Fractal 头矿首日收益如何,租赁算力能赚钱吗?

比推Pubblicato 2024-09-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-09-10

要实现盈亏平衡,FB 价格至少要在 10 美元以上。

撰文:Golem,Odaily 星球日报

今日早上 8 点,备受瞩目的 Fractal 主网终于上线。Fractal 采用了一种名叫「Cadence Mining」独特的挖矿机制,即每开采 3 个区块,其中两个区块将被免许可挖矿,另一个区块将被合并挖矿。这样的机制催生出许多 Fractal 生态挖矿项目,同时也激发了用户租赁算力参与挖头矿的激情。

因此,由于利益相关,主网挖矿产出和 FB 价格成为社区关注焦点。虽然 FB 场外价格已经上涨到 19 u 左右,但许多社区成员依表示可能租赁算力参与头矿可能血本无归。

事实果真如此吗,普通用户参与 Fractal 头矿究竟是「吃肉」还是「割肉」的前奏,Odaily 星球日报将在本文中简要分析 Fractal 挖矿产出与收益,希望能为读者提供参考。

挖矿成本收益估算

根据 Fractal 区块浏览器的数据显示,目前 Fractal 合并挖矿算力约为 90 EH/s,免许可挖矿算力为 10000 PH/s(1 EH/s= 1000 PH/s)。

已知目前市面上每月 1 PH/s 算力的租赁价格在 3000-5000 USDT 之间。即使按最低的租赁成本计算,以 FB 19 USDT 的价格计算,每日产量达到 5.26 枚 FB 就实现了盈亏平衡。

社区中较为广泛的挖矿产出计算方式如下:

按 30 秒的平均出块时间和三分之二产量被免许可开采来计算,每日大约产出 7.2 万枚 FB,其中免许可挖矿获得 FB 约为 4.8 万枚。因此 1 PH/s 的算力每天大约能获得 4.8 枚 FB,按照 FB 场外价格 19 USDT 计算,矿工每日收入约为 91.2 USDT。

如果以这种计算方式来估计,租赁算力开采 FB 头矿不仅不会赚钱,而且随着全网免许可挖矿算力的增加,每 1 PH/s 被分配到的 FB 奖励持续减少,亏损还将会扩大。

相对动态的计算方式:

以上的计算方式基本是基于算力持续增加和每日产量不变的情况,但事实是,虽然 Fractal 官方预设的平均出块时间为 30 秒,每日产出大约为 7.2 万枚 FB,不过目前网络平均出块速度已经明显快于预期。

如下图,Fractal 主网启动 10 小时就开采出了 2500 个区块,产出了超 6.25 万枚 FB,这也就是说实际上随着算力的增加,区块的开采速度也在加快。每日真正的产量将会超过此前估计的 7.2 万枚。

因此,Fractal 主网在头矿期间真正的出块平均时间约为 10 ~ 15 秒,也就是说 FB 今日产出可能会在 14 到 21 万枚之间。即使按最保守 14 万枚 FB 产出估计,其中三分之二被免许可开采,即 9.3 万枚 FB, 1 PH/s 的算力今日大约能获得 10.3 枚 FB。按照 FB 场外价格 19 USDT 计算,矿工每日收入约为 195.7 USDT。

如果以这种计算方式来估计,只要 FB 价格坚挺在 10 USDT 以上,租赁算力开采 FB 头矿的玩家依然是可以盈利的。

不过,这样的计算方式也只是相对动态而已,全网算力情况、每日产出和 FB 价格等变化都会影响到挖矿产出与收益,最终 Fractal 挖矿是否值得长期参与还需要等网络运行稳定后再重新进行评估。

Fractal 仍然充满挑战

围绕今日 Fractal 主网上线,除了在挖矿收益上受到广泛讨论外,关于其网络仍然存在着一些质疑。

mempool 创始人就在 X 平台发文表示,Fractal Bitcoin 似乎是 Bitcoin Core v2 4.0.1 的「克隆」副本,其预挖(premine)代币占 Fractal Bitcoin 完全稀释供应的 50% ,矿工们将需要整整两年(一个 Fractal Bitcoin 减半区间)才能赚取创始人们首日获得奖励的一半。同时 Fractal Bitcoin 有许多只存在白皮书中的无意义技术用语,因此在他看来,其只是(比特币的)又一个垃圾分叉(shitfork)。

