Digging deep into Wanchain’s Cardano-BNB Bridge exploit – How $9M NIGHT vanished in hours

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-21Last updated on 2026-07-21

Abstract

Wanchain's Cardano-BNB Bridge was exploited due to a cryptographic vulnerability in its TreasuryCheck validator, known as non-injective signed-message encoding. This flaw allowed multiple withdrawal requests to generate the same encrypted message, enabling an attacker to reuse a legitimate signature to authorize fraudulent transactions. As a result, approximately 515 million NIGHT tokens, valued at $9 million, were drained from the bridge's treasury. The stolen tokens were subsequently laundered into ADA on the Cardano network. Wanchain has since halted the bridge and confirmed the incident was isolated, not affecting Midnight's network or Cardano's core blockchain. This exploit is part of a series of recent attacks on cross-chain protocols, though overall crypto losses have reportedly declined year-over-year.

Wanchain’s Cardano-BNB Bridge, a cross-chain protocol allowing asset transfers between Cardano [ADA] and other blockchain networks, was allegedly compromised.

This opened doors for attackers to drain up to 515 million NIGHT tokens worth $9 million from the bridge’s treasury.

As per the investigation, the exploit was induced by a cryptographic vulnerability in the bridge’s TreasuryCheck validator called non-injective signed-message encoding.

Multiple withdrawals lead to the loss of 515 mln NIGHT

For context, each withdrawal request in a secure system is supposed to generate a distinct message. This is to ensure that a validator’s digital signature can only authorize that particular transaction.

However, this vulnerability was possible due to multiple withdrawal requests to generate the same encrypted message.

As a result, the illicit actor was able to secure the ability to authorize phony withdrawals without having access to the validator’s private key. For its part, this was done by reusing a legitimate signature from a legitimate transaction.

Moving ahead, the wrongdoer also laundered the stolen NIGHT tokens to ADA on the Cardano network.

Steps taken and impact on NIGHT

Since then, Wanchain has halted the Cardano-BNB Bridge and begun an investigation. They even confirmed that the incident was restricted to the bridge and had no impact on Midnight’s network or Cardano’s core blockchain.

Source: Wanchain/X

Surge in exploits, but hope remains

In fact, in the past week, the crypto space has witnessed multiple exploits wherein the wrongdoer took advantage of a distinct flaw in a decentralized protocol. This included the Allbridge Core, a cross-chain bridge exploit that resulted in the loss of $1.65 million.

Then a perpetual decentralized exchange on Arbitrum called Ostium was the target of an oracle exploit, resulting in the loss of $18 million. Lastly, a malicious governance proposal that was approved resulted in an exploit that cost the BONK ecosystem about $20 million.

Yet despite an increase in attack frequency, DeFiLlama stated that overall losses dropped precipitously to $1 billion as of July 2026 as compared to $2.135 billion seen in the same period in 2025.

Source: DeFiLlama

Final Summary

  • A cross-chain protocol exploit resulted in the loss of 515 million NIGHT tokens worth $9 million.
  • The exploiter earned access to authorize fake withdrawals by reusing a legitimate signature from a legitimate transaction.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the specific vulnerability that led to the exploit on the Wanchain Cardano-BNB Bridge?

AThe exploit was caused by a cryptographic vulnerability in the bridge's TreasuryCheck validator known as non-injective signed-message encoding. This flaw allowed multiple withdrawal requests to generate the same encrypted message.

QHow much was stolen in the exploit, and what token was primarily affected?

AThe attackers drained 515 million NIGHT tokens from the bridge's treasury, which were worth approximately $9 million.

QHow did the attacker manage to authorize fraudulent withdrawals according to the investigation?

AThe attacker secured the ability to authorize fake withdrawals by reusing a legitimate digital signature from a previous, legitimate transaction, without needing access to the validator's private key.

QWhat immediate actions did Wanchain take following the discovery of the exploit?

AWanchain halted the Cardano-BNB Bridge and initiated an investigation. They confirmed the incident was isolated to the bridge and did not impact Midnight's network or Cardano's core blockchain.

QAccording to DeFiLlama data cited in the article, what is the trend in overall crypto exploit losses as of July 2026?

ADespite an increase in the frequency of attacks, overall losses from exploits dropped significantly to $1 billion as of July 2026, compared to $2.135 billion during the same period in 2025.

Related Reads

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手11m ago

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手11m ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手34m ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片