$7 Trillion Bypassing the Dollar: How China Built an Alternative to SWIFT

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-08

Introduzione

The article discusses China's development of the Cross-border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) as a yuan-based alternative to SWIFT, driven by global de-dollarization efforts following the use of the US dollar as a political tool. Launched in 2015, CIPS now processes cross-border payments equivalent to roughly $7 trillion monthly. Its growth accelerated after key geopolitical events, most notably the 2022 freezing of Russian reserves, prompting countries to diversify away from dollar-dependent systems. While CIPS has expanded to over 1,800 participant institutions, the yuan's share in global payments remains modest at 3.1%, far behind the dollar. The article notes CIPS still relies on SWIFT for about 80% of its message routing, positioning it more as a supplement than a full replacement. A key unresolved challenge is whether CIPS can overcome the fundamental barrier posed by China's capital controls and the yuan's limited convertibility.

Dedollarization is no longer a theoretical topic for economists—it has become a national security issue for a number of countries. The turning point was the repeated use of the dollar as a tool of pressure: disconnecting Iran from SWIFT, sanctions against Russia, and then the freezing of Russian currency reserves. Each such step pushed countries to find ways to conduct settlements bypassing the American financial infrastructure—and China was ready to offer an alternative.

We are talking about the Cross-border Interbank Payment System (CIPS)—a cross-border interbank payment system that China is developing as an analogue to SWIFT for settlements in yuan. Launched in 2015 with nearly zero volume, the system now processes cross-border payments equivalent to approximately $7 trillion per month.

How the Freezing of Russia's Reserves Changed the Yuan's Trajectory

The growth dynamics of CIPS have not been uniform. On the graph of cross-border transaction volumes, acceleration points are clearly visible, and each coincides with another case of the "militarized" use of the dollar:

  • 2012 — Iran's disconnection from SWIFT

  • 2014 — Sanctions against Russia

  • 2017–2018 — Launch of the yuan-denominated oil contract and the first Trump-China trade war

  • 2022 — Freezing of Russia's currency reserves

  • 2023 — Biden administration restrictions on exporting advanced chips to China

  • 2025 — A new round of the Trump-China trade war and the US strike on Iran

The most dramatic spike occurred in 2022: after Western countries blocked Russia's access to its reserves, the volume of yuan settlements grew multiple times. The logic is simple—if a currency can be frozen by a political decision, countries have an incentive to diversify reserves and switch trade to other currencies.

From Zero to $7 Trillion Per Month in a Decade

Official statistics from the People's Bank of China (PBOC) confirm the scale of growth. In 2025, CIPS processed 8.4419 million transactions with a total value equivalent to $25.55 trillion for the year. Preliminary data for the first half of 2026 indicate the annual pace could be even higher—suggested by estimates based on monthly PBOC and CIPS operator statistics. The average daily transaction value grew from about $96 billion in 2025 to around $118 billion by June 2026.

The network itself is expanding: the system is currently used by 210 direct and 1,619 indirect participants—banks and financial organizations worldwide that in 2015 simply did not have the ability to conduct settlements in yuan directly, bypassing the dollar.

The Yuan is Still Far from Reserve Currency Status

The growth of CIPS should not be confused with displacing the dollar from the global financial system. According to SWIFT tracker data, the yuan's share in global payments in June 2026 was only 3.10%—fifth place among currencies, far behind the dollar. In trade finance, the figure is slightly higher at 8.00%.

The total volume of cross-border yuan settlements within China at the end of 2025 reached approximately $9.9 trillion equivalent, which is 10.2% more year-on-year. In other words, the yuan is becoming a significant tool for settlements between specific trade partners and for bypassing sanctions risks, but does not yet aspire to the role of a universal reserve currency.

Nevertheless, the trajectory itself is indicative: each new use of the dollar as a tool of pressure—be it disconnection from SWIFT, freezing of reserves, or trade restrictions—has historically coincided with a new wave of growth for CIPS.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of machine data analysis, the growth of CIPS looks less clear-cut when adding a technical detail not covered in the article: the platform still largely depends on SWIFT at the level of interbank message exchange. According to estimates from industry sources, about 80% of CIPS transactions pass through SWIFT channels for message routing, making the Chinese system more of a complement to the global infrastructure than a full-fledged alternative to it.

Historical context adds another layer: China's reluctance to fully liberalize the yuan exchange rate and remove capital movement restrictions long constrained the currency's internationalization more than the lack of an alternative payment system. The question is whether the CIPS infrastructure can accelerate this process by itself, or whether the yuan's convertibility remains a more fundamental barrier than any technical limitations.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is CIPS and what is its primary purpose according to the article?

ACIPS, or the Cross-border Interbank Payment System, is a Chinese-developed international payment system for clearing and settling cross-border yuan (renminbi) payments. Its primary purpose is to serve as an alternative to SWIFT, allowing countries and financial institutions to conduct trade and financial transactions in yuan, bypassing the US dollar and the traditional US-led financial infrastructure.

