Bought Bitcoin at $117,000, Sold at $62,000 in Tears: This Company’s Faith Only Lasted a Year

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-21Last updated on 2026-07-21

Abstract

Wall Street's once-hot trend of corporate "Bitcoin hoarding" has hit a painful reality check. Empery Digital, formerly an electric motorcycle company, pivoted to Bitcoin in July 2025, accumulating over 4,000 BTC at an average cost of approximately $117,600 each. As Bitcoin's price plummeted, the company faced massive paper losses exceeding its total market value by early 2026, triggering internal conflict with a major shareholder demanding a sale. In a stark reversal from its earlier refusal to sell, Empery Digital recently sold 1,400 BTC at an average price of $62,000, locking in a significant loss of roughly $77 million on just those coins. The proceeds were used to pay down $10 million in debt, prepare for legal fees related to shareholder lawsuits, and, most notably, fund a new strategic shift: a $65 million investment for a 25% stake in an AI data center facility. This move completes a cycle of chasing market trends—from electric vehicles to Bitcoin treasury and now to AI infrastructure. Empery's case exposes the leveraged nature of the corporate "treasury model," where buying Bitcoin with borrowed money works only while prices rise. Once the asset fell below its cost basis, the company was forced to sell at a loss to service debt and pivot to the next opportunity. The company's remaining assets are 1,514 BTC and its ambitions in AI, demonstrating that its stated "long-term belief" in Bitcoin had a clear price tag: a 50% discount.

In the past, the hottest business on Wall Street was "hoarding coins."

The public thought that as long as Bitcoin was written into the balance sheet, these companies were steadfast long-term believers.

But in fact, it was just a leveraged game played during favorable conditions.

When the asset price fell below the cost line, the first player to publicly admit defeat has emerged.

I. Buying at $117,000, Selling at $62,000

Empery Digital was formerly known as Volcon, originally an electric off-road motorcycle manufacturer.

In July 2025, the company changed its name and pivoted, starting to buy Bitcoin in large quantities.

It was a time when prices were at a peak. The company accumulated around 4,000 BTC, with an average cost of approximately $117,600, representing a total investment of about $470 million.

It later increased its holdings to a peak of 4,081 BTC.

By 2026, the company made multiple disposals. On July 10, it disclosed the sale of another 1,400 BTC, raising $87.1 million at an average price of about $62,000.

Average purchase price: $117,600; average selling price: $62,000.

Just for these 1,400 coins, the loss relative to the cost price is approximately $77 million.

In terms of figures, the company's holdings are now reduced to 1,514 BTC, and it holds approximately $73.9 million in cash on its books.

Yet, this was supposed to be a strategic asset for long-term holding. Why choose to sell at a loss when the price has nearly halved?

II. The Reversal That Occurred Within Three Months

Behind the sale of coins is a ledger that doesn't add up.

As Bitcoin's price fell from its peak, by February of this year, the company's paper loss on its Bitcoin holdings was about 46%, equivalent to an unrealized loss of approximately $220 million.

At that time, the company's total market capitalization had fallen to about $135 million. The money lost from buying Bitcoin had already exceeded the entire value of the company.

This triggered internal conflict.

In February this year, a shareholder holding 9.8% publicly demanded the CEO's resignation and called for liquidating all Bitcoin to return cash to shareholders.

Management refused to liquidate, even privately proposing to repurchase that shareholder's stake, an offer the shareholder rejected.

In March, the company also announced plans to raise up to $1.3 billion to increase its Bitcoin holdings.

Yet just a few months later, the coins were sold, and the money was used to fill three holes.

On July 7, the company used part of the proceeds to repay $10 million in debt; it still owes $45 million.

The remaining funds are earmarked for preparing for the acquisition of an equity stake in an AI data center and for paying legal fees related to shareholder lawsuits.

But was selling Bitcoin for a massive cash infusion merely to repay debt?

III. The End of Chasing Trends Is Computing Power

The most noteworthy aspect is the final destination of this money.

The largest expenditure from Empery Digital's Bitcoin sale was $65 million used to acquire a 25% equity stake in a yet-to-be-converted AI data center facility in the Midwestern United States.

Co-CEO Ryan Lane led the pivot. The company announced discontinuing its Bitcoin holdings dashboard, shifting its strategic focus to AI infrastructure projects.

From electric motorcycles, to a Bitcoin treasury, and now to AI data centers, this company's business trajectory perfectly aligns with every trending hype cycle.

But this is not an isolated case; peers are making similar moves.

In Q1 this year, Bitcoin mining giant MARA sold over 20,000 BTC to repay debt; by Q2, another prominent institution, Strategy, also began selling coins to pay preferred stock dividends.

This is the so-called "treasury model."

Its core logic is to issue debt to buy coins, using the rising coin price to drive up the stock price.

However, this model operates under one essential condition: the coin price cannot fall below the cost of capital.

Once it falls below, with debt pressure mounting, the company is forced to sell coins for survival.

Currently, Empery Digital holds 1,514 BTC and a bundle of AI data center dreams.

