Altcoin ETF Market Reshuffle: XRP in Focus, Why Are LTC and DOGE Being Abandoned by the Market?

金色财经Published on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

The first batch of four altcoin ETFs (Litecoin, XRP, Solana, Dogecoin) launched in the U.S. in November 2025, revealing a sharply divided market. XRP emerged as the clear winner, with over $600 million in net inflows and price appreciation, attributed to its clear regulatory status, utility in cross-border payments, and competitive fees. Solana also attracted over $600 million in inflows, but its price fell nearly 30%, showing that ETF demand can be overshadowed by broader market sentiment, though its staking yield remained a draw. Litecoin and Dogecoin were largely ignored, with combined inflows under $8 million due to lack of new narratives, high fees, and limited functionality. The divergence highlights two distinct investor groups: traditional institutions withdrew over $40 billion from Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs amid market volatility, while crypto-native investors viewed the dip as an opportunity to enter new altcoin ETFs. This debut underscores that ETF approval alone isn’t a guarantee of success; long-term viability depends on real-world utility, regulatory clarity, and ecosystem strength. The altcoin ETF era marks a shift from speculative hype toward institutional value assessment, with only assets possessing strong fundamentals likely to thrive in an increasingly crowded market.

In November 2025, the first four altcoin ETFs (Litecoin, XRP, Solana, Dogecoin) were approved for listing in the U.S. Against the backdrop of massive losses in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs during the same period, their performance was starkly different, revealing a new era of market divergence.

Key Highlights: A Tale of Two Extremes in the Debut Performance

XRP

The clear winner, with net inflows exceeding $600 million, it was the only asset whose price increased. Its success stems from a clear regulatory status, practical value as a cross-border payment infrastructure, and competitive fee structures.

Solana

The awkward runner-up, also attracting over $600 million in inflows, yet its price plummeted nearly 30%. This exposed the limited effect of ETF inflows in the face of systemic market panic, though its offered staking rewards remain a unique attraction.

Litecoin and Dogecoin

Forgotten by the market, with combined inflows of less than $8 million. A lack of new narratives, high fees, and insufficient functionality made them unattractive to institutional investors.

Underlying Logic: Investors in Two Parallel Worlds

The most contradictory market phenomenon in November was this: Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs saw net outflows of over $40 billion, while altcoin ETFs saw net inflows of $13 billion. This wasn't a rotation of funds but reflected a fundamental difference between investors in the "traditional finance world" and the "crypto-native world":

Traditional Institutions Are Retreating

Triggered by risk controls during the market flash crash, they took massive profits by exiting BTC/ETH ETFs.

Crypto-Native Institutions Are Entering

They viewed the market adjustment as an opportunity to allocate to new instruments (altcoin ETFs), executing their established plans.

Future Implications: ETFs Are Not a Panacea, But a "Litmus Test"

This debut shows that the "new product effect" of ETFs has a time limit. Once the initial hype subsides, the asset's inherent practical value, regulatory clarity, and ecosystem fundamentals will become the decisive factors attracting capital.

By 2026, hundreds of crypto ETFs could emerge in the U.S. market. However, it's foreseeable that only a few assets with real value and strong narratives will stand out, while a large number of uncompetitive products will face elimination. The launch of altcoin ETFs marks crypto's transition from speculative narratives into a new phase where institutions use real capital to screen for value.

Related Questions

QWhich cryptocurrency ETF was the clear winner in terms of net inflows and price performance upon their US debut in November 2025, and why?

AThe XRP ETF was the clear winner, attracting over $600 million in net inflows and being the only one to experience a price increase. Its success is attributed to its clear regulatory status, utility as a cross-border payment infrastructure, and competitive fee structure.

QDespite significant inflows, why did the Solana ETF's price drop nearly 30% after its launch?

AThe Solana ETF's price dropped nearly 30% despite over $600 million in inflows because the ETF inflows were not enough to counteract a broader, systemic market panic. However, its ability to offer staking rewards remained a unique attraction for investors.

QWhat was the combined net inflow for the Litecoin and Dogecoin ETFs, and what were the primary reasons for their poor performance?

