Twitter Launches Verified NFT Profile Pictures

Daily HodlPublished on 2022-03-23Last updated on 2022-03-23

Abstract

On January 20, 2022, Twitter launched a new non-fungible token (NFT) feature for its...

On January 20, 2022, Twitter launched a new non-fungible token (NFT) feature for its Twitter Blue users – a paid subscription service that gives its users access to premium services. This includes editing published tweets, posting longer videos, reading news without advertisements and more. Twitter Blue will allow people to showcase the NFTs they own by setting them as their profile pictures.
The current NFT feature is only available on iOS – although Twitter says that it will soon be rolled out on Android smartphones as well. The Twitter Blue service is not globally available, and it’s only offered in the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. However, Twitter says that the new NFT profile picture feature will be visible to everyone, irrespective of the Twitter platform.
Twitter had shown its interest in NFTs when people started changing their profile pictures to showcase their NFTs. In September 2021, it started exploring the idea of an official authentication that will allow NFT owners to showcase their digital assets. With this new feature, Twitter has officially become the first social media platform to launch something specially dedicated to NFT users.
NFTs or non-fungible tokens are digital collectibles – often works of art – that provide unique ownership of the collectible to the buyer. Like cryptocurrencies, they are traded on the blockchain. However, they are non-fungible (i.e., one NFT cannot be exchanged for another because of the unique value assigned to that particular NFT).
NFTs have become quite a lucrative industry, with some NFTs selling for millions of dollars. Last year, an artwork collection by creator Mike Winkelmann was sold at a swooping $69,346,250 at an online auction.
The NFT trend came into action when sports stars and celebrity NFTs were sold by the NBA earlier in 2021. It produced more in a month than the entire NFT market produced in the entire year of 2020. OpenSea, a leading NFT marketplace, experienced a jump in trading volume from $329 million in July to $3.4 billion in August.
People, especially millennials, are bullish about NFTs, projecting them as the next big thing after Bitcoin. Some of them are also looking at NFTs as a vehicle of investment and considering buying them. Irrespective of whether the NFT trend is just ephemeral or sustainable, NFTs have definitely become the talk of the day, with its market expanding each minute. And this move by Twitter speaks to their popularity this time.
Twitter authenticating unique ownership
As discussed above, crypto enthusiasts have been showcasing their NFTs on their profile pictures a long time before this feature was launched. This feature prevents people from copying others’ NFTs and displaying them on their profile pictures. This is done through an official verification mechanism launched by Twitter after much deliberation. NFT owners can do this by linking their Ethereum wallet to their Twitter account, which will present them with a list of NFTs they own.
At the moment, Twitter only supports a limited number of Ethereum wallets including Coinbase Wallet, Rainbow, MetaMask, Ledger Live, Argent and Trust Wallet. However, it plans to expand to other wallets soon. After linking the wallet, users can easily choose which NFT they want to display on their profile.
Their chosen NFT will get a hexagonal border instead of the normal circular one. This is done to underline the uniqueness and authenticity of that NFT. So, if anyone tries to copy your NFT and use it as their profile picture, they will get the normal circular frame.
Therefore, Twitter prevents your NFT from being stolen and displayed as someone else’s profile picture. However, if the stealer re-uploads that image to an NFT platform and mints an identical NFT, they might be able to get that hexagonal frame. It is not yet known how Twitter will prevent that kind of forgery.
Despite this drawback, the current effort by Twitter to protect NFTs is being applauded by crypto enthusiasts and advocates who are also looking at this as a step toward the mainstream adoption of blockchain and crypto.
Another issue with this new feature is the usage of application programming interfaces (APIs) to fetch users’ NFTs from online marketplaces. Twitter brings a third party into this verification instead of directly interacting with the blockchain. This means that if the marketplace goes down, Twitter may not be able to load those NFT profile pictures.
After this feature was launched, several people reported that their profile picture was not loading because Twitter uses the API of OpenSea, an NFT marketplace, which suffered an outage leading to the difficulty in loading profile pictures on Twitter.
This new announcement to support NFT profile pictures came in line with Twitter’s commitment to decentralized technologies. Last year, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said that Bitcoin would be a big part of Twitter’s future. Later in September, it rolled out a feature that allowed Twitter users to tip content creators in Bitcoin. It is also taking progressive measures to build a crypto team focused on cryptocurrencies, blockchain and decentralized technologies.
Other important players like Meta are also exploring the prospects of launching an NFT marketplace on its Facebook and Instagram platforms. Social media platforms are often the first places where people want to showcase and display their work. Therefore, a feature like this will definitely give momentum to the NFT market. However, it is yet to be seen how and in what capacity these features are launched.
The bottom line
With the new NFT profile picture feature, Twitter has become the first major social media platform to recognize the importance of NFTs in this growing market. As more social media platforms adopt NFTs, the NFT market and popularity will grow.
The integration of social media and NFT can open a new stream of opportunities for content creators who will now be able to reach a much wider audience to showcase their artwork. It is yet to be seen how well this new feature is taken by NFT owners themselves and how they respond to this new Twitter feature.

