Attention: Cryptocurrency Exchange Mistakenly Transfers User Information to Hackers

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-09-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-09-12

Introduzione

Blockchain researcher ZachXBT reports that fintech company Revolut may have inadvertently disclosed user data to hackers by falling for a spoofed legal request. The incident began when Revolut received an information request that appeared to come from a legitimate government agency, using the agency's official email domain. The email was accepted as authentic because it contained valid domain verification information. Failing to detect the fraudulent nature of the request, Revolut potentially provided user information in response. Potentially compromised data includes user names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, copies of passports or driver's licenses, selfies from identity verification, account statements, IBAN information, withdrawal records, and extensive transaction history, including Bitcoin transactions. Revolut's security notice stated that facial biometric telemetry data was not affected. ZachXBT notes that while the incident appears limited so far, it may have specifically targeted high-net-worth users. Several Revolut users have reportedly received security notifications related to this event.

Blockchain researcher ZachXBT suggests that fintech company Revolut may have transferred personal data of some users to third parties, having mistaken a forged request from a government institution for a genuine one. According to information published on ZachXBT's personal channel, the incident began when Revolut received a request for client information that appeared to come from a legitimate government agency and used that agency's official email domain.

According to the investigation, the email in question was accepted by Revolut as authentic because it contained verifiable domain confirmation information. As a result of the company's failure to detect the fraudulent nature of the request, some user information may have been obtained or transferred in response to it.

The potentially affected data includes users' first and last names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, email addresses and phone numbers, as well as copies of passports or driver's licenses, selfies taken during identity verification, account statements, IBAN information, withdrawal records, and extensive transaction history, including Bitcoin transactions. In its security notice to users, Revolut indicated that facial biometric telemetry data was not affected by the incident.

ZachXBT noted that although the incident currently appears to be limited in scope, it may have specifically targeted users with substantial assets. According to the statement, several Revolut users have recently received security notifications related to this incident.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the suspected security incident involving fintech company Revolut, according to blockchain researcher ZachXBT?

AZachXBT suspects that Revolut may have mistakenly handed over some users' personal data to third parties after falling for a fake request that appeared to be from a legitimate government agency.

QHow did the fraudulent request manage to appear genuine to Revolut?

AThe fraudulent request used the official email domain of the legitimate government agency and contained authentic-looking information to verify the domain, which led Revolut to accept it as genuine.

QWhat types of user data were potentially compromised in this incident?

APotentially compromised data includes users' first and last names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, copies of passports or driver's licenses, selfies from identity verification, account statements, IBAN information, withdrawal records, and extensive transaction history, including Bitcoin transactions.

QWhat user group might have been specifically targeted in this attack, according to the report?

AThe report suggests that while the incident appears limited, it might have been specifically targeted against Revolut users with substantial assets.

QWhat assurance did Revolut reportedly give to users regarding biometric data in its security notification?

AIn its security notification to users, Revolut reportedly stated that facial biometric telemetry data was not affected by the incident.

Letture associate

Changxin Stands Transistors Upright: A Path to Catch Up While Bypassing EUV — Will It Shake the Big Three Memory Makers?

ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) announced major progress in DRAM devices, 4F2 architecture, and hybrid bonding, briefly rattling the stocks of the three major memory makers. The key changes are the shift from the mainstream 6F2 cell architecture to 4F2, and the self-developed VSG (Vertical Surrounded Gate) transistor that enables it. In DRAM, each 1T1C cell pairs one transistor with one capacitor. Moving from 6F2 to 4F2 shrinks cell area by about one-third, allowing roughly 50% more cells in the same area—though chip-level density gains are lower (about 30–50%) because peripheral circuits do not shrink. 4F2 also relaxes design rules, reducing reliance on EUV by roughly two process generations, which matters greatly for CXMT, which cannot obtain EUV under export controls. It also eases capacitor manufacturing pressure. 4F2 is not unique to CXMT; all three major players are pursuing it. Samsung leads, targeting mass production around 2028; SK Hynix will likely adopt it one node later; Micron's plans are unclear and likely latest. CXMT says its first 4F2 product, a DDR5 RDIMM, will arrive by year-end, though volume and yield are unverified. Challenges include floating-body effects, difficult manufacturing sequences (epitaxy, backside processes, or hybrid bonding), array-periphery process decoupling, materials and resistance issues (molybdenum, ruthenium), and yield ramp. Short term (2026–2027), impact on supply-demand is limited. Medium to long term (post-2028), supply growth risks rise, potentially pressuring memory prices and the big three's profits, since conventional DDR drives most DRAM profit. CXMT gains an EUV-free catch-up path; Samsung may regain ground; SK Hynix's near-term position is safe; Micron looks relatively passive. Upstream equipment and materials suppliers may benefit.

marsbit2 h fa

Changxin Stands Transistors Upright: A Path to Catch Up While Bypassing EUV — Will It Shake the Big Three Memory Makers?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片