最全指南:加密项目如何打入韩国市场?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-09-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-09-10

Introduzione

一文了解韩国生态系统概况,如何规划项目营销活动?有哪些可以利用的资源?

原文标题:How should project founders approach the Korean market?

原文作者:Ash 

原文编译:Ismay,BlockBeats 

编者按:刚刚落幕的韩国 KBW 会议产生了很多有趣的故事,三箭资本联合创始人 Zhu Su 曾在社交媒体发文表示,「听说区块链会议韩国区块链周(KBW)的门票供不应求,这是看涨信号。」加密 KOL 在本文中从多方面介绍了加密项目如何打入韩国市场,值得收藏。

以下为原文内容:

韩国的加密货币交易所处理了惊人的 20 亿美元交易量,这为项目提供了独特的机会。今年我在 @kbwofficial 会议上有机会与当地利益相关者交流,并总结了一些关键见解,帮助您制定进入策略。

最全指南:加密项目如何打入韩国市场?

内容分解:

• 韩国生态系统概况

• 规划营销活动

• 了解韩国散户

• 其他

保存这份指南!

韩国生态系统概况

这一部分涵盖了当地的生态系统,包括中心化交易所(CEX)、媒体、研究和咨询、投资、项目以及 KOL。据多个消息来源,约有 10% -15% 的韩国人(600 万-900 万人)使用中心化交易所进行交易!

a) 中心化交易所

韩国有三大中心化交易所(Upbit、BitThumb 和 Coinone),其中 Upbit 和 BitThumb 占据了 95% 的市场份额。

一个有趣的事实是,这些交易所都与银行连接以支持资金的进出:

• UpBit 连接 KBank

• BitThumb 连接 农协银行

• Coinone 连接 KakaoBank

在每个交易所内,韩元(KRW)的交易量最大,因此大多数项目应该努力让自己的代币与韩元进行交易对的上线。

最全指南:加密项目如何打入韩国市场?

我发现本地中心化交易所交易量之所以如此庞大,原因有:

• 本地赌博文化*以及韩国散户强大的购买力

• 韩国人不喜欢自我托管,因此更愿意在中心化交易所进行交易

• 韩国人将加密货币视为一种投机资产类别(类似于股票),注重的是炒作的叙事而非基本面(例如与大品牌的关联,如 Ondo 与 Blackrock,Doge 与 Elon Musk)

*在与一些人交谈后,我会说这是韩国的阴暗面,当前的经济条件(飙升的房地产市场、低工资、疲软的股市以及垄断性的经济结构)迫使人们通过高风险赌博摆脱贫困,希望一夜暴富。

b) 媒体

语言障碍使韩国用户往往依赖本地出版机构获取最新新闻和动态。除了 @official_naver 的博客,知名的媒体平台还包括:

@eBlockmedia

@CoinnessGL

@bloomingbit_io

@FACTBLOCK

@tokenpostkr

对于非韩国项目,直接与这些媒体公司合作可能具有挑战性,这时下一个利益相关方会派上用场。

c) 研究与咨询

韩国拥有一个蓬勃发展的研究和咨询生态系统,许多公司充当项目与用户之间的桥梁,也在国际项目与韩国受众之间发挥中介作用。

要制定成功的韩国市场进入策略,与一家有信誉的公司合作至关重要。我将这些公司分为两大类:

i. 顾问类

• @Xangle_official

• @DeSpreadTeam

• @0x undefined_

• @INF_CryptoLab

• @Edward__Park

• @EncodingLabs

• @Whitewater_Labs

• @ 071 _labs

ii. 研究类

• @FourPillarsFP

• @Tiger_Research_

明确目标能够帮助创始人更容易选择合适的公司。例如:

• 想要与韩国机构建立联系:

@Xangle_official

• 连接韩国开发者并增加研究曝光率:

@FourPillarsFP

• 针对 Degen 或散户用户:

@DeSpreadTeam

• 紧跟本地法规动态:

@Tiger_Research_

d) 投资

韩国的资本市场规模不大,只有少数几个主要玩家,可以分为两大类:

i. 风投基金

• @hashed_official

• @nonceclassic

• @LECCAVentures

• @blocore_vc

• @ROKCapital

• @SamsungNext

ii. 做市商(MMs)

