速览美众议院小组委员会稳定币听证会要点:应当迅速采取行动,推动立法

PanewsPublicado em 2023-04-20Última atualização em 2023-04-20

Resumo

4月19日,美国众议院金融服务委员会举行了一场关于稳定币的听证会,会上美国两党议员各自发表了意见,一致认为稳定币立法非常必要。本文带你速览此次听证会亮点。

周三(4月19日),美国国会下的一个重要委员会(众议院金融服务委员会)举行了一场听证会,讨论稳定币在全球经济中发挥的重要作用,以及是否全面立法以释放稳定币的全部价值。

“”

听证会的主题是“了解稳定币在支付中的作用和立法的必要性”,由众议院金融服务委员会的数字资产、金融技术和包容性小组主持。Circle首席战略官兼全球政策负责人Dante Disparte是出席听证会的领导人之一。

“”

众议院金融服务委员会主席Patrick McHenry(北卡罗来纳州共和党人)表示,他将以两党合作的方式通过稳定币法案。“不采取行动不符合消费者利益。我们需要一套针对稳定币的联邦监管制度,这对我们在国际和国内都很重要,而且在两党的基础上理解这项法案的效用和重要性也非常重要。”

“”

众议院金融服务委员会高级成员Maxine Waters(加州民主党人)表示,她理解“迅速”通过稳定币法案的重要性。“我同意大多数小组成员的意见,即我们应该迅速采取行动,制定一项稳定币法案,并推动立法。”

“”

数字资产、金融技术和包容性小组委员会主席、国会议员French Hill(阿肯色州共和党人)表示,人们“一致”认为需要一个全面的稳定币法案框架。“我想感谢我们的证人今天成为一个出色的小组。我认为这次对话对于明确稳定币立法的方向非常有帮助。我当然听到了专家组的一致意见,即国会的监管框架将有利于美国经济、美国发明家和消费者。”

“”

Circle首席战略官兼全球政策负责人Dante Disparte谈到联合国难民署如何利用支付稳定币和区块链来帮助难民。

“”

“一个最有力的例子是最近的一个,那就是我们与联合国难民事务高级专员办事处 (UNHCR) 的合作伙伴关系。Circle与Stellar和Moneygram(注:速汇金,是一种个人间的环球快速汇款业务,可以在15分钟内完成由汇款人到收款人的汇款过程)一起,帮助设计了一项针对乌克兰难民的数字现金援助计划。该计划的运作方式是其他任何支付系统无法替代的,您想一想,我们国家今天运送对外援助或灾难援助的方式是实物现金,这是容易滋生腐败、贿赂或欺诈的蜜罐。以设备为中心的货币具有抗腐败、近乎即时和可审计的特性,这是一个非常强大的功能,在这种情况下,以美元计价的稳定币USDC是支持这种创新的有效载体。”

“”

Disparte在听证会上指出:

“”

“迄今为止,几乎所有其他支付创新都只是在借贷和结算速度方面略有改进,与之相比,USDC等稳定币是一种以美元计价的电子现金传输形式。随着时间的推移,互联网规模、近乎即时的美元结算,将接近世界上最大支付系统的每秒交易量。这是一项关键的创新,可以同步提升美国的经济竞争力和国家安全利益。在如何以数字形式向任何联网设备发送、消费、储蓄和保护资金的方式上,有望成为一项重要突破。随着时间的推移,只要国家监管框架落实到位,一种数字美元的新形式就会出现,它将具有法律明确性、互联网规模的传输性、基本保护(包括即使发行人破产时也享有同等赎回权、隐私)、法治和其他关键特征。实现这一目标的唯一途径是国会制定全面的稳定币法案。”

Leituras Relacionadas

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

The article examines the significance of recent data showing China's total R&D expenditure, measured by purchasing power parity (PPP), catching up to or slightly surpassing that of the United States in 2024. It argues that while this milestone reflects China's immense capacity to mobilize research resources, the competition in semiconductors now extends far beyond sheer financial input. The analysis highlights key differences: China's R&D is heavily skewed towards experimental development (over 80%), focusing on product engineering and industrialization, whereas the U.S. allocates a proportionally larger share (about 15%) to basic research. Furthermore, leading U.S. semiconductor firms reinvest a significant portion of their substantial global sales revenue into R&D, creating a sustainable commercial innovation cycle that is difficult to replicate. The article emphasizes that semiconductor progress depends on converting R&D into commercially viable products that pass rigorous customer validation and achieve repeat orders, not just on spending levels. It concludes that as China enters the top tier of R&D spenders, the critical challenges shift to improving resource allocation efficiency, fostering long-term basic research, and building effective mechanisms to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and reliable, market-ready industrial capabilities.

marsbitHá 43m

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

marsbitHá 43m

Top 10% of American Households Capture 88% of Wealth, How Is the AI Era Cake Divided?

AI Worsens Wealth Inequality as Top 10% of US Families Garner 88% of Stock Gains (2019-2026) A report from the China Finance 40 Forum highlights that the AI boom is significantly widening wealth inequality in the United States. From 2019 to Q1 2026, wealth from directly held stocks by US households nearly doubled from $29 trillion to approximately $55 trillion, with rapid growth concentrated post-2023, coinciding with the AI-driven stock market surge. The distribution of these gains has been starkly uneven. Between 2022 and Q1 2026, the wealth increase of about $21 trillion was captured almost entirely by the wealthiest families: the top 10% secured roughly 88% ($18.5 trillion), while the bottom 50% received only about 1% ($0.2 trillion). This has contributed to a growing disparity in disposable income shares. The report, referencing economic historian Robert Allen, draws parallels to historical technological shifts like the "Engels' Pause" during the First Industrial Revolution, where worker wages stagnated despite productivity gains. It suggests AI could induce a similar period where capital收益 outpace labor income, exacerbating inequality. Huang Yiping of Peking University identifies four mechanisms through which AI impacts income distribution: capital-bias (reducing labor's income share), task polarization (hollowing out middle-skill jobs), skill-based digital divides, and wealth amplification through assets. He warns that if this trend continues, strong supply growth driven by AI could be undermined by persistently weak consumer demand, threatening sustainable economic growth. To address these challenges, the report proposes a three-pronged strategy: 1) Defensive measures like strengthening social safety nets and antitrust enforcement; 2) Empowering workers through education reform and lifelong learning to collaborate with AI; and 3) Rebalancing via policies such as potential taxes on AI超额收益 and mechanisms for broader sharing of technology's benefits, ensuring AI's红利 are more equitably distributed.

marsbitHá 49m

Top 10% of American Households Capture 88% of Wealth, How Is the AI Era Cake Divided?

marsbitHá 49m

Trading

Spot
活动图片