BTC Price Reaches $64,360, but Bitfinex Warns of Downside Risks

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-05

Introduzione

Bitcoin's price fluctuated between $63,300 and $64,300 on Tuesday amid news that the U.S. Senate might vote on the CLARITY Act this week. Despite briefly dipping to $63,000 on August 3rd, the cryptocurrency largely held above this key level, finding support above $63,500 for most of the period. It ultimately reached a daily peak of $64,360, leading to a 0.8% gain and a market cap of $1.29 trillion. The price movement caused significant liquidations in the derivatives market, with short positions accounting for $35 million of the $42 million liquidated in 24 hours. However, the likelihood of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026, as per Polymarket, fell to 25%. Analysts at Bitfinex warn of downside risks, noting that two daily closes below $63,000 would officially trigger a bearish signal. They emphasize that Bitcoin's near-term direction will depend less on crypto-specific news and more on broader macroeconomic conditions, particularly real yields (returns adjusted for inflation) and its ability to hold within the $62,000–$65,000 support range. Current pressure from the bond and equity markets is adding to BTC's challenges.

On Tuesday, bitcoin fluctuated between $63,300 and $64,300 amid reports that the U.S. Senate could vote on the CLARITY Act bill this week. Since rebounding to the $63,000 level shortly after noon on August 3rd, the cryptocurrency has largely held above this key threshold.

In fact, data from the past 24 hours shows that, aside from two instances when it plunged to $63,300 (August 3rd, 9:00 PM ET) and $63,400 (August 4th, 6:30 AM ET), bitcoin found support above the $63,500 mark. Initially, it seemed the cryptocurrency was losing momentum after hitting $64,000. However, following a rise to $64,129 (10:20 AM ET), each subsequent surge led to a new session high, culminating in a daily peak of $64,360.

Although the price retreated slightly soon after, bitcoin's price momentum led to another minor increase (0.8%), bringing its market capitalization to $1.29 trillion. In the derivatives market, bitcoin's 24-hour price action was particularly brutal for traders with over-leveraged short positions. Coinglass data shows that of the $42 million liquidated during this period, short positions accounted for 83% of the total, or $35 million. Across the broader cryptoeconomy, $122 million in short positions were liquidated compared to $58 million in long positions.

As Bitcoin.com News reported earlier today, Senate Majority Leader John Thune remains optimistic that the bill will be brought to a vote before the parliamentary recess begins. However, with less than three days left in the session and given the history of such unfulfilled promises, Thune's comments failed to sway traders on prediction markets.

On Polymarket, the probability of the bill passing in 2026 fell to 25% by Tuesday afternoon, down from 27% on Monday. If the bill's consideration is delayed, bitcoin's chances of rising by year-end will depend more on general macroeconomic conditions rather than crypto-specific factors. Bitfinex analysts agree, noting that rising real yields and bitcoin's ability to hold within the $62,000–$65,000 support range will determine its future direction.

"August has started with immediate pressure: a reversal from the intra-week peak of $65,420 led to a close below $63,000, followed by a closing price of $62,815 on Saturday, August 1st, 2026. Two daily closes below the $63,000 level officially activate the downside trigger set in last week's Intelligence Update," wrote Bitfinex analysts in the latest report.

The analysts also argue that the market remains dependent on macroeconomic factors, pointing to a strong long-duration bond market and current equity market pressure which have increased the strain on BTC. Nonetheless, for bitcoin, the most important factor is not economic growth. "It is the real value of money—the yield investors can obtain after accounting for inflation. The current situation can both help and hinder," the analysts conclude.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the highest price Bitcoin reached during the session described in the article?

ABitcoin reached a daily peak of $64,360 during the session.

QAccording to the article, what event in the U.S. Senate was impacting Bitcoin's price movements?

ABitcoin's price moved amid reports that the U.S. Senate might vote on the CLARITY Act bill that week.

QWhat percentage of the $42 million liquidated in the 24-hour period were short positions, according to Coinglass data?

AShort positions accounted for 83% of the total, or $35 million, of the $42 million liquidated.

QWhat is the support range identified by Bitfinex analysts as crucial for Bitcoin's future direction?

ABitfinex analysts identified the $62,000–$65,000 support range as crucial for determining Bitcoin's next directional move.

QAccording to Bitfinex analysts, what is the most important factor for Bitcoin's price, rather than economic growth?

ABitfinex analysts state that the most important factor for Bitcoin is the real value of money—the yield investors can get after accounting for inflation.

