FTX Scenario? BitMart Accused of Issues With Withdrawals and Insolvency

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-11

Introduzione

Cryptocurrency exchange BitMart, which previously announced its closure, is facing accusations of insolvency and withdrawal issues, drawing comparisons to the FTX collapse. Despite announcing a gradual wind-down until January 2027 and assuring users they could withdraw assets, reports emerged of significant problems shortly after. On-chain analysts noted unusually low withdrawal volumes, with some users reporting failed or stuck transactions. BitMart's CEO, Sheldon Xia, eventually broke the company's silence on August 8, 2026, claiming the team was consolidating assets for an orderly shutdown and denied misappropriating funds, mentioning potential court and auditor involvement. However, new complaints arose. A user named BeardStaff claimed $10.1 million was stuck, while Matthew Wang, co-founder of market maker OpenGradient, accused BitMart of insolvency, noting his firm's funds were also trapped. Wang highlighted a suspicious offer from BitMart for high-yield, locked staking just a week before the closure announcement. Numerous other users reported being unable to withdraw sums ranging from thousands to millions of dollars. Several crypto projects, including Gen6, Paxi Network, and Scandic Coin, are pursuing legal action. Data from Arkham Intelligence shows BitMart's wallet holdings have plummeted from over $100 million in early July 2026 to around $36.4 million, while CoinMarketCap data indicates reserves are only $4.6 million, mostly in BitMart's native BMX token.

The cryptocurrency exchange BitMart, which previously announced its closure, has faced criticism, for example from OpenGradient market maker co-founder Matthew Wang. It is being accused of insolvency and delays in withdrawing funds.

What is happening with BitMart?

At the end of July 2026, the company announced its closure. It is assumed that the platform will gradually wind down all operations by the end of January 2027. At the same time, BitMart particularly highlighted the fact that assets can be withdrawn even after the start of the transition period.

Despite this, the very next day on-chain experts Lookonchain reported certain problems with the platform. About $805,000 was withdrawn from it in 24 hours from 58 wallets, which, as analysts emphasized, is little for such a platform.

They also drew attention to the fact that for eight hours, not a single withdrawal from BitMart was recorded. Furthermore, some users directly pointed out the inability to receive funds, as transactions were processed for a long time and with errors.

Since the closure announcement, the exchange has not commented on the situation. Only on August 8, 2026, BitMart CEO Sheldon Xia published a message trying to reassure users.

According to him, the team is still consolidating assets, ensuring an orderly wind-down of operations.

"We have not misappropriated any assets nor have we taken any steps for premature withdrawal of funds or evasion of our obligations. We are considering involving courts and independent third-party auditors to prepare a transparent report," he stated.

New Complaints

On August 9, a user under the pseudonym BeardStaff stated on his X (formerly Twitter) page that a sum of $10.1 million was stuck on the exchange for him. He also pointed to suspicious behavior by team members. For example, his manager Tony deleted his Telegram account, and members of the management are not responding to requests to comment on the situation.

The trader asked BitMart's top management to clarify the situation and provide confirmation that the funds are safe. He also began collecting an evidence base from other victims.

His post was commented on by Matthew Wang. According to him, the funds of the OpenGradient market maker are also stuck on the exchange. He called the platform insolvent.

Furthermore, Wang attached screenshots of BitMart's proposal to lock up crypto assets for a period of six months with yields of up to 15% per annum, put forward a week before the exchange's closure. The CEO of OpenGradient considers this suspicious and unethical.

Numerous other victims commented on the post. The amounts stuck on the exchange range from relatively small, for example $3,000, to substantial.

A user under the pseudonym King David tried to withdraw $24,000 from the platform but received only $5.

"Many of us have begun to wonder if another scenario, similar to FTX, is unfolding here. [...] Now you [Sheldon Xia] have mentioned involving courts and third parties. Whatever legal or commercial complexities arise within BitMart's company, they should not become a burden for customers. We placed our funds with BitMart and are simply asking for them to be returned to us in a timely manner," he emphasized.

The team of the crypto project Gen6 stated that they contacted the Hungarian police due to problems withdrawing $80,000. The organization noted that they intend to use all possible legal levers to secure the return of funds.

Similar statements were also made by Paxi Network and Scandic Coin. They all point out that their withdrawal requests are not being processed.

According to Arkham Intelligence, wallets associated with BitMart hold crypto assets worth $36.4 million. As of early July 2026, the balance exceeded $100 million.

According to CoinMarketCap, the exchange's reserves amount to $4.6 million. And most of it is in the native token BMX.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what is the primary accusation against the BitMart crypto exchange?

AThe primary accusation against BitMart is insolvency and delays in processing withdrawals of funds, with users and analysts suggesting it could be following a scenario similar to FTX.

QWhat specific evidence did analysts from Lookonchain provide to suggest BitMart was having problems?

AOn-chain analysts from Lookonchain reported that over 24 hours, only about $805,000 was withdrawn from BitMart across 58 wallets, which they noted was very low for such a platform. They also highlighted an 8-hour period with no recorded withdrawals at all.

QWhat did CEO Sheldon Xia announce in his August 8 statement regarding BitMart's situation?

AIn his statement on August 8, CEO Sheldon Xia claimed the team was still consolidating assets to ensure an orderly wind-down of operations. He denied misappropriating any assets and stated the company was considering involving courts and independent third-party auditors to prepare a transparent report.

