Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2026-06-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-09

Introduzione

The article reports a major security incident involving Humanity Protocol (H), resulting in over $31 million stolen. The team attributes the hack to a private key leak from a Humanity Foundation member, leading to a rapid sale of H tokens and a 90% price drop. However, prominent on-chain investigator ZachXBT suggests the event might be an "exit scam" orchestrated by the team, rather than an external hack. This suspicion is fueled by the team's controversial history, including past management failures, legal issues, and previous scandals like outsourced technology and problematic airdrops. Further investigation reveals that the core team behind Humanity is already involved with a new project called "Everything," which recently secured funding. This has led to community speculation that the alleged hack is a deliberate scheme to abandon the H project while shifting focus and resources to their new venture, leaving investors to bear the losses. The article questions whether this is a genuine security failure or a premeditated "rug pull" strategy.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser(@wenser 2010)

When it rains, it pours. The crypto market has once again been hit by a major security incident with over $30 million in stolen funds.

In the early hours this morning, on-chain monitoring showed that the Humanity Protocol was hacked, with over 17 wallets holding H tokens compromised, resulting in total losses exceeding $19 million. Subsequently, the scale of the lost funds expanded to over $31 million. After the successful attack, the hacker quickly swapped the H tokens for ETH to facilitate subsequent money laundering.

Terence, the founder of Humanity, later confirmed that the incident was due to the private key of a Humanity Foundation member being leaked and exploited by hackers. Following this news, the price of the H token plummeted below $0.08, with a 24-hour drop of over 90%.

Against the backdrop of a minor rebound in the broader market, the "bear market staple" has played out once again. Is it hackers being unpreventable, or is there more to the story?

When a "Human-Induced Security Incident" Occurs at Humanity: Team Member Private Key Leak OR Project Team's Deliberate Plot?

According to the latest official response from Humanity, project founder Terence confirmed that the private key of a Humanity Foundation member had been leaked. As a precaution, please do not interact with cross-chain bridges or any liquidity pools until safety is confirmed. The Foundation is working with security experts and exchange partners to handle the matter and will provide ongoing updates. Furthermore, the official advises users to temporarily revoke permissions granted to the project's contract addresses until the official investigation results are disclosed.

Meanwhile, the "hack" continues. According to LookonChain monitoring, the Humanity hacker minted an additional 100 million H tokens on BSC, valued at $11.4 million, indicating that the sell-off may continue.

As of the time of writing, the address associated with the Humanity hacker holds over 31.35 million H tokens, valued at approximately $3.82 million; holds about 18,000 ETH, valued at over $30.11 million; its BNB holdings have also increased to 2,443, worth nearly $1.5 million; and it continues to mint more H tokens.

On-chain address monitoring information for the hacker can be found at: https://arkm.com/explorer/entity/dcfac174-1b67-46d6-8cab-5b8e955ca921.

Regarding this major security incident with over $30 million in stolen funds, on-chain detective ZachXBT also offered his preliminary investigation conclusions:

He first posted, "Unclear if hack or team maliciously rugged. Looking at the chart and the concentrated supply, the H team was likely working with an active market maker. However, all H tokens were sold on (on-chain) DEXs, not CEXs."

Subsequently, he gave a preliminary conclusion, stating: "This 'security incident' was likely planned. I don't believe the team's corresponding story at all; it's just an excuse made by ill-intentioned people to get away." It's worth mentioning that the Humanity project team does indeed have a "dark history."

Humanity Team's Dark History: Technical Outsourcing, Airdrop Drama, and Team Scandals

In fact, the crypto community's dissatisfaction with Humanity is not without reason.

Previously, when WorldCoin gained fame as a "human iris identity verification project," Humanity, as a "palm print verification identity security protocol," quickly capitalized on the hot concept and rose to prominence. At that time, it was highly sought after as a partner for KYC or identity verification in numerous crypto project airdrops. However, on the other hand, its background team, its promoted "palm print security verification technology," and its token airdrop process all sparked market controversy. For more details, see "From Palm Print 'Revolution' to Access Control Manufacturer, Tearing Apart Humanity's Two-Faced 'Technological' Charade."

Not only that, in June last year, on-chain investigator Specter pointed out in a post: "After understanding the team composition of Humanity, it's concerning: Among the 4 team leaders, 3 have problematic past records involving mismanagement, lawsuits, or financial irregularities."

Among them, project founder and CEO Terence Kwok has a previous "entrepreneurial history." He founded Tink Labs, which once raised $200 million and reached a peak valuation of $1.5 billion, but ultimately went bankrupt in 2019 due to "mismanagement."

Foundation head Mario Nawfal has previously been accused of withholding wages and is implicated in improper financing, false promises, and coercing whistleblowers into silence. He also has a series of "blemished histories": the project Froothie was fined in Australia for false advertising; sued by Juicero; accused of invoice manipulation during his tenure at NFT Tech; and engaged in controversial behavior with BitClout token trading.

