Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推Pubblicato 2025-12-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-09

Introduzione

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather...

Author: Pickle Cat

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: Losing Retail Investors Keep Trading, Winning Retail Investors Take Breaks


Want to stop losing money in the cryptocurrency market? First, stop your day trading!

Because for ordinary investors, day trading is structurally a "scam."

This article is long, but if you are willing to spend 120 seconds reading it, I guarantee you will thank yourself years later.

I started trading when I was a teenager.

I’ve had victories that made me feel like "Batman," and I’ve also suffered devastating losses that shattered me and still haunt me to this day.

I’ve tried every trading strategy an ordinary investor can find.

There was even a whole year when I was obsessed with day trading, thinking it would finally turn things around for me, but I failed so miserably that it still stings every time I think about it.

My profit and loss (PNL) was so bad that the automatic Bitcoin purchase plan I set up for my grandma made more money than I did.

Later, I transformed into a low-frequency swing trader, rarely adjusting my positions. After making a profit, I would decisively exit and then take a break from trading for a while.

It was only then that my life started to improve, and everything became clear.

I’m not a saint. I’m writing this to save my younger, foolish, naive, and impulsive self.

First, as an ordinary day trader, you are engaging in high-frequency trading without any informational advantage (no real order flow, no clear liquidity map, no market maker position information, no execution advantage, nothing).

If you only trade a few times a quarter, you might still survive.

But what if you trade more than 10 times a week?

Even if you have the strongest "discipline" and "risk management" skills in the world, the math will eventually make you lose everything.

The reason ordinary investors fail is not that they never win, but that they never stop. The only outcome of high-frequency trading is one: destruction.

This is also why I set up a "penalty system" for myself—if I exceed the quarterly trading limit, I face consequences.

Every major loss I’ve experienced happened because I continued trading after a big win instead of stopping in time.

And all my big wins (the ones where I actually held onto the money for a long time) happened because I caught a major trend and then chose to rest and cool off.

This pattern is so obvious it’s painful.

"Winning" isn’t about suddenly making a lot of money; real "winning" is being able to keep that money instead of losing it all the next year.

Now I see 14-year-olds on TikTok calling themselves day traders, drawing a few lines on TradingView, thinking that buying some "guru’s" course or joining a Discord group means they’ve mastered some daily executable trading system.

It makes me sick. If they knew they were gambling, I wouldn’t mind—at least they’d know they were playing a game.

But the current day trading trend is even bigger than the "proxy buying craze" of 2016 and 2017. And we all know how that ended.

People underestimate the difficulty of trading and severely overestimate their own abilities.

The problem isn’t just mathematical. Yes, the more you trade and the less you stop, the harder it is to sustain profits.

The real problem is that young, ordinary traders genuinely believe that with "discipline" and "risk management," they are not gambling at all. They think day trading is a "skill" that can be executed like a daily habit.

This doesn’t just apply to cryptocurrency day trading; it’s the same for the U.S. stock market and almost every other market.

High-frequency trading is only for institutions.

Take the U.S. stock market, for example.

Do you know what institutional traders don’t even look at? Candlestick charts and TradingView.

They use Bloomberg terminals, which contain data ordinary investors will never see.

Of course, you might already know this. But 14- to 18-year-olds don’t. They think their indicators are the tools all traders use.

That’s the real danger.

If you know you’re gambling, at least part of you will know when to stop.

But once you believe it’s a "system," you’ll never stop.

You’ll keep clicking until the market empties you out.

Day Trading: A Casino Disguised as a Café

It really is like a casino in disguise.

When you walk into Las Vegas or Macau, you know exactly what kind of place you’re entering. You see the lights, the tables, the dealers, the noise. Your brain immediately realizes: this is gambling.

But today’s day trading is like a casino disguised as a café.

New traders walk in, thinking they’re there to "learn a skill," unaware that they’re already sitting at a table designed to slowly drain them dry.

So they don’t stop.

That’s the essence of the tragedy, not the losses themselves.

The real tragedy is that they genuinely believe they’re not gambling, and it’s this belief that keeps them going until they lose everything.

As for those ordinary traders who seem to be "making money" (like I once was)... honestly, most of them just caught a wave.

They had good luck at the right time, combined with a little discipline learned from previous losses, and finally learned to stop after winning.

Even so, such lucky individuals make up less than one percent of all ordinary traders.

Making money in trading isn’t actually that hard; what’s truly difficult is keeping it.


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594262

Domande pertinenti

QWhy is day trading considered a structural 'scam' for retail investors according to the article?

ABecause retail investors engage in high-frequency trading without any information advantages (no real order flow, liquidity maps, market maker positions, or execution advantages), making consistent profits mathematically impossible.

QWhat key behavioral pattern does the author identify as the cause of major losses versus major wins?

AMajor losses occurred after big wins when the author continued trading instead of stopping; major wins were retained by catching a big market move and then choosing to rest and cool off.

QHow does the article describe the danger of young retail traders believing day trading is a 'skill' rather than gambling?

AIt creates a false belief that encourages continuous trading until they are wiped out, unlike recognizing it as gambling which might prompt knowing when to stop.

QWhat analogy does the author use to contrast traditional casinos with modern day trading environments?

ADay trading is likened to a casino disguised as a café, where traders think they are learning a skill but are actually at a table designed to slowly drain them.

QWhat is the ultimate challenge in trading as emphasized in the article: making money or keeping it?

AThe real challenge is keeping the money, not making it, as most retail traders fail to preserve gains due to frequent trading and overconfidence.

Letture associate

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is the Profit Moat of Stablecoin Leader CRCL Solid?

The article presents a heated debate surrounding Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, focusing on the sustainability of its business model following its IPO and Q3 2025 earnings report. Key bearish points, led by figures like Jiang Zhuo'er, argue that CRCL's profits are unsustainable. They compare it to a bank reliant on an interest rate spread, which is highly vulnerable to Federal Reserve rate cuts. Critics highlight that over 60% of profits are paid to distributor Coinbase, leaving CRCL with a thin margin. They warn that competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan could easily disrupt its model, and that its regulatory advantage is a temporary benefit, not a permanent moat. Bullish commentators, including @BTCdayu and @qinbafrank, counter that CRCL is a long-term infrastructure play, not a simple bank. They believe current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve market dominance and network effects, similar to companies like Amazon in their early days. They argue that future growth from massive USDC adoption (potentially reaching trillions) will far outweigh the impact of falling interest rates. They see compliance as a powerful, long-term moat that will eliminate smaller competitors. Additional short-term concerns include a significant sell-off pressure from the post-IPO lockup expiration and a structural barrier to USDC's use in U.S. retail payments due to its classification as a taxable asset. In summary, the debate pits short-term cyclical risks (interest rates, high costs, sell pressure) against a long-term structural opportunity (market growth, network effects, compliance as a barrier to entry). The core question remains whether CRCL's current model is a fragile interest-rate play or a foundational bet on the future of digital currency.

比推28 min fa

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is the Profit Moat of Stablecoin Leader CRCL Solid?

比推28 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片