QWhat suspicious action did Matthew Wang, co-founder of OpenGradient, highlight regarding BitMart's activities before its closure?

AMatthew Wang highlighted a suspicious and unethical proposal from BitMart, made just a week before announcing its closure, that offered users up to 15% annual yield for locking their crypto assets on the platform for six months.

QWhat discrepancy is reported between the assets held on BitMart's wallets and its official reserves according to the article?

AThe article reports a discrepancy between on-chain data and official reserve figures. According to Arkham Intelligence, BitMart's wallets hold crypto assets worth $36.4 million, down from over $100 million in early July. However, CoinMarketCap data shows the exchange's official reserves are only $4.6 million, mostly in its native BMX token.

Letture associate

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

Recently, analysis firm SemiAnalysis accused tech giants Google and Meta of "benchmark gaming" with their AI models Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3. The accusation stems from a dramatic performance drop between two versions of the Terminal-Bench evaluation for AI agents. On the older, public Terminal-Bench 2.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash scored 89.4, ranking second and beating GPT-6 Astra, while Muse Spark 1.3 scored 88.8. However, on the newly released, more secure Terminal-Bench 4.0, their scores plummeted to 19.1 and approximately 33.3 respectively, far behind competitors. SemiAnalysis argues this indicates "benchmark contamination," where companies train models not on the public test questions themselves, but on expensive, privately purchased training data specifically designed to mimic the benchmark's style. This has evolved into a lucrative industry, with specialized firms selling tailored training tasks for thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The article specifically points to Datacurve, a company that both sells expert coding data and runs its own benchmark (DeepSWE), where the accused models also performed well. Meta's Chief AI Officer, Alexandr Wang, dismissed the claims as a "silly argument," pointing out similar performance drops for other models like GPT-5.6 Sol. He stated Meta never claimed Muse Spark 1.3 was as powerful as top-tier models, only that it offered better value. The report concludes that this is the inevitable fate of all high-quality public benchmarks—they become "gamed" over time. The proposed solution of private, high-quality benchmarks comes with a significant downside: it would erode public transparency, turning open rankings into marketing tools and leaving developers without a common, fair measure to compare AI models.

marsbit2 h fa

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

marsbit2 h fa

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam is venturing into the oil fields of Venezuela, a surprising shift for a prominent figure in the digital asset space. Through his company Primavera Infinita, he recently secured a production contract for the Budare-Elotes block with Venezuela's state oil firm PDVSA. This move into a politically volatile, sanction-scarred country highlights a bet on high returns from its reopening under new leadership and shifting U.S. foreign policy. Ehrsam’s investment reflects a venture capital-style appetite for risk, targeting assets deeply discounted by political uncertainty. He is not alone; smaller, politically connected U.S. firms like Aspect Holdings and Hunt Oil are also entering, while established giants like ExxonMobil remain cautious due to past expropriations. To manage the complex, capital-intensive nature of oil, Ehrsam is assembling a professional team. This trend extends beyond Ehrsam. Other crypto wealth, like BitMEX's Arthur Hayes and Tether, is diversifying into traditional hard assets—energy, metals, and agriculture—seeking physical scarcity as a long-term anchor. Tether, for instance, took a controlling stake in agricultural giant Adecoagro. These moves signify crypto capital's evolving interest: not just tokenizing real-world assets (RWA), but directly acquiring and operating them. Ultimately, Ehrsam's gamble is less on oil geology and more on the duration of Venezuela's current political window. It underscores a broader narrative where digital-era wealth seeks stability and scale in the physical world's most traditional, immovable resources.

marsbit3 h fa

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

marsbit3 h fa

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

Title: Refuting the "Ethereum Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does Paying Gas Without ETH Really Mean? The debate sparked by Vitalik Buterin's discussion of EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions), which suggests users could pay transaction fees without holding ETH, has led to extreme claims that ETH will lose its value. However, this perspective misunderstands the proposal. Currently, an Ethereum user initiating a transaction must also pay the network's Gas fee in ETH. EIP-8141 aims to decouple these actions. It allows a transaction to be split into separate "frames." A user could sign a transaction to, for example, send USDC, while a separate Paymaster account pays the required ETH Gas fee on their behalf. The user would then settle the cost with the Paymaster using USDC or another token. From the user's perspective, they pay in a stablecoin without interacting with ETH. Crucially, from the Ethereum protocol's perspective, the Gas is still paid in ETH; only the settlement layer between the user and Paymaster changes. This concept isn't entirely new; ERC-4337's Account Abstraction already allows similar Gas sponsorship. EIP-8141 seeks to integrate this capability more natively. The core goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of Gas, similar to how one pays with a credit card abroad without handling the local currency. It also enables atomic operations, like bundling token approval with a swap, which would revert together if the swap fails. Regarding ETH's value, the argument that "no ETH is needed" is incorrect. While users may not hold ETH, Paymasters and services must still acquire and spend ETH to pay network fees on the backend. The demand for ETH shifts from being distributed across millions of user wallets to being concentrated in the balances of these service providers. The key variable is whether this improved usability attracts significant new users and increases overall network activity. If it does, total ETH burned in fees could rise substantially. If it doesn't, the change merely reshuffles who holds the ETH needed for Gas. In summary, EIP-8141 aims to lower the entry barrier by hiding Gas complexity, betting that this will drive broader adoption and increase the fundamental utility—and thus demand—for the Ethereum network and ETH itself.

marsbit3 h fa

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片