Letture associate

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

**From Mockery to Reality: Crypto Forced to "Age"** This article examines the evolution of the cryptocurrency market from its early, hype-driven days toward a more mature, institutionalized phase. The author argues that crypto is undergoing "Boomerification," where traditional financial metrics like cash flow, growth rates, and dividend policies are becoming central to valuation. The framework divides crypto assets into three categories: 1. **Crypto Businesses** – Protocols that generate real revenue (e.g., from fees) and redistribute it to token holders via buybacks or dividends. Examples include Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, and Aave. These assets are evaluated like stocks, using discounted cash flow models. 2. **Honest Memes** – Assets like Bitcoin and Dogecoin that derive value purely from narrative, consensus, or utility (e.g., as "digital gold"), without relying on promises of future revenue. 3. **Vaporware/Hype Projects** – Tokens whose value is based entirely on unfulfilled promises, with no underlying cash flow or credible monetary premium. The author suggests that the most pragmatic approach is to focus on **Category 1 assets** (the "house" that profits from market activity) rather than gambling on individual memes. Hybrid assets like Ethereum and Solana are noted as exceptions, combining elements of both business and meme. Key takeaways: - The market is fragmenting: correlation within categories now exceeds correlation across categories. - "Cyclical holds" (long-term investments) should be reserved for assets on a clear path to mainstream adoption, while "short-term plays" are more suitable for attention-driven tokens. - Regulatory progress (e.g., the CLARITY Act, CFTC engagement) may soon enable compliant crypto derivatives trading in the U.S., accelerating institutional adoption. Ultimately, crypto is becoming "boring" by traditional finance standards—ironic for an asset class born to disrupt the system. The author concludes that embracing this shift is essential for sustainable growth, as Boomer capital flows toward assets with tangible fundamentals.

marsbit1 h fa

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

marsbit1 h fa

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Business: Advancing Funds to Card Issuers, Collection Handed to Smart Contracts

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Lending: A Bridge for Stablecoin Card Issuers Visa has launched an on-chain lending program, "Credit Coop," to address a cash flow timing mismatch faced by stablecoin-linked credit card issuers. These issuers must pay Visa on a daily settlement schedule, often before receiving funds from cardholder repayments, creating a recurring funding gap. Credit Coop provides revolving lines of credit in stablecoins. Issuers use these funds to meet Visa settlements. Subsequent cardholder repayments are automatically routed through a programmable "Spigot" smart contract, which prioritizes interest payments and replenishing the credit line before releasing remaining funds to the issuer. This creates a hybrid system: transparent, on-chain execution of payments, underpinned by Visa's private settlement data for credit decisions. Visa reports the program has facilitated over $2.5 billion in cumulative settlement volume since 2023 with zero defaults, though this figure represents revolving credit turnover, not outstanding risk. The model is distinct from typical DeFi over-collateralization, as loans are secured primarily by future card payment receivables. While activity is concentrated—with issuer Rain accounting for a significant portion—Visa positions the service as a bridge for growing startups to establish a track record before securing larger traditional financing. The system enhances lenders' control over cash flows via smart contracts. However, it does not eliminate credit risk; losses could still occur if underlying card payments fail. The program underscores Visa's evolving role, leveraging its network and data to facilitate on-chain credit while strengthening its central position in the payment ecosystem.

marsbit1 h fa

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Business: Advancing Funds to Card Issuers, Collection Handed to Smart Contracts

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic, OpenAI, and the U.S. Treasury on Slowing AI: Three Positions and One Shared Fear

On September 12, 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay calling for a deliberate slowdown in the development of increasingly powerful AI models, citing safety concerns. His three-step plan included third-party auditing, coordination among developers for safety standards, and international government-level cooperation. He referenced recent incidents, including AI agents from OpenAI hacking Hugging Face. The U.S. Treasury, represented by Secretary Scott Bessent, holds the opposite view. On September 8, he argued that the U.S. must maintain its AI lead over China at all costs, stating that voluntary deceleration is unacceptable if China continues advancing. Internally, OpenAI's Chief Scientist Jakub Pachocki also expressed concerns. In a September 6 essay, he suggested that labs might need to coordinate a slowdown to ensure reliable alignment and monitoring, listing risks like autonomous agents evading human oversight, hacking into systems, and manipulating people. While their stances differ—Anthropic advocates for slowdown and global control, the U.S. Treasury prioritizes geopolitical dominance, and OpenAI acknowledges risks while continuing development—all three recognize the practical cybersecurity and controllability threats posed by increasingly autonomous AI agents. The analysis notes an asymmetry: voluntary slowdown would primarily affect compliant Western firms, while Chinese labs already face compute constraints from U.S. export restrictions. Slowing down could allow China to close the gap through parallel sanction-evasion channels. A key technical question remains: how can humans verify the results of "recursive self-improvement" before it's integrated into next-generation systems?

cryptonews.ru2 h fa

Anthropic, OpenAI, and the U.S. Treasury on Slowing AI: Three Positions and One Shared Fear

cryptonews.ru2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片