The Big Short's Burry: Now is the Perfect Time to Bottom-Fish in Hong Kong Stocks

链捕手Published on 2026-07-17Last updated on 2026-07-17

Abstract

Michael Burry, the investor famous for predicting the 2008 financial crisis, recently stated on X that now is an "excellent time" to look for cheap stocks in the Hong Kong market. His bullish view is based on the expectation that the global AI chip stock frenzy will cool, leading funds to flow out of Korea, Japan, and semiconductor ETFs and into undervalued areas like Hong Kong. He has already acted by increasing his stake in JD.com. Hong Kong stocks have significantly underperformed global peers this year, with the Hang Seng Index down about 7% and the Hang Seng Tech Index falling over 15%. This contrasts sharply with major gains in Korean, Japanese, and semiconductor markets. Burry sees this disparity as creating a bargain-hunting opportunity. Adding another perspective, Goldman Sachs' Asia equity capital markets head, Wang Yajun, argues that while the Hong Kong market has already entered the AI era with active related IPOs and trading, its major indices have not yet reflected this reality due to structural lag. He expects record equity fundraising this year, driven by more AI company listings. Morgan Stanley has also recently advocated buying Hong Kong stocks, citing optimistic corporate earnings prospects. However, challenges remain, including concerns over China's consumer recovery and e-commerce profitability. The key for investors is navigating the overall index pressure while identifying specific structural opportunities highlighted by these bullish narratives.

Author:Zhao Ying

A battle between bulls and bears, represented by Michael Burry, is playing out in the Hong Kong stock market, with bullish voices continuing to gather.

Michael Burry, the investor famous for accurately predicting the 2008 U.S. subprime mortgage crisis and who became the prototype for the film The Big Short, recently publicly stated that now is a "perfect time" to look for cheap stocks in the Hong Kong stock market. His bullish logic is based on the prediction of a cooling global AI chip stock frenzy, believing that funds will flow out of South Korea, Japan, and the semiconductor sector to seek undervalued areas.

Meanwhile, Wang Yajun, Goldman Sachs' head of equity capital markets for Asia (ex-Japan), also pointed out that the Hong Kong market has de facto entered the AI era, though the major indices have yet to reflect this reality.

The views from both sides point to the same conclusion from different angles: there is a significant disconnect between the current weak performance of Hong Kong stocks and the underlying vitality within the market. This disconnect itself may constitute an investment opportunity. For investors seeking undervalued assets, the attractiveness of Hong Kong stocks is rising.

Burry Bullish on Hong Kong Stocks: A Valuation Gap After AI Mania Cools

Michael Burry, founder of Scion Asset Management, posted on platform X on July 17, stating, "Perfect time to look for cheap Hong Kong stocks, should do well as Korea, Japan, and SOXX (semiconductor ETF) fade."

Burry's statement comes with a market backdrop. Global chip stocks recently faced large-scale sell-offs. Lingering doubts about whether AI companies can translate technological investment into actual profits, coupled with high capital expenditure pressure, have weighed on the previously global-leading semiconductor sector. In contrast, Hong Kong stocks' year-to-date decline has made their valuations relatively more attractive.

Notably, Burry had already taken action earlier this month – according to Bloomberg, he increased his stake in Chinese e-commerce firm JD.com and established new positions in DraftKings and Flutter, showing his bullish stance on Hong Kong stocks and related Chinese tech stocks is not merely talk.

Hong Kong Stocks Lag Far Behind Global Major Markets This Year

Data clearly shows the relative weakness of Hong Kong stocks. The Hang Seng Index is down about 7% year-to-date, while the Hang Seng Tech Index has fallen a deeper 15.22%, mainly dragged down by weak consumer spending and insufficient market confidence in the outlook for China's e-commerce sector.

This starkly contrasts with the strong performance of other major global markets. According to Bloomberg data, South Korea's benchmark index has surged 62% year-to-date, benefiting from the strong performance of its two chip giants; Japan's Nikkei 225 has risen 26%; and the iShares SOXX ETF tracking the semiconductor sector has skyrocketed 76%.

It is precisely this significant underperformance that leads Burry to believe Hong Kong stocks meet the conditions for "bargain hunting" – when global capital begins to re-examine the sustainability of the AI frenzy, previously neglected Hong Kong stocks may see a catch-up opportunity.

Goldman Sachs: Index Distortion, Hong Kong Market Has Entered AI Era

Goldman Sachs' perspective provides another dimension of interpretation – the weakness of Hong Kong stocks is, to some extent, a "false impression" caused by structural lag in the indices.

Wang Yajun, head of equity capital markets for Asia (ex-Japan) at Goldman Sachs, bluntly stated at a recent media briefing, the Hong Kong market has entered the AI era, but the major stock indices have not yet been able to reflect this reality. This is the fundamental reason for the "icy fire double sky" phenomenon of a hot IPO market coexisting with sluggish index performance.

