一文读懂FluxBeam:补齐Solana的TG Bot版图

Odaily星球日报Published on 2023-11-13Last updated on 2023-11-13

Abstract

为Solana生态引入Telegram新流量。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

一文读懂FluxBeam:补齐Solana的TG Bot版图

近期,Solana 基金会公布第八届黑客松“Hyperdrive”获奖项目名单,其中 FluxBeam 摘得桂冠。

一句话概括 FluxBeam:设计开发面向 Solana 生态的 Telegram Bot Fluxbot,为 Solana 上的代币提供更多交易选择,为 Solana 生态开通新的流量入口。

今年以来,Telegram Bot 作为新兴板块,大多数的 Bot 都是针对以太坊生态所构建,其他不兼容 EVM 的生态基本未从“Telegram 带来新鲜流量”其中分到羹。

但 FluxBot 的出现为 Solana 开启代币交易的新途径。就凭此举,FluxBeam 荣获黑客松冠军也不难理解。

趁着热度,FluxBeam 紧接着发行代币 FLUXB。不过发售后,它惨遭短暂的滑铁卢,不同投资者的买入价差极大,导致 FLUXB 一度跌回发售价,后续再次上涨。价格波动也让一部分投资者收获颇丰,另一部分投资者仍在渴望回本。

下面,Odaily星球日报从 FluxBeam 的项目机制入手,结合 FLUXB 的代币经济学,为大家简要介绍 FluxBeam。

FluxBot 和同类 Bot 并没有什么不同,只因其为 Solana 服务

Fluxbot 是一个基于 Solana 生态系统的 Telegram Bot,可以引导新用户进入 Solana 生态系统。用户可通过 Fluxbot 交易基于 Solana 的代币。

Fluxbot 允许用户交易、监控和管理 Solana 上的代币,并在 Telegram 上创建和管理限价单。Fluxbot 还提供链上借贷业务,用户可通过 Marginfi 访问这个服务。同时,Fluxbot 提供镜像交易选项,可以跟随目标交易者进行交易。

在代币支持方面,Fluxbot 通过 FluxBeam 提供服务,并通过 RugCheck 进行代币验证。Fluxbot 还开发了一种 Solana 代币狙击器和流动性池警报系统。

一文读懂FluxBeam:补齐Solana的TG Bot版图

Fluxbot 目前支持 10 种语言。自上线以来,Fluxbot 官方披露已吸引了 1300 多名活跃用户。

综上,Fluxbot 的突出亮点就是支持 Solana 生态,但自身功能上并没有与其他 Telegram Bot 有太大区别。

FLUXB 代币经济学

$FLUXB 是一种基于区块链的代币,其总供应量为 5 亿。根据 CoinMaketCap 显示,初始流通供应量约为 4.33 亿。目前价格为 0.037 美元,FDV 为 1687 万美元。初始发售价格尚难统计,由于 FluxBeam 采用机器人抢购方式,公开发币初期,价格波动较大,最高触及 0.098 美元,最低触及 0.0018 美元。

FLUXB 代币分配详情如下:

  • 公开销售: 80% 的 FLUXB 在发布时立即释放,无需等待任何锁定期。

  • 用户奖励:在接下来的 24 个月中,每个月会将供应量的 0.5% 作为用户奖励进行释放。

  • 储备: 5% 的 FLUXB 将作为储备,根据需要进行策略性的释放。

  • 预发布用户奖励、顾问和合作伙伴: 3% 的 FLUXB 将按照表现进行释放,用于奖励预发布用户、顾问和合作伙伴。

在 FLUXB 发布后,将采取 Token 2022 标准,在所有买卖交易中收取 3% 的税。这部分税收将按以下方式进行分配:

  • 50% 分给持币者

  • 25% 分给流动性提供者

  • 25% 用于团队和运营费用。

需要注意的是,用户必须持有至少 1000 $FLUXB 才能收到这部分的分配。

此外,FLUXB 还有一项特别的机制,即 Fluxbot 费用。除了代币税奖励外,所有 Fluxbot 收取的 40% 的费用将用于回购 FLUXB。这部分被回购的 FLUXB,将被分发给持有至少 1000 $FLUXB 的用户。用户不仅可以通过持有 FLUXB 获取收益,也可以通过 Fluxbot 的后续手续费获得额外收益。

Related Reads

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

The Fate of Digital Banks: A Flashy App is No Match for a Banking License The article argues that despite attracting billions of users with fee-free checking accounts and sleek apps, most "neobanks" struggle to be profitable because their core business—transaction fees—is inherently low-margin. The real profit engine of banking is lending (credit), which generates interest income. However, many early neobanks operated without their own banking licenses, which restricted their ability to lend at scale. Examples like Nubank, Revolut, and Chime illustrate the point. While they gained users with free accounts, their eventual profitability came from rolling out credit products. The piece highlights systemic risks for neobanks that rely on third-party infrastructure, citing the Synapse bankruptcy, which froze user funds and revealed the fragility of such models. The solution, according to the author, is obtaining a formal banking license, like the U.S. OCC's national trust charter. This provides regulatory backing, allows direct custody of funds, and eliminates dependency on intermediary partners. The trend is now evident in the crypto sector, where companies like Kraken, SoFi, and others are actively pursuing such licenses. The article concludes that while technology changes, the fundamental business logic of banking—profiting from lending—remains constant. Successful digital banks ultimately conform to this old model, just with better interfaces and fairer terms.

