Can Bitcoin price hold $90K after $729M in BTC ETF outflows?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-08Last updated on 2026-01-08

Abstract

Bitcoin's price retreated from $94.7K to $90K, shifting market sentiment to "fear" amid $729 million in ETF outflows on January 6th and 7th. The decline mirrored a correction in Asian stocks, with BTC barely holding the $90K support. Technically, holding the 50-day Moving Average ($89.2K) could trigger a rebound toward $94K–$96K, while a break may lead to a drop to $84K–$80K. On-chain data indicates reduced selling pressure, with realized profits dropping significantly from Q4 2025. A sustained recovery depends on reclaiming the short-term holder cost basis of $99.1K; failure could lead to panic selling and extended bearish conditions. The current consolidation above $80K remains constructive for a potential 2026 rebound.

Bitcoin’s [BTC] mid-week correction from $94.7K to $90K shifted market sentiment from a “neutral” to a “fear” level again.

The sentiment recovered along with the price from late December, followed by renewed ETF inflows in the first two days of 2026. However, the ETFs’ daily net flows turned negative on the 6th and 7th of January, resulting in a total of $729 million in outflows.

But based on past sentiment levels, this was still a buy opportunity for Bitcoin. Especially if there is no major bearish catalyst or geopolitical event that flips it into ‘extreme fear.’

BTC falls with Asian stocks

But there was another interesting link to the Asian stock market.

Since mid-December, BTC has recorded most of its daily gains during the Asian trading sessions, only to sell off during U.S. market hours.

However, mid-week BTC’s retreat appeared to track the latest correction in the Asian stock market.

The Nikkei and Nifty 50 both eased by over 1% on the 8th of January. BTC also slipped 1.4% and was barely holding the $90K support at press time.

From a price chart perspective, BTC was still within the December price range of $80K-$94K. In the short-term, defending the 50-day Moving Average (MA, $89.2K) could trigger a rebound towards $94K-$96K again.

However, if the support is cracked, dropping to the range lows at $84K or $80K could be feasible.

That said, the consolidation above $80K was healthy for a potential and constructive BTC rebound in 2026, from an on-chain perspective.

Bitcoin price recovery likely only if...

According to Glassnode, the selling pressure and profit-taking seen in late 2025 had eased significantly. The daily average Realized Profit has dropped to $183 million from over $1 billion seen during most of Q4 2025.

The on-chain analytics firm noted that the selling relief, especially from long-term holders (LTH) was a crucial setup for more upside momentum.

“The early-January breakout thus reflects a market that had effectively reset its profit-taking pressure, allowing the price to move higher.”

Meanwhile, the firm cautioned that further recovery could be confirmed if the short-term holder’s (STH) cost basis of $99.1K is reclaimed. Otherwise, if the STH isn’t back to profitability, they may panic sell and extend the bear market.

“Without a decisive and sustained return to profitability, the probability of further bear market continuation increases, making this a critical metric to monitor in the weeks ahead.”


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin gave back January recovery gains but was still within the December price range of $80K-$94K
  • The current sideways structure was constructive for a mid-term BTC rebound amid easing selling pressure, but only if $99.1K if reclaimed.

Related Questions

QWhat was the total amount of outflows from Bitcoin ETFs on January 6th and 7th, and what was its impact on the market sentiment?

AThe total outflows from Bitcoin ETFs on January 6th and 7th were $729 million. This contributed to a shift in market sentiment from 'neutral' back to a 'fear' level.

QAccording to the article, what is the significance of Bitcoin price holding above the 50-day Moving Average?

AHolding above the 50-day Moving Average (approximately $89.2K) could trigger a short-term price rebound towards the $94K-$96K range.

QWhat on-chain metric does Glassnode highlight as a critical setup for more upside momentum in Bitcoin's price?

AGlassnode highlights that the significant easing of selling pressure and profit-taking, particularly from long-term holders (LTHs), is a crucial setup for more upside momentum.

QWhat condition must be met for the short-term holders (STHs) to avoid panic selling and potentially extending the bear market?

AThe short-term holders' cost basis of $99.1K must be decisively and sustainably reclaimed to return them to profitability and prevent panic selling.

QHow did the performance of the Asian stock market on January 8th correlate with Bitcoin's price movement?

AOn January 8th, the Nikkei and Nifty 50 both eased by over 1%, and Bitcoin's price also slipped by 1.4%, showing a correlation where BTC tracked the correction in the Asian stock market.

