TON Strategy Earns $15 Million from Gram Staking in Q2

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-12

Introduzione

TON Strategy, the company managing the cryptocurrency treasury for The Open Network (TON) ecosystem, reported its Q2 results. The company generated $15 million in revenue from staking Gram (the rebranded native asset, formerly Toncoin) and increased its reserve to approximately 230.5 million tokens. This represents about 4.4% of Gram's total supply and 35% of all tokens staked on the network. The staking yield for the quarter was approximately 17%, attributed partly to the Catchain 2.0 consensus update which sped up block creation. The company's fair value of digital assets rose to about $369.5 million from $272 million in Q1. Net profit from continuing operations before tax was $83.5 million, a significant turnaround from a $91.3 million loss in the prior quarter, heavily influenced by an $82.8 million net gain from the change in Gram's fair value. TON Strategy also completed measures to wind down legacy operations, terminating contracts and reducing staff costs, which is expected to cut annual cash operating expenses by around $4 million. CEO Kevin Wilson stated the company now has a more focused business model centered on accumulating Gram and developing the TON ecosystem. He highlighted TON's growing integration with Telegram, its increased speed and lower fees, and its potential role in payments, digital ownership, and AI agents capable of transacting on behalf of users.

The company TON Strategy, which specializes in managing the cryptocurrency treasury of The Open Network (TON) ecosystem, reported its Q2 results. Over the three months, the company earned $15 million in revenue from Gram staking, increased its reserve to 230.5 million tokens, and reduced legacy operating expenses by approximately $4 million per year. The results indicate TON Strategy's shift towards a model focused on accumulating Gram and developing the TON ecosystem.

TON Strategy Earned $15 Million from Gram Staking

As of June 30, 2026, the company owned about 230.5 million Gram, of which approximately 229.9 million were staked. According to TonStat data from August 4, this constituted about 4.4% of the total Gram supply and about 35% of all tokens staked on the network.

Recall that in June, the native asset underwent a rebranding: Toncoin was renamed Gram with the ticker GRAM. TON Strategy stated that it supported this decision, as Gram is the original name of the asset, established back at the white paper writing stage.

For capital allocation, the company uses the "Own, Promote, Amplify" strategy. It involves evaluating the Gram position, liquidity, potential share buybacks, and ecosystem investments from the perspective of their potential to increase long-term value per share.

"We selectively evaluate initiatives that can strengthen the TON ecosystem, improve market access to Gram, or provide attractive financial returns, prioritizing opportunities where strategic initiatives and shareholder interests mutually reinforce each other," said TON Strategy CEO Kevin Wilson.

The fair value of TON Strategy's digital assets at the end of the quarter was about $369.5 million compared to $272 million on March 31.

In Q2, the company received approximately 9.4 million Gram from staking compared to 2.2 million in the first quarter. Accordingly, revenue from staking amounted to $15 million, and the quarterly annualized gross yield was about 17%.

Infographic by Incrypted.

TON Strategy attributed the growth in rewards to the Catchain 2.0 consensus update. It reduced block creation time from approximately 2.5 seconds to 400 milliseconds, which increased validator reward issuance and boosted staking yields.

Against this backdrop, the company's total quarterly revenue also amounted to $15 million compared to $3 million in Q1. Gross profit reached $14.3 million, or 95% of revenue.

At the same time, the financial result included a significant effect from the revaluation of crypto assets. Net profit from continuing operations before taxes was $83.5 million, whereas in Q1 the company recorded a loss of $91.3 million.

Specifically, in Q2, TON Strategy realized $82.8 million in net profit from the change in the fair value of Gram.

Company Reduced Costs and Focused on TON

TON Strategy also reported the completion of most measures to wind down legacy operations. The company terminated a number of supplier contracts, reduced staff and contractor expenses, and discontinued certain low-margin services.

These measures are expected to reduce annual cash operating expenses by approximately $4 million.

