On-Chain Economy: Past, Present, and Future

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-06Last updated on 2026-03-06

Abstract

On-Chain Economy: Past, Present, and Future In 2014, before "Web3" became synonymous with blockchain and crypto assets, the core vision revolved around smart contracts and their potential to enable a self-managing decentralized network. This early idea evolved into the concept of a Smart Economy, where autonomous economic coordination could flourish. Today, Web3 is rapidly growing, largely driven by decentralized finance (DeFi). Stablecoins serve as global settlement tools, and crypto assets have reshaped public understanding of money. Beneath these developments lies a fundamental improvement in financial efficiency. At the same time, AI has moved from abstract concept to daily reality. While many see AI as a productivity tool, its deeper role is that of a new financial efficiency paradigm. By increasing productivity, AI raises the value of attention even during non-working hours, making it a natural core component of the next-generation on-chain economy. The future on-chain economy will be defined by three core features: 1. Minimal human involvement: Humans act as intent providers, while AI handles analysis, execution, and feedback. 2. Complete trustlessness: Systems must be fully secure and trustless. 3. Extreme efficiency: AI will push capital utilization to unprecedented levels. Key enabling technologies include rapidly evolving AI models, intent-based AI agents, agent networks, privacy-preserving tech like ZKP and FHE, enhanced security components, and sustainable m...

In 2014, before "Web3" became exclusively associated with blockchain and crypto assets, blockchain was simply blockchain itself. People were deeply fascinated by the future potential unlocked by smart contracts.

Our early vision of the on-chain economy eventually crystallized into the concept of the Smart Economy. We envisioned a decentralized network capable of autonomously managing task completion, with smart contracts serving as the key, unlocking unprecedented possibilities for economic collaboration.

As we rapidly move into the third decade of the 21st century, the current Web3 ecosystem is booming, with decentralized finance (DeFi) as its core driver. Stablecoins have become a mainstream global settlement solution, breaking geographical barriers; payment finance (PayFi) is permeating daily life. Regardless of the depth of public understanding, crypto assets have profoundly reshaped mass financial perception.

Beneath the surface of these developments, the most profound structural progress is the leap in financial efficiency.

Meanwhile, artificial intelligence, a long-familiar technology that remained largely conceptual, has finally materialized into everyday reality over the past two years. Powered by the continuous emergence and iteration of large language models, it has deeply integrated into our work and lives.

For most people, AI is a productivity tool: designers save time, content creators automate copy polishing, and programmers significantly increase coding efficiency.

But in our view, AI is far more than a productivity booster; it is a new paradigm of financial efficiency.

Human labor always incurs costs, and human attention is inherently limited. As AI increases productivity per unit of time, it simultaneously raises the value of attention during non-working hours. Therefore, we believe AI is naturally compatible with blockchain and should become a core component of the next generation on-chain economy.

Three Core Characteristics of the Next Generation On-Chain Economy

  1. Minimized Human Participation: In on-chain economic activities, humans will primarily act as intent providers, while the system autonomously completes the analysis, execution, and feedback loop based on intent. Taking decentralized finance (DeFi) as an example: the so-called "composability" initially required users to invest significant effort in validating strategy combinations; in the new on-chain economy, AI will autonomously handle reasoning and planning.
  2. Fully Trustless: Asset security is the foundation of usability. In the Web3 space, security issues have always loomed like a sword of Damocles. The next-generation economy must completely eliminate user security concerns, creating a truly trustless system.
  3. Extremely Efficient: As mentioned earlier, every technological revolution is accompanied by a leap in efficiency. Web3 has already significantly surpassed traditional finance in transaction and settlement efficiency, but there remains huge potential in capital utilization. The deep integration of AI will elevate capital efficiency to unprecedented heights.