Foresight News5m ago

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

Foresight News5m ago

In the Name of Charity, For the Benefit of the Family: How the Trump Family Turns Philanthropy into Profit?

Charity for Profit: How the Trump Family Turned Philanthropy into Personal Gain Amid a recent controversy over misleading claims about his cryptocurrency company American Bitcoin, Eric Trump invoked his children's cancer charity as evidence of his good intentions. While his Curetivity foundation (formerly the Eric Trump Foundation) has donated over $25 million to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, an investigation reveals a pattern of self-dealing and opaque practices that benefited the Trump family business. Internal documents show that from 2011 to 2016, over $500,000 from the charity was funneled back to Trump-owned properties for event costs, transactions often omitted from tax filings. This created clear conflicts of interest, with figures like former club manager and current White House aide Dan Scavino involved on both sides. Public claims of "one of the lowest expense ratios" were contradicted by records showing significant spending on entertainment, auctions, and transportation. Facing scrutiny in 2017, Eric Trump distanced himself from the board and rebranded the foundation. After a state investigation shifted focus to compliance rather than enforcement, he returned as the public face. Fundraising events, now less transparent, continue at Trump venues. Estimates suggest these events have directed over $1 million to the Trump Organization over two decades. The same playbook of optimistic claims and obscured financial realities is now evident in Eric Trump's role at American Bitcoin. He promoted it as a highly profitable venture with low mining costs, but reports indicate most Bitcoin was purchased with funds from constant stock issuance, not mined, with actual costs far higher than claimed. While the company's stock has crashed nearly 90% from its peak, Eric Trump's personal stake remains valuable. The recurring pattern involves aggressive public defense, legal maneuvering to bury records, making minimal changes to satisfy regulators, and eventually repackaging the venture to regain trust, often successfully.

marsbit14m ago

In the Name of Charity, For the Benefit of the Family: How the Trump Family Turns Philanthropy into Profit?

marsbit14m ago

Bernstein Report: Agentic AI Will Transform CPU from Supporting Role to Leading Role, Bullish on Hygon Information

Bernstein research report: Agentic AI will turn CPUs from supporting players to leading roles, bullish on Hygon Information. Analysts led by David Dai argue that AI is transitioning from the chatbot era to the agentic AI era. Unlike simple query-response models, agentic AI involves complex workflows including retrieval, planning, tool calling, and multi-step reasoning. This shift dramatically increases the demand for CPU compute to orchestrate these tasks, manage memory, and prevent expensive GPU idling. The report forecasts that the GPU-to-CPU ratio in inference clusters will reverse from 8:1 in 2025 to 1:1 by 2029. In agentic AI workloads, CPUs could account for 50% of the compute, on par with GPUs. Consequently, the server CPU Total Addressable Market (TAM) is projected to surge from $37 billion in 2025 to $223 billion by 2030, representing a 6x expansion. Arm is identified as a key beneficiary due to its superior performance-per-watt and a strategic shift from IP licensing to designing its own chips, targeting $15 billion in chip revenue by 2030. Bernstein raises Arm's price target to $500. For x86 vendors, the report is Overweight on AMD (target $600) and Hygon Information (target CNY 450), citing leadership and strong growth in the Chinese market respectively. Intel's target is raised to $100, reflecting upgraded earnings assumptions. The analysis acknowledges significant supply-side risks, questioning whether foundry and memory capacity can support such rapid CPU growth. The optimistic demand forecast also heavily relies on Nvidia's guidance for over $1 trillion in annual AI infrastructure spend by 2027.

marsbit22m ago

Bernstein Report: Agentic AI Will Transform CPU from Supporting Role to Leading Role, Bullish on Hygon Information

marsbit22m ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Can Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

TL;DR: Standard Chartered Bank predicts UNI token will reach $100 by 2030, based on the growth of tokenized assets fueling demand for open DeFi liquidity and Uniswap's potential to capture fees from that trading. However, institutional tokenized products like BlackRock's BUIDL fund show that strict access controls and permissioned systems remain major barriers. Standard Chartered's $100 price target for Uniswap's (UNI) governance token by 2030 projects massive growth from current levels. The bank's thesis hinges on tokenized real-world assets (RWA) reaching trillions in value and a significant portion flowing into open, decentralized markets for trading and liquidity, rather than remaining in closed, permissioned systems. Uniswap's position as a leading decentralized exchange (DEX) infrastructure could allow it to capture a major share of this future trading activity. A key challenge is whether tokenized assets like bonds, funds, and stocks will trade openly on DEXs or be restricted to controlled, institutional platforms. The case of BlackRock's BUIDL fund exemplifies this tension: while it uses Uniswap's technology for settlements, trading is strictly limited to pre-approved, whitelisted institutional participants. This hybrid model provides DeFi efficiency but maintains traditional access barriers. For UNI to achieve such a high valuation, Uniswap must not only see increased trading volume from tokenized assets but also implement effective value-capture mechanisms for token holders. Recent governance proposals aim to direct protocol fees to UNI stakers, creating a clearer link between platform usage and token value. Ultimately, the realization of Standard Chartered's prediction depends on the future structure of the tokenized asset market. If open liquidity pools and reduced restrictions prevail, Uniswap's role could expand far beyond crypto-native trading. If permissioned, walled-garden systems dominate, its growth from institutional tokenization may be limited. The prediction itself signals growing institutional recognition of DeFi's potential role in the future of finance.

marsbit30m ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Can Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片