7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

On May 15, Cerebras Systems (stock code: CBRS) opened at $350 on its first day on Nasdaq, above the IPO issue price of $185.

[Cerebras Systems (CBRS) Opens at $350 on Nasdaq Debut]On May 15, Cerebras Systems (stock code: CBRS) opened at $350 on its first day on Nasdaq, above the IPO issue price of $185.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) Opens at $350 on Nasdaq Debut

HTX data monitoring shows that XRP has broken through 1.5 USDT, currently reported at 1.501 USDT, with a 24H increase of 4.81%.

【XRP breaks through 1.5 USDT】HTX data monitoring shows that XRP has broken through 1.5 USDT, currently reported at 1.501 USDT, with a 24H increase of 4.81%.

XRP breaks through 1.5 USDT

opg Surges 10.29% in 24H, Currently at 0.2797 USDT

【opg currently trades at 0.2797 USDT, up 10.29% in 24h, according to HTX market data.】opg Surges 10.29% in 24H, Currently at 0.2797 USDT

opg currently trades at 0.2797 USDT, up 10.29% in 24h, according to HTX market data.

On May 15, Republican senators proposed an amendment during the Banking Committee review of the CLARITY Act, calling for the establishment of a regulatory framework by the SEC and CFTC for the offering and sale of digital assets, aimed at providing enforcement for investor and consumer protection. Democratic Senator Warren opposed the amendment, stating that it should be referred to as the 'Ninth Shroud.' She claimed it aimed to restore state-level consumer and investor protections and the ability for harmed investors to sue, but was filled with exceptions, additional conditions, and loopholes, rendering it essentially meaningless. One of the most severe and fatal flaws of the amendment is that it strips state enforcement authority. As the crypto industry evolves, scams are also on the rise, and state-level enforcement is the only line of defense for law-abiding Americans. If this amendment actually did something, I would support it. But in reality, it does nothing, merely deceiving people into thinking something has been done. The amendment was passed with 18 votes in favor and 6 against. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Bill (i.e., the CLARITY Act) is currently undergoing line-by-line voting and debate on the amendment.

[Amendment to CLARITY Act Establishing SEC and CFTC Regulatory Framework for Digital Asset Offerings Passed]On May 15, Republican senators proposed an amendment during the Banking Committee review of the CLARITY Act, calling for the establishment of a regulatory framework by the SEC and CFTC for the offering and sale of digital assets, aimed at providing enforcement for investor and consumer protection. Democratic Senator Warren opposed the amendment, stating that it should be referred to as the 'Ninth Shroud.' She claimed it aimed to restore state-level consumer and investor protections and the ability for harmed investors to sue, but was filled with exceptions, additional conditions, and loopholes, rendering it essentially meaningless. One of the most severe and fatal flaws of the amendment is that it strips state enforcement authority. As the crypto industry evolves, scams are also on the rise, and state-level enforcement is the only line of defense for law-abiding Americans. If this amendment actually did something, I would support it. But in reality, it does nothing, merely deceiving people into thinking something has been done. The amendment was passed with 18 votes in favor and 6 against. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Bill (i.e., the CLARITY Act) is currently undergoing line-by-line voting and debate on the amendment.

Amendment to CLARITY Act Establishing SEC and CFTC Regulatory Framework for Digital Asset Offerings Passed

On May 15, Senator Cynthia Lummis proposed an amendment during the Senate Banking Committee's review of the CLARITY Act, which seeks to apply existing insider trading laws to crypto assets, particularly to 'ancillary assets.' BlockBeats notes that 'ancillary assets' refer to a category of crypto assets defined in the bill that are related to securities but are not entirely classified as such. Senator Warren opposed the amendment, stating that it only addresses superficial issues while the bill itself creates a larger loophole—many assets with characteristics of securities will not be classified as 'ancillary assets' and therefore will be completely exempt from insider trading rules. While I support combating all forms of insider trading, this fix is far from sufficient to address the problem and gives the public a false sense of security, making them believe they are safe from insider trading in the crypto space—when in fact, they are not. Insiders will still exploit loopholes. Therefore, I urge my colleagues to vote against it. The amendment was passed with 18 votes in favor and 6 against. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) is currently undergoing line-by-line voting and debate on the amendment.