Core Components Supporting These Structural Features

  1. Rapidly iterating AI foundation models (new architectures and open-source models emerge almost daily)
  2. Intent-centric AI agents that accurately interpret and execute user intent
  3. An AI agent network enabling communication and collaboration between agents, forming synergistic clusters
  4. Privacy-preserving computation technologies (e.g., Zero-Knowledge Proofs ZKP / Fully Homomorphic Encryption FHE) to ensure data security without a centralized trust mechanism
  5. Foundational security components providing maximum asset protection (e.g., Trusted Execution Environments TEE and retrospective verification)
  6. Sustainable monitoring systems that continuously supervise economic activity, possessing self-diagnostic and self-correcting capabilities

The synergy of these elements will give birth to a truly organic, evolvable, and self-driven on-chain economy—we define this as the true Intelligent-Sensing Economy.

All of this is far more than just building a faster system or rearranging a set of instruments.

The on-chain economy has never been merely a stacking of technologies. More accurately, it is a collective narrative about value creation, distribution, and perception, concerning collaboration, order, and consensus.

With the deep integration of AI agents, AI is no longer just an external efficiency tool but becomes an intrinsic structural component—possessing intent, logic, preferences, and even goals.

This structural change is far more profound than the technological progress itself. We are moving from a human-activity-centric on-chain system towards a collaborative intelligence-driven network architecture.

Consequently, the economy begins to exhibit coherent, life-like characteristics beyond just a combination of rules and incentives: perceiving external data, responding internally, adjusting parameters, and reorganizing iteratively under pressure.

The Intelligent-Sensing Economy we speak of does not refer to the birth of emotion or consciousness, but rather the gradual perfection of the internal information-action feedback loop. This means synergy no longer relies on external scheduling but can emerge naturally from within the system. This marks a directional shift in the infrastructure of human civilization—from simply "governing an economy" to "embedding intelligence into the economy".

We often discuss the on-chain economy from the perspectives of structural design and financial efficiency, but perhaps what is truly worth rethinking is: when a system possesses the ability for continuous autonomous learning, adaptation, and self-coordination, should we still simply define it as an "economy"? Or is it evolving into a new form of life?

Related Questions

QWhat was the initial vision for the on-chain economy before the term 'Web3' became synonymous with blockchain and crypto assets?

AThe initial vision was crystallized as the 'Smart Economy' concept, which envisioned a decentralized network capable of autonomously managing tasks, with smart contracts being the key to unlocking unprecedented possibilities for economic collaboration.

QAccording to the article, what is the most profound structural progress beneath the development of the current Web3 ecosystem?

AThe most profound structural progress is the leapfrog improvement in financial efficiency.

QWhat are the three core characteristics of the next generation on-chain economy as outlined in the article?

AThe three core characteristics are: 1. Minimal human participation (humans as intent providers), 2. Complete trustlessness (eliminating user security concerns), and 3. Ultimate efficiency (unprecedented capital efficiency through deep AI integration).

QWhat core components are identified as necessary to support the structural features of the next-generation on-chain economy?

AThe core components are: rapidly iterating AI foundation models, intent-centric AI agents, an AI agent network for collaboration, privacy computing technologies (like ZKP/FHE), foundational security components (like TEE), and a sustainable monitoring system with self-diagnosis and correction capabilities.

QHow does the article define the 'Sensory Economy' that emerges from the synergy between AI and blockchain?

AThe 'Sensory Economy' is defined as a truly organic, evolvable, and self-driven on-chain economy. It is characterized by an internal information-action feedback loop that allows for coordination to emerge naturally from within the system, rather than relying on external scheduling, marking a directional shift in human civilization's infrastructure.

