Coinbase Flags Concerns Over CLARITY Bill

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-12Actualizado a 2026-01-12

Resumen

Coinbase has threatened to withdraw its support for the upcoming CLARITY Act, a key U.S. crypto bill, if it restricts the ability of platforms to offer rewards on stablecoin holdings beyond basic disclosure rules. The exchange argues such limitations would harm its business and competition in the stablecoin market, particularly affecting rewards programs for assets like USD Coin. This stance follows the earlier GENIUS Act, which prohibited issuers from paying yields but allowed third-party platforms to offer rewards. Coinbase claims restricting platform-based rewards would undermine previous compromises and unfairly advantage traditional banks. The issue arises as policymakers work on broader crypto market reforms, with some senators seeking a compromise that would permit rewards only for chartered banks or trust companies.

As per the reports, it is speculated that Coinbase might withdraw its support for Washington’s upcoming major crypto bill. The firm is setting its boundaries as Congress moves closer to finalising its upcoming major crypto bill named the CLARITY Act.

In a report shared by Bloomberg on January 11, a warning surfaced as policymakers got ready to put up an extensive digital-asset market structure bill in the Senate later this week. Coinbase revealed that it may pull out its support for the CLARITY Act if it limits stablecoin rewards beyond fundamental disclosure rules.

As per the exchange, the issue directly hits its business and the competition in the stablecoin market, and the people close to the company’s thinking think alike. The ability to offer rewards on stablecoin balances, mainly USD Coin, remains at stake.

Association with the other Act

The debate trails through the GENIUS Act in July, which made the first federal framework for stablecoin issuers. That law bars creators from paying interest or yield associated only with holding stablecoins, but it does not obstruct third-party platforms from offering rewards to users.

Companies associated with crypto say that distinction was intentional. The officials from Coinbase state that prohibiting platform-based rewards would revoke compromises so far settled in the GENIUS Act and shift the field in favour of banks.

The firm has also mounted rewards as a way to make the role of the dollar in global digital finance more robust, mainly as different countries explore interest-bearing virtual currencies. Political pressure surrounding the bill is also increasing. In the election cycle of 2023-24, the crypto industry was leading in being the largest corporate political spender, in which Coinbase was a prominent donor.

The threat to withdraw support has weight as policymakers attempt to maintain momentum in the back of broader market structure reforms. Still, the final outcome is not clear. Some senators are looking for a middle ground that would permit rewards only for companies holding bank or trust charters.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Holds Near $92K as Asia Rises Ahead of US CPI Data

TagsCoinbaseCrypto BillGenius ACT

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy might Coinbase withdraw its support for the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase may withdraw its support if the CLARITY Act limits stablecoin rewards beyond fundamental disclosure rules, as this directly impacts its business and competition in the stablecoin market.

QWhat is the main concern for Coinbase regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe main concern is the potential restriction on the ability to offer rewards on stablecoin balances, particularly for USD Coin, which is a key part of its business model.

QHow does the GENIUS Act relate to the current debate over the CLARITY Act?

AThe GENIUS Act, passed in July, established the first federal framework for stablecoin issuers. It prohibits issuers from paying interest directly but allows third-party platforms to offer rewards. The current debate centers on whether the CLARITY Act will uphold this distinction.

QWhat is the crypto industry's argument for allowing platform-based stablecoin rewards?

AThe industry argues that prohibiting platform-based rewards would undo compromises made in the GENIUS Act and unfairly shift the competitive landscape in favor of traditional banks.

QWhat is one potential legislative compromise being considered regarding stablecoin rewards?

ASome senators are seeking a middle ground that would permit rewards only for companies that hold a bank or trust charter, attempting to balance innovation with regulatory oversight.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ethereum Startup EthSystems Bets on Privacy as Key to Luring Banks to Public Blockchains

EthSystems, a startup spun out of the Ethereum Foundation, posits that privacy, not scalability, is the primary barrier preventing financial institutions from adopting public blockchains. The company builds privacy infrastructure for banks, asset managers, and governments looking to use Ethereum for tokenized assets, stablecoins, and other financial applications. Unlike projects creating new blockchains, EthSystems helps institutions deploy privacy technologies directly on Ethereum, keeping transaction data confidential while settling on the mainnet. Co-founder Mo Jaleel explains that financial institutions require control over who sees transaction data, not necessarily anonymity. While competitors like Canton Network and protocols like Aztec also work on private transactions for enterprises, EthSystems differentiates itself by advising on architecture, building custom infrastructure, and publishing open-source research. It aims to collaborate with existing privacy projects rather than rebuild the entire stack. The decision to become a commercial entity stemmed from institutional demand for production-ready solutions, which the team couldn't fulfill within the non-profit Ethereum Foundation. According to Jaleel, operating as a business facilitates funding and participation in large institutions' procurement processes. He notes a shift in client conversations from experimental innovation teams to core business units now seeking to place real assets and financial flows on-chain. EthSystems argues that the key to bridging public blockchains and institutional needs lies in cryptography and privacy.