[Amendment to the CLARITY Act to Apply Insider Trading Laws to Crypto Assets Passed]On May 15, Senator Cynthia Lummis proposed an amendment during the Senate Banking Committee's review of the CLARITY Act, which seeks to apply existing insider trading laws to crypto assets, particularly to 'ancillary assets.' BlockBeats notes that 'ancillary assets' refer to a category of crypto assets defined in the bill that are related to securities but are not entirely classified as such. Senator Warren opposed the amendment, stating that it only addresses superficial issues while the bill itself creates a larger loophole—many assets with characteristics of securities will not be classified as 'ancillary assets' and therefore will be completely exempt from insider trading rules. While I support combating all forms of insider trading, this fix is far from sufficient to address the problem and gives the public a false sense of security, making them believe they are safe from insider trading in the crypto space—when in fact, they are not. Insiders will still exploit loopholes. Therefore, I urge my colleagues to vote against it. The amendment was passed with 18 votes in favor and 6 against. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) is currently undergoing line-by-line voting and debate on the amendment.

Amendment to the CLARITY Act to Apply Insider Trading Laws to Crypto Assets Passed

Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $82,000, currently priced at $82,009.39, with a 24-hour increase of 3.54%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

[BTC Surpasses $82,000]Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $82,000, currently priced at $82,009.39, with a 24-hour increase of 3.54%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

BTC Surpasses $82,000

On May 15, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee approved the Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) with a vote of 15 in favor and 9 against, officially submitting the bill for a vote in the full Senate. All 13 Republican members voted in favor, while two Democratic members crossed party lines to support it. Democratic chief member Elizabeth Warren and 8 others voted against it. The CLARITY Act will establish a regulatory framework for the digital asset market, clarifying the regulatory responsibilities of the SEC and CFTC. The bill had previously passed the House with a vote of 294 to 134 in July 2025, and after the Senate's full vote, it will need to be reconciled with the version from the Senate Agriculture Committee before being sent to the President for signing. The Trump administration had previously set a goal to complete the legislation by July 4. The latest version of the CLARITY Act is crucial for DeFi, as it will provide clearer legal protections and developer safeguards for DeFi developers in the U.S. Regarding yield issues, the CLARITY Act could bring new growth to DeFi, similar to how the GENIUS Act promoted the development of stablecoins. According to PolyBeats monitoring, the probability of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 has risen to 74% on the prediction market Polymarket.

[CLARITY Act Approved by Senate Banking Committee, Moves to Full Senate Vote]On May 15, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee approved the Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) with a vote of 15 in favor and 9 against, officially submitting the bill for a vote in the full Senate. All 13 Republican members voted in favor, while two Democratic members crossed party lines to support it. Democratic chief member Elizabeth Warren and 8 others voted against it. The CLARITY Act will establish a regulatory framework for the digital asset market, clarifying the regulatory responsibilities of the SEC and CFTC. The bill had previously passed the House with a vote of 294 to 134 in July 2025, and after the Senate's full vote, it will need to be reconciled with the version from the Senate Agriculture Committee before being sent to the President for signing. The Trump administration had previously set a goal to complete the legislation by July 4. The latest version of the CLARITY Act is crucial for DeFi, as it will provide clearer legal protections and developer safeguards for DeFi developers in the U.S. Regarding yield issues, the CLARITY Act could bring new growth to DeFi, similar to how the GENIUS Act promoted the development of stablecoins. According to PolyBeats monitoring, the probability of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 has risen to 74% on the prediction market Polymarket.

CLARITY Act Approved by Senate Banking Committee, Moves to Full Senate Vote

On May 15, Senator Cynthia Lummis proposed an amendment during the Senate Banking Committee's review of the CLARITY Act, which pertains to the permissible scope of digital asset activities for banks and credit unions. The amendment clarifies the transaction activities banks are allowed to engage in and expands the scope to include insured deposit institutions. Senator Warren opposed the amendment, stating, "I acknowledge that this amendment makes some limited improvements to a portion of the bill (significantly expanding the crypto-related activities that taxpayer-insured banks can participate in), but it is still far from sufficient. Under this amendment, banks will be able to engage in decentralized finance transactions, lend using crypto assets as collateral, trade crypto assets directly, trade crypto derivatives, and more—many of which could go awry. Why are Republicans trying to divert Americans' deposits away from small business loans and home mortgages? It makes no sense at all. Even if this amendment passes, the next crypto crash could still drag down banks and, in turn, the entire economy. We should directly remove this part instead of making superficial fixes and pretending the problem is solved." The amendment was passed with 19 votes in favor and 5 against. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (i.e., the CLARITY Act) is currently undergoing line-by-line voting and debate on the amendment.

