Coldcard Hacker Moves 45% of Stolen Bitcoin Through THORChain

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-09-07Last updated on 2026-09-07

Abstract

The hacker behind the third wave of attacks on the Coldcard wallet has accelerated the movement of stolen funds, transferring roughly 45% of the Bitcoin stolen in that wave. According to Galaxy Research, the perpetrator is using methods like THORChain to move Bitcoin to Ethereum and CoinJoin transactions to obscure the trail on the blockchain. The attacker opened 293 two-of-two multisignature vaults with the stolen Bitcoin and has begun draining the largest ones. While this activity has revealed new transaction patterns, the majority (82%) of all Bitcoin stolen across all Coldcard attack waves remains unmoved in the initial addresses. The third wave attack is part of one of 2026's largest crypto exploits, ranking third in reported losses. The incident highlights how stolen cryptocurrency can be laundered across different blockchain ecosystems.

The perpetrator of the third wave attack against the Coldcard wallet has escalated the pace of transferring funds, reports Galaxy Research. The exploiters have transferred approximately 45% of the Bitcoin stolen from the third wave so far. These transfers indicate a pattern of using methods that make blockchain tracking difficult.

The perpetrator moved Bitcoin to Ethereum through THORChain on September 2. Recent transactions involved moving Bitcoin via CoinJoin rounds. CoinJoin is a process whereby payments from different users are included in a transaction. This makes it more difficult to track transactions of individual fund transfers on the Bitcoin blockchain. It now provides researchers with insight into how the attacker operates the stolen funds.

Two-of-Two Multisignature Vaults Indicate Attack Plan

According to Galaxy, the third-wave attacker opened 293 multisignature two-of-two vaults. These were vaults with Bitcoin stolen from Coldcard victims. So far, the funds have been transferred from the biggest vaults in decreasing order of their sizes. According to Galaxy, funds from the 11 biggest vaults have already been transferred.

This information allowed researchers to track down some of the transactions linked to the exploit. They managed to find an unknown multisignature vault, which had most probably been used for transferring stolen Bitcoins from another victim. However, Galaxy was unable to determine the circumstances of this new theft. It means that the extent of the attack has expanded, but no new confirmed loss is known yet.

Bulk of the Stolen Bitcoin is Yet Unmoved

Even with all of the recent activities, the bulk of the Bitcoin stolen in all Coldcard attack waves remains in the initial attack-controlled addresses. According to Galaxy, 82% of Bitcoin stolen in all Coldcard attacks still lies in those addresses. The remaining 18% has since been transferred in transactions indicative of laundering.

The third wave is, therefore, a big portion of the active fund movement activity. It provides investigators with yet another pattern of transactions for monitoring. The Coldcard exploit is one of the biggest cryptocurrency exploits documented within the year 2026. According to DefiLlama, it is the third-biggest exploit of the year with reported losses. The Kelp DAO hack is ranked first with reported losses of approximately $293 million. In second place is the Drift Protocol exploit, which incurred about $280 million in losses.

This particular exploit reveals how stolen cryptocurrency can be moved through various blockchain ecosystems like THORChain and CoinJoin. The transactions present yet another piece of evidence for investigators and market players to track down.

Highlighted Crypto News:
South Korea’s Hanwha Advances Tokenized Securities With Avalanche Platform as Regulations Evolve

TagsBitcoinBitcoin (BTCBitcoin (BTC)BlockchainBTCCold WalletGalaxy

Related Questions

QAccording to Galaxy Research, what percentage of the Bitcoin stolen in the Coldcard third-wave attack has been moved so far?

AAccording to Galaxy Research, approximately 45% of the Bitcoin stolen from the third wave has been transferred so far.

QWhat two primary methods did the attacker use to move the stolen Bitcoin, making it difficult to track?

AThe attacker used THORChain to move Bitcoin to Ethereum and employed CoinJoin rounds to mix the transactions, both of which make blockchain tracking difficult.

QWhat did the discovery of 293 multisignature two-of-two vaults indicate about the attacker's plan?

AThe discovery of 293 multisignature two-of-two vaults indicated a structured attack plan, with funds being transferred from the largest vaults first in descending order of size.

QWhat overall percentage of Bitcoin stolen from *all* Coldcard attack waves remains in the initial attacker-controlled addresses?

AAccording to Galaxy, 82% of the Bitcoin stolen in all Coldcard attack waves remains in the initial attacker-controlled addresses.

QHow does the Coldcard exploit rank among the biggest cryptocurrency exploits of 2026 according to DefiLlama?

AAccording to DefiLlama, the Coldcard exploit is ranked as the third-biggest cryptocurrency exploit of 2026, following the Kelp DAO hack (first) and the Drift Protocol exploit (second).

Related Reads

Mathematical Explosion: OpenAI Overnight Solves 722 Math Problems, Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Proven

OpenAI has stunned the global mathematics and AI communities by releasing a GitHub repository containing 722 manuscripts addressing 372 previously unresolved major mathematical problem families, all reportedly generated by an unreleased internal AI model. The announcement, made without prior peer review, has provoked both excitement and alarm among mathematicians. The most notable breakthrough claims to be a proof of a "quasi-Riemann Hypothesis," establishing a zero-free region for Dirichlet L-functions with real part greater than 7/8 and eliminating the Landau-Siegel zeros—a significant leap in analytic number theory. The work has reportedly undergone formal verification using Lean. Other highlighted results include: unconditionally proving the NP-hardness of the basic semidefinite programming (SDP) threshold for approximation algorithms, based solely on P ≠ NP and circumventing the Unique Games Conjecture; proving the rational Hodge conjecture for abelian varieties with complex multiplication (CM); and resolving both the symmetric and asymmetric Mahler conjectures in convex geometry. According to OpenAI, most proofs were generated automatically by the model, with an average "thinking" time of just three hours per problem. This unprecedented scale and speed have sparked intense debate about the future of human mathematicians. While some express fear about the concentration of intellectual power, others see it as the dawn of a new era of discovery driven by AI. The mathematical world is now tasked with scrutinizing these claims, which, if verified, would represent historic milestones.

marsbit33m ago

Mathematical Explosion: OpenAI Overnight Solves 722 Math Problems, Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Proven

marsbit33m ago

As Midterm Elections Approach, the Real Trade in U.S. Stocks Isn't About Who Wins

With the US midterm elections approaching in early November, political uncertainty has re-emenrged as a market variable. While market participants are weighing potential shifts in congressional control and policy direction, historical data suggests midterm elections themselves are not a definitive negative catalyst for US equities. Since 1937, the S&P 500 has averaged a positive gain of 9.2% in midterm election years, though this lags behind the 13.3% average for non-election years. A more consistent historical pattern is increased market volatility and a tendency for stronger performance concentrated in the fourth quarter, as political uncertainty is resolved. The article, citing analysis from J.P. Morgan and Capital Group, argues that the market's primary concern is policy path uncertainty rather than which party wins. This uncertainty tends to depress markets in the run-up to the vote, with a potential rebound afterward as the political risk premium dissipates. However, the article cautions against attributing market performance solely to the election. Recent midterm years like 2018 and 2022 saw significant market declines primarily driven by factors like Federal Reserve tightening and inflation, not the election outcome itself. The core argument is that the midterm election's impact on markets is often secondary to more fundamental drivers. Regardless of whether the result is a unified or divided government, the market's longer-term trajectory has historically been determined by underlying economic conditions. For the current environment, the key variables to watch post-election are not political labels but the path of interest rates, corporate earnings trends, and whether any actual policy changes materially alter cash flow expectations for businesses. The election may influence sentiment and policy expectations, but the sustainability of any year-end rally will ultimately depend on these core fundamentals of profitability, rates, and economic data.

marsbit39m ago

As Midterm Elections Approach, the Real Trade in U.S. Stocks Isn't About Who Wins

marsbit39m ago

AI Can't Change 'DNA': How Long Can SanDisk Stay Strong?

**AI Cannot Alter the "DNA": How Much Longer Can Western Digital's Run Last?** This analysis examines the sustainability of the current "super cycle" for NAND flash memory, driven by AI, with a focus on Western Digital (WD). The core argument is that while AI demand has fundamentally shifted NAND's role from a data warehouse to an essential component on the compute path, especially for AI inference, this does not eliminate the industry's cyclical nature. The piece first assesses the supply-demand dynamics. On the supply side, major producers are showing capital expenditure restraint for NAND, prioritizing DRAM/HBM. Capacity growth through 2028 relies heavily on technological upgrades (increasing 3D layers to 300+) and expansion primarily from China's YMTC, rather than new fabs. Global new fab capacity from players like Samsung and WD/Kioxia is concentrated post-2029. This results in estimated bit supply growth (CAGR ~24% for 2026-2028) largely driven by higher per-wafer output. Demand is undergoing a structural shift. AI-related NAND demand (for data lakes, KV cache, and staging) is forecast to grow at a 75% CAGR from 2025-2028, becoming the dominant driver. Data center demand will surpass 50% of total NAND demand in 2026. Consumer demand (PC, smartphone) is being squeezed and is expected to decline or stagnate. A key 2027 demand catalyst is NVIDIA's Rubin platform with its dedicated contextual memory storage (ICMS). The analysis concludes that a supply-demand deficit will persist into 2027. However, 2028 is identified as a potential inflection point where supply (led by YMTC's new fab) could outpace demand, ending the price rally. For Western Digital, the analysis models a more conservative path than management's guidance. It forecasts Average Selling Price (ASP) peaking in FY28 (ending June 2028) before declining in FY29-30 as the market loosens, though supported by long-term agreements (LTAs) and a higher mix of data center products. Consequently, margins and profits are expected to peak in FY28 and then contract. The valuation suggests WD's current price largely reflects a neutral scenario, with limited short-term upside unless the market becomes convinced that prices will remain stable post-2028. The fundamental takeaway is that despite AI's transformative impact, NAND's cyclical "DNA" remains intact.

marsbit1h ago

AI Can't Change 'DNA': How Long Can SanDisk Stay Strong?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片