• @presto_labs

• @alphanonce

• @hyperithm

*请注意,由于监管原因,做市商不能在韩国的中心化交易所开设公司账户。

e) 项目

• DeFi:

@MitosisOrg、@keplrwallet、@Exponents_Fi

• 生态系统:

@KaiaChain、@initiaFDN、@StoryProtocol

• 游戏:

@delabsOfficial、@WemixNetwork、@MaplestoryU

• 验证者:

@dsrvlabs、@a 41 _allforone

*我肯定遗漏了很多项目,请不要怪我。

f) KOL

• @Edward__Park

• @kimyg 002 

• @0x ProfessorJo

• @delucinator

营销活动规划

许多项目渴望进入韩国市场,吸引他们的是巨大的交易量和韩国散户投资者的强大购买力。

然而,这种狭隘的思维方式是不尊重韩国参与者的,韩国人并不容易被操纵来提供退出流动性。特别是在 Terra Luna/Anchor 事件之后,韩国的 Degen 投资者更加谨慎且知识渊博。

韩国人非常重视透明的营销和真实的意图。拥有有魅力但谦逊的创始人、能激发信任的项目,往往能够在韩国文化中吸引大量追随者,类似于邪教或宗教在韩国的影响。

在进入韩国市场之前,制定一份全面的营销计划,确保:

• 有明确的关键绩效指标(KPI)

• 包含可执行的用户操作项

• 提供清晰的未来路线图(包括 TGE 前后的计划)

一个简单的营销活动可以这样规划:定义明确的营销目标并为用户设定具体行动→与媒体机构和咨询公司合作进行 SEO 优化,并推出韩文翻译的研究报告→策划 KOL 推广活动以扩大影响力。

在饱和的市场中,大多数传统营销策略已经不足以脱颖而出。韩国投资者对不断出现的任务活动和代币/节点销售日益疲惫。要想脱颖而出,必须具备创意,提供真正的价值,例如有吸引力的激励措施或财务收益机会。

了解韩国散户

众所周知,韩国人是潮流引领者和追随最新热点的狂热者,这从他们活跃的时尚圈、对奢侈品牌的痴迷以及对 K-Pop 的忠诚便可见一斑。这意味着项目必须不断更新其营销材料,并呈现创新且吸引人的叙事,以维持散户投资者的兴趣。

韩国用户可以分为以下三类:

• 撸空投用户:需要可执行的步骤

• 机会主义的挑选者/交易员:追随叙事和热点

• 基础设施用户(技术至上):非常少见,因为韩国人更信任第三方解决方案

使用一刀切的方法注定失败,定制化的营销活动对目标受众至关重要。通过透明和公开的沟通来建立信任,同时使用韩语,是在韩国市场取得成功的关键。

其他

a) 韩国的大型消费应用

• Naver

• Coupang(电商)

• Kakao(KakaoTalk, Kakao Taxi)

• Samsung Pay(显而易见的原因,Apple Pay 在韩国不适用)

b) 韩国的开发者主要来自 SKY 或 KAIST

SKY 是韩国三所最负盛名大学的非正式缩写:

• 首尔大学

• 高丽大学

• 延世大学

而 KAIST(韩国科学技术院)是一所国立研究型大学。

c) 我学到的其他有趣的事

• Aptos 和 Sui 在韩国非常受欢迎。

• 许多生态系统已经开始招聘韩国负责人,包括 Monad、Chromia 等。

• 没有遇到任何来自 Upbit 或 BitThumb 的人,这些交易所的上市非常困难且随机。

• 街上有很多电子烟店。

• 下次去韩国旅行时:使用 Naver Map 和 KakaoMap 导航;Uber 和 Kakao Taxi 出行;Catch Table 寻找餐厅;Coupang Eats 点餐外卖,Papago 进行翻译。

好了,啰嗦够了。

总结:绘制本地生态系统和市场概况→与本地咨询公司合作→制定本地化的营销活动→了解韩国散户→不要仅仅因为韩国交易量大就去利用它。

本文由非韩国人撰写,如有遗漏或错误,欢迎在评论区指正!

