Bitcoin could break above $26K in coming weeks as inflation pressures slow, analyst says

Seeking AlphaPublished on 2022-08-12Last updated on 2022-08-12

Abstract

As July's headline inflation gauges have experienced a modest sense of relief, bitcoin (BTC-USD), the world's largest cryptocurrency by market cap, could surpass $26K in the coming weeks, said Marcus Sotiriou, an analyst at digital asset brokerage GlobalBlock.

As July's headline inflation gauges have experienced a modest sense of relief, bitcoin (BTC-USD), the world's largest cryptocurrency by market cap, could surpass $26K in the coming weeks, said Marcus Sotiriou, an analyst at digital asset brokerage GlobalBlock.

Bitcoin (BTC-USD) drifted up 1.9% to $24.52K as of shortly before 12:00 p.m. ET, as the broader stock market further advances on softer-than-expected inflation data. The token failed to take $24K three separate times during August, so it'll be interesting to see if the current breakout holds.

The commodity-heavy producer price index unexpectedly fell 0.5% M/M in July, driven by a 9.0% drop in prices for final demand energy. That's on top of July's consumer price index coming in flat from a month before and below the consensus estimate.

As some are speculating the peak in inflation is finally here, risk assets including cryptos and stocks could see "some breathing room over the next month or so," Sotiriou wrote in a note. "This is also the first bit of good news regarding the macro economy in months, so I think it will be well received, and allow Bitcoin to break above $26,000 in the following weeks."

Keep in mind that Sotiriou's price target appears to be a conservative one since it implies only 6% upside from current levels. As historical price action shows, bitcoin (BTC-USD) can easily make a move of that kind of magnitude within just one session.

Speaking of equities, which have been strongly correlated with bitcoin (BTC-USD) in the past year, all three major U.S. stock indices extended their rally with the Dow Jones (DJI) +0.6%, the S&P 500 (SP500) +0.4% and the tech-led Nasdaq (COMP.IND) +0.1%.

Crypto-related stocks: Bakkt (BKKT) +8.9%, MicroStrategy (MSTR) +3%, Riot Blockchain (RIOT) +8.3%, HIVE Blockchain (HIVE) +5.9%, Marathon Digital (MARA) +6.9% and Hut 8 Mining (HUT) +15.7%.

Related Reads

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit11m ago

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit11m ago

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit28m ago

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit28m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片