Top five crypto winners (and losers) of 2022

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-12-27Last updated on 2022-12-27

Abstract

Bitcoin and Ethereum are not part of the surprising list of five best and worst-performing cryptocurrencies for 2022.

Cointelegraph looks back on the best and worst-performing cryptocurrencies of 2022 among the top 100 assets by market capitalization. We used the highest and the lowest year-to-date (YTD) returns through the close of Dec. 25, 2022.

⠀

Overall, Cryptoindex.com 100 (CIX100), an index that tracks the 100 best-performing cryptocurrencies, fell nearly 68% YTD, suggesting most top coins underperformed in 2022.

⠀

CIX100 weekly price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

Stablecoins are naturally omitted from the list below. Similarly, coins tracking the value of gold and similar mainstream assets have also been ignored.

⠀

Instead, the coins mentioned below include decentralized currencies, smart contract tokens, exchange tokens and others.

⠀

Top five crypto of 2022

⠀

1. GMX (GMX)

⠀

YTD return: 111%

⠀

Sector: Decentralized exchange

⠀

Market Cap: $379.4 million

⠀

GMX acts as a utility and a governance token within the GMX decentralized exchange (DEX) ecosystem and is the best-performing digital asset among the top 100 coins (excluding stablecoins).

⠀

GMX’s price uptrend mostly picked its cues from the collapse of FTX, a centralized exchange, and its listing on popular trading platforms — including Binance and Huobi Global — across 2022. In addition, the token rallied impressively in late November after its platform briefly surpassed its top DEX rival, Uniwap, in daily trading fees.

⠀

GMX price performance YTD. Source: CoinMarketCap

⠀

2. Trust Wallet Token (TWT)

⠀

YTD return: 92%

⠀

Sector: Payment platform

⠀

Market Cap: $570 million

⠀

Trust Wallet Token (TWT) serves as a utility and a governance token within the Trust Wallet ecosystem. The token moved lower in tandem with the rest of the crypto market, mostly in 2022, but like GMX, its upside momentum increased amid the collapse of the FTX exchange in November.

⠀

TWT/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

As Cointelegraph reported, the FTX’s collapse boosted mistrust for centralized exchanges, which may have prompted investors to move their funds to self-custody wallets like Trust Wallet. The speculation could have played a major role in boosting TWT’s valuation.

⠀

3. Unus Sed Leo (LEO)

⠀

YTD return: -3.5%

⠀

Sector: Centralized exchange

⠀

Market Cap: $3.44 billion

⠀

Unus Sed Leo (LEO) is native to the iFinex ecosystem. The token suffered losses in 2022, but at -3.5%, they were little compared to most top coins, including Bitcoin and Ether, which lost over 65% in the same period.

⠀

LEO/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

One of the reasons why LEO outperformed most top-ranking assets could be iFinex’s pledge. Notably, the firm declared at the time of LEO’s private sale in 2018 that it would employ 27% of its revenue to buy back the tokens until the entire supply of 985.24 million units was removed from circulation.

⠀

IFinex also said it would use the funds it lost during the August 2016 Bitfinex hack to purchase LEO tokens. That explains why LEO rallied by more than 100% at the start of the year, given the uptrend came after the United States Department of Justice recovered 94,000 BTC from Bitfinex hackers.

⠀

The rally took LEO’s price to a YTD high of $8.15 in February. However, the token has dropped 55% since, though still remaining one of the best performers in 2022.

⠀

⠀

4. OKB (OKB)

⠀

YTD return: -19%

⠀

Sector: Centralized exchange

⠀

Market Cap: $1.38 billion

⠀

OKB is the native token of the OKX exchange. It provides users discounts on trading fees, access to OKX's initial exchange offering (IEO) platform, and voting rights for tokens to be listed on the exchange.

⠀

OKB trended synchronously with the broader crypto market in 2022, including its 150% recovery after bottoming out at around $9.50 in June. The token’s bullish retracement occurred despite the absence of a major market-moving event, suggesting it had been mostly speculative.

⠀

OKB/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

Overall, OKB’s volatile recovery helped it limit its YTD losses compared to most top-ranking assets.

⠀

5. The Open Network (TON)

⠀

YTD return: -33.5%

⠀

Sector: Smart contracts

⠀

Market Cap: $3.52 billion

⠀

The Open Network is a layer-1 blockchain ecosystem developed by the Telegram founders Nikolai Durov and Pavel Durov. Its native token, TON, trended downward in line with other top crypto assets during most of 2022 but recovered impressively ahead of the year’s close.

⠀

TON/USD price performance YTD. Source: CoinMarketCap

⠀

TON’s recovery period coincided with back-to-back optimistic news. For instance, in October, Telegram announced that it would employ the Open Network to auction usernames. Similarly, the Open Network built a bot the next month that allows Telegrams users to trade cryptocurrencies in-app.

⠀

Nonetheless, TON failed to recoup all of its losses, still down 33.5% YTD at $2.36.