It turns out, the faith on the balance sheet has a clearly defined price.

And for this company, its price tag is a half-off clearance sale.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the average cost and selling price of the 1,400 bitcoins sold by Empery Digital in July, and what was the estimated loss on that sale?

AEmpery Digital purchased the 1,400 bitcoins at an average cost of approximately $117,600 each. They sold them on July 10 at an average price of about $62,000 each. This resulted in an estimated loss of approximately $77 million on that specific transaction.

QAccording to the article, what are the three main reasons Empery Digital gave for selling its bitcoin holdings at a loss?

AThe proceeds from the bitcoin sale were used for three primary purposes: 1) To repay $10 million of the company's debt. 2) To prepare for the acquisition of a stake in an AI data center facility. 3) To pay legal fees related to shareholder lawsuits.

QHow does the article describe the 'treasury model' adopted by some companies, and what is its critical flaw?

AThe 'treasury model' involves companies issuing debt to purchase bitcoin, with the core logic being that a rising bitcoin price will drive up the company's stock price. Its critical flaw is that the model only works if the price of bitcoin remains above the cost of capital (the debt's interest rate). If the price falls below this threshold, the company faces debt pressure and is forced to sell its bitcoin to survive.

QWhat major shift in business strategy did Empery Digital announce alongside its recent bitcoin sales?

AAlongside selling bitcoin, Empery Digital announced a strategic pivot away from holding cryptocurrency. The company stated it is decommissioning its bitcoin holdings dashboard and shifting its strategic focus to AI infrastructure projects, specifically by acquiring a 25% stake in a retrofitted AI data center facility in the US Midwest.

QWhat event in February 2026 revealed the severe financial pressure Empery Digital faced due to its bitcoin investments?

AIn February 2026, as bitcoin's price fell from its highs, Empery Digital's paper loss on its bitcoin holdings reached approximately $220 million, a 46% loss. At that time, the company's total market capitalization had fallen to about $135 million, meaning the paper loss on bitcoin alone exceeded the entire value of the company. This triggered internal conflict, leading a major shareholder (owning 9.8%) to publicly demand the CEO's resignation and a full liquidation of the bitcoin holdings to return cash to shareholders.

Related Reads

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

Bank of America has quietly made leadership appointments to accelerate its digital asset strategy, sparking discussion about a potential large-scale migration of bank deposits to stablecoins. Reports highlighted the bank naming Sonali Theisen, Kevin Milsom, and Adam Dixon to lead its global digital asset and AI platform, focusing on stablecoins, tokenized deposits, custody, and crypto settlement. This move revived a claim that $6 trillion in bank deposits could flow into stablecoins, a figure originally cited by Bank of America's CEO Brian Moynihan in January. However, he conditioned this shift on stablecoins being allowed to pay interest—a feature not permitted under the current GENIUS Act. The legislation's final rules are delayed, pushing its effective date to January 2027. Major banks are not waiting. JPMorgan and Citigroup are already piloting tokenized deposit services, and a consortium including Bank of America is building a shared tokenized deposit network targeting a 2027 launch. While some, like Pacemakers.io's Alessandro Hatami, remain skeptical of rapid bank collaboration, data shows significant institutional adoption. Stablecoin settlement volume hit $33 trillion in 2025, and analysts project the market could surpass $1 trillion by 2026. Despite a recent dip in crypto prices and stablecoin supply, the institutional push for real-world use cases continues. The race is on for January 2027, when the GENIUS Act takes effect, potentially reshaping the competition between traditional finance and digital assets.

Foresight News19m ago

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

Foresight News19m ago

US Treasury Secretary Bement Claims: The US Will Soon Control 80% of Global Computing Power

U.S. Treasury Secretary Ben Sent proclaimed that America is poised to control 80% of the world's computing power, positioning compute dominance as a core pillar of U.S. economic strategy. Speaking on the Mike Rowe show, he stated the U.S. currently holds 50-60% of global compute share, with expectations to reach 80% soon. He framed this as a strategic competition the U.S. "cannot afford to lose," warning that a rival's lead would grant "unacceptable" strategic leverage, while asserting a current one-year AI lead. This high-level policy endorsement is seen as a direct boost for AI infrastructure investment, benefiting chipmakers like NVIDIA and cloud providers' capex cycles. Sent positioned AI compute, semiconductors, and quantum computing as three pillars of national economic strength and security. He defended AI's societal impact, citing historical tech shifts, and argued AI empowers small businesses without causing net job loss so far. He highlighted government efforts to deepen public-private AI cybersecurity cooperation. For investors, the statement signals sustained U.S. policy support for AI infrastructure. However, analysts urge caution, noting "compute share" lacks a standard public metric; the 80% figure is a forecast, not audited data. They recommend focusing on tangible indicators like physical capacity expansion and power infrastructure, with future semiconductor and cloud reports providing key verification data.

marsbit31m ago

US Treasury Secretary Bement Claims: The US Will Soon Control 80% of Global Computing Power

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片