在网络运行上也出现了节点问题和长时间不出块的问题,不过团队的问题响应速度也较快,及时修复了节点行为并很快提供了新的节点版本。

同时,根据场外 19 USDT 的价格,目前 FB 的市值已经接近 40 亿美元。虽然 FB 已经可以通过 Fractal 主网进行转移,但目前并没有任何 DEC/CEX 上线 FB 代币,用户的交易行为依然依靠场外 OTC,交易效率较低及不透明性也给 FB 未来的价格走势「蒙上一层不确定」。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Letture associate

The Veil of Mythos Becomes Anthropic's Lever to Move Trillions

The article discusses Anthropic's reported upcoming $30 billion funding round, which would value the company at over $900 billion. It analyzes how the company has leveraged strategic narratives around its unreleased "Mythos" model, rather than just its publicly available products, to drive this massive valuation. Key points include Google's surprising $40 billion investment in a competitor, suggesting it is buying strategic positioning. Anthropic's "Glasswing" cybersecurity project and the unreleased Mythos model are portrayed not through direct proof, but through carefully crafted narratives of being "too powerful for public release," creating an aura of exclusive, high-level capability. This is bolstered by reports of the White House and NSA seeking access to Claude/Mythos despite previous security concerns, implying indispensable technology. Furthermore, Anthropic's reported rapid revenue growth—from a $1 billion annual run-rate in late 2024 to over $30 billion by April 2026, largely driven by enterprise API and Claude Code—provides a financial story for investors. The article concludes that Anthropic's core business model is effectively converting unverifiable technical potential, government interest, and future revenue projections into a compelling narrative that secures immense capital, using the actions of wealthy investors and powerful institutions as the ultimate validation of its worth.

marsbit1 h fa

The Veil of Mythos Becomes Anthropic's Lever to Move Trillions

marsbit1 h fa

Google CEO Admits Lagging Behind in Coding

Google CEO Sundar Pichai acknowledged in a recent interview that Google's Gemini AI models are currently "lagging behind" in coding capabilities, particularly for complex, long-horizon tasks requiring advanced developer expertise. He noted the field is advancing at an "unprecedented" pace, where 30-60 days now brings changes equivalent to five years in the past. Pichai expressed that achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) now seems closer than previously imagined due to rapid progress. While highlighting strengths in text, multimodal, and reasoning tasks, Pichai admitted competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI have focused more intently on coding. He emphasized Google's commitment to catching up, citing internal tools like Antigravity 2.0 and the newly released Gemini 3.5 Flash, which aims to address previous shortcomings. Regarding Google Search's AI-driven overhaul, Pichai stated changes will be gradual to align with user needs, not disrupt the core search experience or its advertising model. He addressed public AI anxiety as understandable, given the technology's potential to reshape jobs and society, but remained optimistic about AI augmenting human capabilities and creating new opportunities. Pichai stressed the need for broad societal dialogue and responsible development as AI approaches more advanced, potentially recursive self-improvement stages. He affirmed Google's long-term commitment to leading in AI while navigating its profound implications responsibly.

marsbit3 h fa

Google CEO Admits Lagging Behind in Coding

marsbit3 h fa

The Paradox of Automation: The Stronger the AI, the Busier Humans Become

The Paradox of Automation: The more powerful AI becomes, the more work humans have to do. This article, based on observations from AI-heavy company Every, argues that while AI agents automate tasks like coding, writing, and customer service, they don't eliminate human jobs. Instead, they transform work and create *more* demand for human expertise. AI commoditizes "yesterday's human capabilities" by cheaply generating code, text, and images from past data. This leads to an abundance of similar, generic outputs. Consequently, what becomes scarce and valuable is human judgment in the present moment: knowing *what* is worth doing, *why*, and *how* to do it well. The article identifies two collaboration models: "Agent employees" for delegated tasks and "human-AI collaboration" within tools like Claude Code for complex work. In both cases, humans are essential to set direction, judge quality, and maintain systems. As AI makes execution cheap, human roles shift from executors to designers, reviewers, and meaning-makers. The author addresses "benchmark anxiety" by explaining that AI excels within specific, human-defined problem "frames." As AI masters one frame (e.g., code rewriting), new, more complex frames emerge (e.g., deciding *when* to rewrite). This creates an ongoing cycle where AI chases the frames, but humans remain the "framers." Even with advanced AGI, this dynamic may persist as long as AI lacks true human-like agency and self-directed purpose. The core paradox holds: automation amplifies the need for the very human judgment it seems to replace.

marsbit4 h fa

The Paradox of Automation: The Stronger the AI, the Busier Humans Become

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片