[Amendment to the CLARITY Act Defining Scope of Bank Crypto Transactions Passed]On May 15, Senator Cynthia Lummis proposed an amendment during the Senate Banking Committee's review of the CLARITY Act, which pertains to the permissible scope of digital asset activities for banks and credit unions. The amendment clarifies the transaction activities banks are allowed to engage in and expands the scope to include insured deposit institutions. Senator Warren opposed the amendment, stating, "I acknowledge that this amendment makes some limited improvements to a portion of the bill (significantly expanding the crypto-related activities that taxpayer-insured banks can participate in), but it is still far from sufficient. Under this amendment, banks will be able to engage in decentralized finance transactions, lend using crypto assets as collateral, trade crypto assets directly, trade crypto derivatives, and more—many of which could go awry. Why are Republicans trying to divert Americans' deposits away from small business loans and home mortgages? It makes no sense at all. Even if this amendment passes, the next crypto crash could still drag down banks and, in turn, the entire economy. We should directly remove this part instead of making superficial fixes and pretending the problem is solved." The amendment was passed with 19 votes in favor and 5 against. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (i.e., the CLARITY Act) is currently undergoing line-by-line voting and debate on the amendment.

Amendment to the CLARITY Act Defining Scope of Bank Crypto Transactions Passed

HTX data monitoring shows that BTC has surpassed 82000 USDT, currently reported at 82000.49 USDT, with a 24H increase of 3.52%.

【BTC breaks through 82000 USDT】HTX data monitoring shows that BTC has surpassed 82000 USDT, currently reported at 82000.49 USDT, with a 24H increase of 3.52%.

BTC breaks through 82000 USDT

Bankrupt crypto exchange FTX is accusing the government of the Bahamas of directing unauthorized access to FTX's systems in order to withdraw assets after the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S., court filings from Thursday show.The document, filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, didn't specify which transactions were unauthorized or how they occured.
The accusation was included in a document challenging a complaint filed in a New York court by the Bahamian liquidators tasked with overseeing FTX's assets. The liquidators, in their chapter 15 filing, which apply to bankruptcy cases that require cooperation between U.S. and foreign courts, had asked the U.S. court to turn over control of the proceedings to the Bahamas, where the crypto enterprise had its headquarters.

Detail

【Bahamas May Have Directed 'Unauthorized' FTX Transactions, Filing Says】Bankrupt crypto exchange FTX is accusing the government of the Bahamas of directing unauthorized access to FTX's systems in order to withdraw assets after the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S., court filings from Thursday show.The document, filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, didn't specify which transactions were unauthorized or how they occured.
The accusation was included in a document challenging a complaint filed in a New York court by the Bahamian liquidators tasked with overseeing FTX's assets. The liquidators, in their chapter 15 filing, which apply to bankruptcy cases that require cooperation between U.S. and foreign courts, had asked the U.S. court to turn over control of the proceedings to the Bahamas, where the crypto enterprise had its headquarters.

Bahamas May Have Directed 'Unauthorized' FTX Transactions, Filing Says

Article

U.S. Stock Market Close: Nasdaq and S&P 500 Reach New Highs; Nvidia, Google, and Apple Hit Record Market Values

Israeli Prime Minister's Secret Visit to UAE During War with Iran

OpenAI Offers Two Months of Free Codex to Companies Switching from Claude

Trump: US-China Relations Will Be the Best in History

Trump: Entrepreneurs from Major U.S. Companies Want to Come to China, But I Won't Allow Their Seconds and Thirds

Intel Stock Drops Over 4% in Pre-Market Trading

Bahamas May Have Directed 'Unauthorized' FTX Transactions, Filing Says

Disclaimer：Il contenuto di cui sopra non rappresenta le posizioni di HTX.，HTX non fornisce alcuna raccomandazione di trading.。

Articoli correlati

Tutti i commenti0RecentePopolare

Temi di tendenza

Articoli correlati