交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2023-11-01Última atualização em 2023-11-01

Resumo

Binance仍具号召力,而Bitget等平台也正在迎头赶上。

LaunchPad 一直是加密领域财富效应的象征。虽然今年加密市场行情处于下行通道,多个项目上线即破发,但多家头部交易所上线的 LaunchPad 项目仍有不错的表现。

本文将综合比较各大交易所 LaunchPad 项目的回报率、平台上新速度、玩法模式等维度,揭秘哪家头部交易所的 LaunchPad 更具造富效应。

1. 项目收益率对比

根据 Coingecko 和 CryptoRank 的数据, 2023 年以来头部交易所的 LaunchPad 项目上线后都有不错,平均最高收益率均在 10 倍以上。

其中,表现最为亮眼的是 Bitget。其 LaunchPad 所有项目的平均历史最高收益率为 39 倍,排名第一;而 Bybit 和 Binance 紧随其后,平均历史最高收益率分别为 32.3 倍和 29 倍。以单个项目的最高收益率而言,Bitget 于 7 月份上线的 TYPE 最高涨幅达到 68 倍,是所有交易所 2023 年上线 LaunchPad 项目收益率最高的。

交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

(2023 年头部交易所 LaunchPad 项目表现)

另外,平台币的价格表现也间接决定着 LaunchPad 项目的收益率。由于参与各大交易所的 LaunchPad 均需持有平台币,如果平台币价格波动较大甚至出现了暴跌,将导致 LaunchPad 项目的收益无法弥补平台币下跌的亏损。

今年以来,平台币整体表现差强人意。虽然多数平台币的价格较年初有所上涨,但却不及比特币 2023 年的上涨幅度(BTC 较年初上涨 107% )。所以,如果以 BTC 本位计算,绝大多数平台币的表现都不及格。而 Bitget 的 BGB 是唯一一个涨幅超过 BTC 的平台币,目前其价格较年初已上涨了 168% ,成为了 2023 年表现最好的平台币之一。

交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

(2023 年头部交易所平台币表现)

2. 项目上新速度对比

此外,上线新项目的数量也从侧面反应出了一个 LaunchPad 的造富能力。

进入 2023 年以来,单从上币数量来看,Bitget 更为积极。截止目前 Bitget 的 LaunchPad 已上线了 5 个项目。10 月 26 日,Bitget 宣布将上线新一期的 LaunchPad——T 2 T 2 ,这是一个类 Friend.tech 项目。而 Binance 已在今年上线了 3 个 LaunchPad,排名第二。

交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

(2023 年头部交易所 LaunchPad 上线项目数)

除了上线更多的 LaunchPad 项目,Bitget 也首发上线了多个行业热门币种(如 BLUR 等);除此之外,Bitget 还设置热门叙事币种专区,如 AI、MeMe、BRC 20 等。

3. 玩法模式对比

经过了多年的发展,目前 LaunchPad 的玩法已基本固定——通常是持有平台币获得参与抽签的资格,中签后兑换新项目代币。各大主流交易平台均采用这种模式,但它对用户的吸引力却在减少。

近期,Bitget 在新一期 LaunchPad 中采用全新的拼团模式,降低了参与门槛(50 BGB 起投)。从参与人数来看,该项目开启不到一周,已有 4000 多个团队拼团中,参与人数近万人。

交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

小结

从以上分析来看,Binance 在 LaunchPad 上仍具号召力,保持着较高的上新速度和投资回报率,而 Bitget 等平台也正在迎头赶上,不仅有更高的投资回报率和上新速度,还有更多元化的玩法。

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight NewsHá 56m

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight NewsHá 56m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片