DWF Labs’ physical gold trade signals crypto capital’s move into commodities

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-23Last updated on 2025-12-23

Abstract

DWF Labs, a cryptocurrency market maker, has expanded into physical commodities by settling its first gold transaction—a 25-kilogram gold bar—using traditional bullion infrastructure rather than blockchain. The company plans to scale this operation and trade additional commodities like silver, platinum, and cotton. This move contrasts with the broader crypto industry’s focus on tokenizing real-world assets and reflects a trend of crypto-native firms diversifying into traditional markets. The timing aligns with strong commodity performance, as gold prices hit record highs amid macroeconomic uncertainty, while crypto markets saw more muted gains. DWF Labs continues to invest in digital assets, including a $250 million Liquid Fund and a $75 million DeFi fund. Other firms like Coinbase are also expanding into legacy markets through tokenization and banking services.

DWF Labs, a cryptocurrency-focused market maker, has expanded into physical commodities after settling its first physical gold transaction, a rare move for a crypto-native company as precious metal prices continue to break record highs.

On Monday, managing partner Andrei Grachev said DWF Labs had “just settled our first gold trade,” describing it as a test tranche involving a single 25-kilogram gold bar. Grachev said the company plans to scale the operation, with ambitions to trade physical silver, platinum and cotton.

Notably, the transaction was completed using conventional bullion custody and settlement infrastructure, rather than blockchain-based rails.

Source: Andrew Grachev

The move stands out at a time when many crypto-native companies are focused on tokenizing real-world assets. DWF Labs, by contrast, has engaged directly in the legacy commodities market in its gold transaction.

The timing reflects strong momentum in commodities markets this year. Gold and silver prices have outperformed much of the crypto sector, as investors seek hedges against macroeconomic uncertainty.

Gold futures recently reached new all-time highs above $4,500 per troy ounce, extending a year-long rally driven by central bank buying, geopolitical risk and expectations of eventual interest-rate cuts. By comparison, Bitcoin (BTC) and broader crypto markets have seen more muted price action over the same period.

Source: The Kobeissi Letter

Beyond commodities, DWF Labs has expanded its footprint in digital assets. The company has launched multiple investment vehicles aimed at supporting crypto adoption, including a $250 million Liquid Fund focused on helping mid-cap blockchain projects scale, as well as a $75 million institutional DeFi fund.

Related: Tether Gold rides bullion boom as central banks, ETFs rush to accumulate

Is crypto blending into brick and mortar?

DWF Labs’ move into physical commodities appears to reflect a broader trend of crypto-native companies gradually extending into legacy markets to diversify revenue, reach new customers and broaden their operating scope beyond purely digital assets.

Other companies are pursuing parallel, though distinct, strategies. Coinbase, for instance, has outlined ambitions to become what it calls an “everything exchange,” with plans to let companies tokenize their shares for round-the-clock trading.

“In time, we believe everything will be tokenized, and bringing stocks to Coinbase is an important milestone toward enabling tokenized stocks,” Coinbase said in a blog post.

Deutsche Bank Research analysts said the move could “substantially widen [Coinbase’s] addressable market” across both retail and institutional clients, while helping to offset potential future pressure on retail crypto trading volumes, according to Bloomberg.

Several cryptocurrency companies have also sought entry into the traditional banking system through bank or trust charters, including stablecoin issuer Circle and digital asset custodian BitGo, which have pursued regulated banking or trust structures to expand their financial services offerings.

Related: Coinbase ‘cautiously optimistic’ on 2026 as crypto nears institutional inflection point

Related Questions

QWhat is the significance of DWF Labs settling its first physical gold transaction?

AIt marks a rare expansion for a crypto-native company into physical commodities, signaling a move to diversify beyond digital assets and into legacy markets like precious metals.

QHow did DWF Labs complete the gold transaction, and what infrastructure was used?

AThe transaction was completed using conventional bullion custody and settlement infrastructure, rather than blockchain-based rails.

QWhat are DWF Labs' future plans following this initial gold trade?

AThe company plans to scale its physical commodities operations and expand into trading physical silver, platinum, and cotton.

QHow have gold prices performed compared to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin recently?

AGold futures reached all-time highs above $4,500 per troy ounce, outperforming Bitcoin and broader crypto markets, which saw more muted price action over the same period.

QWhat broader trend does DWF Labs' move into physical commodities reflect among crypto companies?

AIt reflects a trend of crypto-native companies expanding into traditional markets to diversify revenue, reach new customers, and broaden their operating scope beyond purely digital assets.

Related Reads

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit1h ago

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit1h ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit1h ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit1h ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit1h ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片