Furthermore, on August 10, TON Strategy terminated its consulting services agreement with Kingsway Capital Partners. The company noted it had already ceased monthly payments under this agreement back in March.

Wilson stated that after the first three months of operation, the company now has a more focused business model.

"Our Gram treasury demonstrated strong staking rewards during the quarter, and we have largely completed the measures needed to wind down legacy operations. We enter the second half of the year with a more focused business and greater freedom to direct our resources towards the TON ecosystem."

According to him, the company views Gram's potential not only through the profitability of staking.

TON Bets on Payments and AI Agents

Separately, Wilson emphasized the technological development of TON and its integration with Telegram. In his words, the network is becoming faster, cheaper, and more user-friendly, with blockchain functionality being integrated into the Telegram platform with over a billion users.

This, in the CEO's opinion, could strengthen TON's role in payments, digital ownership, and the work of AI agents, which will be able to act and conduct transactions on behalf of users.

Earlier, the network's development was already accompanied by significant technical changes. In April, Pavel Durov announced a significant speed-up of TON after an update: block creation speed increased approximately sixfold, and transactions began to be processed in less than a second.

In May, Durov also reported a roughly sixfold reduction in network fees, almost to zero, and announced Telegram's plans to become the largest validator on TON.

end-content

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat were the key financial results reported by TON Strategy for the second quarter?

ATON Strategy reported $15 million in revenue from staking Gram, grew its reserve to 230.5 million tokens, and reduced legacy operational expenses by approximately $4 million annually. The fair value of its digital assets reached about $369.5 million at the end of the quarter.

QHow much of the total Gram supply and staked tokens did TON Strategy's holdings represent as of early August?

AAs of early August, TON Strategy's holdings of approximately 230.5 million Gram represented about 4.4% of the total Gram supply and about 35% of all tokens staked in the network.

QWhat was cited as the reason for the increase in staking rewards during the quarter?

AThe increase in staking rewards was attributed to the Catchain 2.0 consensus update, which reduced block creation time from about 2.5 seconds to 400 milliseconds, thereby increasing validator rewards and staking yield.

QWhat business model shift did CEO Kevin Wilson describe for TON Strategy?

ACEO Kevin Wilson stated that TON Strategy has transitioned to a more focused business model centered on accumulating Gram and developing the TON ecosystem, having largely completed measures to wind down legacy operations.

QWhat future roles for the TON network did the CEO highlight, related to its integration with Telegram?

AThe CEO highlighted that TON's integration with Telegram could strengthen its role in payments, digital ownership, and the operation of AI agents capable of acting and conducting transactions on behalf of users.

Letture associate

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

Recently, analysis firm SemiAnalysis accused tech giants Google and Meta of "benchmark gaming" with their AI models Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3. The accusation stems from a dramatic performance drop between two versions of the Terminal-Bench evaluation for AI agents. On the older, public Terminal-Bench 2.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash scored 89.4, ranking second and beating GPT-6 Astra, while Muse Spark 1.3 scored 88.8. However, on the newly released, more secure Terminal-Bench 4.0, their scores plummeted to 19.1 and approximately 33.3 respectively, far behind competitors. SemiAnalysis argues this indicates "benchmark contamination," where companies train models not on the public test questions themselves, but on expensive, privately purchased training data specifically designed to mimic the benchmark's style. This has evolved into a lucrative industry, with specialized firms selling tailored training tasks for thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The article specifically points to Datacurve, a company that both sells expert coding data and runs its own benchmark (DeepSWE), where the accused models also performed well. Meta's Chief AI Officer, Alexandr Wang, dismissed the claims as a "silly argument," pointing out similar performance drops for other models like GPT-5.6 Sol. He stated Meta never claimed Muse Spark 1.3 was as powerful as top-tier models, only that it offered better value. The report concludes that this is the inevitable fate of all high-quality public benchmarks—they become "gamed" over time. The proposed solution of private, high-quality benchmarks comes with a significant downside: it would erode public transparency, turning open rankings into marketing tools and leaving developers without a common, fair measure to compare AI models.

