Polygon Price Holds Amidst Bloody Day, Can Price Hold Above $0.60?

newsbtcPublished on 2022-08-27Last updated on 2022-08-27

Abstract

The price of Polygon (MATIC) has shown great strength in the past few weeks against Tether as it maintained its bullish sentiment.

The price of Polygon (MATIC) has shown great strength in the past few weeks against Tether as it maintained its bullish sentiment. Despite the retracement across the crypto market, Polygon has shown great strength holding above $0.75 compared to other crypto assets that have lost their key support.

Polygon (MATIC) Price Analysis On The Weekly Chart

From the chart, the price of MATIC saw its weekly low at $0.75; the price of MATIC bounced from that region to a price of $1 on the weekly chart as the price is unable to show much strength to trend higher after being rejected.

MATIC’s weekly candle closed with a bearish sentiment, with the new week’s candle looking more bearish.

The price has continued to show little or no traction; If the price of MATIC on the weekly chart maintains this structure, it could retest its low of $0.6 as the support region on the weekly chart.

For the price of MATIC to trend higher, it needs to hold above the resistance at $0.6 to enable the price to trend higher.

Weekly resistance for the price of MATIC – $1.

Weekly support for the price of MATIC – $0.6.

Price Analysis Of MATIC On The Daily (1D) Chart

The price of MATIC has found itself ranging in a channel after being rejected from the $1 mark despite showing bullish strength in weeks, rallying from $0.3 to the $1 mark.

MATIC has found its price between $0.75 acting as support and $1 acting as the resistance for the price of MATIC. The price of MATIC needs to reclaim the region of $0.8 for the price to have the chance of trending higher.

If the price of MATIC fails to reclaim $0.8, the support at $0.75 and $0.6 would be a good region for bulls to build more strength and hold the price sell-off.

MATIC is currently trading at $0.77, just below the 50 and 200 Exponential Moving Average (EMA), which corresponds to prices of $0.82 and $1, acting as resistances for MATIC price.

MATIC is holding up well despite the retracement; if the price holds above $0.6-$0.77 price could have a good chance to trend higher.

On the daily chart, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for the price of MATIC is at 40, indicating sell orders.

Daily (1D) resistance for MATIC price – $0.82-$1.

Daily (1D) support for MATIC price – $0.75-$0.6.

Price Analysis Of MATIC On The Four-Hourly (4H) Chart

The price of MATIC has shown great strength holding up after the rejection from $0.82, acting as resistance. MATIC price is trading just below the 50 and 200 EMA price, corresponding to $0.85, acting as resistance to the MATIC price.

Polygon price needs to break and hold above the 50 and 200 EMA to assume its bullish sentiment; if MATIC fails to break and hold above, we could see the price retesting its support levels at $0.75-$0.6.

Four-Hourly (4H) resistance for MATIC price – $0.82.

Four-Hourly (4H) support for MATIC price – $0.75-$0.6

Related Reads

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

US banking trade groups are urging revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise in the upcoming CLARITY Act ahead of a key committee markup. The Act currently aims to ban all passive, deposit-like interest on stablecoins to prevent competition with traditional bank savings, while allowing rewards tied to active uses like staking or transactions. In a letter, groups including the American Banking Association and Bank Policy Institute proposed stricter language to eliminate perceived loopholes for passive yield and prevent deposit flight from banks. However, these efforts are reportedly viewed as minor by some lawmakers. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on May 14, a critical step before it can advance through Congress.

bitcoinist49m ago

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

bitcoinist49m ago

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

Finance CEO Raoul Pal prefers Solana over Bitcoin, citing its high throughput and low transaction costs as better suited for the future crypto-AI era. He believes Solana is ideal for machine-to-machine microtransactions and AI-driven DeFi activity, predicting AI agents will soon dominate DeFi users. While Bitcoin serves as a store of value, Pal sees higher growth in networks built for mass, automated transactions. This view was highlighted at Consensus 2026, where AI integration and crypto infrastructure were key themes.

bitcoinist1h ago

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

bitcoinist1h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit1h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit1h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit3h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit3h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit3h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow