育碧公布《星球大战:亡命之徒》PC要求和规格

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-18Actualizado a 2024-08-18

币界网报道:

育碧在一篇博客文章中宣布了《星球大战:亡命之徒》的官方PC功能和规格。开发人员概述了最低、推荐、爱好者和超预设的设备规格。该公告揭示了多显示器设置、无上限帧率和升级功能。

育碧表示,《星球大战:亡命之徒》将在两周后上映。育碧透露了即将在PC上推出的开放世界游戏的系统要求以及不同硬件配置的预期帧率。该游戏将在PC、PlayStation 5和Xbox Series玩家上提供。

Ubisoft公布《星球大战:亡命之徒》系统规格和功能

育碧在一篇博客文章中宣布了其即将推出的《星球大战:亡命之徒》PC游戏的具体系统要求。

《星球大战:亡命之徒》开发商育碧此前曾宣布,该游戏将于8月30日发布。然而,黄金版和终极版的所有者可以从8月27日开始观看太空歌剧。

开发人员强调了《星球大战:亡命之徒》PC的功能,包括NVIDIA RTX动态照明(RTXDI),即使在阴影和反射中也能支持更好的视觉效果。其他功能包括支持NVIDIA DLSS 3.5、英特尔XESS 1.3和AMD FSR 3.0,以及无上限帧率。

该游戏还将以21:9的电影显示模式提供,并将包括多显示器和超宽支持,

育碧透露了不同配置的游戏帧率,以及《星球大战》罪犯在1080像素下运行游戏的最低要求。粉丝们评论说,最低要求似乎是可以管理的。

然而,他们提出了他们的担忧,称较旧的游戏PC可能无法处理多星球游戏。GPU的最低规格被突出显示为GeForce GTX 1660 6GB、AMD RX 5600或Intel Arc a750 8 GB(ReBAR ON)。玩家将需要英特尔酷睿7-8700或AMD Ryzen 5 3600作为CPU。

根据Ubisoft的说法,所有规模都需要Windows 10或11操作系统。为了达到游戏的最佳性能,还需要16GB和65GB的SSD存储空间。

Ubisoft概述了《星球大战:亡命之徒》的高PC和超PC要求

育碧还透露了想要以1080像素和高质量运行《星球大战:亡命之徒》的玩家的规格。推荐的系统要求与最低规模要求相似。

然而,GPU中的这两个比例各不相同,需要GeForce RTX 8GB或AMD RX 6700 XT 12GB。推荐预设的CPU规格被透露为英特尔酷睿i5或Ryzen 5 5600X。

育碧还为希望以更高分辨率玩游戏的玩家透露了类似的设备规格。对于喜欢以1440像素访问游戏的爱好者来说,GPU GeForce RTX 4070将是必不可少的。Enthusiast预设的CPU要求也指定为Core i5-11600K。

育碧强调,想要以4K分辨率和超预设质量访问游戏的玩家也需要更高的GPU和CPU功率。

超模式的GPU规格概述为GeForce RTX 4080 16GB或AMD RX 7900 XTX 24GB。为了获得更好的性能,游戏玩家将需要英特尔酷睿i7-12700K或AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D作为CPU。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片