⠀

Worst five cryptos of 2022

⠀

1. Terra (LUNA)

⠀

YTD performance: -99.99%

⠀

Sector: Smart contracts

⠀

Market Cap: $604 million

⠀

Terra became a debacle for the cryptocurrency sector after its market valuation crashed by 99.99% in May. The unraveling started with the implosion of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD (UST), marking one of the biggest busts in the crypto industry’s history.

⠀

LUNA/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

Terra’s implosion prompted its founder Do Kwon to suggest a fork to revive the project. Eventually, Terra underwent a chain split, with the old chain existing as Terra Classic and the new chain as Terra 2.0.

⠀

Luna Classic (LUNC) jumped nearly 100% after its launch in late May 2022 while LUNA (LUNA2) dropped around 40% in the same period.

⠀

2. FTX Token (FTT)

⠀

YTD performance: -98%

⠀

Sector: Centralized exchange

⠀

Market Cap: $307 million

⠀

FTX Token served as a native token to FTX, which collapsed after facing a liquidity crisis in November.

⠀

FTT/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

The token continues to trade across several exchanges but accompanies poor liquidity and volume. It is technically “dead” given the defunct status of FTX.

⠀

3. Solana (SOL)

⠀

YTD performance: -93.35%

⠀

Sector: Smart contracts

⠀

Market Cap: $4.11 billion

⠀

Solana, a layer-1 blockchain protocol, crashed 93.35% YTD due to a sequence of bad news all across 2022. That includes six network outages in the year, a $200 million hack on a Solana-based wallet and Solana’s association with FTX.

⠀

SOL/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

More bad coverage appeared in the form of accusations that Solana is not as decentralized as it claims to be, resulting in SOL being one of the worst-performers of 2022.

⠀

4. Axie Infinity (AXS)

⠀

YTD performance: -93%

⠀

Sector: Gaming/metaverse

⠀

Market Cap: $775 million

⠀

Axie Infinity Shard serves primarily as the governance token for Axie Infinity, a play-to-earn (P2E) gaming ecosystem. It also acts as a legal tender in the Axie Infinity marketplace, where in-game nonfungible tokens (NFT) can be purchased.

⠀

The AXS market has consistently trended lower in 2022 due to underwhelming players turnout (which lowers the demand for tokens), a $650 million hack concerning Axie Infinity’s blockchain Ronin in late March and fears surrounding the unlocking of 8% of supply in October.

⠀

AXS/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

AXS is down approximately 93% YTD, becoming one of the worst-performing assets in the current bear market.

⠀

5. The Sandbox (SAND)

⠀

YTD performance: -92.50%

⠀

Sector: Gaming/metaverse

⠀

Market Cap: $690 million

⠀

Like Axie Infinity, The Sandbox is a virtual platform where users can create, own and monetize their gaming skills using NFTs and The Sandbox, the platform’s utility token. But, despite initial success, the platform now has less than 500 unique users, according to data from DappRadar.

⠀

The lower turnout has affected SAND’s demand across spot exchanges, which, in turn, has pushed its price down 93.50% YTD, as shown below. Other factors behind the declining interest include a general lack of demand for riskier assets in a higher interest rate environment.

⠀

SAND/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

Other tokens that fell more than 90% YTD are Fantom, Avalanche, Algorand, Decentraland, BitTorrent (BTT) and others.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
jst
JUSTJST
band
Band ProtocolBAND

Related Reads

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

A Deep Dive into FWA: The “On-Chain Gacha” Experiment for NFTs Fake World Assets (FWA), created by TokenWorks, introduces an innovative “NFT gacha machine” fully operating on-chain. Users can deposit eligible NFTs paired with ETH (called Backing) to create a Position, acting as a prize pool. Others can then pay a uniform Acquisition Price for a chance to win a random NFT from the pool. The core mechanism features a reverse probability system: Positions with lower Backing have a higher chance of being selected, serving as common prizes, while high-Backing Positions are rare “jackpots.” The acquisition price is calculated based on the harmonic mean of all Backings, keeping entry costs low. When a Position is won, the purchaser must choose: keep the NFT or accept the Standing Bid (85% of the Backing, claimable in ETH or $FWA tokens), returning the NFT to the original depositor. The protocol involves two main roles. Depositors provide liquidity (NFT + ETH), earning a share of fees from each draw, distributed equally per active Position, plus potential $FWA rewards. Purchasers pay to spin the gacha, receiving $FWA rewards for participation. A special “Crown” reward goes to the Position with the highest Backing. The $FWA token has a fixed supply and is initially obtainable only through protocol participation (depositing or purchasing), with external buying disabled early on to reduce sell pressure. Its value is supported by a built-in buy pressure: when purchasers opt for the $FWA settlement on a Standing Bid, the protocol uses the backing ETH to buy $FWA from the market. Revenue for the protocol comes from a 1% fee on each draw, a 1% settlement fee when an NFT is kept, and the 15% discount from Standing Bid settlements (currently allocated to the protocol). The design cleverly blends Uniswap-style liquidity provision, gacha mechanics, and tokenomics to create a novel, self-regulating marketplace for NFT liquidity and engagement.