AThe combined net inflow for the Litecoin and Dogecoin ETFs was less than $8 million. They performed poorly due to a lack of new compelling narratives, high management fees, and insufficient perceived utility, making them unattractive to institutional investors.

QWhat does the simultaneous massive outflow from Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and inflow into altcoin ETFs in November 2025 reveal about different investor groups?

AThis divergence reveals a fundamental difference between 'Traditional Finance (TradFi) World' and 'Crypto-Native World' investors. TradFi institutions were retreating, taking profits and triggered by risk controls during a market crash, while crypto-native institutions saw the market adjustment as an opportunity to deploy capital into new altcoin ETF products according to their plans.

QAccording to the article, what will be the decisive factors for an asset's success in the future crypto ETF landscape beyond the initial 'new product effect'?

ABeyond the initial hype, the decisive factors for success will be an asset's practical utility, regulatory clarity, and fundamental strength of its ecosystem. The ETF acts as a 'litmus test,' and only assets with real value and powerful narratives will thrive in the long term.

Related Reads

U.S. Stablecoin Regulatory Framework Finalized, Global Crypto Finance Enters New Institutionalized Phase

The United States has enacted its first federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, marking a pivotal moment for the global cryptocurrency industry. This framework transitions stablecoins from a state of fragmented oversight to a unified federal system, establishing clear legal definitions and operational standards for dollar-pegged payment stablecoins. Key provisions mandate that stablecoin issuers must hold high-quality liquid assets—such as cash and short-term U.S. Treasury securities—as reserves. They are also required to comply with strict auditing, transparency, risk management, and consumer protection rules. The regulatory structure adopts a dual approach: larger issuers will be overseen at the federal level, while smaller ones may fall under state jurisdiction. This development is expected to significantly enhance the role of stablecoins like USDC and USDT as critical infrastructure for cross-border payments, settlements, and decentralized finance (DeFi). By providing legal certainty, the framework is likely to encourage greater adoption by traditional financial institutions, payment companies, and fintech firms, integrating stablecoins more deeply into the mainstream financial system. However, the new rules also present challenges. Higher compliance costs and operational requirements may pressure smaller issuers and could lead to industry consolidation. The shift emphasizes regulatory-driven competition over innovation-driven growth. Furthermore, global regulatory disparities remain, as jurisdictions worldwide have differing definitions and standards for stablecoins, potentially creating friction in international flows. Overall, this U.S. regulatory move signals a structural shift from an enforcement-led approach to a rules-based system for digital assets. It is seen as a maturation of the industry, setting the stage for stablecoins to evolve from crypto trading tools into foundational components of the future digital financial ecosystem, including in cross-border trade, retail payments, and financial market settlements.

cointelegraph_中文4분 전

U.S. Stablecoin Regulatory Framework Finalized, Global Crypto Finance Enters New Institutionalized Phase

cointelegraph_中文4분 전

Securities or Commodities? A Decade-Long Tug-of-War Ends as the 'Crypto Market Structure Act' Races to the Senate

The "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" (CLARITY Act) is advancing to the U.S. Senate for final review after passing the House with strong support. The bill aims to resolve the long-standing regulatory debate over whether cryptocurrencies are classified as securities or commodities. It introduces a clear framework: tokens on decentralized blockchains are defined as "digital commodities" under CFTC oversight, while those meeting the Howey test remain securities regulated by the SEC. Key provisions include a "mature blockchain" exemption for highly decentralized networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum, a 360-day temporary registration pathway for trading platforms, and a fundraising exemption of up to $75 million for certain token offerings with enhanced disclosure. The bill also establishes a joint advisory committee to improve coordination between the CFTC and SEC and explicitly exempts non-custodial DeFi actors from broker-dealer regulations. This legislative effort aligns with the Trump administration's pro-crypto stance, including the appointment of industry-friendly leaders at key agencies like the SEC and CFTC, and recent moves to allow regulated spot crypto trading on CFTC-approved exchanges. If enacted, the law would provide regulatory clarity, encourage institutional adoption, and position the U.S. as a leader in the digital asset space.

Odaily星球日报18분 전

Securities or Commodities? A Decade-Long Tug-of-War Ends as the 'Crypto Market Structure Act' Races to the Senate

Odaily星球日报18분 전

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片