Fed Governor Says Stablecoins May Lower Neutral Interest Rate

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-10-31Last updated on 2025-11-10

Key Highlights

A growing wave of demand for dollar-backed stablecoins could shape future U.S. interest rate decisions, according to U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran. He delivered the remarks at the BCVC Summit 2025 held at the Harvard Club in New York on November 7, 2025.

Miran explained that rising global use of stablecoins might increase demand for U.S. Treasury. Hence, borrowing costs could move lower. He linked this trend directly to the neutral rate, known as r*, which guides long-term monetary policy decisions. Miran argued that stablecoins “may become a multitrillion-dollar elephant in the room for central bankers” if current growth patterns continue.

Stablecoins function as digital tokens pegged to a specific asset, such as the U.S. dollar. They make it easier and less costly to send money across borders. Miran noted that this fits with the strong worldwide demand for using dollars.

Moreover, the passage of the GENIUS Act this year provided a regulated framework for U.S.-based stablecoin issuers. Hence, they must now maintain full reserves in safe and liquid dollar assets. This rule increases credibility, attracts broader users, and connects stablecoins further into mainstream finance.

Expanding dollar access through stablecoins

Miran highlighted how stablecoins help people in emerging and developing economies access dollars more easily. Unreliable financial systems and capital controls are problems in many nations. As a result, it is frequently difficult for people and companies to hold or deal in stable value currencies. Stablecoins move on blockchain networks, which operate across borders without traditional banking roadblocks. Besides, adoption could accelerate where local currencies suffer from inflation and volatility.

He explained that demand for these tokens could increasingly come from abroad rather than the U.S. market. Users in the U.S. already access insured deposits and yield-bearing assets. However, savers in countries with strict financial controls often cannot. Stablecoins provide a new channel for saving and transacting in dollars. Therefore, global demand may expand the amount of capital seeking U.S. Treasury bills and other short-term dollar assets.

Effects on the neutral rate and Treasury demand

Miran said stablecoin issuers will likely hold reserves in Treasurys, repos, or government money market funds. Consequently, demand for these assets increases. He compared the situation to the “global saving glut” that former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke talked about in the early 2000s. 

Back then, a lot of money from overseas flowed into U.S. investments, which helped push long-term interest rates down. Miran said stablecoins could create a similar effect today, just on a smaller scale, by drawing more global money into U.S. Treasury markets.

Fed researchers think stablecoins could grow to between $1 trillion and $3 trillion by 2030, and some experts believe the number could go even higher. Miran pointed out that if stablecoins become widely used, they could push interest rates down by as much as 0.40%. That means the Fed may eventually need to rethink how it sets interest rates, because the “normal” level could end up being lower than it is today.

Current stablecoin market trends

According to DefiLlama, the total stablecoin market currently stands near $305.2 billion. The market dipped slightly in the past week, but long-term expansion persists. Tether (USDT) controls around 60% of the total supply. 

The stablecoin market grew sharply during the 2020–2021 crypto boom, contracted in 2022, and regained momentum from mid-2023 onward. The growth in this sector keeps rising as usage of stablecoins continues across trading markets, decentralized finance, and cross-border payments.

Total Stablecoin Market Cap Data
Source: DefiLIama

Stablecoins are no longer just a crypto trend. They’re starting to shape how money moves across countries. As more people around the world use dollar-backed stablecoins, it is more likely for the U.S. to consider key-policy updates favoring interest while managing the broader financial system. 

Also Read: India’s Gujarat CID Busts ₹200 Cr Crypto Racket Linked to Pakistan


Mobile Only Image

Related Reads

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

**Tau Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine for the Post-Moore Era** For 60 years, progress in semiconductors was driven by Moore's Law – making transistors smaller, denser, and cheaper. This path has now stalled due to plummeting returns below 7nm, astronomical lithography costs, and rising per-transistor expenses. After six years and testing 381 production chips, Huawei’s semiconductor team proposes a fundamental shift: **stop competing on size, start competing on time**. This is the core of their "τ (Tau) Scaling" theory. It treats *time* as the key optimization metric, compressing characteristic delays (τ) across all levels – from transistor switching (picoseconds) to data center tasks (seconds), spanning 12 orders of magnitude. **What is τ Scaling?** It holistically minimizes delay/time constants (τ) across four layers: transistors (switching speed), circuits (signal delay), chips (compute/memory access), and systems (end-to-end communication). The goal is to align optimization from process and circuit design to architecture and systems using this unified metric. **Mobile Application: LogicFolding** Without advancing the process node, this technique vertically stacks chips using ultra-precision hybrid bonding, distributing critical paths across layers ("stacking floors"). Results include a 55% transistor density increase, 41% better energy efficiency, over 40% higher SRAM frequency, and a roadmap targeting 4GHz by 2029. **AI Data Center Application: Full-Link Latency Compression** With 80% of AI cluster energy and 70% cost spent on data movement, the focus is slashing communication time. Key innovations include: 1. **Unified Bus:** Cuts multi-layer protocols, reducing remote access latency from microseconds to ~100 nanoseconds – 500x faster. 2. **Hi-ONE Optical Interconnect:** Replaces copper with fiber, enabling 8Tb/s per module and scaling distances from 1m to 100m for 10,000-chip clusters. 3. **3D Folding:** Solves the "interface bottleneck" of 2.5D packaging by vertically integrating memory, power, and optical I/O alongside compute, predicting over 100x integration density gain by 2035. **Re-fusion of Logic and Memory** The AI era, where data movement is more critical than computation, demands tight 3D integration of logic and memory, shifting industry influence towards memory and advanced packaging. **Remaining Challenges** include adapting EDA tools for 3D design, optimizing wafer-to-wafer process variation and vertical interconnect losses, and establishing new energy efficiency and benchmarking standards. **Conclusion:** The era of scaling physical dimensions is over. The era of scaling time has begun. By leveraging 3D stacking, system architecture, and interconnect optimization—rather than solely chasing advanced lithography—performance and efficiency can continue to advance. This is poised to be the semiconductor industry's core roadmap for the next decade.