原文链接

Letture associate

Google CEO Admits Lagging Behind in Coding

Google CEO Sundar Pichai acknowledged in a recent interview that Google's Gemini AI models are currently "lagging behind" in coding capabilities, particularly for complex, long-horizon tasks requiring advanced developer expertise. He noted the field is advancing at an "unprecedented" pace, where 30-60 days now brings changes equivalent to five years in the past. Pichai expressed that achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) now seems closer than previously imagined due to rapid progress. While highlighting strengths in text, multimodal, and reasoning tasks, Pichai admitted competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI have focused more intently on coding. He emphasized Google's commitment to catching up, citing internal tools like Antigravity 2.0 and the newly released Gemini 3.5 Flash, which aims to address previous shortcomings. Regarding Google Search's AI-driven overhaul, Pichai stated changes will be gradual to align with user needs, not disrupt the core search experience or its advertising model. He addressed public AI anxiety as understandable, given the technology's potential to reshape jobs and society, but remained optimistic about AI augmenting human capabilities and creating new opportunities. Pichai stressed the need for broad societal dialogue and responsible development as AI approaches more advanced, potentially recursive self-improvement stages. He affirmed Google's long-term commitment to leading in AI while navigating its profound implications responsibly.

marsbit59 min fa

Google CEO Admits Lagging Behind in Coding

marsbit59 min fa

The Paradox of Automation: The Stronger the AI, the Busier Humans Become

The Paradox of Automation: The more powerful AI becomes, the more work humans have to do. This article, based on observations from AI-heavy company Every, argues that while AI agents automate tasks like coding, writing, and customer service, they don't eliminate human jobs. Instead, they transform work and create *more* demand for human expertise. AI commoditizes "yesterday's human capabilities" by cheaply generating code, text, and images from past data. This leads to an abundance of similar, generic outputs. Consequently, what becomes scarce and valuable is human judgment in the present moment: knowing *what* is worth doing, *why*, and *how* to do it well. The article identifies two collaboration models: "Agent employees" for delegated tasks and "human-AI collaboration" within tools like Claude Code for complex work. In both cases, humans are essential to set direction, judge quality, and maintain systems. As AI makes execution cheap, human roles shift from executors to designers, reviewers, and meaning-makers. The author addresses "benchmark anxiety" by explaining that AI excels within specific, human-defined problem "frames." As AI masters one frame (e.g., code rewriting), new, more complex frames emerge (e.g., deciding *when* to rewrite). This creates an ongoing cycle where AI chases the frames, but humans remain the "framers." Even with advanced AGI, this dynamic may persist as long as AI lacks true human-like agency and self-directed purpose. The core paradox holds: automation amplifies the need for the very human judgment it seems to replace.

marsbit2 h fa

The Paradox of Automation: The Stronger the AI, the Busier Humans Become

marsbit2 h fa

a16z: 7 Charts to Understand How Tokenization is Changing the Nature of Assets

"a16z: 7 Charts on How Tokenization is Changing the Nature of Assets" Tokenized Assets (or Real-World Assets - RWA) are transforming asset forms, liquidity, and financial system construction. The market recently surpassed $30 billion, stabilizing around $34 billion (excluding stablecoins), representing a tenfold increase in less than two years, driven by clearer regulations, mature institutional infrastructure, and increased financial institution adoption. The primary driver of recent growth is tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds. These offer investors efficient, flexible digital access to yield-bearing assets and improve institutional operations like settlement and collateral management. Other asset classes show varied growth: asset-backed credit leads, followed by niche financial assets (e.g., reinsurance, mining notes), while venture capital took longer to scale. Market segmentation shows high concentration. In commodities, tokenized gold dominates (~$5 billion), as its standardized, storable nature fits tokenization well. Bonds are the largest category ($15.2B), but only ~5% are used in DeFi protocols. Conversely, smaller niches like reinsurance tokens see high (~84%) on-chain utilization, highlighting a core industry divide: most current tokenized assets are merely digitized records for easier holding/transfer, lacking the "composability" (free combination/interaction) that is key to blockchain-native finance. The ecosystem is distributed across multiple blockchains, with Ethereum hosting over half the value ($15.7B), followed by BNB Chain, Solana, and others. Future market size predictions vary widely (e.g., $2-$30 trillion by 2030+), but all indicate massive potential from the current small base. Tokenized assets currently represent minuscule fractions of their global counterparts (e.g., 0.01% of global bonds). The current phase focuses on digitizing straightforward assets. The next challenge is to bring more complex financial components on-chain and deeply integrate tokenized assets into composable, internet-native financial infrastructure.

链捕手3 h fa

a16z: 7 Charts to Understand How Tokenization is Changing the Nature of Assets

链捕手3 h fa

a16z: How Tokenization is Transforming the Nature of Assets in 7 Charts

"Tokenized Assets: How Tokenization Changes the Nature of Assets" by a16z Crypto The market for tokenized assets, excluding stablecoins, has grown from under $3 billion two years ago to over $340 billion today. US Treasury bonds are the primary growth driver, allowing investors to hold yield-bearing assets digitally and enabling more efficient settlement. Other key sectors include private credit (growing fastest), commodities (dominated by gold), and niche financial assets. However, the market remains concentrated in tokenized US Treasuries and gold. A critical insight is that most tokenized assets currently lack "composability." While the total market is large, only a small fraction is actively used within DeFi protocols. For instance, only about 5% of tokenized bonds and a low percentage of tokenized gold are utilized on-chain. In contrast, assets like reinsurance and private credit tokens show much higher on-chain usage rates (84% and 33%, respectively). This highlights a divide: many tokenized assets are merely digital records on a blockchain without enabling new, programmable financial applications. The Pantera Capital Token Native Index indicates over 70% of tokenized assets have minimal on-chain native functionality. Ethereum remains the dominant blockchain for tokenized assets (over $150B), but the ecosystem is diversifying across chains like BNB Chain, Solana, and Stellar, based on factors like cost and compliance. Major institutions forecast massive future growth, with predictions for the tokenized asset market ranging from $2 trillion to over $30 trillion by the early 2030s. However, compared to the global financial system (e.g., ~$140T bonds, multi-trillion dollar gold market), tokenized assets currently represent a tiny fraction (0.01% or less). The conclusion is that while tokenization has begun by digitizing and streamlining settlement for simpler assets, the next phase involves bringing more complex financial instruments on-chain and deeply integrating them into composable, internet-native financial infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报3 h fa

a16z: How Tokenization is Transforming the Nature of Assets in 7 Charts

Odaily星球日报3 h fa

The Revived Codex, Carrying OpenAI's Hopes for IPO

This article analyzes the intense recent development of OpenAI's Codex, positioning it as a crucial component for OpenAI's impending IPO. Over the past two months, Codex has seen a rapid series of major updates focused on integrating into real enterprise workflows. Key new features include enhanced context capture (Appshots, file previews, built-in browser), long-running task execution ("Goal Mode"), remote operation (phone control, lock-screen access), and enterprise management tools (plugin sharing, access tokens, automated risk review). These updates aim to make Codex a comprehensive AI workbench that can "see the scene, push tasks, and manage risks." The author argues that while ChatGPT proves OpenAI's massive user base and API provides foundational revenue, Codex represents OpenAI's clearest path to demonstrating tangible, high-value commercial viability. It targets developers and engineering teams—a segment already accustomed to paying for efficiency gains in costly software development cycles. This is critical because, despite higher overall revenue, OpenAI's adjusted operating margins remain deeply negative, highlighting the challenge of outrunning immense compute costs. The pressure is amplified by competitor Anthropic's success with Claude Code, which has shown that a focused approach on high-value enterprise and developer workflows can lead to a path toward profitability. Codex's aggressive evolution is thus seen as OpenAI's strategic move to capture a similar enterprise-ready, revenue-generating narrative essential for its market debut. In essence, "ChatGPT proved OpenAI has users. Codex needs to prove OpenAI is a business that can make money."

marsbit4 h fa

The Revived Codex, Carrying OpenAI's Hopes for IPO

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片