Solana Gets A $1.7 Billion Boost As BlackRock Expands Tokenized Funds

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-03-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-03-26

Introduzione

Financial management behemoth BlackRock has made another move in its approach to blockchain by starting a fund for big clients...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Financial management behemoth BlackRock has made another move in its approach to blockchain by starting a fund for big clients on the Solana network. Reports from Fortune say that this fund, called the USD Institutional Digital Fund (BUIDL), is now available on seven different blockchain platforms.

Related Reading: Solana Co-Founder Challenges Layer 2s—Are They Even Needed?

Solana & BlackRock: Pioneering Crypto Markets

BlackRock, which manages $11.6 trillion in assets, has been slowly entering the world of cryptocurrency and blockchain. Since its start in March 2024, BUIDL has already gathered $1.7 billion in assets. Experts believe the fund could reach $2 billion by April.

Expanding To A Strategic Network

Solana is attractive because it carries out transactions fast and charges low fees. This blockchain gives investors constant access to regular financial tools. Michael Sonnenshein, the COO of Securitize, says this way of doing things makes it easier and more convenient for funds like treasuries.

“We’re making them unboring,” Sonnenshein told Fortune. “We are advancing and leapfrogging some of the quote-unquote deficiencies that money markets may have in their traditional formats.”

BlackRock brought its Bitcoin ETP to Europe on Tuesday. It announced that it would start on Xetra and in Euronext Paris and Amsterdam.

SOL market cap currently at $73 billion. Chart: TradingView.com

Trends In Global Investment Taking Shape

Franklin Templeton also entered the blockchain scene by launching a money fund on Solana in February. This shows that more major financial groups are interested in using blockchain for investment products.

In addition to running funds on blockchain, BlackRock has set up Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the US, Canada, and Europe. CEO Larry Fink believes blockchain will be important in future financial tools.

SOL price up following the news. Source: Coingecko
Related Reading: Bitcoin Is The Ultimate Opportunity, Robert Kiyosaki Says—Here’s Why

The company appears to have shifted its focus to asset tokenization after the breakthrough. Moving traditional investment vehicles to the blockchain is the next big thing, Fink said.

BUIDL is now a part of blockchain networks like Ethereum, Optimism, Aptos, Avalanche, Arbitrum, and Polygon. The fund, backed by cash and Treasury bills, offers big investors a new way to invest using regular financial methods.

BlackRock’s effort to merge blockchain with everyday financial products is clear with $1.7 billion already invested, showing strong interest from investors in these new financial tools.

Choosing Solana shows the growing confidence in this blockchain’s ability to manage many transactions fast and at a low cost. This makes it a suitable option for big financial firms seeking innovative investment methods.

Featured image from Gemini Imagen, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Follow

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Full Profile

Related Posts

Ethereum

Ethereum Price Risks Closing Below 3M Bollinger Bands, Expert Says Think Longer Term

1 hour ago
Dogecoin

Dogecoin Foundation’s Corporate Arm Launches Official DOGE Reserve With Massive Purchase, Here’s What We Know

15 hours ago
XRP

Crypto Pundit Says XRP Looks Excellent Here, Gives Reasons Why

22 hours ago
Solana

Solana Co-Founder Challenges Layer 2s—Are They Even Needed?

1 day ago
Dogecoin

Here’s Why The Dogecoin Price Surged Over 10%

1 day ago
XRP

XRP For Real Estate? Leading Japanese Company Says Yes!

3 days ago

Letture associate

Even the DAT Companies Included in the Russell Index Can't Save Ethereum

The FTSE Russell preliminary list for 2026 includes several crypto-related companies like CoreWeave, Iren, Galaxy Digital, and DAT firms BitMine and Sharplink. Inclusion in the Russell 3000 index means billions in passive fund inflows will automatically buy these stocks. While this is positive for the stock prices of these Digital Asset Technology (DAT) companies, the article argues it may not directly benefit the underlying cryptocurrencies like Ethereum. DAT firms can use stock price gains to buy more crypto, but the capital doesn't flow directly to the assets. Citing David Hoffman's recent exit from ETH, the piece notes a structural issue: Ethereum's value as a public good ("giver, not taker") and the profit capture by L2s and applications mean only a small portion of ecosystem success translates to ETH's price. Despite BitMine buying millions of ETH during its price decline, Ethereum's value has fallen significantly. The conclusion is that while index inclusion marks traditional finance acceptance, the "ETH as money" narrative is fading. New value narratives for native tokens are needed, as current mechanisms like chain revenue and buybacks may have inherent limits.

marsbit36 min fa

Even the DAT Companies Included in the Russell Index Can't Save Ethereum

marsbit36 min fa

Confirmed: GPT-5.5 "Brain Drain" Exposed, OpenAI's Own Documentation Admits It

Summary: Evidence emerges that OpenAI's GPT-5.5 may be "silently" switching to a less capable model during use. Users report that after roughly two hours, the GPT-5.5 Extended Thinking model begins responding instantly with significantly degraded output quality, while the interface continues to display the premium model's label. Complaints on developer forums describe a loss of instruction-following ability and poor code quality, with even the highest "xhigh" tier affected. This is corroborated by an OpenAI help document stating that after Plus users exceed 160 messages per 3 hours, the system "silently" switches to a "mini" model without any user notification. Pro users also report "heavy thinking" modes being throttled during high server loads. Trace commands from earlier incidents have shown users requesting GPT-5.3 Codex but receiving GPT-5.2 outputs. OpenAI acknowledged performance degradation in mid-May, marking it resolved, but user reports surged again in late May. The pattern mirrors past controversies with GPT-5, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 releases, where each update was followed by user complaints of reduced capability. The article suggests cost-cutting on compute may be a factor, noting that while GPT-5.5 users struggle, GPT-5.6 is already being tested internally.

marsbit36 min fa

Confirmed: GPT-5.5 "Brain Drain" Exposed, OpenAI's Own Documentation Admits It

marsbit36 min fa

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbit1 h fa

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbit1 h fa

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbit1 h fa

Ethereum OG Sitting On 630,000% Gain Wakes Up After 10 Years

On-chain data reveals a long-dormant Ethereum wallet from 2015, containing 2,000 ETH, has been reactivated after 10.8 years. Classified as a "pre-mine address," it belonged to an early participant from Ethereum's 2014 presale. The wallet's initial $620 investment, untouched for over a decade, is now worth over $4.2 million—a gain of nearly 630,000%. The activity began with a small test transfer of 1 ETH, followed by a near-complete movement of the remaining 1,997.9 ETH. While the funds have not been sent to a centralized exchange, the sudden activity suggests the owner may have recently regained access to lost or forgotten keys.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Ethereum OG Sitting On 630,000% Gain Wakes Up After 10 Years

bitcoinist1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片