marsbit8m ago

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

marsbit8m ago

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

**Summary: The Fundamental Flaws of NodeStrategy, the 'First Ordinals DAT'** NodeStrategy presents itself as the first Ordinals Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) on Bitcoin. Its model mirrors MicroStrategy's treasury narrative but for NFTs, specifically targeting the NodeMonkes collection (not officially affiliated). The project's core mechanism is a four-step flywheel: a 10% fee on all trades (90% to treasury, 10% to radFi/Bound marketplace) is used to buy NodeMonkes. These NFTs are then listed for sale on Satflow, with 100% of the sale proceeds used to buy back and burn the project's token, NODESTRAT, aiming to create a perpetual value cycle. However, the design contains critical, self-defeating flaws: 1. **Platform Lock-In:** As a Bitcoin Rune, NODESTRAT lacks smart contract functionality and cannot natively enforce the 10% fee. The fee can only be collected on the radFi/Bound marketplace itself. This makes the entire flywheel dependent on a single platform. If liquidity moves elsewhere, fee revenue drops to zero, halting the mechanism. 2. **Self-Suffocating Economics:** The 10% fee acts both as the flywheel's fuel and a major drag on demand. A buy/sell roundtrip incurs a 20% cost, creating a massive hurdle for traders. This strangles the very trading volume needed to generate fees. 3. **Ineffective Value Support:** The flywheel is starved. Low daily volume (~$9K) generates minimal fees for NFT purchases. The NFT "ladder" sales are slow and unpredictable (only 39 total sold), meaning buybacks are infrequent. While 30.77% of the supply has been burned, this supply reduction cannot lift price without corresponding demand, which is suppressed by the high transaction tax. 4. **Meaningless NAV:** The Net Asset Value (NAV), currently at a 0.46x discount to market cap, is merely a marketing figure. There is no redemption mechanism for token holders to claim the underlying NodeMonkes assets. Price is set by market liquidity flows, not by this theoretical backing. In essence, NodeStrategy's design forces its revenue source (trading fees) to simultaneously cripple the demand and liquidity required for its own success, trapping the project in a stagnant state.

marsbit14m ago

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

marsbit14m ago

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

"Agentic Design Patterns" is a 2025 book by Antonio Gullí, a Google engineering director, which offers a systematic framework for AI Agent development through 21 design patterns. A core contribution is the "Four Levels of Agency": Level 0 (bare LLMs) are not true agents. Level 1 agents actively decide when and how to use tools. Level 2 agents engage in strategic planning, context engineering (curating and filtering information), and self-reflection. Level 3 involves multi-agent collaboration with defined communication topologies. The book introduces **Context Engineering** as a superset of prompt engineering, managing four layers of information for the agent: system prompts, external data, implicit context (user history, environment), and feedback loops for automated optimization. A key pattern is **Reflection (Producer-Critic)**, where two distinct agents with different prompts collaborate iteratively—one produces output, the other critiques it—until quality is satisfactory or a max iteration limit is reached. For **Memory**, a three-layer model is proposed: Session (ephemeral conversation context), State (temporary task data), and Memory (persistent, long-term storage). Regarding **Multi-Agent Systems**, the book advises against unnecessary complexity, recommending simple topologies like Supervisor or Peer-to-Peer based on task needs. It emphasizes perfecting a single Level 2 agent before moving to multi-agent setups. The author concludes with three actionable takeaways: 1) Add a Critic agent to existing workflows, 2) Practice Context Engineering beyond simple prompts, and 3) Avoid premature multi-agent complexity; first master a robust single agent. The book provides a practical map, codifying common challenges like reflection, memory, and coordination into reusable patterns, saving developers from reinventing foundational solutions.

链捕手1h ago

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

链捕手1h ago

An AI Read SpaceX's Prospectus and Wrote This Investment Memo in 12 Minutes

An AI agent autonomously analyzed SpaceX's 226MB S-1 filing, purchased real-time market data on-chain for $1.87, and generated a comprehensive investment memo in 12 minutes. The memo concludes a "Hold" recommendation. Bull Thesis: SpaceX holds a near-monopoly in commercial launch (80% of global orbital mass since 2023), operates the profitable Starlink business (10.3M subscribers, $7.2B adj. EBITDA), and is vertically integrated from rockets to AI via the xAI acquisition. Starlink alone is a standout, high-margin business. Bear Thesis: The AI division is a massive cash burn ($6.4B operating loss on $3.2B revenue in 2025). True debt obligations approach ~$42B, not the headline $29B, due to bridge loans and X-related debt. Significant contingent liabilities exist, including a potential $10B fee from a Cursor option agreement. The company faces concentrated counterparty risk (e.g., a $45B Anthropic contract), slowing revenue growth, and complex governance as a controlled company with four share classes. Valuation anchors Starlink's standalone value at ~$84B (applying Iridium's 7.4x sales multiple), suggesting the current ~$500B+ IPO target prices in immense future execution risk for Starship and AI. Key risks include Starship delays, accelerating AI losses, and underwriter conflicts (the IPO's lead banks are also lenders on the $20B bridge loan it aims to refinance). Investment triggers: upgrade to "Overweight" if priced ≤$350B and Starship meets milestones; downgrade to "Pass" if priced >$510B or key risks materialize.

marsbit1h ago

An AI Read SpaceX's Prospectus and Wrote This Investment Memo in 12 Minutes

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MAY (MAY) are presented below.

活动图片