Dogecoin’s Price Poised For A Price Recovery To New Highs – Here’s How

BitcoinistPubblicato 2025-03-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-03-25

Introduzione

With the broader crypto market turning bullish again, Dogecoin, the largest dog-themed meme coin has shifted toward positive territory as...

With the broader crypto market turning bullish again, Dogecoin, the largest dog-themed meme coin has shifted toward positive territory as it recovers above the $0.17 level. Many crypto experts continue to predict an impending price rebound, which means that DOGE’s renewed upward movement could be part of a larger uptrend.


A Price Rebound Imminent For Dogecoin?


Dogecoin is seeing renewed positive momentum, recording an over 5% gain in the last 2 days. As the price begins to show upward movements, Ali Martinez, a market expert and trader has forecasted an impending rally for DOGE, suggesting the continuation of the ongoing uptrend.

While Ali Martinez predicts a rally for the meme coin, it must maintain support at a critical price level. DOGE’s recent price action shows a potential trend reversal, setting the stage for a notable upsurge as bullish momentum builds up.


Martinez’s forecast is based on a massive Ascending Parallel Channel formation that is spotted on the weekly time frame. Looking at the chart, this rising pattern hinting at a bounce-back scenario has been forming for the past 10 years.

Dogecoin

Key support for DOGE uptrend | Source: Ali Martinez on X Presently, the ascending parallel channel pattern has created a strong support zone at the $0.16 mark. As seen in the past, whenever the pattern forms a strong support, DOGE usually undergoes a significant rally toward a new all-time high.

Considering past trends, Martinez forecasts a rebound toward the mid or upper range if Dogecoin maintains its positive above the $0.16 support at the channel’s lower boundary. A surge to the mid or upper range of the channel will bring the meme coin’s price between $4.5 and $14 at the end of the current bull market cycle.


Downside Movement For DOGE More Likely Than An Upside Push


Even though DOGE has often skyrocketed once the channels find strong support, it is possible that its failure to maintain above the support zone might expose it to further downside risks in the short term.

Trader Tardigrade, a crypto analyst and investor has outlined a potential downside move in the upcoming days after examining DOGE’s price action on the daily chart. According to the expert, the Dogecoin daily chart displays a bearish Tweezer candlestick pattern, with a false breakout at the resistance level of $0.176.


This technical setup shows that Dogecoin is more likely to move downward to retest the previous support level of $0.143, thereby creating a sideways range between $0.143 and $0.176. Meanwhile, DOGE’s stabilization within the sideways range may set the stage for an upward breakout to key resistance levels. However, DOGE must gain momentum with higher lows slightly below $0.176 in order to break past the level.


At the time of writing, the meme coin has risen to the $0.175 mark, displaying a more than 2% increase in the last 24 hours. Data from CoinMarketCap reveals that investors’ sentiment has turned significantly bullish, with its trading volume increasing by over 56% in the past day.

Dogecoin

DOGE trading at $0.17 on the 1D chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Pexels, chart from Tradingview.com

Letture associate

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbit1 h fa

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbit1 h fa

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片