Related Reads

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

This article explores how the AI Agent paradigm is fundamentally transforming Web3 gaming, moving from a disruptive force to a core, legitimized element. It begins with the controversy in the competitive baking game Rugpull Bakery, where automated scripts caused fairness issues. Instead of banning them, the developers integrated AI Agents into the official gameplay by providing technical documentation (skill.md, agent.json), marking a shift towards "Agentic Gaming." The piece outlines three primary implementation models for AI Agents in Web3 games by 2026: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** AI Agents act as independent players with unique strategies. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, and Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data. The Somnia blockchain is highlighted as a dedicated "Agentic L1" infrastructure supporting this model at scale. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** This model, exemplified by EVE Frontier, allows AI Agents to program game world logic itself. Using "Smart Assemblies" (e.g., Smart Turrets, Smart Gates), Agents can modify shared economic and physical rules on-chain, creating dynamic, player/AI-built worlds. The ERC-8183 standard further enables these automated entities to hire other AI services for complex tasks. 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptation:** Here, AI serves as a collaborative partner. In Parallel Colony, highly autonomous AI Avatars work alongside human players who provide high-level guidance. Illuvium plans to use AI to make NPCs dynamic and responsive, creating personalized, emergent narratives for each player. The conclusion posits that Web3 gaming has reached a "post-human" inflection point. Blockchains' transparency and programmability, combined with new standards and infrastructure like Somnia, make integrating and governing AI Agents not just viable but essential. The future lies in a symbiotic digital order where players transition from manual laborers to commanders and partners of algorithmic intelligence.

marsbit3m ago

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

marsbit3m ago

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

**Title: Saylor's Purchase of 1,550 Bitcoins Was a Bad Trade** The article critically analyzes Strategy's recent move of selling 32 bitcoins followed by a much larger purchase of 1,550 bitcoins. While appearing bullish, the author argues this trade is detrimental to MSTR shareholders. The core argument revolves around the concept of "breakeven modified Net Asset Value (mNAV)," a key metric for Strategy. To increase Bitcoin per share (BPS) for MSTR holders, Strategy must issue new shares at a premium high enough that the funds raised can buy more bitcoin than the bitcoin backing each existing share. Currently, this breakeven mNAV is estimated at 1.30. The recent trade failed on two counts: 1. The shares for the $181 million raise were issued at an mNAV *below* the 1.30 breakeven point. Selling "cheap" shares to buy bitcoin actually *reduces* BPS. 2. Only $101.3 million of the raised funds were used to buy bitcoin; the rest went to boost the company's dollar reserves. The breakeven mNAV calculation assumes *100%* of proceeds are used for bitcoin purchases. Diverting funds, even if mNAV were high, dilutes BPS. The result is an estimated 0.19% decrease in Bitcoin per share for MSTR holders. In exchange, Strategy merely extended its operational runway for its dollar reserves from ~6.3 months to 7 months. The author interprets this as Strategy prioritizing the survival and development of its STRC business over its stated core goal of increasing MSTR's BPS. This constitutes a gamble: if sacrificing MSTR value leads to improved market sentiment and a recovery in STRC's price (and thus mNAV), the whole system could work. If not, Strategy may be forced into a cycle of further diluting MSTR to stay afloat, potentially leading to deferred STRC dividends or corporate decline. The article concludes with a hope for price recovery for Bitcoin, MSTR, and STRC.

Foresight News14m ago

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

Foresight News14m ago

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

After a severe two-day selloff in early June that erased over $1 trillion from U.S. chip stock market value, capital is flowing back first to the memory sector. The correction was not driven by a collapse in AI demand but rather a market reassessment of high expectations. Stocks like Broadcom faced selling pressure despite strong AI revenue guidance, signaling a shift in focus from who has an "AI story" to who can most rapidly translate AI demand into verifiable profits and earnings per share (EPS). Memory companies, such as Micron and SK Hynix, are leading the recovery because their EPS growth is more immediately verifiable. The AI server boom directly increases demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and high-capacity server DRAM, tightening supply and driving up contract prices for conventional DRAM and NAND Flash. This price increase, coupled with a shift to higher-margin products, flows directly into near-term revenue and profitability, as evidenced in recent earnings reports. In contrast, other AI semiconductor segments like GPUs, ASICs, and optical modules, while central to the long-term AI infrastructure story, face longer and less certain paths to EPS validation. Their growth depends more on future product cycles, customer adoption timelines, and capital expenditure plans. The rebound in memory stocks highlights a market preference for assets with shorter, more transparent EPS conversion cycles following the recent de-risking phase. However, this does not negate the potential of other AI hardware segments should they provide clearer near-term order visibility. The episode has raised the validation bar for all AI-related investments.

marsbit14m ago

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

marsbit14m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片