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Ethereum Startup EthSystems Bets on Privacy as Key to Luring Banks to Public Blockchains

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Russia Establishes New Rules for Digital Depository Ahead of Cryptocurrency System Deployment

Russia is creating new rules for digital depositaries ahead of the launch of its cryptocurrency system. The proposals will extend existing securities market regulations—covering trading, custody, record-keeping, and disclosure—to digital assets. Within this framework, regulated "digital depositaries" will be established to register holdings of cryptocurrency and other digital assets. Their capital requirements will range from 50 million rubles ($570,000) to 250 million rubles ($2.8 million), depending on services provided. Settlement depositaries require the highest capital (250 million rubles), with lower thresholds for firms controlling crypto addresses or using foreign depositaries (100 million rubles) and for other digital depositaries (50 million rubles). Assets counted toward capital must be liquid and meet the central bank's credit quality standards. These rules will also apply to operators of electronic platforms trading digital financial assets. The Bank of Russia will maintain registers for these depositaries, crypto exchange operators, and issuers of digital financial assets. The regulations are based on a digital assets bill passed by parliament in July, with the full crypto system expected by September. The proposals are currently open for public feedback. This announcement follows the European Union's latest sanctions package targeting 14 crypto firms.

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Russia Establishes New Rules for Digital Depository Ahead of Cryptocurrency System Deployment

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

The Disappearing Buy Button

"The Vanished 'Buy' Button" In June 2026, major Chinese online brokers Futu and Tiger were barred from allowing mainland Chinese users to purchase or deposit funds for US stocks, following a multi-department regulatory crackdown. This move, part of China's long-standing capital controls, aims to stem the outflow of domestic capital to support the development of local technology sectors, particularly in AI, where China perceives itself to be lagging. The restriction highlights a growing divergence between national economic strategy and individual investor needs. With slowing wage growth and a deflating property market, Chinese retail investors saw US tech stocks—which dominate global indices and capture a quarter of global economic growth—as a crucial avenue for wealth preservation. Domestically, the A-share market has only recently seen its technology sector surpass the long-dominant financial sector in index weight, reflecting a state-directed shift toward "new quality productive forces." The crackdown mirrors past actions against cryptocurrencies and tech deals, prioritizing financial stability and onshore control. It also aims to funnel liquidity and listings to Hong Kong and mainland exchanges to retain economic sovereignty. This regulatory gap creates an opportunity for decentralized finance. The emerging narrative shifts from "banking the unbanked" to "brokering the unbrokered"—using crypto and tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), like stocks, to provide global access to productive assets for those excluded by traditional finance, from Chinese散户 to users in other restricted markets. Simultaneously, the AI era is reshaping global capital flows. US tech giants act as "macro hedge funds," issuing cheap foreign-currency debt to fund expansion, leveraging their superior credit. However, non-US AI supply chain players (e.g., in semiconductors) are also rising. The competition for asset ownership and low-cost financing rights is intensifying, making access to capital a new societal divide as AI devalues routine intellectual labor. Finance remains in the "business of hope," but its gates are being redrawn.

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

The Disappearing Buy Button

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

According to Strategy, MSTR Has Delivered an Annual Return of 42% Since Adopting the 'Bitcoin Standard,' Even Though Its Treasury Is Underwater

According to Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) Executive Chairman Michael Saylor, the company's stock MSTR has delivered a 42% annualized return since August 10, 2020, when it adopted its "Bitcoin standard" strategy. This performance surpasses that of Bitcoin itself, the "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks, and the S&P 500 over the same period. Saylor frequently highlights this to demonstrate the success of transforming the software firm into a leveraged Bitcoin investment vehicle. Despite this strong long-term stock performance, Strategy's core Bitcoin treasury position is currently at a loss. As of July 29, the company holds 843,775 BTC, purchased for an average of $75,476 per coin, implying an unrealized loss of approximately $11.4 billion. The disparity arises because MSTR stock acts as a leveraged proxy for Bitcoin, allowing for high annualized returns over a multi-year period even when recent purchases are underwater. To address its increasingly complex capital structure, which now includes multiple classes of preferred stock, Strategy introduced a new reporting framework on July 24. Key metrics include "Net BTC per Share," "$BTC Hurdle ARR" (the annual Bitcoin yield needed to cover financing costs), and "$BTC Floor ARR" (the minimum yield to maintain a sustainable leverage ratio). The company continues to accumulate Bitcoin and recently bolstered its dollar reserves by $525 million to strengthen coverage for preferred stock dividends.

cryptonews.ruHace 19 min(s)

According to Strategy, MSTR Has Delivered an Annual Return of 42% Since Adopting the 'Bitcoin Standard,' Even Though Its Treasury Is Underwater

cryptonews.ruHace 19 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片