Coinbase has made a quite unexpected decision to delist two altcoins!

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-28

Introduzione

Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase has announced the suspension of trading for two altcoins, Badger DAO (BADGER) and Storj (STORJ), following a recent review of its listing standards. Trading for these assets will be halted on September 28, 2026, at approximately 9:00 PM Turkey Time, affecting Coinbase's retail and institutional platforms. Coinbase stated it regularly reviews listed assets and made the decision based on its standards, though no specific reason for the delisting was provided. Prior to the suspension, order books for BADGER and STORJ will be moved to limit-only mode. Badger DAO is a decentralized project focused on expanding Bitcoin's use within DeFi, with its BADGER token used for governance. Storj is a decentralized cloud storage network that distributes encrypted data across a global node network, using its STORJ token for network payments. The article includes a chart showing a decline in STORJ's price and concludes by stating it is not investment advice.

The American cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase announced its decision to suspend trading of the cryptocurrencies Badger DAO (BADGER) and Storj (STORJ) following a recent review of its listing standards.

According to Coinbase's statement, trading of BADGER and STORJ will be suspended on September 28, 2026, at approximately 21:00 Turkish time. This decision will also affect the Simple and Advanced Trade services on Coinbase, as well as Coinbase Exchange and Coinbase Prime, the platform for institutional investors.

The exchange stated that it regularly reviews cryptoassets traded on its platform for compliance with listing standards and, after recent reviews, made the decision to suspend trading of the two altcoins. According to Coinbase's official help page, delisting decisions can be made for various reasons, including changes to the project, failure of the asset to meet review standards, or the project ceasing operations. However, the exchange did not specify a clear reason for the delisting decision.

Prior to the delisting, Coinbase has moved the order books for BADGER and STORJ into 'limit-only' mode. At this stage, investors can only place limit orders or cancel existing limit orders. Trade execution may continue if a suitable counter order is found.

What is Badger DAO (BADGER)?

Badger DAO is a decentralized project focused on expanding the use of Bitcoin within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. The project describes itself as a decentralized structure consisting of community-governed developers who support the growth of Bitcoin within DeFi.

The ecosystem's native token, BADGER, is used in various DeFi protocols related to Badger DAO, primarily for governance. The project's official website also states that support for some legacy products and vaults has been discontinued, and access to the relevant smart contracts is now directly via the blockchain.

What is Storj (STORJ)?

Storj is one of the blockchain projects developing decentralized and distributed cloud data storage infrastructure. The network's goal is to store user data by distributing it across various storage nodes, rather than storing it in a single centralized data center.

In Storj's infrastructure, files are encrypted, fragmented, and distributed across various storage nodes in a global network. The project also offers S3 compatibility as an alternative to traditional cloud storage services. The STORJ token is used for payments between storage services and network participants within the network's economic structure.

The chart shows the drop in the price of STORJ.

*This is not investment advice.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two altcoins being delisted by Coinbase, and what is the scheduled date and time for trading suspension?

AThe two altcoins being delisted are Badger DAO (BADGER) and Storj (STORJ). Trading for these cryptocurrencies will be suspended on September 28, 2026, at approximately 21:00 Turkish Time.

QAccording to Coinbase, what are the general reasons that can lead to a delisting decision for a cryptocurrency?

AAccording to Coinbase's official help page, delisting decisions can be made for various reasons, including changes in the project, the asset no longer meeting the listing review standards, or the discontinuation of the project's activities.

QWhat is the primary focus of the Badger DAO (BADGER) project, and what is the main use of its token?

ABadger DAO is a decentralized project focused on expanding the use of Bitcoin in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. Its native token, BADGER, is primarily used for governance within various DeFi protocols associated with Badger DAO.

QWhat problem does the Storj (STORJ) project aim to solve, and how does its network function?

AStorj aims to create a decentralized and distributed cloud data storage infrastructure. It functions by encrypting, fragmenting, and distributing user files across a global network of storage nodes, instead of storing them in a single centralized data center. Its STORJ token is used for payments within this network economy.

QHow will the delisting process affect order books for BADGER and STORJ on Coinbase prior to the suspension date?

APrior to the delisting, Coinbase will move the order books for BADGER and STORJ into 'limit-only' mode. During this phase, investors can only place limit orders or cancel existing limit orders. Trade execution may continue if a matching counterparty order is found.

Letture associate

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparative Analysis of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

This report from Blockstream Research analyzes three lattice-based signature schemes as quantum-resistant candidates for Bitcoin, focusing on Dilithium, Falcon, and the now-withdrawn Hawk. Core evaluation criteria include on-chain costs (combined size of public key and signature), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and potential for integration with Bitcoin's existing infrastructure like BIP-32 hierarchical deterministic wallets. Key Findings: * **Dilithium** is praised for its design simplicity, using only integer operations, making secure implementation easier. However, it has the largest size (5,261 bytes for security level 3). * **Falcon** offers the most compact signatures and the fastest verification. Its main drawback—platform-dependent floating-point operations in signing—can be mitigated with a slower, deterministic integer-based implementation. The report recommends **Falcon-1024** (security level 5) for its safety margin. * **Hawk**, which aimed for a better balance, was withdrawn after a cryptographic attack revealed a structural flaw that halved its estimated security. The report concludes that Falcon-1024 is the most suitable lattice-based choice for Bitcoin, pending the finalization of its NIST FN-DSA standard. In the short term, it still recommends hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) as a lower-risk transitional solution, with future hybrid deployments as a possibility.

marsbit1 h fa

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparative Analysis of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

marsbit1 h fa

Ripple (XRP) Company Announces Plans for Major Future Update

Ripple (XRP) has announced a four-phase plan to prepare the XRP Ledger (XRPL) for future security threats posed by quantum computers. The company's senior director of engineering stated the goal is to build necessary infrastructure before quantum computers become a direct threat, aiming to minimize impact on existing systems, user assets, and network operations. The plan begins with identifying potential quantum vulnerabilities within XRPL, followed by testing quantum-resistant cryptographic methods. The next phase involves parallel testing of existing security mechanisms and new quantum-resistant solutions to ensure reliability and prevent disruption for users and applications. The final phase would involve transitioning the XRPL to more comprehensive, quantum-resistant security standards if the technology matures. Ripple is also developing contingency plans for a faster-than-expected advancement of quantum computing, which could accelerate the transition timeline. A current XRPL feature allowing users to change the keys controlling their accounts without altering the accounts themselves is seen as a potential advantage in any future migration. However, Ripple cannot unilaterally change transaction validation rules or network-wide cryptographic standards; such updates require coordination and approval from independent validators via XRPL's governance process. While quantum computers are not yet capable of breaking the cryptography used by major blockchains like Bitcoin or XRPL, developers across the industry are already evaluating transition scenarios to quantum-resistant algorithms due to the long-term risks they pose to public-key cryptography.

cryptonews.ru2 h fa

Ripple (XRP) Company Announces Plans for Major Future Update

cryptonews.ru2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片