yet, funds driven by AI FOMO are still chasing the final feast; the long-awaited industry blow-up moment hasn't arrived, and old money within the industry is still waiting for the final dip.

At this juncture, what's truly worth pondering is, when the market steps into the unclaimed territory, do we dare to move ahead of the consensus and position ourselves early?

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the Hash Global research report, what key change in Bitcoin's on-chain structure suggests a potential market bottom is forming?

AThe report highlights that a large amount of BTC, over 2.4 million coins (about 12% of circulating supply), has accumulated in the price range of $61k to $65k, with a particular concentration of over 1 million BTC (about 5.2% of supply) near $63k. This high degree of price range concentration indicates strong accumulation and the establishment of a new cost base, a pattern seen before previous bull market cycles, suggesting a new market bottom is being 'bought' through consolidation.

QWhat three main forces that previously pushed the crypto market down are now weakening, according to the report?

A1. Macro Pressure: Expectations for prolonged high interest rates are easing due to cooling inflation (e.g., June CPI drop) and a weakening labor market. 2. Strategy's Crisis: The fear of a large-scale, forced sell-off by Strategy has diminished. Strategy has sold a very small portion of its BTC (0.26%), bolstered cash reserves, repurchased its discounted bonds, and resumed convertible note financing, easing its short-term liquidity pressure. 3. AI Capital Outflow: The hype and capital flow into the AI stock trade has cooled, which may lead funds to seek new allocation opportunities in undervalued assets like crypto, as seen in July's relative outperformance.

QWhat is the concept of the 'unclaimed zone' mentioned in the report, and how does it relate to the current Bitcoin market?

AThe 'unclaimed zone' is a concept from investor Stanley Druckenmiller, referring to a structural gap where one type of investor (e.g., value investors) has sold an asset, but the next group of buyers (e.g., growth investors) has not yet stepped in due to uncertainty or waiting for a catalyst. The report argues that Bitcoin is currently in such a zone: external AI-focused capital is not yet rotating in, while experienced crypto investors ('old money') are still waiting for a final price dip, creating a potential investment opportunity for those willing to act before a clear consensus forms.

QHow did the performance of crypto assets compare to major stock indices in July, and what does the report suggest this indicates?

AIn July, while the Nasdaq 100 index fell about 7% and the S&P 500 was flat, Bitcoin rose about 6% and Ethereum about 18%. Some DeFi blue-chips like UNI performed even stronger, rising over 100%. The report suggests this relative outperformance indicates that as the crowded AI trade cools, capital is beginning to rotate back into undervalued crypto assets with improving fundamentals and policy outlooks, marking a potential shift in market leadership.

QWhat strategic shift has Strategy undertaken according to the report, and how does it address market concerns?

AStrategy has shifted from a passive 'buy and hold' strategy to an active capital management strategy. This involves selling a minimal portion of its BTC holdings to significantly increase its cash reserves (to ~$4.5B, covering ~3 years of interest), repurchasing its heavily discounted bonds (STRC) to reduce debt at low cost, and resuming equity financing via MSTR convertible notes. This transformation aims to break the 'negative spiral' the market feared—where falling BTC prices would force massive liquidations—by proactively securing long-term liquidity and stabilizing its capital structure to survive the bear market and be ready for the next cycle.

Related Reads

Embodied AI Companies Have Yet to Learn How to Spend Money | TMTpost In-depth

Embodied AI companies in China are facing unprecedented challenges in capital management after a wave of massive funding. The industry, seen as the ultimate carrier for AI, attracted approximately 43.8 billion RMB in the first half of 2026 alone, creating a landscape where even small startups hold billions in cash. However, this influx has exposed a critical gap: many founders—often scientists and engineers—lack experience in deploying such large sums effectively. The article highlights contrasting and often problematic approaches to spending. Some companies practice extreme frugality, drastically limiting R&D, marketing, and even basic operational costs to extend their financial runway, sometimes resorting to living off investment income. This "wait-it-out" strategy, while conserving cash, risks stifling innovation, causing talent drain, and missing crucial product development windows. In one case, excessive cost-cutting led to catastrophic data loss. Conversely, other firms spend recklessly. Examples include a company secretly paying 100 million RMB for ineffective TV exposure, jeopardizing its IPO plans, and others funding multiple unproven product lines simultaneously or creating deceptive demos to attract further investment. The cautionary tale of Vicarious Surgical, which burned through over $100 million on an overly complex proprietary arm before failing, is cited. A core issue is the immense and often opaque cost structure. High salaries for scarce AI talent, exorbitant compute costs for training models (especially "embodied brains" or world models), and the colossal expense of acquiring high-quality robotic training data create financial black holes. Estimates suggest collecting 1 million hours of usable data could cost over 1.6 billion RMB, with most collected data being unusable. This lack of transparency extends to investors, who struggle to verify how funds are actually spent. There are reports of companies maintaining separate internal accounts, engaging in circular "data trading" to artificially boost revenue, and general obfuscation around R&D burn rates. In response, some investors are taking unprecedented control, embedding their own financial personnel to approve even minor expenses. The sector is at a crossroads. While capital continues to flow due to China's strategic advantage in supply chains and engineering, the fundamental question has shifted from securing funding to learning how to spend it wisely. The industry must now master the difficult discipline of allocating vast resources to drive genuine technological progress and sustainable business models, or risk a significant reckoning when the investment tide eventually recedes.

marsbit17m ago

Embodied AI Companies Have Yet to Learn How to Spend Money | TMTpost In-depth

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片