Wang Yajun pointed out that the hottest topic in the Hong Kong stock market this year is AI. The most active, best-performing, and largest fundraisers are all AI-related stocks. However, adjustments to index constituents take a relatively long time, leading to a mismatch between the index and the true face of the market. He expects that total equity financing in the Hong Kong market this year is likely to hit a record high, with annual IPO fundraising potentially surpassing the historical peak of 2021. More AI companies will list in Hong Kong in the second half of the year.

Regarding the fundamental outlook, Wang Yajun believes that supported by end-user demand growth, capital expenditure by AI companies will continue, providing a foundation for the long-term performance of related sectors.

Multiple Bullish Voices Gather, Divergence Remains

Burry is not fighting alone. According to Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley recently also called on investors to buy Hong Kong stocks, citing optimistic expectations for corporate earnings as one reason, and believing that the impact of lock-up expiries will be relatively limited.

However, the logic for being bullish on Hong Kong stocks is not without challenges. The Hang Seng Index's downtrend this year reflects persistent market concerns about the pace of China's consumption recovery and the profitability of the e-commerce sector. These structural pressures are difficult to completely dissipate in the short term. The "index-market mismatch" described by Goldman's Wang Yajun also means that ordinary investors who only refer to the index may both underestimate the structural opportunities within Hong Kong stocks and overlook the pressures still facing traditional heavyweight constituents.

For investors, Burry's bottom-fishing signal and Goldman's AI narrative together sketch a picture of opportunity for Hong Kong stocks. However, the core challenge facing the market remains how to position precisely between overall index pressure and structural bright spots.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy does Michael Burry believe now is an 'excellent time' to look for cheap stocks in the Hong Kong market?

AMichael Burry believes it is an excellent time because he anticipates a cooling of the global AI chip stock craze, which will cause funds to flow out of markets like South Korea, Japan, and the semiconductor sector (represented by the SOXX ETF). This shift would lead investors to seek undervalued assets, making the currently underperforming and cheaper Hong Kong stock market an attractive destination.

QAccording to the article, what specific action has Burry taken regarding Hong Kong/China stocks?

ABurry has backed his view with action by increasing his stake in the Chinese e-commerce company JD.com and establishing new positions in DraftKings and Flutter Entertainment in July.

QHow does Goldman Sachs' Wang Yajun explain the disconnect between Hong Kong's hot IPO market and its weak main stock indices?

AWang Yajun explains that while the Hong Kong market has already entered the AI era with active trading and high financing in AI-related stocks, the main stock indices have not yet reflected this reality. This is because index composition adjustments take a long time, creating a mismatch between the indices and the market's actual dynamism.

QWhat is the performance comparison between Hong Kong's key indices and major global markets like South Korea, Japan, and the SOXX ETF in the current year?

AHong Kong's key indices have significantly underperformed. The Hang Seng Index is down about 7%, and the Hang Seng Tech Index has fallen over 15%. In contrast, South Korea's benchmark index surged 62%, Japan's Nikkei 225 rose 26%, and the iShares SOXX ETF (tracking semiconductors) skyrocketed 76%.

QWhat are some of the challenges or opposing views to the bullish outlook on Hong Kong stocks mentioned in the article?

AChallenges include persistent market concerns about the pace of China's consumption recovery and the profitability of the e-commerce sector, which continue to pressure traditional heavyweight stocks in the indices. Additionally, the 'mismatch' highlighted by Goldman Sachs means that while there are structural opportunities (like in AI), the overall index may remain under pressure, making precise stock selection crucial for investors.

Related Reads

Stable Vaults Are the Final Piece in Aave's Mass Commercialization Puzzle

Aave's introduction of "Stable Vaults" aims to bridge the gap between complex DeFi protocols and mainstream users by offering a simplified, predictable savings product. The core innovation is a fixed-yield layer built atop Aave's volatile underlying lending pools. Partnering platforms (like digital banks or wallets) can offer users a guaranteed interest rate (e.g., 4%), shielding them from market fluctuations. The partner absorbs the risk and profit/loss from the difference between this fixed rate and Aave's variable rate. From the user's perspective, Stable Vaults provide ease of use, predictable returns, and familiar services like customer support and account recovery, addressing key barriers like wallet management and volatility. However, users pay a price: they cap their potential earnings (forgoing higher market yields), add counterparty risk from the partner platform, and may lack transparency into the true spread being captured. For partners, Stable Vaults turn idle user funds into a revenue stream via the yield spread. For Aave, this strategy attracts sticky, "sticky" capital from mass-market applications, providing a stable fee revenue stream crucial for its tokenomics (e.g., buyback mechanisms), especially in bear markets. The article contrasts this approach with direct DeFi interaction, where users keep all yield but face complexity and volatility. It argues that Stable Vaults align with proven consumer behavior: most users prioritize convenience, safety, and predictability over maximizing returns, willingly paying a "peace of mind" premium. Examples like Coinbase and Robinhood offering similar "savings" products validate this demand. Thus, Stable Vaults represent Aave's strategic move to commercialize by catering to fundamental human preferences for simplicity and stability in finance.

marsbit39m ago

Stable Vaults Are the Final Piece in Aave's Mass Commercialization Puzzle

marsbit39m ago

Support Rate Less Than 1%, BIP-110 Still Pushes Bitcoin Towards a Soft Fork?

Title: BIP-110 Pushes Bitcoin Towards a Soft Fork Despite Less Than 1% Approval With its August mandatory activation window approaching, the controversial BIP-110 proposal is back in the spotlight. Proposed in December 2025 by Dathon Ohm and supported by Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr, BIP-110 aims to impose a one-year limit on arbitrary/non-monetary data in Bitcoin transactions, primarily targeting large data storage like Ordinals and Bitcoin NFTs, to reduce network "spam" and refocus Bitcoin on its monetary function. However, the proposal faces overwhelming opposition. To activate, BIP-110 requires a 55% threshold, yet current miner support is below 1%. Of the 102,674 network nodes, only 14.64% (15,035) signal readiness to enforce it. Despite this lack of consensus, BIP-110 has a contentious "mandatory window" mechanism: if the threshold isn't met by block height 961,632, supporting nodes will begin rejecting non-compliant blocks from height 961,632 to 963,647, attempting to force activation by block 965,664. This could lead to a chain split in early August between a minority chain enforcing BIP-110 and the main chain. Proponents, led by Luke Dashjr (founder of Ocean mining pool), argue that inscriptions constitute an "attack" on Bitcoin, congesting block space and raising transaction fees, thereby undermining Bitcoin's primary use as money. They view BIP-110 not as a change but as a reversal of a harmful change. Opponents, including figures like Adam Back, Jameson Lopp, and Michael Saylor, contend that BIP-110 fails to solve the spam problem while creating new risks. They warn it could stifle future innovation (e.g., impacting BitVM), introduce transaction censorship—eroding Bitcoin's neutrality—and potentially cause a damaging chain split that fragments developer resources, hash power, and monetary consensus. They argue market-based fee pressure and block size limits already manage congestion effectively. Potential outcomes post-activation include: 1) The BIP-110 chain stalling due to insufficient hash power; 2) The BIP-110 chain becoming the longest chain if it gains majority miner support (though currently, Ocean holds only 2.6% of hash power vs. opponents like F2Pool at 13.6%); or 3) A persistent minority chain that remains economically unviable, potentially leading to a permanent fork. Most analysts and prediction markets deem BIP-110's success unlikely, with one market giving only a 10% probability that it will become the accepted longest chain by September 2026.

marsbit44m ago

Support Rate Less Than 1%, BIP-110 Still Pushes Bitcoin Towards a Soft Fork?

marsbit44m ago

Mining Stocks Are Moving Further Away from Crypto

Title: Mining Stocks Are Drifting Away from Crypto Summary: Despite Bitcoin (BTC) falling approximately 46% over the past year, leading Bitcoin mining stocks (e.g., HUT, WULF, IREN) have surged significantly. This divergence stems from a fundamental shift in how the market values these companies. Their stock prices are no longer tied primarily to crypto prices, mining output, or hash rates. Instead, investors are now pricing them as AI infrastructure plays. Mining companies possess critical assets for AI data centers: pre-permitted land, grid-connected power capacity, and operational expertise for high-load facilities—resources facing severe shortages and long lead times for new entrants. For example, CleanSpark signed a 20-year, ~$6.6 billion infrastructure lease for an AI data center, while Marathon Digital acquired a project with up to 2 GW of planned power capacity. Analysts note a strong correlation between a mining company's market valuation and its contracted or potential AI power capacity in North America. CoinShares predicts that by year-end, up to 70% of revenue for listed miners could come from AI/HPC, compared to about 30% at the start of 2026. However, this re-rating introduces new risks: 1) Valuation volatility linked to the broader AI/semiconductor sector, 2) Potentially low baseline return rates (estimated at 4-5% for some firms), and 3) Execution risks including massive financing needs, regulatory permits, and tenant quality. This strategic pivot is also changing miner behavior. They are selling BTC holdings more aggressively to fund AI capex, meaning selling pressure may persist regardless of Bitcoin's price. Furthermore, once power and sites are locked into long-term AI contracts, they are unlikely to return to Bitcoin mining, potentially altering the network's hash rate dynamics long-term. In essence, mining firms are being valued for what they are becoming—AI infrastructure providers—rather than pure-play crypto miners.

链捕手50m ago

Mining Stocks Are Moving Further Away from Crypto

链捕手50m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片