Wealth Management Companies Addicted to 'New Share Subscriptions'? 53 Products Chase YuShu Technology, 23 Make Repeat Appearances, New Play for 'Fixed Income+' Emerges

Published on 2026-08-13Last updated on 2026-08-13

Abstract

Unitree Tech announced its offline placement results, revealing a further expansion in the participation of wealth management firms in offline IPO subscriptions. A total of 53 products from 6 wealth management companies – CMB Wealth Management, Ningbo Bank Wealth Management, China Merchants Bank Wealth Management, China Post Wealth Management, China Minsheng Bank Wealth Management, and Bank of Nanjing Wealth Management – were initially allocated shares. They collectively received approximately 140,100 shares, amounting to 21.1277 million yuan.

On August 12th, YuShu Technology announced its offline allotment results, revealing an expanded lineup of wealth management companies participating in offline new share subscriptions:

A total of 53 products from six wealth management companies—Everbright Wealth Management, Ningbo Bank Wealth Management, China Merchants Bank Wealth Management, Postal Savings Bank of China Wealth Management, China Minsheng Bank Wealth Management, and Bank of Nanjing Wealth Management—were granted preliminary allotments, collectively receiving approximately 140,100 shares amounting to 21.1277 million yuan;

Compared with the previous ChangXin Technology allotment, the number of participating wealth management products increased by 24, with 23 products participating in both allotments consecutively. This indicates that offline issuance business has shifted from sporadic attempts to regular configuration within the product pools of some wealth management companies.

In terms of the number of products receiving allotments, wealth management subsidiaries of city commercial banks and joint-stock banks were the main participants in this round:

Ningbo Bank Wealth Management had 24 products allotted, Everbright Wealth Management had 21, with the two together accounting for over 80%; China Merchants Bank Wealth Management had 4, Postal Savings Bank of China Wealth Management had 2, and China Minsheng Bank Wealth Management and Bank of Nanjing Wealth Management each had 1.

Currently, products participating in new share subscriptions commonly adopt a portfolio strategy of "fixed income foundation + equity holdings + offline new share subscriptions." This involves building a foundational position with fixed-income assets like bonds to obtain stable coupon income, while holding a certain scale of stock positions to meet the market value threshold for offline inquiry and subscription, and then overlaying the price difference boost brought by offline new share allotments.

In an environment of low interest rates and narrowing yield space for pure bond strategies, this model is seen by some wealth management companies as a feasible path for "fixed income+" products to enhance returns.

However, the boost from new share subscriptions is not a guaranteed profit.

Statistics show that some products participating in new share subscriptions still recorded negative returns over the past three months or six months. This means that if equity holdings experienced drawdowns during this period due to stock market fluctuations, the resulting losses could offset or even exceed the net value boost contributed by the subscriptions. The final product return still depends on the combined performance of the fixed income, equity, and new share subscription components, not on the subscription segment alone.

Taking the YuShu Technology allotment as an example, even if the new stock's post-listing gain is high, the net value contribution to a single product from this subscription is likely only a few tenths of a percent, due to the relatively tiny allotment size and low allotment rate compared to the product's total assets under management;

In other words, a single subscription has limited pull on a product's net value. The actual value of the subscription strategy relies more on "sustained, multi-project accumulation"

. By frequently participating in multiple new share allotments, the scattered contributions of a few tenths of a percent can gradually accumulate to form an observable boost in returns.

This is also why 23 products participated in two consecutive allotments rather than just dabbling.

According to current rules, after the implementation of the underwriting new regulations in March 2025, bank wealth management products have been included as Class A priority allotment objects, enjoying the same priority allotment rights as public funds and social security funds. This provides the institutional foundation for wealth management companies to participate in offline new share subscriptions on a large scale;

However, the equity holdings themselves are affected by stock market fluctuations, introducing uncertainty into the effectiveness of the subscription strategy. When holdings draw down, the subscription boost may be eroded.

Up to the YuShu Technology allotment, both the number of participating products and the number of wealth management institutions involved in offline subscriptions have increased significantly compared to the first allotment, but single-allotment sizes are limited and return contributions are dispersed;

Subsequently, it will be necessary to observe the actual magnitude of net value boost that subscriptions provide to "fixed income+" products after more new share projects materialize, as well as the overall return stability amid fluctuations in equity holdings.

Related Reads

Just Now, Meta's Flagship Model Crushes GPT-6 and Opus! Leaps Back into World's Top Three Overnight

Meta has launched its most powerful flagship AI models yet, Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, positioning them as a historic leap toward "personal superintelligence." Benchmark results show these models are now competitive with leading counterparts from OpenAI and Anthropic. On the Artificial Analysis index, Muse Wonder Full scored 56, placing it in the global top tier alongside Claude Sonnet 5.5 and surpassing GPT-6 Astra. In long-context programming tasks like SWE-Marathon, both Wonder and Wonder Full outperformed Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra. Key new capabilities include "Active Memory" for retaining user information across conversations and "Active Focus" for autonomous problem-solving and plan adjustment. The models show significant gains over the previous Muse Spark 1.3, with the Full version improving by 8 points on the Artificial Analysis index in just six weeks. In professional tasks like legal and financial analysis, Wonder Full exceeded Opus 5.5 in 8 out of 14 tests. It also demonstrated improved efficiency, solving more math problems while reducing output tokens by 40%. Developed using Meta's gigawatt-scale "Prometheus" supercomputing infrastructure, the models feature a 1 million token context window and native multimodal support. Pricing starts at $4 per million tokens for input and $20 for output via API for the standard Wonder model, while Wonder Full is available through Muse Code subscriptions at $50 or $200 per month.

marsbit24m ago

Just Now, Meta's Flagship Model Crushes GPT-6 and Opus! Leaps Back into World's Top Three Overnight

marsbit24m ago

How to Understand the CFTC's Regulation of Prediction Markets?

On October 9, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) released two conflicting documents concerning event contracts in prediction markets. A proposal seeks to classify contracts on sports, politics, and other events as "swaps" under CFTC jurisdiction, while a separate interim rule explicitly excludes licensed sports betting and casino games from the swap definition. This creates a regulatory split where bets on the same NFL game could be regulated as state-level gambling if placed at a Las Vegas sportsbook, but as a federally regulated swap if traded on a CFTC-registered exchange like Kalshi. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig argues these event contracts are commodity derivatives for hedging, speculation, and price discovery. However, the move faces legal challenges. The NFL and 39 states oppose the CFTC's stance, arguing these contracts create new gambling risks rather than hedging existing ones. Federal appeals courts are divided: the Third Circuit ruled such contracts are swaps, while the Sixth and Ninth Circuits concluded they are not. This circuit split has prompted New Jersey to petition the Supreme Court for review. The proposed rules are not yet in effect, pending publication and a comment period. The ultimate outcome hinges on court decisions and the future composition of the CFTC commission. The core conflict remains whether event contracts on prediction markets fall under federal derivatives regulation or state gambling laws.

marsbit36m ago

How to Understand the CFTC's Regulation of Prediction Markets?

marsbit36m ago

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

This weekly analysis examines the recent price action of Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE, focusing on key technical developments and outlining potential trading strategies. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis:** * **Market Trend Assessment:** The analysis applies a "52-week moving average confirmation method" to assess the broader trend. While BTC's weekly closing price has broken above this key average, the moving average itself remains in a downtrend, and a proper pullback confirmation is still lacking. The conclusion is that the rally from the July 1st low is still classified as a technical rebound, not yet confirming a new bull market. * **Daily Chart Structure:** The report argues that the five-wave rally (a-e) from the July low likely concluded at the September 21st high. The recent breakdown below the key support of $82,500, followed by a weak-volume rebound, supports this view. If the e-wave is complete, a larger corrective decline (potentially in three sub-waves) is anticipated. The first leg of this correction is underway, with an initial target around $78,000. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The focus is on the downside targets from the September 21st high. Key resistance is seen at $85,500 and the $87,500-$90,000 zone. Support levels are identified at $80,500-$82,500, $75,000-$78,000, and $69,100-$70,500. * **Strategy:** The medium-term posture is neutral/cautious, recommending watching for a potential pullback to a "channel" for confirmation. For short-term traders, two scenarios are outlined: (A) Selling into strength near the $85,500-$87,500 resistance if bearish signals appear, or (B) Selling a confirmed breakdown below the $80,500-$82,500 support zone. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss management is advised. **HYPE Analysis:** * **Daily Chart Structure:** HYPE broke below the lower boundary of its two-month ascending channel on October 8th. Price is currently in a "pullback confirmation" phase, testing this breached support-turned-resistance. A failure to reclaim this level would signal weakness and open the path towards the $75-$77 support area. The longer-term uptrend line, however, remains intact. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The critical watchpoint is the outcome of the current test of the former channel support. Resistance levels are noted at $88-$90, $94, and $102. Key support zones are $80-$82 and $75-$77. * **Strategy:** Two bullish scenarios are proposed for short-term trades: (1) A light long position if price convincingly reclaims and holds above the former channel support, or (2) A light long position if price falls to the $75-$77 support area and shows signs of stabilization. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **Risk Management Reminder:** The article includes a standard trailing stop-loss protocol (moving stop to breakeven at +1% profit, then locking in profits progressively). It strongly cautions that all analysis is for informational purposes only, not investment advice, and strategies must be adapted to changing market conditions.

marsbit1h ago

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片