marsbit10m ago

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

marsbit10m ago

Samsung unit explores stablecoin infrastructure with Upbit’s operator

Samsung SDS, the IT arm of Samsung Group, is exploring stablecoin infrastructure, digital asset systems, and AI-based payment models in partnership with Dunamu, the operator of the Upbit crypto exchange. CEO Lee Jun-hee announced the discussions during a Q2 earnings call, highlighting Samsung SDS's experience from a tokenized securities project. The move follows Samsung Electronics' plan to add stablecoin support to Samsung Wallet. This cooperation deepens Samsung's strategic ties to the digital finance sector, following a May 2026 investment where Samsung affiliates acquired a combined 4% stake in Dunamu. The initiative aims to combine Samsung's IT and cloud capabilities with Dunamu's blockchain expertise. Samsung SDS's digital asset push coincides with strong growth in its AI and cloud business, which saw Q2 revenue rise 5.9% year-on-year to 3.72 trillion won ($2.6 billion), fueled by a 75% surge in external cloud revenue. The company plans to significantly expand its AI infrastructure capacity by 2031.

cointelegraph11m ago

Samsung unit explores stablecoin infrastructure with Upbit’s operator

cointelegraph11m ago

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

OpenAI has launched the "ChatGPT for Academic Researchers" program, offering free one-year access to its flagship models for 100,000 university researchers globally, with 10,000 spots available this summer. Selected institutions include prestigious centers like ENS Paris and the IAS at Princeton. The initiative provides an integrated research workspace within ChatGPT, bundling tools like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, and Codex, along with expanded Deep Research capabilities, higher usage limits, and specialized tools for life sciences. The suite connects to platforms like Zotero and GitHub, aiming to streamline the entire research workflow from literature review and coding to data analysis and manuscript drafting. OpenAI notes that about 1.3 million people already use ChatGPT weekly for advanced science and math. The program targets building long-term user dependency by embedding these tools into daily research habits. However, access comes with limitations: it does not include API credits or model weights, and eligibility is restricted to verified academic researchers from supported countries. This approach contrasts with Anthropic's "AI for Science" program, which offers API credits but not an integrated workspace. Both companies emphasize preventing misuse by withholding model weights, a point of contention for AI researchers seeking transparency. The core strategy remains clear: provide a powerful, integrated environment to foster user reliance ahead of the post-free period.

marsbit15m ago

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

marsbit15m ago

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

Gigadevice Innovation, a leading Chinese memory chip company, has executed a controversial financial maneuver. The company's controlling shareholder and chairman, Zhu Yiming, sold approximately 44 billion RMB worth of his shares between early May and mid-June 2026, capitalizing on a soaring stock price that peaked at 846.66 RMB on June 29th. Following a subsequent stock crash—plummeting to around 350 RMB in 22 trading days and erasing over 330 billion RMB in market value—Zhu announced a combined "market rescue" plan on July 29th. This plan includes his personal commitment to buy back at least 1 billion RMB in shares and a company proposal to repurchase 1 to 2 billion RMB worth of stock. This sequence of high-selling followed by a low-buying plan has confused and unsettled many of the company's 240,000 retail investors. The stock's dramatic decline was attributed to several factors: the successful IPO of its sister company, Changxin Technologies, which ended Gigadevice's status as a primary investment proxy for the domestic memory sector; a Morgan Stanley report warning of a potential peak in the memory chip cycle; and a severe loss of market confidence triggered by the chairman's massive sell-off. While the sell-off was procedurally compliant, its timing has been criticized. The company's fundamentals appear strong, with preliminary H1 2026 results showing revenue up 177% year-on-year to 11.5 billion RMB and net profit skyrocketing 1099% to 6.9 billion RMB, driven by a boom in memory chips and MCU demand. However, a significant portion (2.05 billion RMB) of this profit came from non-recurring gains like securities investment, and the memory industry is notoriously cyclical. Analysts highlight the company's role in the domestic substitution of niche DRAM and NOR Flash memory, with some maintaining bullish price targets. Yet, the recent events underscore key risks: its fabless model creates dependency on foundries like Changxin, and the chairman's actions have raised serious questions about management's alignment with minority shareholders. The promised buybacks cannot commence until December 13th due to a mandatory six-month cooling-off period following an insider sale, leaving the stock vulnerable in the interim.

marsbit15m ago

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

marsbit15m ago

Hedge fund with $1.1B in Bitcoin miner stocks seeks capital after AI sell-off: FT

Hedge fund Situational Awareness, founded by ex-OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, is seeking new capital after heavy losses from an AI stock sell-off in July. The fund, which reportedly managed around $20 billion in assets, saw gains of 439% through June, but leveraged bets led to significant losses when AI stocks fell. Aschenbrenner argued the sell-off created new investment opportunities. The fund holds major positions in Bitcoin miners pivoting to AI, with a March SEC filing showing about $1.11 billion across stocks like IREN, Core Scientific, Riot Platforms, and CleanSpark. The fund was launched alongside Aschenbrenner's essays predicting artificial general intelligence surpassing college graduates by 2030.

cointelegraph25m ago

Hedge fund with $1.1B in Bitcoin miner stocks seeks capital after AI sell-off: FT

cointelegraph25m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow