Trump Security Strategy Overlooks Crypto Despite Industry Push

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2025-12-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-08

Introduzione

The Trump administration's latest national security strategy notably omits cryptocurrency and blockchain technology from its list of core priorities, despite the President's previous statements about making the U.S. a leader in the digital asset space. Instead, the document emphasizes AI, biotech, and quantum computing as key technological frontiers. This exclusion appears contradictory, given Trump's past concerns about China dominating the crypto sector and the CIA's view of crypto as a critical area of technological competition. Although the strategy vaguely mentions U.S. leadership in digital finance and innovation, it lacks specific references to crypto or blockchain. Nevertheless, the administration has pursued crypto-friendly policies this year, including signing the GENIUS Act, establishing a crypto task force, banning CBDCs, and creating a Bitcoin reserve from forfeited assets. Following the strategy's release, Bitcoin prices fell below $90,000, partly due to calls for increased NATO defense spending. Market attention now turns to the Federal Reserve's upcoming interest rate decision, with expectations of a cut potentially benefiting crypto markets.

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ most recent national security strategy by the Trump administration has deliberately left out cryptocurrency and blockchain technology from the list of main priorities. The absence of these technologies seems to be at odds with the statements that President Trump had previously made regarding turning America into a leading power in the digital asset ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌space.

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ document dropped on Friday pinpointed AI and quantum computing as the core issues that shaped America’s essential national interests. According to the White House, one of the main objectives should be to make sure that American technology and standards in AI, biotech, and quantum computing are the ones that guide the world towards the next stage of global ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌progress.

Missing From Security Priorities

Before,​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ Trump informed CBS that he was against China turning into the number one global power in cryptocurrency and wished that the entire Bitcoin mining operations were local. In that regard, CIA Deputy Director Michael Ellis concurred with the opinion in his statement in May when he said that crypto is one of the main areas of technological competition in which China and other opponents are ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌involved.

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ strategy document names the U.S. as the financial sector leader of the world and indicates that America will maintain that lead by being first in digital finance and innovation for market security. This unclear statement might be able to cover cryptocurrency as well, but it doesn’t have any specific mentions of blockchain or digital assets in the ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌text.

Even​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ though the omission was there, the administration of Trump has been pushing the policies that are friendly to cryptocurrency actively for the whole year and has gone ahead with the implementation of several initiatives that were promised to the industry. The legislation on the GENIUS Act was signed into law, and the executive orders created a task force in the crypto industry and prohibited central bank digital currencies.

Under the new administration, federal agencies have refrained from taking a number of crypto enforcement actions that they had previously considered, thus creating a regulatory environment that is more favourable to digital assets. The government made a Bitcoin reserve and a crypto stockpile using the assets that were forfeited, and is at the same time looking into budget-neutral acquisition methods for the ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌expansion.

After​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ the document came out, Bitcoin prices dropped below $90,000 as investors reacted to the call for NATO allies to drastically increase their defence spending. According to the plan, each member country should spend 5% of its GDP on defence, which is three times the current level and may have a significant impact on inflation rates.

Investors are now focusing on the upcoming decision by the Federal Reserve regarding interest rates, with nearly 89% convinced that the rate will be lowered. When rates are lower, it is more likely that investors will take riskier positions, which could be beneficial for cryptocurrency markets that are looking for a new uptrend after a recent period of ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌instability.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

7 Crypto Exchanges With the Lowest Spot Fees

TagsCryptoTRUMP

Letture associate

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather than a form of gambling.

比推19 min fa

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推19 min fa

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

"Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of USDC, has sparked intense debate in the crypto community following its Q3 2025 earnings report. Despite reporting strong growth—revenue up 66% YoY to $740 million and net income of $214 million, driven by a 108% increase in USDC circulation—its stock price fell significantly post-earnings and remains near its IPO price of $64. The core disagreement revolves around Circle’s business model and sustainability. Critics, including Jiang Zhuorer, argue that Circle operates like a bank, earning primarily through interest on reserve assets (mainly U.S. Treasuries), but is highly vulnerable to interest rate cuts. They highlight that ~60% of revenue is paid to distributors like Coinbase, leaving thin margins that could turn negative in a low-rate environment. They also warn of competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan and potential policy changes. Proponents, such as BTCdayu and qinbafrank, counter that Circle is building a long-term, network-driven infrastructure play. They compare it to Amazon or JD.com, arguing that current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve scale, compliance advantage, and eventual market dominance in a winner-take-all industry. They believe USDC’s合规 (compliance) edge and institutional trust will drive adoption to multi-trillion dollars, outweighing interest rate risks. Short-term concerns include significant post-IPO lockup expirations adding selling pressure, and structural barriers like U.S. tax treatment of USDC as a property (not cash), hindering retail payment adoption. The debate encapsulates a clash between cyclical concerns (rates, costs, competition) and structural optimism (scale, compliance, network effects)."

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片