Securitize falls 16% after earnings miss, tokenization revenue drops

cointelegraphPubblicato 2026-08-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-13

Introduzione

Securitize shares fell 16% in premarket trading after the tokenization platform reported Q2 revenue of $14.4 million, missing Wall Street estimates of $20.6 million and marking a 5% year-over-year decline. Revenue from its core tokenization business dropped 12% to $7.8 million. The company, backed by BlackRock, posted a widened net loss of $21.7 million and a swing to negative adjusted EBITDA. Despite the financial miss, it reported record average tokenized assets under management of $4.3 billion, a 16% increase.

Securitize shares sank in premarket trading on Thursday after the tokenization platform missed Wall Street revenue estimates.

Securitize reported $14.4 million in total revenue in its second-quarter earnings, down 5% compared to the same period last year, according to its quarterly results published on Wednesday.

The revenue came in below the Wall Street consensus estimate of $20.6 million, according to analyst estimates compiled by Yahoo Finance. Securitize shares traded at $6.62 in premarket trading as of 8:10 am UTC, down about 16% from Wednesday’s $7.86 close.

Securitize reported $7.8 million in quarterly revenue from tokenization, down 12% from $8.9 million in the second quarter of 2025.

The BlackRock-backed company also reported a record average tokenized AUM of $4.3 billion in the second quarter of 2026, up 16% from the second quarter of last year.

Securitize posted a net loss of $21.7 million for the quarter, widening from $6.1 million a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA swung to a $5.5 million loss from a $1.8 million profit.

Across the broader tokenized real-world asset market, the number of asset holders has climbed to more than 1.7 million, while distributed asset value stands at roughly $38 billion, according to data provider RWA.xyz.

Magazine: Securitize gains on NYSE debut with tokenized stocks live on Solana, Avalanche

Domande pertinenti

QWhy did Securitize's shares fall in premarket trading on Thursday?

ASecuritize's shares fell because the company missed Wall Street revenue estimates in its second-quarter earnings report.

QHow much revenue did Securitize report for Q2, and how did it compare to Wall Street's expectation?

ASecuritize reported $14.4 million in total revenue for Q2. This was below the Wall Street consensus estimate of $20.6 million.

QWhat was the percentage change in Securitize's tokenization revenue year-over-year for Q2?

ASecuritize's tokenization revenue for Q2 was $7.8 million, which is down 12% from $8.9 million in the second quarter of the previous year.

QWhat was Securitize's net loss for the quarter, and how did it compare to the previous year?

ASecuritize posted a net loss of $21.7 million for the quarter. This loss widened significantly from a net loss of $6.1 million a year earlier.

QAccording to the article, what is the current state of the broader tokenized real-world asset market?

AAccording to data from RWA.xyz, the broader tokenized real-world asset market has over 1.7 million asset holders, and the distributed asset value stands at roughly $38 billion.

Letture associate

‘White hats’ take 4000 BTC from Liquid, ETFs see best week of 2026: Hodler’s Digest

A purported "white hat" hacking group has withdrawn nearly 4,000 BTC (worth $319 million) from the Blockstream-run Liquid Network sidechain, leaving a message to "contact us on chain." The network has been paused as its team investigates the security breach and negotiates for the funds' return. Analysis suggests the transaction pattern is more consistent with a white hat extraction than a theft. In other news, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw their strongest three-week inflow stretch of 2026, attracting a net $3.8 billion. Meanwhile, AMC's CEO Adam Aron has threatened legal action against Robinhood's Ethereum L2 for tokenizing AMC stock without permission, sparking a public feud. A consortium of 21 major financial institutions, including Bank of America and Goldman Sachs, plans to launch a USD-denominated stablecoin in the first half of 2027. Prediction market platform Kalshi has issued a lifetime ban to former lawmaker George Santos for alleged insider trading, while facing a legal challenge from New Jersey over state jurisdiction. Bitcoin traded around $80,234 at week's end. Arthur Hayes predicted Bitcoin could reach $1 million by 2030 but stated his best risk-adjusted bet is currently Ethereum. The IMF reported El Salvador used private donations, not public funds, for recent Bitcoin accumulation, a claim President Bukele disputes. A fake Claude desktop app is spreading crypto-stealing malware, and Hyperscale Data has ended Bitcoin mining in Michigan to convert the site for AI operations.

cointelegraph18 min fa

‘White hats’ take 4000 BTC from Liquid, ETFs see best week of 2026: Hodler’s Digest

cointelegraph18 min fa

Robinhood Chain Fees Spark Debate Over Business Models: To Be a Tenant or a Landlord?

A public debate erupted over the weekend of September 5th regarding the fee model of Robinhood Chain, highlighting a fundamental conflict between two blockchain philosophies: Solana's "lowest Gas" approach versus Arbitrum's focus on "finding a sustainable business model." Robinhood Chain, an L2 built on Arbitrum Orbit that launched in July 2026, saw its average Gas fee rise to around $0.40 as transaction volume grew—over 100 times more expensive than Solana and even double Ethereum's mainnet cost. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko ("Toly") criticized this model, arguing that the 10% of net protocol revenue Robinhood shares with the Arbitrum ecosystem (with 90% retained) could cover quadruple the fees on Solana. He contended that applications, not the base layer, should charge users, with the base layer focusing on ultra-low costs. In response, Offchain Labs co-founder Steven Goldfeder defended the Arbitrum model. He stated that by operating its own sequencer, Robinhood captures 90% of the Gas revenue—acting as a "landlord"—whereas on Solana, all fees go to validators, leaving Robinhood as a "tenant" that would have to subsidize user costs out of pocket. This exchange framed the core debate: should chains be free with applications monetizing, or should chains themselves capture value? The discussion broadened with contributions from Nina Rong (BNB Chain Growth Lead and former Arbitrum employee), who argued that endlessly lowering Gas is no longer the top priority. The industry must establish sustainable business models—whether through fees, revenue sharing, or other agreements—to ensure long-term viability beyond reliance on foundation grants. The debate underscores two diverging paths: 1. **Solana's "Ultra-Low Cost + Ecosystem Flywheel":** Prioritizes high throughput and minimal fees to attract users and applications. Value capture for apps happens off-chain (e.g., front-end fees, subscriptions). 2. **Arbitrum's "Customizable App-Chain + Revenue Share":** Allows projects to launch their own chains, control sequencers, and retain most fee revenue while sharing a portion with the parent ecosystem, creating a clearer business闭环 for large entities like Robinhood. An underlying issue is Ethereum's minimal value capture. While Robinhood Chain settles on Ethereum, over 99.99% of the fees are retained by Robinhood and Arbitrum, with only a tiny fraction going to Ethereum for data availability and security—posing a long-term challenge for the mainnet's security budget. The conclusion is that the industry is moving beyond a simple "cheapest Gas" competition. The real challenge is finding a sustainable balance between user experience, infrastructure profitability, and security incentives. The winners will be those who successfully navigate this complex trilemma.

marsbit22 min fa

Robinhood Chain Fees Spark Debate Over Business Models: To Be a Tenant or a Landlord?

marsbit22 min fa

A new altcoin has entered the top ten cryptocurrencies! Today's surge triggered a wave of liquidations

Zcash ($ZEC) surged by approximately 15% in the past 24 hours, reaching $1,170, and became the focal point for market liquidations. According to CoinGlass, total cryptocurrency liquidations over this period amounted to roughly $212 million, with about $156 million from short positions. $ZEC led with liquidations of around $45.32 million, followed by Ethereum (ETH), Bitcoin ($BTC), and Arbitrum (ARB). This price spike also propelled $ZEC into the top ten cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. The rally inflicted significant losses on a major short position held by trader Garrett Bullyish (aka "October 10 whale") on Hyperliquid. He held a 2x leveraged short of 32,759.57 $ZEC (~$38.18 million) with an average entry price of $444 and a liquidation price of $2,566, resulting in an unrealized loss of approximately $23.57 million. Concurrently, the same trader held a long position of 1,331.88 $BTC, which generated an unrealized profit of about $3.6 million. *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

A new altcoin has entered the top ten cryptocurrencies! Today's surge triggered a wave of liquidations

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

Solana and Arbitrum Co-founders Clash Over Robinhood Chain Fee Model

The co-founders of Solana (Anatoly Yakovenko) and Arbitrum/Offchain Labs (Steven Goldfeder) have engaged in a public debate over the fee economics of Robinhood Chain. The discussion intensified as average transaction fees on Robinhood Chain reached $0.40, over 100x higher than on Solana and more than double Ethereum's fees. Yakovenko argued that the 10% of net revenue Robinhood Chain pays to Arbitrum (with 8% to Arbitrum DAO and 2% to Developer Guild) would be enough to cover Solana's transaction fees four times over, suggesting Robinhood could make user transactions free. He proposed Robinhood could charge fees at the application frontend while using a cheaper backend infrastructure. Goldfeder countered, stating Yakovenko's view focuses on costs but ignores revenue. He emphasized that by building on Arbitrum, Robinhood keeps 90% of the gas fees. If it were merely a user of Solana's infrastructure, it would earn 0% from gas and would have to subsidize any free transactions from its own funds. Goldfeder framed the choice as Robinhood opting to be a "landlord" (earning from the chain's activity) rather than a "tenant." The debate comes amid surging activity on Robinhood Chain, which recently saw daily DEX trading volume exceed $1.72 billion and generated $24.5 million in fees in a single day. Over the past 30 days, the chain's fees totaled $188.16 million.

cryptonews.ru4 h fa

Solana and Arbitrum Co-founders Clash Over Robinhood Chain Fee Model

cryptonews.ru4 h fa

Satoshi-Era Bitcoin Wakes Up After 16 Years: 600 BTC Moved

Bitcoins mined in 2010, totaling 600 BTC worth approximately $48 million, were moved from long-dormant addresses after over 16 years of inactivity, sparking speculation about a potential link to Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. On-chain analysis tracked the coins to mining rewards from 12 blocks processed in March 2010, when the block subsidy was 50 BTC. Blockchain tracking platform Whale Alert stated its investigation found no connection between these specific blocks and Nakamoto, dampening the speculation. The movement is notable because the coins originate from the period when Nakamoto was still actively involved in Bitcoin's development. Whale Alert suggested one of the transfers may have been a test transaction before the bulk of the coins were moved.

cryptonews.ru4 h fa

Satoshi-Era Bitcoin Wakes Up After 16 Years: 600 BTC Moved

cryptonews.ru4 h fa

Trading

Spot