Related Reads

TAO is Elon Musk who invested in OpenAI, Subnet is Sam Altman

The article, titled "TAO is Elon Musk who invested in OpenAI, Subnet is Sam Altman," presents a critical analysis of the Bittensor (TAO) project. It argues that Bittensor functions as a decentralized AI marketplace where TAO tokens fund AI research via subnets. However, the author highlights a fundamental flaw: subnet operators have no obligation to return any value, such as AI models or profits, back to the TAO ecosystem or its token holders. This structure is likened to Elon Musk's early investment in the non-profit OpenAI, which later commercialized its technology without returning value to its initial benefactor. The bear case posits that Bittensor is essentially a wealth transfer from crypto speculators to AI researchers ("miners"). Subnets can use TAO incentives for development and then take their successful products elsewhere, leaving TAO holders with diluted tokens from inflation and no captured value. The lack of enforced equity or binding mechanisms means the project relies on a "hope" that subnet tokens maintain value. The optimistic perspective counters that two factors could create a successful, self-sustaining economy: 1) AI's perpetual and massive resource needs could incentivize subnets to stay for continued funding, and 2) crypto has a proven ability to aggregate resources through token incentives, as seen with Bitcoin and Ethereum. The conclusion states that investing in TAO is a bet on a博弈论 (game theory) miracle—that soft incentives alone will be enough to keep the best subnets within the ecosystem and create a flywheel effect. This outcome is possible but represents a highly skewed, low-probability success scenario amidst significant risks of failure.

marsbit8m ago

TAO is Elon Musk who invested in OpenAI, Subnet is Sam Altman

marsbit8m ago

Hermes Agent Guide: Surpassing OpenClaw, Boosting Productivity by 100x

A guide to Hermes Agent, an open-source AI agent framework by Nous Research, positioned as a powerful alternative to OpenClaw. It is described as a self-evolving agent with a built-in learning loop that autonomously creates skills from experience, continuously improves them, and solidifies knowledge into reusable assets. Its core features include a memory system (storing environment info and user preferences in MEMORY.md and USER.md) and a skill system that generates structured documentation for complex tasks. The agent boasts over 40 built-in tools for web search, browser automation, vision, image generation, and text-to-speech. It supports scheduling automated tasks and can run on various infrastructures, from a $5 VPS to GPU clusters. Popular tools within its ecosystem include the Hindsight memory plugin, the Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills pack, and the mission-control dashboard for agent orchestration. Key differentiators from OpenClaw are its architecture philosophy—centered on the agent's own execution loop rather than a central controller—and its autonomous skill generation versus OpenClaw's manually written skills. Installation is a one-line command, and setup is guided. It integrates with messaging platforms like Telegram, Discord, and Slack. It's suited for scenarios requiring a persistent, context-aware assistant that improves over time, automates workflows, and operates across various deployment environments.

marsbit58m ago

Hermes Agent Guide: Surpassing OpenClaw, Boosting Productivity by 100x

marsbit58m ago

Brother Sun "Rights Protection" Stands Up Against the Trump Family, WLFI Is the Real Scythe in the Crypto Circle

The article details the controversy surrounding World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a cryptocurrency project linked to the Trump family. It reports that WLFI allegedly used the DeFi lending protocol Dolomite, whose co-founder is also a WLFI advisor, as a disguised channel to sell tokens by collateralizing around 5 billion WLFI tokens to borrow approximately $75 million in stablecoins. Despite WLFI's claims that the loans were for ecosystem development and posed no liquidation risk, critics argue it was a way for insiders to cash out, shifting risk to retail investors. The piece highlights WLFI's significant price decline—over 66% since its September 2025 launch—and suggests the Trump family and insiders are the main source of selling pressure, as they control nearly 74% of the token supply. It also revisits WLFI’s prior move to blacklist 272 addresses, including those of investor Justin Sun, under the pretext of preventing large-scale sell-offs, which now appears to be an effort to reduce competition for their own sales. Sun publicly accused WLFI of exploiting users, freezing assets, and treating the crypto community as a "personal ATM." WLFI countered by threatening legal action. The author notes that while Sun’s criticism may gain sympathy, a legal battle in the U.S. against the well-connected Trump family would be risky for him. Finally, the article concludes that WLFI exemplifies how powerful elites can exploit crypto’s regulatory gray areas for profit, and urges the community to reject such projects driven more by political privilege than genuine decentralized finance ideals.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Brother Sun "Rights Protection" Stands Up Against the Trump Family, WLFI Is the Real Scythe in the Crypto Circle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片