After the U.S. Banned Fable 5, Zhipu's Stock Soared 47%

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-16Last updated on 2026-06-16

Abstract

On June 15, Chinese AI company Zhipu's stock surged up to 47.6% in Hong Kong, closing with a 32.82% gain. This sharp rise followed two key industry events. On June 12, Anthropic was compelled by a U.S. government export control order to suspend global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, impacting developers and businesses reliant on them. The next day, Zhipu announced it was opening access to its new open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, for all Coding Plan users, with API and model weights (under the MIT license) to follow. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical shift in the AI industry: beyond raw capability, the stability, continuous accessibility, and control over AI models are becoming equally vital, especially as AI integrates deeper into business workflows. Zhipu's move, emphasizing that "frontier intelligence should not belong to a few nor be subject to arbitrary revocation," positioned its open, accessible model as an alternative. GLM-5.2 focuses on "Long Horizon Tasks" with a 1M context window, aiming for consistency in complex, extended projects. Market analysts suggest this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdiction policies, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The investment response indicates a new valuation metric is emerging—prioritizing which companies can provide AI capabilities that are not only advanced but also...

On June 15th, when the Hong Kong stock market opened, Zhipu AI's stock price surged continuously, reaching an intraday peak gain of 47.6%, setting a new record for single-day trading volume since its listing. By the close, the gain narrowed to 32.82%, with the total market capitalization surpassing HKD 649.6 billion.

The immediate catalyst came from two industry announcements two days prior.

On June 12th, due to U.S. government export control requirements, Anthropic suspended access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5. A day later, Zhipu announced that its latest open-source model, GLM-5.2, would be available to all Coding Plan users, with API access and model weights to be released the following week under the MIT license.

01 When the Most Advanced Models Become 'Potentially Unavailable'

On June 12th, Anthropic issued an official announcement stating that the U.S. government, exercising national security-related authority, issued an export control directive requiring the suspension of access to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals. The restrictions applied to foreign users both inside and outside the U.S., even including foreign employees within Anthropic.

Limited by the technical inability to accurately distinguish user nationality in real-time, Anthropic ultimately chose to temporarily disable the two models for all global customers to ensure compliance. This occurred only three days after the models' official release. As of now, both models are shown as unavailable on Anthropic's website, with no clear timeline for restoration.

As top-tier closed-source models in terms of current performance, the Claude series has been deeply integrated by numerous developers and enterprises for long-range tasks, code development, and complex document processing. The sudden service suspension directly disrupted many teams' workflows, sparking rapidly increasing discussions within the community about alternative solutions.

Just as the suspension news was gaining traction, on June 13th, Zhipu announced that its open-source flagship GLM-5.2 would be available to all Coding Plan users, covering Lite, Pro, Max, and Team editions. It also previewed that the API and model weights would be launched the following week, open-sourced under the MIT license.

In recent years, competition in the large model industry has primarily revolved around capability.

Whose reasoning is stronger, whose coding ability is better, who can first break through new capability boundaries—these factors almost dictated the choices of developers and enterprise customers.

However, the Anthropic incident highlights another issue previously often overlooked: beyond capability, whether a model can be accessed continuously and stably.

In this Anthropic event, for many developers and enterprises relying on overseas models for R&D work, even if they have accounts and paid subscriptions, they may face the risk of models suddenly becoming unavailable.

This is why this incident triggered far more discussion in the developer community than typical product updates.

As AI gradually evolves from a chat tool into infrastructure for software development, business operations, and even production processes, the stability, sustainability, and controllability of models are beginning to become metrics as crucial as model capability itself.

Zhipu stated in its announcement, "Cutting-edge intelligence should not belong only to a few, nor should it be subject to revocation by a few rules at any time." This statement, in essence, corresponds to the new reality facing the global AI industry today.

02 From 'Who is Stronger' to 'Who is More Accessible'

The capital market's swift reaction essentially represents an early pricing-in of this shift in industrial logic. Beyond the stock price performance, the market is more focused on the signals released by GLM-5.2 itself.

According to information disclosed by Zhipu, GLM-5.2 is its most capable open-source model to date, supporting a 1M context window and significantly enhancing long-horizon coding task capabilities. Zhipu positions it as a "truly usable 1M context" model, aiming to address the issue of models forgetting context during lengthy, multi-step engineering tasks.

A core keyword here is "Long Horizon Task." As AI Agents evolve from conversational tools into execution tools, models need to continuously handle thousands of tool calls, tens of thousands of lines of code, and large amounts of intermediate state information. The longer the context window, the stronger the model's ability to maintain project state and task continuity.

Current industry competition has shifted from "answering questions" to "sustained work." For developers, what truly matters is not parameter scale, but whether the model can maintain consistency and reliability over complex tasks lasting hours or even days.

Judging by the market reaction, investors have clearly recognized this change.

Oriental Securities pointed out in a research report that the Anthropic model incident exposed the risk of closed-source model access being subject to a single jurisdiction, which may drive more enterprises to shift their core AI capabilities toward domestic foundation models and localized deployment. Simultaneously, GLM-5.2 being open-sourced under the MIT license further lowers the barrier for enterprises to trial and integrate the model.

Over the past year, valuations assigned to large model companies by the capital market were largely based on model capability and market share. Today, as the global regulatory environment intensifies, a new valuation dimension is emerging—who can provide developers and enterprises with AI capabilities that are stable, sustainable, and reliably accessible in the long term.

When access to the world's most advanced models begins to be influenced by external factors, openness, accessibility, and autonomous controllability are becoming new bargaining chips in the AI competition.

Related Questions

QWhat was the direct trigger for the sharp rise in Zhipu's stock price on the Hong Kong stock exchange on June 15th?

AThe direct trigger was two industry news events from two days prior. On June 12th, Anthropic suspended access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, due to U.S. government export control requirements. The next day, Zhipu announced that its latest open-source model, GLM-5.2, was available to all Coding Plan users, with API access and model weights to be released the following week under the MIT license.

QAccording to the article, what new factor is becoming as important as model capability in the AI industry competition?

AThe article states that the stability, sustainability, and controllability of model access are becoming as important as raw model capability. The Anthropic incident highlighted that even with accounts and paid access, developers and enterprises relying on overseas models could face sudden unavailability of the models they depend on.

QWhat key feature of Zhipu's GLM-5.2 model does the article highlight as particularly important for the evolution of AI Agents?

AThe article highlights its support for a 1M context window and enhanced capabilities for long-horizon coding tasks. This is important as AI Agents evolve from conversation tools to execution tools, requiring models to handle thousands of tool calls, tens of thousands of lines of code, and maintain consistency over long, complex tasks.

QHow did the U.S. export control instructions affect Anthropic's model deployment, according to its official announcement?

AAccording to Anthropic's official announcement, the U.S. government's export control instructions required suspending access to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals, including those outside the U.S. and even foreign employees within Anthropic. Due to technical difficulties in precisely distinguishing user nationality in real-time, Anthropic chose to temporarily disable the two models for all global customers to ensure compliance.

QWhat shift in the competitive landscape for large AI models is signaled by the market's reaction to the Zhipu and Anthropic news, according to the article's analysis?

AThe article's analysis suggests the market reaction signals a shift from competition based primarily on "who is stronger" (model capability) to competition based on "who is more accessible." As access to the most advanced models becomes susceptible to external factors like geopolitics, providing open, accessible, independently controllable, and sustainably available AI capabilities is becoming a new competitive advantage and valuation factor.

Related Reads

Standard Chartered Bank Places a 40x 'Bet', Calls for UNI to Rise to $100

Standard Chartered Bank’s digital asset research head, Geoff Kendrick, initiated coverage on Uniswap with a highly bullish long-term price target of $100 for its UNI token by 2030—a roughly 40-fold increase from its ~$2.60 trading price at the time of the report. The bank’s thesis hinges on the exponential growth of tokenized real-world assets (RWA), projected to surge from ~$340 billion to $4 trillion by 2028. It expects the share of these assets deployed in DeFi to rise from 3.5% to 30%, driving total DeFi TVL to around $2.7 trillion. As the leading decentralized exchange (DEX), Uniswap is positioned to capture a significant portion of this liquidity influx. A key catalyst is Uniswap’s “fee switch,” activated in late 2024, which directs a portion of protocol fees to UNI token buybacks and burns. This transforms UNI from a pure governance token into a yield-generating, deflationary asset, narrowing its valuation gap with centralized exchanges like Coinbase. The report draws an analogy: Coinbase operates like Netflix (centralized, high-cost), while Uniswap functions like YouTube (open, user-generated, network-effect driven). Despite its dominant market share and recent institutional adoption—such as BlackRock’s BUIDL fund and Fidelity’s stablecoin using Uniswap for liquidity—the path faces challenges. Competition from Solana-based DEXs and aggregators threatens user mindshare, while regulatory delays or setbacks in RWA adoption could slow the projected growth. Furthermore, UNI remains down over 92% from its 2021 peak, reflecting persistent market skepticism. Ultimately, Standard Chartered’s report signals a shift in traditional finance’s perception of DeFi, valuing network effects and cash flow potential. However, realizing the $100 target depends on Uniswap successfully navigating intense competition, regulatory hurdles, and the multi-year timeline for massive tokenized asset adoption.

marsbit9m ago

Standard Chartered Bank Places a 40x 'Bet', Calls for UNI to Rise to $100

marsbit9m ago

For Those Still Obsessed with Altcoins, Just Go All-in on HOOD

Title: "For Those Still Fixated on Altcoins, Just Bet on HOOD" The article argues that Robinhood (HOOD) stock is a compelling alternative for investors still holding onto hopes for altcoin rallies. It highlights HOOD's recent strong performance, briefly touching $100, and expresses continued optimism. The bullish thesis is multi-faceted: HOOD's operational data for May showed record highs in key metrics like total assets and funded customers, though crypto volume was weaker. Positive catalysts include Robinhood launching its own prediction market (Rothera) to capture more revenue, gaining approval to act as an IPO underwriter for major upcoming listings, and being selected to manage the new "Trump Account" government savings program for millions of future US newborns. Insider and institutional buying, along with raised price targets, provide further confidence. The core argument is that HOOD is successfully decoupling from the crypto market's fortunes. While crypto-related revenue was once a major contributor, its share of total revenue has been declining, hitting 13% in Q1 2026. Although HOOD's price historically moved with Bitcoin, a recent divergence is noted. The author posits that Robinhood's growing equity trading, prediction markets, and IPO-related businesses can drive growth independently of a crypto bull market. Thus, HOOD offers asymmetric exposure: it stands to benefit if the crypto market recovers but is no longer wholly dependent on it. For those disillusioned with altcoins' risks, HOOD presents a potentially safer way to maintain exposure to the fintech and speculative trading space.

marsbit17m ago

For Those Still Obsessed with Altcoins, Just Go All-in on HOOD

marsbit17m ago

For Those Still Obsessed with Altcoins, Just Buy HOOD

The author expresses bullish sentiment on Robinhood (HOOD) stock, citing multiple positive catalysts. Recent monthly operational data shows record highs in key metrics like total assets, funded customers, and margin balances. On the news front, Robinhood launched its own prediction market (Rothera), received approval to act as an IPO underwriter, and was selected to manage the new "Trump Accounts" for U.S. newborns, ensuring a long-term user base. Insiders and institutions are also buying or raising price targets. The core investment thesis, however, focuses on HOOD's evolving valuation narrative. Historically viewed as a "crypto proxy," its stock price was highly correlated with Bitcoin and its revenue heavily dependent on cryptocurrency trading fees. Recent data indicates this dependence is waning: crypto-related revenue hit a multi-quarter low of 13% of total revenue in Q1 2026, and the stock price has recently decoupled from BTC's trend. The author argues HOOD is transforming into a more diversified platform. Its growth is now driven by equities, options, prediction markets, and IPO-related services. This reduces its cyclical vulnerability to crypto bear markets. Crucially, if the crypto market recovers, HOOD would still benefit from increased trading activity. Therefore, for investors still hoping for gains from altcoins but concerned about their risks and liquidity, the author suggests HOOD offers a compelling alternative with higher safety margins—it can rise with a crypto bull run but isn't reliant on one.

Odaily星球日报22m ago

For Those Still Obsessed with Altcoins, Just Buy HOOD

Odaily星球日报22m ago

Cryptocurrency & Stock Market Indicator丨SpaceX Discloses Holding 18,712 Bitcoins Worth $1.18 Billion; Strategy Spends $100 Million Two Weeks in a Row to Scoop Up BTC at Low Levels (June 16)

"Coin-Stock Barometer: SpaceX discloses holding 18,712 Bitcoin worth $1.18B; Strategy spends another $100M accumulating BTC (June 16) SpaceX has officially disclosed holding 18,712 Bitcoin in its S-1 filing, valued at ~$1.18B, becoming the 8th largest public company Bitcoin holder. Its average cost is ~$35,000 per BTC. In weekly BTC treasury news, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) purchased another 1,587 BTC (~$100M) last week, increasing its total to 846,842 BTC. Mara Holdings added 1,000 BTC. However, Metaplanet and others made no purchases. Nakamoto sold ~600 BTC to repay ~$45M in debt. Global public companies (excluding miners) now hold 1,121,341 BTC. In other crypto treasury developments: - Metaplanet acquired Siiibo Securities to build a Bitcoin-focused financial ecosystem in Japan. - Bitmine increased its ETH holdings by 76,881 last week. - SharpLink's cumulative ETH staking rewards surpassed 21,119 ETH. - Forward Industries' acquisition offers for two SOL treasury companies, including Brera Holdings (holding 2.1M SOL), were rejected. - Tron Inc.'s TRX holdings surpassed 700 million. - Avalanche Treasury Co. (AVAT) begins trading on Nasdaq. - AIFC detailed plans to use WLFI tokens for collateral/loans. Market perspectives on U.S. stocks vary. 'White-Haired Stock God' Serenity sees the current cycle as retail-to-institution transfers, where negative reports may signal institutional accumulation. Morgan Stanley suggests a rotation from tech to cyclical stocks could occur. Citrini believes the U.S. stock market hasn't peaked but expects frequent 10-15% pullbacks in the coming months."

marsbit27m ago

Cryptocurrency & Stock Market Indicator丨SpaceX Discloses Holding 18,712 Bitcoins Worth $1.18 Billion; Strategy Spends $100 Million Two Weeks in a Row to Scoop Up BTC at Low Levels (June 16)

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片