As for Yat Siu, founder of Animoca Brands, one of Humanity's backers, he was previously involved in violations related to blockchain and crypto investments, leading to his company being delisted from the Australian Securities Exchange.

Coupled with Humanity's past incidents being exposed, such as "Shenzhen technical outsourcing," large-scale sybil attacks in token airdrops, and airdrops worth single-digit amounts for loyal users, this theft incident is hard not to be seen as having ulterior motives.

Appearing Hacked, Actually a Golden Cicada Shedding Its Shell? Humanity Team Accused of Already Shifting to a New Project

Soon, more information was revealed by the crypto community and on-chain detective ZachXBT.

After suggesting that the Humanity theft might be a planned event, ZachXBT again posted, questioning Humanity's official account: "You chose to hype your token for weeks without any real substance and think the crypto community would blindly believe your story? Please disclose all your active market-making agreements with related entities in Hong Kong first."

Subsequently, he even shared a previous tweet from crypto KOL Irene Zhao, which mentioned: "2 years ago, I made a 100x return on my KOL round investment in H tokens; now, I have also participated in the KOL round financing for Everything, a new project incubated by the Humanity team."

In January this year, Everything, which promotes the concept of an "all-in-one exchange," announced the completion of a $6.9 million seed round. The round was led by Humanity's venture capital arm, Humanity Investments, with participation from Animoca Brands, Hex Trust, WallStreetBets creator Jamie Rogozinski, and Three Point Capital. The platform emphasizes its advantage in integrating perpetual contracts, spot markets, prediction markets, and payment functions.

Looking at it now, it's a familiar taste (combining current hotspots), a familiar recipe (similar investor team composition). Often, we have to admire the keen sense and superb execution of these "entrepreneurial veterans." As for the KOLs and investors involved, perhaps all benefits have already been divided behind the scenes, leaving the losses for the token traders on stage.

Of course, in the crypto market, projects and token prices are always two sides of the same coin. As for how the H token price performs subsequently, it may still depend on the handling plan of the Humanity project team and the stage performance of the market makers.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what was the official explanation given by the Humanity Protocol team for the massive security breach?

AThe official explanation, as confirmed by Humanity founder Terence, was that a private key belonging to a member of the Humanity Foundation was compromised and exploited by hackers.

QWhat was the estimated total loss from the Humanity Protocol attack as detailed in the report?

AThe estimated total loss from the attack exceeded $31 million. Initially, over 17 wallets holding H tokens were drained for over $19 million, and the scale later expanded to over $31 million.

QWho is ZachXBT and what was his preliminary conclusion about the nature of the incident?

AZachXBT is a well-known on-chain investigator. His preliminary conclusion was that the security event was likely a deliberate, man-made scheme, suggesting it was an exit strategy rather than a genuine hack.

QWhat new project is mentioned as being incubated by the Humanity team, according to the article?

AThe new project mentioned is called 'Everything', a platform described as an all-in-one exchange. It was announced in January and raised $6.9 million in seed funding, led by Humanity's venture arm, Humanity Investments.

QWhat are some of the alleged 'black histories' or past controversies associated with key members of the Humanity team mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions several controversies: Founder Terence Kwok's previous venture Tink Labs collapsed due to mismanagement; Foundation lead Mario Nawfal allegedly had issues with unpaid wages, false promises, and questionable financial practices; and investor Yat Siu's company was delisted from the Australian Stock Exchange for irregularities in blockchain investments.

Letture associate

Rapper Afroman: Doesn't Understand Bitcoin, but Becomes a New Crypto Freedom Fighter

Joseph "Afroman" Foreman, the rapper famed for "Because I Got High," has become an unlikely symbol for the crypto community's libertarian ideals. Following a 2022 police raid on his Ohio home, which yielded no charges, Foreman used the footage to create viral songs mocking the officers, leading to a lawsuit he ultimately won. His defense of free speech against government overreach resonated deeply with attendees at the Bitcoin 2024 conference in Las Vegas, where he performed. Despite admitting he knows little about cryptocurrency and owns none, event organizers saw his personal fight as embodying Bitcoin's core ethos of individual sovereignty and resistance to centralized control. Foreman, a self-described "icon of weed culture," has long performed for paying crowds but found a new political voice after his legal battle. His platform, which includes federal marijuana legalization and police accountability, aligns with the diverse, anti-establishment crowd at the Bitcoin conference, though he remains unaffiliated with any major party. The event featured an auction of his memorabilia, celebrating him as a modern "freedom fighter." In a final surprise, Foreman used his stage time to announce his candidacy for the 2028 U.S. presidential election, thrilling the remaining audience before launching into his signature hit.

Foresight News3 min fa

Rapper Afroman: Doesn't Understand Bitcoin, but Becomes a New Crypto Freedom Fighter

Foresight News3 min fa

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbit37 min fa

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbit37 min fa

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight News51 min fa

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight News51 min fa

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit59 min fa

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit59 min fa

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbit1 h fa

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures