Top 10 Crypto Assets with the Biggest Weekly Gains: How Much Could You Have Earned

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-09-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-09-06

Introduzione

According to CoinMarketCap, the top-performing cryptoassets over the past week were $PONS, Arbitrum (ARB), and Dash (DASH), with gains of 180.84%, 126.60%, and 66.61% respectively. $PONS's rally is attributed to the development of Robinhood Chain and its role as a token launchpad, with a record $5.95M in protocol fees. Other notable gainers in the top 10 included Uniswap ($UNI, +43.51%), Zcash (ZEC, +40.06%), Lighter (LIT, +31.90%), Falcon Finance (FF, +30.56%), PancakeSwap (CAKE, +25.30%), Pendle (PENDLE, +25.12%), and Curve DAO Token (CRV, +24.60%). Uniswap's rise was highlighted by its first-ever daily token burn exceeding $1 million in value.

According to CoinMarketCap, over the past week, the crypto assets with the strongest growth were $PONS, Arbitrum, and Dash. The first token gained 180.84%, while the next two rose by 126.60% and 66.61% respectively. The top ten also included Uniswap, Zcash, Lighter, Falcon Finance, PancakeSwap, Pendle, and Curve DAO Token.

Infographic by Incrypted.

According to CoinMarketCap, at the time of writing, $PONS was trading at $0.936, and its market capitalization had reached $657.98 million. The daily trading volume was about $196.99 million, with 703.03 million $PONS in circulation.

The token's rally is happening against the backdrop of active development of Robinhood Chain and the growing role of $PONS as a launchpad for token launches. It was previously reported that the protocol recorded record fees of $5.95 million, which increased interest in the asset.

Second place in weekly dynamics was taken by Arbitrum (ARB). Its market capitalization was about $1.3 billion, and its daily trading volume exceeded $1 billion.

Third was Dash (DASH) with a gain of 66.61%. The cryptocurrency's price was around $68.09, and its capitalization was approximately $874 million.

Fourth place was taken by Uniswap. Over the week, $UNI gained 43.51% and was trading near $6.94. The asset's market capitalization reached $4.32 billion, and its daily trading volume was $902.82 million.

The rise in $UNI is happening against the backdrop of increased activity in the Uniswap ecosystem. Specifically, on September 4, the protocol burned about 184,000 $UNI worth approximately $1.15 million—the first time the daily burn volume exceeded $1 million. About 150,000 $UNI of that amount were related to activity on the Robinhood Chain.

Fifth in the ranking was Zcash. Over the week, ZEC grew by 40.06% to $1171.59, and its market capitalization reached $19.74 billion. The daily trading volume was about $1.2 billion, with 16.85 million tokens in circulation. Zcash has previously established itself among the top ten crypto assets by market capitalization.

Also in the top ten were:

  • Lighter (LIT) — up by 31.90%;
  • Falcon Finance (FF) — up by 30.56%;
  • PancakeSwap (CAKE) — up by 25.30%;
  • Pendle (PENDLE) — up by 25.12%;
  • Curve DAO Token (CRV) — up by 24.60%.

More details on the top 10 most profitable crypto assets of the past week:

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhich cryptocurrency showed the highest growth over the past week according to the article, and what was its percentage increase?

AAccording to the article, the cryptocurrency with the highest growth over the past week was $PONS, with an increase of 180.84%.

QWhat is the stated market capitalization of $PONS and its approximate trading price at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, $PONS was trading at approximately $0.936, with a market capitalization of $657.98 million.

QWhy has the price of $UNI (Uniswap) been rising recently, as mentioned in the article?

AThe rise in $UNI's price is attributed to increased activity in the Uniswap ecosystem, notably the protocol burning approximately 184,000 $UNI (worth about $1.15 million) on September 4th. Around 150,000 of those tokens were related to Robinhood Chain activity.

QBesides $PONS, which two cryptocurrencies took second and third place in terms of weekly growth, and what were their respective gains?

AArbitrum (ARB) took second place with a gain of 126.60%, and Dash (DASH) took third place with a gain of 66.61%.

QWhat were the names of the cryptocurrencies that rounded out the top 10 list for weekly growth, from sixth to tenth place?

AFrom sixth to tenth place, the cryptocurrencies that rounded out the top 10 list for weekly growth were: Lighter (LIT), Falcon Finance (FF), PancakeSwap (CAKE), Pendle (PENDLE), and Curve DAO Token (CRV).