QWhat event in 2022 is cited as causing the sharpest acceleration in CIPS transaction volumes?

AThe sharpest acceleration in CIPS transaction volumes occurred in 2022, following the Western freeze of Russia's foreign currency reserves. This event drove a multiple-fold increase in yuan-denominated settlements as countries sought to diversify reserves and move trade away from currencies that could be politically weaponized.

QWhat was the approximate total value of transactions processed by CIPS in 2025, and what was the year-on-year growth in China's cross-border yuan settlements for that year?

AIn 2025, CIPS processed transactions with a total value equivalent to $25.55 trillion. Additionally, the overall volume of cross-border yuan settlements within China reached approximately $9.9 trillion for the year, representing a year-on-year growth of 10.2%.

QAccording to the 'AI Opinion' section, what key technical dependency limits CIPS from being a full-fledged alternative to SWIFT?

AThe 'AI Opinion' section notes that CIPS still largely depends on SWIFT for message routing between banks. Approximately 80% of CIPS transactions reportedly pass through SWIFT channels for messaging, making the Chinese system more of a complement to the global infrastructure rather than a complete standalone alternative.

QDespite the rapid growth of CIPS, what is the yuan's current share in global payments according to SWIFT tracker data from June 2026, and what does this indicate about its global role?

AAccording to SWIFT tracker data from June 2026, the yuan's share in global payments was only 3.10%, placing it fifth among global currencies and far behind the US dollar. This indicates that while the yuan is becoming a significant tool for specific trade partners and sanction avoidance, it is not yet close to challenging the dollar's status as a universal reserve currency.

Letture associate

Trade.xyz Enters the Prediction Market: Who Has Cheaper Fees Compared to Polymarket?

Trade.xyz has launched its prediction market product, "Events," on the Hyperliquid mainnet. Its initial week saw modest activity: $180k in volume and 263 users. The platform aims to integrate prediction markets into a "universal exchange" vision alongside its existing perpetual contracts. A key focus is its fee structure compared to incumbent Polymarket. Trade.xyz uses Hyperliquid's spot trading fees: a fixed 0.07% for Takers and 0.04% for Makers, with volume-based discounts and additional reductions for HYPE token stakers. Fees are charged upon position closure or settlement. Polymarket employs a dynamic model: Makers pay no fees and receive rebates, while Taker fees vary by market category and are calculated as `C × feeRate × p × (1-p)`, where `p` is the outcome probability. This makes fees highest near 50/50 odds and lower as probability approaches 0% or 100%. In a 50% probability scenario for a $100 Taker trade, Polymarket fees (0.04%-0.07% parameter) range from $1 to $1.75, significantly higher than Trade.xyz's ~$0.07. However, for highly probable outcomes (e.g., 99%) or for Maker orders, Polymarket can be cheaper or even free (e.g., Geopolitics markets). While Trade.xyz currently lags far behind Polymarket in scale, it leverages Hyperliquid's existing liquidity and user base. Its potential lies in combining prediction markets with its proven perpetuals infrastructure, positioning it as a possible challenger in the evolving prediction market space.

marsbit1 h fa

Trade.xyz Enters the Prediction Market: Who Has Cheaper Fees Compared to Polymarket?

marsbit1 h fa

Bankless Swap Strategy Success Methodology: How to Screen Undervalued Tokens from VVV to Hyperliquid?

Title: Bankless on Identifying Undervalued Tokens: From VVV to Hyperliquid Summary: In a shifting crypto market, the investment focus is moving from infrastructure narratives to applications with verifiable business models and revenue. This Bankless podcast discussion with Austin Barack of Relayer Capital analyzes how tokens like Venice (VVV), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Pump.fun (PUMP), and ether.fi (ETHFI) can be evaluated based on their fundamentals. Key points include: 1) The market is shifting from chasing growth narratives to finding the intersection of growth and reasonable valuation. 2) Token value is increasingly linked to observable value flow through mechanisms like protocol revenue used for buybacks/burns (e.g., Venice, Hyperliquid). However, this is not a direct equivalent to stock dividends, as token rights are less formalized. 3) Revenue quality and sustainability matter more than just the amount. For instance, Pump.fun's low valuation reflects market skepticism about meme coin trading longevity, despite its resilient revenue over two years. 4) Market categorizations can lag behind business evolution. ether.fi is now primarily a neo-bank/payments platform, not just a restaking protocol, which may create a pricing disconnect. 5) While real revenue can provide a valuation floor and reduce correlation with crypto cycles, these tokens are not fully decoupled from broader market trends. The core argument is that the next phase of crypto valuation will be driven by applications that convert real usage into sustainable revenue and credibly share a portion of that value with token holders, moving towards an application-based economy.

marsbit1 h fa

Bankless Swap Strategy Success Methodology: How to Screen Undervalued Tokens from VVV to Hyperliquid?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片