marsbit2 h fa

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

marsbit2 h fa

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam is venturing into the oil fields of Venezuela, a surprising shift for a prominent figure in the digital asset space. Through his company Primavera Infinita, he recently secured a production contract for the Budare-Elotes block with Venezuela's state oil firm PDVSA. This move into a politically volatile, sanction-scarred country highlights a bet on high returns from its reopening under new leadership and shifting U.S. foreign policy. Ehrsam’s investment reflects a venture capital-style appetite for risk, targeting assets deeply discounted by political uncertainty. He is not alone; smaller, politically connected U.S. firms like Aspect Holdings and Hunt Oil are also entering, while established giants like ExxonMobil remain cautious due to past expropriations. To manage the complex, capital-intensive nature of oil, Ehrsam is assembling a professional team. This trend extends beyond Ehrsam. Other crypto wealth, like BitMEX's Arthur Hayes and Tether, is diversifying into traditional hard assets—energy, metals, and agriculture—seeking physical scarcity as a long-term anchor. Tether, for instance, took a controlling stake in agricultural giant Adecoagro. These moves signify crypto capital's evolving interest: not just tokenizing real-world assets (RWA), but directly acquiring and operating them. Ultimately, Ehrsam's gamble is less on oil geology and more on the duration of Venezuela's current political window. It underscores a broader narrative where digital-era wealth seeks stability and scale in the physical world's most traditional, immovable resources.

marsbit2 h fa

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

marsbit2 h fa

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

Title: Refuting the "Ethereum Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does Paying Gas Without ETH Really Mean? The debate sparked by Vitalik Buterin's discussion of EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions), which suggests users could pay transaction fees without holding ETH, has led to extreme claims that ETH will lose its value. However, this perspective misunderstands the proposal. Currently, an Ethereum user initiating a transaction must also pay the network's Gas fee in ETH. EIP-8141 aims to decouple these actions. It allows a transaction to be split into separate "frames." A user could sign a transaction to, for example, send USDC, while a separate Paymaster account pays the required ETH Gas fee on their behalf. The user would then settle the cost with the Paymaster using USDC or another token. From the user's perspective, they pay in a stablecoin without interacting with ETH. Crucially, from the Ethereum protocol's perspective, the Gas is still paid in ETH; only the settlement layer between the user and Paymaster changes. This concept isn't entirely new; ERC-4337's Account Abstraction already allows similar Gas sponsorship. EIP-8141 seeks to integrate this capability more natively. The core goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of Gas, similar to how one pays with a credit card abroad without handling the local currency. It also enables atomic operations, like bundling token approval with a swap, which would revert together if the swap fails. Regarding ETH's value, the argument that "no ETH is needed" is incorrect. While users may not hold ETH, Paymasters and services must still acquire and spend ETH to pay network fees on the backend. The demand for ETH shifts from being distributed across millions of user wallets to being concentrated in the balances of these service providers. The key variable is whether this improved usability attracts significant new users and increases overall network activity. If it does, total ETH burned in fees could rise substantially. If it doesn't, the change merely reshuffles who holds the ETH needed for Gas. In summary, EIP-8141 aims to lower the entry barrier by hiding Gas complexity, betting that this will drive broader adoption and increase the fundamental utility—and thus demand—for the Ethereum network and ETH itself.

marsbit2 h fa

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare GRAM

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di prev. Toncoin (GRAM) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente prev. ToncoinGRAM.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva prev. Toncoin (GRAM)Dopo aver acquistato prev. Toncoin (GRAM), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia prev. Toncoin (GRAM)Scambia facilmente prev. Toncoin (GRAM) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

519 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.15Aggiornato il 2026.08.20

Come comprare GRAM

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di GRAM GRAM sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片