Letture associate

Claude Forms Teams to Hunt Bugs! 66 Bugs Found in 116K Lines of Code, Single Agent Maxed Out at 27

Claude Managed Agents, Anthropic's new multi-agent workflow system, significantly outperformed a single AI agent in finding bugs. In a test with 70 bugs hidden across 116,000 lines of code, a single Claude agent found a maximum of 27 bugs. When Claude was tasked with organizing a team of agents itself via the dynamic workflow, it consistently found 66 bugs across three runs. This capability is part of two major updates: "Claude Managed Agents" for developers to integrate multi-agent coordination into their apps, and an expanded beta for "Claude Code Projects," which lets users manage complex tasks in a single conversation, with Claude breaking down work and coordinating parallel threads. The Managed Agents feature allows a primary Claude agent to receive a task, automatically write a workflow program to divide labor among specialized sub-agents, and coordinate their execution and results aggregation. For example, it can orchestrate checking 300 contracts for specific clauses, using multiple agents for parallel reading and verification. The system supports workflows with up to 1000 cumulative agents per run. While this multi-agent approach improves task coverage and results, Anthropic notes that costs and efficiency gains need careful evaluation. Projects use existing plan credits, while Managed Agents incur token usage fees plus a $0.08 per hour runtime fee per active session. The key challenge is whether offloading coordination to Claude leads to faster, more reliable outcomes with less human oversight.

marsbit2 h fa

Claude Forms Teams to Hunt Bugs! 66 Bugs Found in 116K Lines of Code, Single Agent Maxed Out at 27

marsbit2 h fa

Terence Tao's Blog Explodes on Hot Search! 250,000 Math PhDs on the Brink, Must Slow Down AI

Mathematician Terence Tao's blog post ignited a fierce online debate after a video of him warning "we must slow down AI" went viral. He described AI's progress as an "extremely nonlinear dynamic" pursued with unclear consequences. This warning came just days after he promoted a project for open-source AI mathematical models, highlighting a profound tension. The core crisis, explored in a guest post by 3Blue1Brown creator Grant Sanderson, is AI's threat to traditional mathematics. Automated theorem provers combined with large language models can generate proofs at superhuman speeds, potentially rendering the human role of "proving theorems" obsolete. Sanderson argues that the true goal of mathematics is not proof-generation but the advancement of *human understanding*. As AI masters the former, the academic value of proof alone is diminished. Sanderson proposes a paradigm shift: elevating "motivational explanation" over mere proof. Unlike a formal proof, a motivational explanation guides readers through the intuitive reasoning, historical context, and conceptual connections behind a result—the "why" and "how" of discovery. To institutionalize this, he suggests creating "open explanation problems," reforming PhD defenses to prioritize clear exposition, and valuing pedagogical work as highly as journal publications in tenure reviews. The debate drew reactions across academia. Some physicists welcomed mathematicians to a world long prioritizing understanding over rigorous proof. Critics worried this shift could disadvantage brilliant but inarticulate problem-solvers. Others questioned if AI will eventually master explanation too. Supporters countered that the goal is fostering *human* comprehension, which is inherently subjective and interactive. The article concludes that AI's rise presents both a crisis and an opportunity. Without adapting academic culture and reward systems, human mathematicians risk irrelevance. However, by embracing their unique role as architects of understanding and interpreters of AI-generated knowledge, they can steer mathematics toward a new renaissance focused on human insight and clarity.

marsbit4 h fa

Terence Tao's Blog Explodes on Hot Search! 250,000 Math PhDs on the Brink, Must Slow Down AI

marsbit4 h fa

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

"Valuation Game in Trillions: The 'Digital Metrics Play' Behind OpenAI and Anthropic's Incomparable Revenues" Investors face significant uncertainty as core financial metrics from the two AI giants, OpenAI and Anthropic, cannot be compared directly due to differing accounting methods. OpenAI projects its annualized revenue run rate (ARR) to reach or exceed $70 billion by year-end, while Anthropic announced in July that its ARR had hit $65 billion. However, a key discrepancy renders these figures incomparable: Anthropic records the total sales value generated through cloud partners like Amazon as revenue, whereas OpenAI only counts its net share from partners like Microsoft. This reporting difference has tangible market impact. A recent tech stock downturn was partly attributed to investor attempts to adjust OpenAI's numbers for a direct comparison, leading to lower estimates and concerns about its growth pace. Currently, OpenAI's ARR is reportedly around $50 billion, with expectations to approach $70 billion by December. The issue highlights broader concerns about ARR as a non-standardized, often manipulated metric used to showcase growth and justify high private valuations. It is calculated by extrapolating short-term performance or summing contract values, offering companies considerable discretion. A significant gap exists between ARR and actual recognized annual revenue: OpenAI expects 2026 revenue of roughly $35 billion (half its year-end ARR projection), and internal documents show Anthropic's 2025 revenue was about $4.6 billion against a published ARR exceeding $9 billion. Experts warn that the opacity surrounding these key players creates a "black box" effect, complicating investment decisions and amplifying market volatility. As their performance is a bellwether for the AI investment narrative, any signs of slowing sales growth could ripple through the broader market, affecting chipmakers and other beneficiaries of the AI boom. The reliance on ARR sidesteps a fundamental question: the scale of real sales needed to justify trillion-dollar valuations and cover massive expenditures. The situation may improve with greater transparency, particularly if Anthropic proceeds with its anticipated Wall Street debut, which would subject the company to standardized GAAP financial reporting.

marsbit7 h fa

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

marsbit7 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片