Can Solana’s $900M stablecoin surge help SOL clear $145?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-08Last updated on 2026-01-08

Abstract

Stablecoins are increasingly seen as indicators of capital positioning across blockchain networks, not just as a market hedge. Solana has experienced a significant $900 million surge in stablecoin supply, signaling strong structural rather than speculative demand. This growth is supported by Solana becoming the leading chain for tokenized stocks, with a record $800 million market cap and a 17% increase in 30-day RWA value. The network's on-chain activity is robust, with Daily Active Addresses up 55% year-to-date, far outperforming Ethereum. SOL's price has risen 8% in 2026 but faces key resistance at $145. The influx of stablecoin liquidity, combined with major developments like Jupiter's on-chain stablecoin launch and Morgan Stanley's spot SOL ETF filing, could provide the catalyst needed for SOL to break this resistance and continue its upward trend.

Stablecoins are no longer just a market hedge.

In the past, sharp jumps in USDT or USDC supply were viewed as bearish, signaling a shift toward a risk-off mood. In simple terms, more stablecoins often meant investors were sidelining liquidity rather than deploying it.

However, that narrative has evolved. Today, stablecoins reflect how capital is being positioned across different L1s. In this context, Solana’s [SOL] recent $900 million increase in stablecoin supply clearly stands out.

As the chart shows, SOL has outrun every other chain in stablecoin inflows. More importantly, the timing suggests this move isn’t a fluke. Instead, it indicates that the capital flowing in is more structural than speculative.

Backing this, Solana recently became the largest chain by market cap for tokenized stocks, with the combined value reaching a record $800 million. Meanwhile, its 30-day RWA value is leading the top three chains, up 17%.

Taken together, these trends suggest that the stablecoin inflow is tied to real on-chain demand. However, the key question remains: Will this capital translate into price action, helping SOL finally break key resistance?

Stablecoin supply strengthens Solana’s bullish case

Solana has kicked off 2026 by clearly diverging from its 2025 performance.

On-chain, the network is seeing strong activity, with Daily Active Addresses (new wallets) jumping 55% year-to-date. For context, that’s a massive outperformance compared to Ethereum [ETH], which is up just 0.3%.

Notably, the price chart tells a similar story. SOL is up 8% so far in 2026, roughly twice the ROI of ETH. That said, looking closer at the weekly trend, SOL is moving up but now facing a key resistance around $145.

In this context, the recent jump in stablecoin supply starts to matter.

With strong on-chain fundamentals, solid relative performance, and capital flowing across sectors, this extra liquidity could be the catalyst Solana needs to finally break out of its 8-week sideways chop.

What’s more, the surge in liquidity lines up with big developments: Jupiter launched its on-chain stablecoin, and Morgan Stanley filed for a spot SOL ETF.

All of this adds weight to the case for Solana to break resistance.


Final Thoughts

  • Stablecoin inflows and strong on-chain activity highlight structural demand for Solana, setting the stage for a potential breakout.
  • Recent market developments add further weight to the bullish case.

Related Questions

QWhat does the recent $900 million increase in stablecoin supply on Solana indicate, according to the article?

AIt indicates that the capital flowing in is more structural than speculative, reflecting real on-chain demand and how capital is being positioned across different L1s.

QHow has Solana's performance in Daily Active Addresses compared to Ethereum's so far in 2026?

ASolana's Daily Active Addresses (new wallets) have jumped 55% year-to-date, massively outperforming Ethereum, which is up just 0.3%.

QWhat key resistance level is SOL facing on its weekly price chart?

ASOL is facing a key resistance level around $145 on its weekly price chart.

QWhat two recent major developments are mentioned that align with the surge in liquidity on Solana?

AJupiter launched its on-chain stablecoin, and Morgan Stanley filed for a spot SOL ETF.

QWhat record did Solana recently achieve in the realm of tokenized stocks?

ASolana recently became the largest chain by market cap for tokenized stocks, with the combined value reaching a record $800 million.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit45m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit45m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit55m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit55m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片