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHá 5m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHá 5m

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

As Bitcoin and Ethereum prices drop significantly, two major corporate treasury holders, Strategy and Bitmine, are facing massive unrealized losses—approximately $100 billion and $90 billion, respectively. The article compares their financial health and underlying risks. Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH, relies primarily on equity financing (like ATM offerings) and has substantial cash reserves, alongside staking income from its ETH holdings. It plans a $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy, holding Bitcoin, is burdened by significant convertible debt and preferred stock dividends, with cash reserves covering only about six months of its annual dividend obligations. Strategy's leverage is higher, and it faces potential liquidity pressure if BTC prices fall further, possibly forcing asset sales. While both companies are under pressure, Bitmine’s financial structure appears more resilient, whereas Strategy’s high leverage makes it more vulnerable to continued market declines.

Odaily星球日报Há 9m

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

Odaily星球日报Há 9m

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbitHá 17m

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbitHá 17m

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Metamorphosis of Crypto

Bitcoin's decline signifies a structural transformation within the crypto industry. Its two traditional core functions are being usurped: AI has absorbed speculative capital that once flowed into Bitcoin, while dollar stablecoins have replaced it as the foundational on-chain currency. This decoupling is not a sign of crypto's demise but of its maturation. Projects are now valued based on fundamentals like revenue and user growth, independent of Bitcoin's price movements. Examples include the on-chain exchange Hyperliquid, with transaction volumes surpassing Coinbase, and the prediction market Polymarket, valued at $200 billion. Privacy has emerged as a critical new sector, with assets like Zcash surging and protocols like NEAR enabling private, cross-chain transfers without requiring users to hold a new token. The landscape is shifting toward a multi-chain ecosystem anchored by stablecoins. A new layer of infrastructure for cross-chain coordination, privacy, and AI-agent interaction is emerging to connect this fragmented world, a role once implicitly held by Bitcoin. The era where all altcoins moved in lockstep with Bitcoin is over. The industry's health should now be gauged by project fundamentals and the underlying infrastructure enabling private, dollar-settled, and interconnected crypto-economy.

marsbitHá 25m

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Metamorphosis of Crypto

marsbitHá 25m

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

"Standing in the Light: Understanding the Optical Module and CPO Industry Chain" This article analyzes the critical role of optical communication technology, specifically optical modules and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), as the "nervous system" for modern AI data centers. With exponential growth in AI computational demands (e.g., NVIDIA's Vera Rubin architecture), traditional electrical interconnects using copper cables face severe bottlenecks in bandwidth, power consumption, and signal integrity over distance. The core function of an optical module is to act as a "translator," converting electrical signals from chips into optical signals for transmission over fiber (and vice-versa). Key internal components include lasers, modulators, photodetectors, drivers, and DSP chips. The industry is currently transitioning from 800G to 1.6T modules. However, the future lies in CPO. This next-generation technology integrates the optical engine directly with the switch ASIC/XPU on the same package substrate, drastically reducing power consumption (by ~3.5x according to NVIDIA), overcoming bandwidth density limits, and minimizing signal attenuation compared to traditional pluggable modules. Key challenges for CPO include advanced packaging capacity (dominated by TSMC), thermal management, repairability, and standardization. The article details the broader technology landscape, including Near-Packaged Optics (NPO, a pragmatic intermediate step), Linear-drive Pluggable Optics (LPO), Optical I/O (OIO for chip-level integration), and Optical Circuit Switches (OCS). A comprehensive CPO industry chain is mapped, highlighting shifting power dynamics: * **Architecture Definers:** NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Marvell now hold greater influence. * **Advanced Packaging & Manufacturing:** TSMC is central; Fabrinet is a key EMS player. * **Lasers ("The Heart"):** A strategic bottleneck. EML lasers are led by Lumentum and Coherent (both receiving major NVIDIA investments). CW lasers, favored for CPO/silicon photonics, see strong Chinese players like Source Photonics and Sicoya. * **Silicon Photonics Chips:** The mainstream path for CPO engines, with key players like Broadcom, Intel, Marvell, and China's Accelink. * **Fiber Connectivity Components:** A major new, high-growth market created by CPO, including Fiber Array Units (FAU), Polarization-Maintaining Fiber (PMF), and MPO connectors. Companies like Tianfu Communication and US Conec are leaders. * **Fiber & Cable:** Experiencing a super-cycle (e.g., Corning, Yangtze Optical Fiber). * **PCB/Substrates:** Requiring advanced materials (e.g., Shengyi Tech). * **DSP & SerDes:** Functions are integrated into switch ASICs in the CPO era (e.g., Broadcom, Astera Labs). * **Optical Module Makers:** Transitioning from standalone module suppliers to providers of optical engines and NPO/LPO solutions while riding the current pluggable boom (e.g., Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink). The investment timeline is segmented: Short-term (2026-2027) features the "last feast" for pluggable modules and CPO's initial rollout. Medium-term (2027-2029) will see CPO expand and NPO peak. Long-term (2029-2032+) involves CPO/OIO penetration into intra-rack scaling. In conclusion, optical interconnects are fundamental to AI infrastructure. The competitive landscape sees US firms leading in architecture and high-end chips, TSMC in advanced packaging, and Chinese firms holding strong positions in modules, connectivity components, CW lasers, and fiber/cable. The future belongs to companies that can navigate the technological shift from "selling shovels" (modules) to "building highways" (CPO/OIO infrastructure).

marsbitHá 27m

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

marsbitHá 27m

Trading

Spot

Futures